Tfw people can't tell the difference between Christianity and Catholicism

Christianity is belief in Jesus as the son of the Hebrew Yahweh and the messiah prophesied in previous teachings
Catholicism is the dogmatic continuation of the Christian community established and centered in Rome.

only traditional catholics are Christians everything else is heresy and condemned

Germany and america were great, mighty nations due to racial superiority given by God for being loyal, protestant followers.

It was catholic treachery that lead to their downfall! America flooded with illiterate irish catholics and immoral wops, germany betrayed by the inferior catholic meds in the south!

They're both Christianity

youtu.be/5P2miTZCsno

Attached: 3454434325764584.png (1885x768, 217K)

yea this

Catholicism is cucked, but so is most of christianity a subversion, some protestant sects were literally started by freemasons and you're posting a Catholic knight...

Attached: Kalergi - Mosaic Tradition.png (686x428, 445K)

fpbp

Attached: 1520691655238.jpg (719x768, 73K)

Disgusting how you catholic dogs shit all over the former american, protestant ethnostate!

Sad!

Christians follow christ's dogmatic teachings which is traditional catholicism, heretics follow their feelings and martin luther's teachings.

Attached: church of sweden.jpg (2084x1362, 673K)

you guys heretics fuck off or convert.

FUCK YOU RAT!

Russia was Orthodox since forever.

The Eastern Roman Empire stayed Orthodox until it fell 1000 years after Diocletian split the Empire.

The Kingdom of Serbia was the supreme power in the Balkans for about as long as Prussia/Germany was a serious contender.

If you're saying Protestantism is rewarded by God, I'd like to introduce you to the decline of the British Empire.

I will never worship the antichrist of the catholic temple!

Catholicism a henothestic abrahamic religion based on dagon worship and other religions created before it.
Christianity is based on a meta-hero concept imagined up by the Flavian family

Checked and kekked

And show me a single catholic nation that could compare in might to the anglos? They declined for many reasons, shedding fellow germanic blood being the main one.

They utterly dominated and slowly chipped away at italy and spain, they never truly stood a chance.

No other empire covered more ground.

Massive leaps in intelectual advancement became nearly exclusive to protestant nations after the Renaissance, no catholic nation would produce a Von Braun or Issac Newton.

>buzzwords

Because other religions worship one God in three Persons.

checked
abrahamic religions started off as poly-deistic then shifted to henothestic after the invasion of Egypt and during the Hyksos dynasty.

Protestants don't wear the fish hats of DAGON (papal miter), doggone it!!!!

Napoleonic France at it's height, for one, had the English running scared. The Spaniards were pretty friggin' mighty at some point, not at the level of the Brits for sure, but they were still formidable. And the "many reasons" bit is what I was trying to point out, although I didn't state it explicitly. There's many factor that determine exactly what allows a country to come into huge amounts of power, I just don't think Protestantism in particular is what determines it.

You could argue Orthodoxy especially considering early Christianity (Orthodoxy) was the official religion of Rome before the East/West split, and while both Empires had it, the Western half couldn't keep up with their Germanic assimilation... there's a lot of factors at play, man, and not a very strong case for Protestantism being the deciding one.

How many non-Orthodox countries could produce a Mendeleev, or a Tesla? Gregor Mendel? Tchaikovsky? Dostoevsky?

Picking up what I'm putting down?

>being an ortholarp
>russia was orthodox since forever
>1000 ad

Attached: 1520046776147.png (671x645, 173K)

>tfw people willingly join churches that don't have bishops with awesome Thulsa Doom staves

Attached: June29palliumreuters5.jpg (340x451, 38K)

Source?

>being a salute larper
>what is hyperbole

>you don't understand the distinctions between my arbitrary fairy tales

>calling National Socialists "salute larpers" on Jow Forums to defend "his" church
>doing a bad hypberbole on a country that wasn't converted untill late

Chatolicism is chistian church, read a book..

checked
research the Hyksos dynasty :
T. Saeve-Soederbergh, in: Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 37 (1951), 53–71
A.H. Gardiner, Egypt of the Pharaohs (1961), 155–73
S.R.K. Glanville (ed.), The Legacy of Egypt (1963), 219–21, M.A. Murray, The Splendour that was Egypt (1964), 26–32.
D. Redford, Egypt, Canaan and Israel in Ancient Times (1992)
D. Redford and J. Weinstein, in: ABD, 3:341–48 (extensive bibliography)
A. Rainey, in: BASOR, 295 (1994), 81–5; C. Redmount, in: BA, 58 (1995), 182–90
E. Oren (ed.), The Hyksos: New Historical and Archaeological Perspectives (1997)
COS II, 5–7.

>Political-economic system that lasted literally fucking 12 years compared to 950+ of Orthodox Russia
>Kievan Rus founded 862, adopted Christianity in 988

Not exactly a very strong case for a late adoption of Christianity.

The holy prepuce vs the feast of jesus' circumcision

Checked
I'll add that to the reading list.

>Armenia adopted christianity in 300 ad
>Russia in 988, with another pagan ruler afterwards, and only consolidated in the 1000's

>early

Mfw catholicism is the only true christian religion

Attached: 53F73C7D-32E7-4C4F-AD29-4CFCDD0BF4E4.jpg (1079x1413, 269K)

Attached: markstrongjesus.png (2458x962, 2.64M)

The orthodox are without a doubt a big step up over catholics, without a doubt. But they had a culture which didnt foment to the same degree the spirit of God given wisdom, and before their ultimate fall to bolshevism, the ignorance fomented by orthodox society gave a heavy hand to sway the outcome of the civil war that the church ended up losing. Meanwhile, in germany similar steps were taken to implement bolshevism, but higher politicsl critical thinking skills helped stagnant the process long enough for the veterans to take proper action..

Spain in many ways died due yo their empire, they kept losing strong virile men due to them staying as conquerors in foreign lands... Many spaniards behaviour was indicative that they were glad to have gotten distance from roman influence, polygamy was common amongst them and they adopted a lot of foreign customs.

The orthodox even today after all the years of communist damage are indeed a thousand times more redeemable than the catholics are.

But, I suppose one could claim a certain degree of innate intelect in favour of Russian advance, but generally the desire to seek truth is the key to reaching new technological heights.

While france had considerable strength under napolean, it proved culturally weak to
prevent the ultimate decay and falling away into democratic decadence.

The protestant movement was the root of a massive boom of advancment, even today things move at a snails pace comparatively.. Too bad both the orthodox and protestants have been so thoroughly battered over the years

The protestant movement was the root of a massive boom of advancment, even today things move at a snails pace comparatively.. Too bad both the orthodox and protestants have been so thoroughly battered over the years

>Armenia existed as early as 190BC
>Armenia exists literally a stone's throw from Biblical lands
>Took 250 years after Christ's death to convert

Compared to
>First Russian governed collective exists in 862AD
>Russian lands literally over a thousand kilometers from the Roman border
>Took 120 years to initially convert

Yeah, I'd say that's pretty early, especially considering how long it took the Suebians to change up.

Both are Santa Claus tier, that any rational adult should rightly reject.

>there was nothing before statehoods
>arab tribes also converted as early as armenia

>things I don't understand are "arbitrary"
OK

Britain is an island which helps a lot in order to not get invaded. Had they not been on an island it would not be as impressive.

Didn't instill the spirit of God-given wisdom? There's a pretty substantive list of Byzantine inventions from well before the Renaissance. Hell, Nikola Tesla alone has more patents to his name than (I'd wager, anyway) some small countries. Additionally, Protestantism came about after universities had already been established and we'd started getting serious with astronomy -- it's two entirely different eras that they stayed dominant in.

If we're going to argue that ignorance of religion leads to downfall of society, where was American Protestantism to prevent the subversion of America by Catholics and Jews? Where was German Protestantism to prevent the Treaty of Versailles among other things in WWI (and leading up to it)?

I'm not arguing that any of those countries are weak by any means -- they have a STRONG track record for military, economy, land, tech, take your pick -- but I'm not convinced that being Protestant is what sparked it.

Speaking of Renaissance, DaVinci was Catholic. Descartes, Copernicus, Galileo... there's a long list of Catholic scientists just as there are Protestants.

I just can't say Protestantism, given all the examples of strong Orthodox empires or notable Catholic/Orthodox scientists, explicitly pushes critical thinking more than any other sect of Christianity.

>there was nothing before statehoods
Nothing that we can definitively characterize as "Russia". This doesn't go against my point whatsoever. We don't call Syrians Persians, breh, we call them Syrians.

>arab tribes also converted as early as armenia
Mecca to Jerusalem - 1,511km
Yerevan, Armenia to Jerusalem - Approximately 2,000km
Kyiv to Sofia, along Byzantine BORDER - 1,400km

Also, no definitive proof that individual Slavic tribes didn't convert before then. For a country that was literally thousands of kilometers from Christianity to convert about 150 years after it was founded is pretty darn good.

>can't tell the difference between one desert religion from another

lmao who gives a shit

There was the Russian Khaganate, and Russian tribes...

>Khaganate
Okay, you got me. Add 100 years onto the conversion time to 240 years. On pace with Armenia, which is your example of an early adopter.

We still good.