>The Constitutional Self-Evident Right To Life begins at the moment of conception >direct abortion is inherently evil >direct abortion is homicide >Life begins at conception >unique human dna at the moment of conception
Conservatives take issue with Kavanaugh’s decisions on ObamaCare and abortion-related cases.
In a 2011 opinion, he suggested that the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate could be made a “tax,” providing a “roadmap” to a 2012 Supreme Court ruling that Republicans believe saved the 2010 healthcare law.
Kavanaugh's ruling on "Garza v. Hargan" - better known as the "teen-immigration abortion case"
His opinion dissenting from the court's ultimate decision to permit the abortion was not "as constitutionally principled" as another conservative judge who considered the issue.
"He came straight out of the Ivy League to Washington, was never outside the beltway and went to the Bush White House."
>Kethledge Has A Record That Shows Weakness On Immigration
Kethledge has consistently demonstrated interpretations of immigration law at odds with the conservative wing of the Supreme Court and, more broadly, the notion that American immigration laws exist for the benefit of Americans.
Kethledge’s opinion in Patel v. USCIS expressly rejected the government’s contention that the sole purpose of those laws is to protect American workers and benefit American businesses that need foreign labor in qualifying circumstances where they cannot find Americans.
Kethledge joined an opinion in Nguyen v. Holder blocking the deportation of a criminal with a green card who, after lying about an earlier drug conviction on his citizenship application, committed grand theft auto. Kethledge signed on to the opinion, holding that his conviction was not an “aggravated felony” mandating deportation. Another judge on the panel, while he agreed that grand theft auto was not a “crime of violence” and therefore not an “aggravated felony” for deportation purposes, rebuked the opinion Kethledge joined for going too far and not focusing on the federal definition of such a crime, which includes those includes those that involve a “‘substantial risk’ that physical force may be used against property.”
>2 days ago, Federalist brings up Kavanaugh's shitty record on Religious Liberty >Within a day the (((National Review))) scrambles and writes an article talking about how flawless and handsome his religious liberty views are I wonder...
I hate people who eat the young version of the animal instead of raising it and eating the mature version of the animal instead. I am sure long pork cutlets are delicious and probably pulled long pork shoulder too.
Barrett is, objectively, the worst pick. It's not even a competition. Prove me wrong. Give me one appellate opinion of hers. Give me a case that shows her judicial thinking. Please. PLEASE. PLEASE I KNOW YOU LOVE HER FOR HOW GOOD HER THINKING IS AND NOT JUST BECAUSE IT WOULD "BTFO" THE LIBTARDS PLEASE JUST ONE OPINION
Noah Young
This. Nobody predicted Gorsuch the last time around, in fact, I'm not even sure if /ptg/ discussed him even once before the announcement.
Brayden Collins
Oh my god, I better adopt some of those kids right away to protect them
I knew he would be picked as soon as I saw a picture of him in a line up with the "top 5" contenders at the time. I think it was a NYT article. Just looks the part. Trump is a very aesthetically-oriented boss, coming from tv.
Jayden Stewart
Every thing I've read of hers has either been co-authored or not actually written by her. JUST ONE OPINION, I'M BEGGING YOU PLEASE, JUST GIVE ME ONE, THE ONE YOU READ, THAT I KNOW YOU READ
>Google’s motion also revealed that two of its top lawyers, Kent Walker and Richard Salgado, have security clearance, which FISA requires for handling classified legal orders and materials. It was filed on behalf of the company by Albert Gidari, a partner at the law firm Perkins Coie who has earned a reputation in tech and legal circles as the go-to man on surveillance law.
yfw google Google lawyers have security clearance for FISA material
But does that known bias make their opinions really useful? National Review has been about as useful as cnn when it comes to Trump coverage. The federalist is better but they still bitch and moan that the sky is falling for too often about stuff thats gone in the next news cycle.
Adrian Myers
this picture is gay af
Zachary Anderson
Abortion is a moral good solely based on the demographics. You aren’t thinking big picture.
Lucas Allen
Gorsuch was name dropped here due to his Scalia relationship.
Adam Gonzalez
Those are bolts >throwing spark plugs at gas anomalies
Cameron Cook
>Give me a case that shows her judicial thinking. Give me an example of you being qualified to interpret such a case of her judicial "thinking"
James Nelson
African-Americans were angry at the not-guilty verdict of LAPD officer after the beating of Rodney King. Protests turned into rioting, rioting turned into looting. Billions of dollars in damage and several deaths.
(and that makes no sense but I get your point. I still full expect no deal/hard brexit when all is said and done. The EU are incapable of agreeing to whatever we negotiate)
Nathan Wood
>being evil is good you realize there are non-immoral ways to expel darkies right you don't have to go straight for the most odious option
Hunter Torres
>Google lawyers have security clearance for FISA material
What will the consequences be?
Gabriel Reyes
They have the same ballistic characteristics for good throwing and it sounds fun. I mostly throw them at other rude stalkers anyways.
user, please, I've asked so many barrett people to give me one opinion of hers. One that is written by her, or even a dissent by her. Just one, from the appellate court. Cause I KNOW that you wouldn't support a candidate who has no proven record, I mean, that's just preposterous, Barrett supporters are MUCH smarter than that. A single opinion user. Please. I JUST WANT ONE FUCKING OPINION PLEASE user I'VE TRIED ASKING SO MANY TIME AND NO ONE SEEMS TO HAVE ACTUALLY READ AN OPINION BY HER
