A wide range of different political positions have been tried over the past 4,000 years, each one leading to varying but terrible amounts of human suffering and misery. If it is true that politics is the art of compromise, then all political philosophies are sets of compromises. This essay discusses one such: the philosophy of national alt-centrism.
National alt-centrism is the answer to all problems. In particular, it’s the answer to three massive questions that have divided people (both mentally and physically) since the dawn of civilisation.
The first question of politics is the question of how wide to throw open the circle of solidarity. Keep it too narrow, and you risk your people becoming insular, myopic, small-minded and inbred. Open it too wide, and you no longer have any bonds of solidarity that would cause a person to act bravely on behalf of another one, and you will be conquered.
This question has long been understood by political philosophers, who have had to strike a balance between the xenophobia that leads to a culture collapsing out of insularity, and the xenophilia that leads to a culture collapsing out of no longer possessing common bonds.
The fashion today appears to be in favour of removing borders, but it isn’t plausible that the human species is ready to unify as a single entity. The range of behaviours exhibited by people in various places around the world is so vast, that they cannot all mingle together peacefully any more than chimpanzees could freely wander the main streets of major Western centres.
Disagreements are already so numerous that no one single world authority could possibly hope to mediate them all without unrest. Worse, no one world government could possibly have the trust of the whole world, for it will inevitably be comprised of people who have deep historical antipathy towards other people who they intend to rule. The only possibility would involve the introduction of totalitarianism.
On the other hand, however, it’s obvious that very small units, such as city-states, are not viable (outside extremely unusual circumstances) on account of their inability to project any meaningful force on the world stage, which means that they quickly get overrun by larger neighbours. This suggests that a balance between global and parochial, such as national, is the right size of circle to optimise the benefits of solidarity and co-operation.
The second question is essentially the question between left and right. There are a variety of ways of posing this question and there are a number of ways of summarising what this question all boils down to. It’s apparent that the right is masculine and the left is feminine, but there are a near-infinite number of different ways of interpreting what this means.
In either case, it can be seen that the political solutions offered by either extreme are insufficient, and only cause the political pendulum to swing back equally as far as it is initially pulled. Leftist solutions are short-sighted, naive and reckless, and this inspires right-wing countermovements. Right-wing solutions are cruel, exclusionary and narrow-minded, and this inspires left-wing countermovements.
This swinging back and forth along the left-right paradigm has torn all nations of the West in two. None of them work as true nations any more: they are comprised only of a cadre of politicians and their wealthy backers trying to screw an ever-increasing horde of suckers as hard as possible. No-one has any national solidarity any longer because both sides have imported so many randoms that no-one has anything in common.
The left-right paradigm has to be abolished because it induces people to put their class interests above the national interests and, in so doing, makes it impossible for the people to have any real solidarity. Instead of being members of the nations, people self-segregate into social circles based on ideology. In doing so, they are divided and conquered.
Here it can be seen that a centrist position is the most naturally fitting to those who have already decided to operate on a national level. This avoids at once the cruelty of the right and the stupidity of the left, striking a balance in much the same way that silver is alchemically speaking a balance of iron and clay. This gives us National Centrism.
The third question is whether to go along with the established systems or to overthrow them. Regardless of the precise balances struck on the range of solidarity and the left-right questions, one separate question has to be asked: whether to co-operate with the established systems or to overthrow them if those systems are hopelessly corrupt. This is the alt question.
It’s apparent that the centrist parties have failed to create a worthy compromise between the left and the right. Rather than taking the best from both they have either taken the worst from both (in the form of neoliberalism) or adopted a piss-weak compromise that satisfies no-one except for major moneyed interests (such as most of the centrist parties in Europe). This is a political error akin to the balance fallacy in philosophy.
Alt-centrism is the refusal to fall prey to the balance fallacy. It seeks to harness both the strengths of the right and the strengths of the left. The right may be cruel, but within that cruelty is a healthy self-interest that can induce a people to stand up proud. The left may be stupid, but within that stupidity is an honest and earnest will to make the most out of what life offers.
Alt-centrism is, by contrast, an uncompromising position. The emphasis is not on insipid compromises but rather a dynamic fusion of the yin and the yang. This naturally eschews materialism but way of appealing to metaphysical ideals, and therefore leaves room in the national consciousness for the spiritual, which is the major way that the current political system has failed.
National alt-centrism is, therefore, a revolutionary nationalist philosophy that seeks to combine the orderliness of the wealthy with the creativity of the poor, for the benefit of both sides as one nation. It solves at once five separate problems: the problem of opening the gates to barbarians, the problem of becoming insular and weak, the problem of hoarding wealth in too few hands, the problem of losing touch with tradition, and the problem of how to deal with an incumbent political system that is rotten to the core.
That's what an army is for, you fucking idiot. What am I going to do, let the citizens handle it?
Zachary Johnson
Well, when you realise that licking the arses of the rich doesn't actually make you yourself better off, you stop being a mainstream right-winger.
Americans are yet to realise this of course.
Jeremiah Lee
I'm not going to read your drivel, but what are you going to do about Whites becoming minorities in their own countries? In America, if every illegal was deported and all immigration legal or illegal was halted tomorrow, White people would still be a minority in America in the late 2040's. Whites were a minority of American births during Obama's last term and this was only temporarily reversed because of the Trump baby boom (same psychological phenomenon that makes cities whose sports team wins the championship have baby booms). How does your civicuck blather address this problem in any way? Do you even recognize teh growing number of non-Whites as a problem to be solved?
The only thing that'll save NZ now is a fucking pogrom, and a return to more tribal values. Chinks and pajeets will evaporate as soon as this little island gets even remotely PNG.
Settle down there Adolf, not all political questions necessarily reduce down to 1488 straight away.
Joseph Walker
i dig it. sounds good.
Jack Evans
Of course you can faggot.
The alt-right is a reaction to the shitty warmongering globalist Christcuck conservatism of George W Bush.
The alt-centre is similar.
Parker Morris
your synopsis of a retarded 'national centrism' theory doesn't actually dictate solutions to european world problems. hitler and the natsocs were the best example of european counter attacks against the ebbing of our race.
Christopher Allen
although this is very intriguing, and i hate to be a cucked out fan boy, but this is exactly what JBP has been saying all along
Owen Ramirez
When my people are facing genocide they do. Once we've secured the existence of our people, then we can wank over economic policy and government size. To be frank you come across as a highly intelligent non-White who doesn't want to go live with his own kind. Sorry bro, we can be penpals but you gotta go.
Mate white people rule four continents, we're not going away anytime soon. Even with mass shitskin immigration, genetic drift will see to it that K-selected white genes drive out r-selected black ones from the inside.
Now, stop shitting and pissing yourself in fear and discuss some political philosophy like an adult with some order in his mind.
Jeremiah Jenkins
socio politically the major world problem is that in 1900 european world population was 20% of total. It is now less than 9%. destruction of central europe, invasion of our frige colonies, and support of non-european regional growth rates have led to a situation of real apolitical genocide. physical solutions and not political jargon is needed.
Gavin King
>genetic drift will see to it that K-selected white genes drive out r-selected black ones from the inside so, you think an interbred population of mutts will be comparable to a real european population?
Christopher Long
It's an epidemic here, so much onions-tier politics. I mean we literally just elected a fucking communist, a member of antifa to the highest position in our government, with cash from the CCP. And then you've got people pushing for more indecision (which is what 'centrism' really is) fuck this place
>stop shitting and pissing yourself in fear and discuss some political philosophy like an adult with some order in his mind Pic related faggot Whites will be a minority in America in by 2040. How much longer from that point until White Americans start getting genocided like the Boers?
It will evolve to be white, if white genes are superior.
The same way our ancestors did. Or I suppose you think God ejaculated us our of His Rod 6,000 years ago?
Jacob Anderson
>k/r selection Brainlet's analogy to simplify a more complex issue.
Jordan Parker
Over a long enough timeline, we're all wormfood bro.
What is the real point of this objection?
Christopher Martin
>we should subject ourselves to another 150,000 years of genetic struggle just to reach where we already are now because being mean to brown people violates my philosophical principles Go fuck yourself fag
Jackson Harris
although european population was never 40% of total in southern africa i don't doubt the same ethnic conflicts will begin in the next generation everywhere except europe. there we easily have another 100 years without a major 10 million/yr invasion. but, without north american resources by 2050 europe will probably get innudated as much.
Nice tactical nihilism faggot. You debate just like a liberal. Now I'll throw your nihilism right back in your fucking face: what's the point of your philosophical wanking then "bro"?
Andrew Morris
>Alt Centrism >still talking in Left Right paradigms Step away from the mutton and go read Wahsington's farewell speech.
so you're little 'national centrism' is actually a typical lefty cuck out to european world wide genocide. fuck off your thread is now a natsoc thread.
To reduce the amount of suffering endured by sentient beings.
Henry Stewart
It's not "us vs. them", mate, that's nigger logic. Did you just get out of prison?
Asher Walker
No, we'll all end up working in chink sweatshops to pay the rent, you stupid cunt.
Ayden Young
>i am are computer. all human are being same. sentient lifeforms must coexist in national centrist paradise. or else
Hudson Taylor
it's "us for us" did you just get out of state funded holocaust studies school?
Brandon Thomas
fuck off faggot join natsoc or kys
Ian Martinez
>If it is true that politics is the art of compromise It isn't.
Landon Campbell
Suffering isn't necessarily bad.
Easton Perez
Yes it is us versus them for fuck's sake. God damn it, we're giving away our fucking countries to third-world subhuman cunts, who won't even play by our fucking rules. You think the chinks give a fuck about our environmental sentimentality? You think some streetshitting pajeet gives a fuck about not throwing garbage out of the window of his fucking lexus? Just fuck back off to >>>/leftypol/ bitch I fucking hate you already.
Lucas Clark
That sounds like the kind of logic that leads to the Police ignoring Muslim grooming gangs, maybe try harder Britanon.
Aiden Hall
What a clever response. Good one, mate.
Now go take your nihilistic pseudo-morality elsewhere.
Kayden Diaz
perversion and degeneracy are caused by capitulation to foreign invasion. you can water down gasoline reducing it's efficiency up to a certain point before it just ceases to fire in the piston. next generation new zealand will be at US levels of muttitude and who would want to raise children in such an abyss? so they'll chop off their dicks, finger children, and blow each other rather than foster future generations. the president's daughter will probably marry pic related
