>The Constitutional Self-Evident Right To Life begins at the moment of conception >direct abortion is inherently evil >direct abortion is homicide >Life begins at conception >unique human dna at the moment of conception
Conservatives take issue with Kavanaugh’s decisions on ObamaCare and abortion-related cases.
In a 2011 opinion, he suggested that the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate could be made a “tax,” providing a “roadmap” to a 2012 Supreme Court ruling that Republicans believe saved the 2010 healthcare law.
Kavanaugh's ruling on "Garza v. Hargan" - better known as the "teen-immigration abortion case"
His opinion dissenting from the court's ultimate decision to permit the abortion was not "as constitutionally principled" as another conservative judge who considered the issue.
"He came straight out of the Ivy League to Washington, was never outside the beltway and went to the Bush White House."
Was I the only one who saw that glowing post last bread?
Adrian Foster
>SCOTUS PICK
>Kethledge Has A Record That Shows Weakness On Immigration
Kethledge has consistently demonstrated interpretations of immigration law at odds with the conservative wing of the Supreme Court and, more broadly, the notion that American immigration laws exist for the benefit of Americans.
Kethledge’s opinion in Patel v. USCIS expressly rejected the government’s contention that the sole purpose of those laws is to protect American workers and benefit American businesses that need foreign labor in qualifying circumstances where they cannot find Americans.
Kethledge joined an opinion in Nguyen v. Holder blocking the deportation of a criminal with a green card who, after lying about an earlier drug conviction on his citizenship application, committed grand theft auto. Kethledge signed on to the opinion, holding that his conviction was not an “aggravated felony” mandating deportation. Another judge on the panel, while he agreed that grand theft auto was not a “crime of violence” and therefore not an “aggravated felony” for deportation purposes, rebuked the opinion Kethledge joined for going too far and not focusing on the federal definition of such a crime, which includes those includes those that involve a “‘substantial risk’ that physical force may be used against property.”
Genuinely, please stop using the same OP over and over again for no reason. Why? Please stop, there's always something to post about going on or some good OC, there's no reason to do something so boring.
IDK... I got some weird bumps on my dick recently, we could talk about that.
Brayden Sullivan
I obviously meant the edition, there's no need whatsoever to keep posting the same OP edition night after night. It's very pointless.
Owen Butler
Is /ptg/ full of blind Trump lovers or are you willing to admit when he makes a mistake? Betting odds now have Kethledge as Trump's favorite for the Supreme Court right after his shady background on illegal immigration was revealed
I’m waiting for an article too but dont expect journalists to want to write on it
Jackson Walker
>grand theft auto is not a crime of violence We need more libertarian/classically liberal jurisprudence. Violence should be considered any harm against a person's property. As opposed to victimless crimes.
Never heard of wired sources. Anything corroborating from other sources?
Ryan Roberts
that's a waste of space, i have to periodically clear unused stuff from my computer since i keep filling up the memory
William Myers
>saught a role >didnt get a role Fail
Jonathan Butler
This is what I mean, instead of being worried about him making an awful pick you jump straight to semantics to defend him and I'm sure if he does pick kethledge and he turns out to be a bust you guys will still defend the choice anyway. If you seriously support Trump you'll have the balls to criticize him and be worried right now that he is about to make a fucking terrible pick for nominee
Joseph Hernandez
>Shill post links directly to CNN I'm not clicking that.
Adrian Fisher
Oh, I see. I agree also that the edition should never be the same as the previous or following thread. But still, I think it is more interesting if we allow the 2nd post to remain open to the most vigilant poster.
i do not do that because inevitably some faggot posts some shill shit as first and then everyone bitches "wow OP why didn't you take first post." see: obamaleaf being here earlier, who would have certainly done it, or one of the political cartoon spammers i used to feel the same way about leaving it open but y'all bitched too much. it stays taken now
Evan Stewart
>our legion exceeds average navy seal minimum tolerances Come on, now.
It's in the court documents. Mueller said he had no evidence of russia collusion, but would like to use Manafort's connection to the Trump campaign as part of his prosecution for bank fraud.
Isaiah Powell
Yeah, but I want AWBs ruled unconstitutional and apparently Kethledge is the guy for that so...
>Trump is guilty of what other people think will happen These betting this have zero credibility. Why should I care?
Luke Morris
Boys will be boys
Nolan Carter
>i keep filling up the memory With what?
Daniel Reed
I mean sure if you want to lose a civil war be my guest.
Justin Rogers
I’ve doubted Trump before, like with Pence, and was proven wrong, also i’m in no power to chance his pick so why worry myself, anyone he picks will be better than who jeb, bernie, or clinton would have picked, thats what matters.
Julian Fisher
>Only one justice has been impeached by the House of Representatives (Samuel Chase, March 1804), but he was acquitted in the Senate (March 1805). lmao
Jackson King
He says they do not plan on introducing evidence about collusion at this time. They can always amend the charges later when Mueller is finished putting the final touches on the Trump collusion dossier.
I’ll assume he means hard drive or soild state storage. Why anyone wouldn’t just add more is beyond me.
Angel Bell
Pence isn't that great, honestly, except as a candidate. If Pence was President he would cuck for sure.
Hunter Baker
>We've impeached more Presidents than Justices Damn. That really is the most Teflon-plated position in our Government. The only oversight is the icy scythe of death.
Angel Green
Enjoy your ban
Jackson Thompson
I'm no expert on semantics, but if it's not coming up at the trial, then it's not really an allegation, is it?
Jeremiah Smith
if any kind of digits RBG will die on Halloween 2018
Austin Perez
He did have a role in his campaign just not his administration faggot
yes, and also external drives for memory keep breaking for me (as do my computers) i do lots of intensive stuff with them, way more than a laptop is supposed to handle
We all need to voice our opinions here constantly. Jow Forums works on a trickle up principle. Perhaps Trump himself has never once visited Jow Forums, but the topics discussed here undoubtedly reach him.
Rather than a hierarchy of folders, you should use a tag system to organize your images and make them easily searchable. Anyway, Kagerou is a lycanthrope, so even though she normally just has the kemonomimi and tail, I think she still counts as a monster girl. But then again, they say "tag what you see, not what you know," so maybe you should decide on a per-image basis depending on how monstrous she looks.
Brandon Cox
I'm not clicking on the shill, shareblue, or any other known fake news outlet. Archive that shit if its so important or screenshot.
>Anarchist >Talking about using the rule of law You are a disgrace to your kind
Charles Williams
the only fake news is Trump here friends, sorry (((they))) tricked you
Cameron Allen
It's in two days, you wont have to wait long. Supporters like those in this thread should be the ones getting vocal right beforehand to make sure he does not pick someone weak on immigration like Kethledge
Josiah Evans
>The Hill is fake news Boomers will not be spared on the day of the rope.
