So Europeans, Persians, and Poos are Aryans? We're the master race?

Also, for you.

Attached: 1517256851570.gif (775x687, 140K)

All those groups interbred with local peoples in their areas. Small numbers of Semitic people for the Persians (but Arabs later came in and fucked a lot of brown in there) but tons and tons of Dravidians for the Poos, which is why they're so dark. For Euros the amount of Semitic people living there at the time were very small and relatively pale-skinned, plus the Euros mostly did genocide instead of interbreeding. Exceptions are the Finno-Sami branch who fucked a lot of nomadic asians. Thus Europeans are probably the 'purest' descendents of the Indo-Europeans.

>but Arabs later came in and fucked a lot of brown in there
No, they didn't. Check graph here:

Indians are Australoids with some mestizo influence from arabia, persia, and the east:

1. Australoids - people similar to Andamanese, originating in one of the first OOA migrations. Dumb and ugly and are the main major component in both North and South poos.

2. Dravidians - brown mostly-Australoid with some sandnig-Caucasoid from Kuwait and Southern Iran. These people invaded the great Elamite Indus Valley civilization of Pakistan, with running water and even water toilets(continuous flow, not like modern water toilets that flush on command). Ugly and crafty as fuck. Dravidians still dominate Southern and central India and are the genetic core of northern poos.

3. Indo-Persians - Sandniggy mestizos. The Indo-Persians are Gypsies, North Indians, Brahmins. Ugly and sinister. these are descendants of australoids that got raped by Elamites, Arabs, Moghuls, Persians, Turks. Blonde Scythians exterminated many poos and in the process, they absorbed and assimilated lots of the extant Dravidians, thus browning their own race.

there's no proof any of the samples came from Medes or Real Persians. Natives are different from nomadic conquerors that had a totally different appearance. Southern Iranians were literallly Dravidians and even today southern Iranians have dark brown to black skin LMAO

Everyone knows the mostly upper class and atheist diaspora are purer than the lower class muds, user. Same with poos, where the Brahmins and Kshatriya are generally paler than the other castes.

OP map is refutable. Huwhites spread from north-eastern Asia (Yuezhi, Tocharians, Xiongnu, Manchurians, etc.) to conquer all of the steppe plains that were walked by the Mammoths and, in this way, spread westward. The Biblical Garden of Eden was not Mesopotamia, but the Tarim Basin in Northern China. It was this post Ice Age spread that got rid of the Neanderthals, to which East-Asians are far more related than huwhites.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

Here comes the rotten pasta

Toxandria is actually a region encompassing the Benelux before the dykes were built, by the way.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

Attached: Toxandria_919-1125.jpg (309x281, 76K)

The Iron Age sample came from Teppe Hasanlu, NW of Iran ~800 BCE. It probably came from a Mede. Also, analyses indicated he had light hair, so this idea that being blonde is a defining feature of race has been BTFO.
Yeah, but they weren't racially European and blonde hair and gray/blue eyes was still rare among them.

>today southern Iranians have dark brown to black skin LMAO
NW Iranians tend to look like this, snow nigger. Sometimes they even have lighter features. It's been like this for 2500 years.

Attached: 1508634052949.jpg (1456x566, 166K)

Attached: classical persian phenotype.jpg (172x193, 13K)

I am going to repeat this:
>The Iron Age sample came from Teppe Hasanlu, NW of Iran ~800 BCE. It probably came from a Mede. Also, analyses indicated he had light hair, so this idea that being blonde is a defining feature of race has been BTFO.

So that Iron Age sample had very light features, yet he was still racially Iranian.

Just because you have light eyes and hair doesn't mean you're racially close to snow niggers.

Attached: shahanshahkhosrau.jpg (138x122, 15K)

>Yeah, but they weren't racially European and blonde hair and gray/blue eyes was still rare among them.
Well no, they're very closely related but they split off thousands of years before recorded history. Plenty of time for sub-races to develop especially with superficial traits like hair/eye color.

It is important to realise that throughout all of post-Ice Age history, the white skin has been associated with purity. This does not necesarilly mean that this white skin would have been referring to the Aryans/huwhites we imagine today when we talk about white skin, but the possibility is definitely there.

On an interesting sidenote, the DNA of late pharaoh Tutankhamen is still being withheld from the greater public. Sources leaked that Tutankhamen at least had a R-haplogroup, strongly suggesting that Tutankhamen was a huwhite male. So, my based huwhite bro's: '''WE WUZ KANGZ''

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

Yes it does. They are descended from the racially European R1a white men of the Andronovo culture.

True Aryans = blond haired Europoids of R1a haplogroup.

Just because they are a common ancestor, it doesn’t mean we’re the same. Poos are Aryan in name only.

Attached: 3D82D9C7-6200-4E45-A471-3A10CC84D8D9.jpg (721x905, 104K)

reddit.com/r/memes/comments/8wxi3s/kag_2020_hispanics_for_trump/

Aryans are overrated anyway. The native poos invented the Indus Valley civilisation.

>probably
Exactly you don't know. Perhaps that one sample was a mixed mutt.

Well the Persians "came" from south Iran? Why are they all black there? North Iran is not relevant to this particular discussion.

Genetic tests against dug up bones shows iran hasn't changed genetically since 900BC which was the last major migration into that area. Yes it got conquered by Arabs, Mongols and Turks at different eras but these represent armies of 20-100k conquering a region of several million people and consequently neglible genetic input which is why it doesn't show up on DNA testing. Rape babies are largely a myth, that's the conclusion from DNA testing around the world which shows most areas are the same they were since prehistory. Even in Italy, the south like sicily is still largely Punic and the East is still largely Greek from the earliest settlers before Rome was a thing.

True.

The Xiongnu most likely were R1A, whereas the Tocharians/Yuezhi were most likely R1B. The Israelites descend from the Sumerians, who descend from the Tocharians, who had to flee the Tarim Basim because of flooding. This is the Biblical flood.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saltmen

This is what the true Aryans done looked like.

Attached: saltman-iran.jpg (303x390, 43K)

If Tut had pale skin it was almost certainly from Minoans (known to be early Indo-European settlers in that area) and some of the groups in the northern Levant (theorized to be Indo-European settlers) who we also know the Egyptians had important trade relations with.

native range of the Caucasian race in bright green.

Attached: Carleton_Coon_races_after_Pleistocene.png (1357x628, 47K)

Troo faxx, brahmin from West India (Goa) myself, my castemates are atleast 1-2 skin tones fairer than the Dravidians here even in a state that is close to the Equator, I've got tanned due to the intense heat to type 4 (used to be type 3) skin tone myself
There is an Ancestral story that says my clanmates (and other brahmin clans) came southwards to assist Lord Parshuram, I had also read somewhere that my clanmates are mostly from central Asia so the migration stories are true

Attached: 600px-Indo-European_branches_map.svg.png (600x600, 186K)

Why is this retard so mad? Does he not know what Caucasian means?

Tut was an irrelevant nobody. Ramses was one of the greatest pharoahs and he was haplo E. E for Efrican

The Persian and Mede conquerors of the Iranian plateu were R1b while the later Scythian and Parthians were R1a. Both R1a and R1b represent 50% of Persians today but that doesn't mean they look anything like the ancient Persians/Medes or the steppes or the Scythian. They were predominantly light skinned while today's Iranians are swarthy with an armenoid phenotype.

They fucked native brown girls and has bastard semi-brown kids. The same applies to north India where one district is over 70% R1a yet they're all pooskins except for the high caste.

>Israelites descend from Sumerians

Nice meme

Autosomal DNA covers the whole genome, and just because they had R1a, which means common male lineage, doesn't mean their racial character as a whole is Western European. Please look at this graph, you retarded Nordicist scum:
Ancient Medes and Persians were not White.

Ramses was a solidly Semitic individual. Only black Africans who got to rule Egypt were the 25th Dynasty that the Assyrians drove out.

Persians and medes were J2. R1 Were actual Aryan tribes from 3000 years earlier

Although, coming to think of it, the Indo-Aryans from the Rig Vedas, where the word Aryan is derived from, bear a suspiciously similar migration path to the Yuezhi, who were an offshoot of the Tocharians, who were R1B.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

Attached: 350px-Yueh-ChihMigrations.jpg (828x313, 145K)

You've really fallen for stormfag memes there newfag

>Ancient Medes and Persians were not White

The ones that migrated from the steppes were but they mutted their genes a few generations later by mixing with Dravidians. The nobility however were still pure.

Hey, snow nigger, the hair becomes reddened through a natural process based on mummification. Ancient preserved hair often looks red. It seems to be a chemical reaction as the hair denatures.

Liberals really cant meme

REMINDER: Europeans are also a mixture of Aryans and non-Aryans, and in most modern peoples the pre-Aryan js predominant. but wait, weren’t those pre-Indo-Europeans in Europe also “white”? that’s where you’re deeply wrong, kiddo. the Neolithic populations of Europe spilled like sewage out of the Middle East and carried within them a plume of toxic sludge—Basal Eurasian ancestry. you think Australian aborigines and Papuans and East Asians are different from Europeans? well, the original hunter-gatherers of Europe were more closely related to all of those, to AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINES, than they were to Basal eurasians. it was a primal contaminant that had been incubating somewhere, we still don’t know where but likely in northeast africa. the first farmers in Europe and their late neolithic descendants were niggerized multifamily longhouse-dwellers eating out of communal troughs and living under the thumb of obese mammy “matriarchs”, venal, piglike, obese, who crushed the possibility of any higher vision of life. that is what the Aryans crushed but could not obliterate in europe, and it contained within it something even more alien and pernicious to the aryan vision of life than the darkie foragers of India. this pre-Aryan substrate has erupted in Europe in several slave revolts, the most disastrous including the French Revolution. socialism, the shrill
blue-haired SJW, all the ressentiment and weakness turned into a blade, the affinity for congoids, all of this is the direct expression of pre-Aryan ancestry

Abraham was a Sumerian from Ur. His alleged house is next to the Ziggurat of Ur.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

Aryan comes from the Sanskrit word Arya which means noble

>The nobility however were still pure.
No, they weren't, you stupid snow nigger piece of shit. You are just pulling shit out of your ass with no substantiation. Here is a picture of a noblewoman from a Sassanian mosaic taken from Bishapur, Iran.

Ancient Persian royalty were not genotypically European.

Attached: Bishapur_zan.jpg (456x545, 270K)

>Persians and medes were J2

No they weren't.

>R1 Were actual Aryan tribes from 3000 years earlier

Most R1b and R1a arrived after the end of Bronze Age, however the Gutians and earlier tribe did migrate into Iran before that and were R1b.

Dravidian aren't in the Iranian plateau they're in South India and sri Lanka. Get off the internet you're too autistic to separate facts from memes

It's not even remotely red, you blind browniemutt. It's blond.

Jow Forumstards refuse to acknowledge that skin color is just "skindeep"
half of all europeans are far descendants of the ancient pharaoh. what really matters is not the race, it's what you can measure and observe, IQ and real life accomplishments.

Taking into consideration the mosaic picture and other sources provided, the Achaemenid Persians on average probably resembled this. This is from a wax museum. From looking at the autosomal DNA studies and more, I think this is accurate.

Attached: zinat-ol-molk-house-wax.jpg (550x350, 33K)

As your own image clearly shows, Aryans are just one branch of the Indo-Europeans. No-one in Europe (aside from recent immigrants) is an Aryan.

Biblical history is only accurate from the point where Jews were freed from Babylonian slavery by Cyrus. Biblical history from before that doesn't match with archaeology. You're spouting meme history

This very jewwy thing to compare modern populations to ancient populations is what frustrates me highly when doing research. We know, from concrete, objective, factual history, that population A can wipe out population B and subsequently take over the territory of population B, whilst at the same time, population A is driven away from their original homes for a variety of reasons, for example.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

This is a later period though. I'm taking about the early persians and Achaemenid Empire. By Sassanid times Persians got more swarthy but they were substantially lighter then the natives of Persis who are to this day Dravidian looking.

What? Southern Iranians are dark-brown to black skinned like Dravidians because they descend from them moron.

They looked like this.

Attached: 1473107737027.png (961x1271, 150K)

>saying that modern archaelogy is actually representing actual, politically incorrect archaelogy

You, my based huwhite bro, have a long way to go.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

>probably

Again no proof. The Persians and Medes (the unmixed immigrants) came from Central Asia near Kazakhstan and were white in the Northern European sense.

Yes they were. Persians and medes were literally natives to the Iranian plateau that had their language and religion become aryanised by conquests 3000 years before them. They were indigenous to Iran, they werent Aryan in the genetic sense of the word, only linguistically and religiously. Even the old zoroastrian texts refer to the homeland of the Aryans as being in current central Asia, not current iran. Read history books you 13 year old dweeb

I primarily use facial structure to determine race.
Skin color is at most a secondary characteristic.

This.
So in summary:
North Indian Brahmins and Slavs are cousins (R1a)
Pure Persians and West Europeans are cousins (R1b)
You Wuz Snownigger.
Deal with it.

Attached: snownigger.jpg (532x365, 336K)

He isn't wrong, Dravidians were all over India, Google for the 'brahui' people of Pakistan, they are the Dravidians who never went south, their language is still Dravidian but because of living in a Muslim shithole they look and talk like Pakis
IVC was by Dravidians who later went south after their civilization collapsed when the now mythical Saraswati river went dry, these Brahui folk never went south and now are stranded in Pakistan

You are a brainlet and a stupid piece of shit. I already gave autosomal samples of an ancient Persian from NW Iranian dating to ~800 BCE.

Stop trying to claim my culture, snow nigger. You don't even have anything like the Shahnameh, Gathas, or etc. in your culture that ties to any of this.

>Disputing archaeology

You lose

No, they didn't, snow nigger. Even if that guy had light hair doesn't mean he's European. He could have some Caucasus admixture. It wasn't that rare in Northern Iran or among Medes, I think.

On average though, I think Ancient Achaemenids had dark phenotypes. Regardless, they racially clustered. Only a few genes select for skin depigmentation and eye color.

They weren't in Iran. He's talking about Aryans and those mixinf to make Persians and medes. Nonsense

Honestly, the whole "Indo-European" myth is just some bullshit n*rds came up with to compensate.

I GAVE YOU PROOF HERE. I swear to God, you are even worse than Afrocentrists. Go die for Israel, scum.

LOOK AT THE 800 BCE SAMPLE.

I swear to God, the best thing you can do in your life is die for kikes. Eat shit. You are a disgrace to your entire lineage of ancestors and the Indo European spirit. Go to fucking hell Ahrimanic spawn.

We are all cousins
Fun fact - us high caste folk only amount to only around 60 million max in a country of more than a billion, sounds like European population lmao

Here's the first peshwa of the Maratha empire. Anyone who acts like aryan invasion didnt happen is a total meme kike shill

Attached: His_Highness_Balaji_Vishwanath_Peshwa.jpg (1024x768, 163K)

> calls someone a kike
> complains about identity politics
The Tocharians were reportedly blonde, blue-eyed, and unusually tall. Then they started interbreeding and produced the hapas that live on the edge of the Tarim basin now.
Central Asian history is fascinating. The Indo-Greek and Bactrio-Greek mixture is amazing, and its influence on Buddhist art is generally underestimated.

Attached: heartofasia-tocharians.jpg (460x654, 312K)

The R-group is most likely the alien group, which is featured in all of those Annunaki stories or, often overlooked, within the Book of Mormon. With the arrival of the R-haplogroup, Rh-negative blood was also introduced into the human gene pool. The original Chinese emperors claimed their right to rule from the mere fact they were descended from the Serpent Dragon bloodline, as opposed to the more Neanderthal like Han Chinese. It is quite interesting that the Manchurians, who were carriers of the R1 haplogroup, later on became emperors again. Perhaps this indicates something.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

He is visibly European and likely genetically as well.

We wuz Iranians. Please face it.

Disregarding the cringy editing & some inane bits, the clips from interviews in this video are very interesting & quantifiable:

youtube.com/watch?v=GxmcA0ZbWa0

Here's the 3rd peshwa of the maratha empire. These were brahmin caste hereditary roles held by the Aryans over the muds they conquered. These were just from the 1600-1800s. Imagine how much different they looked from modern poos when it was thousands of years back

Attached: Painting_at_Prince_of_Wales_museum.jpg (1280x1563, 335K)

Stfu, snow nigger. He was not visibly Northern European. Please look at the ~800 BCE graph here and then go die for Israel, you good for nothing knuckle-head PIECE OF SHIT:

You people PISS me off tremendously.

1) You don't know SHIT about Ancient Persian, also called Iranshahr during Sassanian empire, BEYOND MEMES.

2) Your only caring comes in the form of using MISCONCEPTIONS to claim WE WUZ WHITE ARYANS, when in fact you know shit about the culture or anything else beyond memes.

Please for the love of god, slit your throat and go straight to hell. I am not being ironic here. Go get a new hobby.

Tocharians weren't blond. They were predominantly brown and dark red haired.

It was Persians, Scythians, Andronovo, Yenisei Kyrgyz, etc, who were predominantly blond and blue eyed.

See

Attached: 1526525840921.jpg (540x665, 107K)

damn.

This was one of the original cars. Is it the best car compared to other current cars?

Just because something is the first of something doesn't mean it's the best in fact it means it's the worst. Humans came from africa originally. So if you look at what the first humans look like, which is like blacks and turks, you realize how primitive on an evolutionary stand point arabs and niggers are.

Attached: mastercar.jpg (940x705, 81K)

I think so Dravidians are related to Semites/Arabs, they have darker skin (but not like abos) , look at how Brahui people look, I think so that's the original Dravidian, also Dravidians used to be KANGZ just like Semites of Babylon ,etc. Abos are subhumans, they can't start any civilization
Maybe Dravidians when they went south they mixed with abos to look like what they are now

Do you think the Egyptian pyramids were built during the last 12.000 years, or that they are actually much older?

All concrete, objective, factual evidence points to the Pyramids predating the Ice Age, but official kiked history claims a Pharaoh built them.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

Hahahaha browniemutt is visibly buttblasted.

We wuz Iranians.

Yup, makes sense proportion-wise Aryan-bro.

Yes yes, peshwas are Brahmins , they aren't highest tier Brahmins tho but they are respected now because they helped to being hindu rule back in our country

that's just insane man and non sense.

please be quiet. I don't want my scientific view on which races are superior muddled with your insanity

No, you weren't, snow nigger filth.

We have tons of artifacts dating to Sassanian era of royalty depicting themselves.

We have an autosomal sample of a NW Persian/Mede dating to ~800 BCE.

etc.

Attached: sasanian2.jpg (595x513, 167K)

The Persians WERE aryan at one point, the Arya of India WERE white at one point. They lost their culture because of intermixture. High Caste Indians have more European features than shitty Dravidians, which were there during the prescience of the Arya.

Basically haplogroups R1a and R1b fucking local women, and spreading love all over the world.

>Modern humans came from Africa originally

Wrong.

The Homo Erectus descended from Africa, after which various subtypes of Human Species formed, including, but not exclusively, the Homo Neanderthalis, the Cro Magnon (who had alien influences, like I said earlier), the Dravidians, the Indo-Aryans (who also had alien influences, like I said earlier), etc.

The last ancestor an apelike nigger from africa and a huwhite serpent master race individual share, was a literal monkey. This is like comparing the fact that trees and humans had a common ancestor millions of years ago.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

I told you shitskin that those samples don't mean anything because there's no proof they were Persians or Medes. The Persians and Medes are not native to Iran. They conquered you and gave you their name and language. Sassanids are later in the timeline and got admixed.

Pic related native of south Iran.

Attached: IMG_1356.jpg (1300x972, 234K)

>You tell a truth that is so true, but at odds with my conceptions of the truth, that you anger me.
>Literally Plato's cave.

youtube.com/watch?v=SWlUKJIMge4

It is okay. I will share my concrete, objective, factual knowledge with you, without judgment or frustration.

Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.

They are hybrids. They descend from their snow nigger daddies.

The depiction you posted is very late.

Race is only skin deep for everything between iceland and pakistan.

Snow nigger, how many goddamn times do I have to explain to you.

The mixing between Sintashta people and Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex occurred around 2300–1700 BCE. You WUZ NOT ACHAEMENIDS, YOU GODDAMN PIECE OF SHIT.

YOU WUZ VULGAR BARBARIAN SCYTHIAN AND SARMATIAN PEOPLES, INCLUDING SINTASHTA.

Goddamn, you stupid fucking piece of shit. You cherry pick whatever the hell you want, but at the end of the day you have no link to the culture, no celebrations or rituals, no literature, etc. It is just WE WUZZING for you. Go slit your throat.

Also, Sassanids were better than Achaemenids. Why? Because they actually made Zoroastrainism the state religion.