She makes some very good points you know

She makes some very good points you know

twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1015726794572533760

Attached: Capture.png (575x533, 103K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_disputes_over_the_Harry_Potter_series
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Stole someone else’s material and then sues everyone who tries to do the same to her. She can rot

JK ROWLING IS A CHILD TRAFFICKER

She's a hack.

Her body of work is 99% rehashed ideas from other writers.

>made all my own money
>whole sentence without lying
N.K. Stouffer says otherwise.

Attached: Larry Potter.jpg (318x474, 32K)

Attached: they fuck.jpg (334x499, 33K)

prove when or else

i do wonder why a YA novelist is so uppity, she's a tier below Steven King and even he embarrasses himself on twitter. I don't think the Twilight chick or the guy that wrote Percy Jackson have this problem. Even the chick that wrote that Jennifer Lawrence vehicle series with the hand sign that tumblr/lefties tried to meme into reality never shows up.

horrible comeback, what he said is 100% true and she knows it

Attached: More plagerism.jpg (180x272, 13K)

most of the people he speak about are here on Jow Forums that's the only part of his statement thats true

> never been investigated for collusion

Is this something I can add to my resume right after Time Person of the Year 2006?

>Made all my own money
LITERALLY a welfare sponge.

>can go a whole sentence without lying
LITERALLY just proven incorrect.

Let me know if she gets into politics. Then she'll start lying.

>never been investigated for collusion
since when do children's book writers get investigated for collusion to begin with?

for fuck's sake

>More Than Just Friends
Wew

>She makes some very good points you know

Damn are you retarded. She is just spewing out the same Operation Mockingbird propaganda to virtue signal to common core libtards.

Attached: trump magician.jpg (540x540, 36K)

holy shit

>made all my own money
By completely, unashamedly stealing the Harry Potter character from a movie (Troll, 1986).

Attached: 9bb58ea0f7d90f19cd812ae8a75e54b1.jpg (600x315, 21K)

Attached: This.gif (300x186, 446K)

holy shit, what is the woman's problem? doesn't she have anything better to do? every fucking day there's a thread about her saying some dumb shit. does she want Trump's balls on her face or what?

the twilight chick was a mormon housewife. I bet she's secretly /ourgirl/. honestly, I'm starting to appreciate those shitty vampire books. at least they conformed to traditional gender norms.

They get investigated for plagiarism instead

>I’ve never been investigated for collusion

>being investigated somehow means you are guilty
>collusion isn’t even a crime
???

>own several mansions
>not a single one houses a refugee child
Socialism and Diversity for ye, but not for me.

Attached: 1442026334077.gif (400x300, 454K)

>i do wonder why a YA novelist is so uppity
Lots of money and attention.

Yes she did

Attached: 596FBD73-D1D7-42BA-BB6D-03027969C22A.jpg (733x1281, 186K)

PewDiePie needs to set his 9 year olds on her.

At least Trump isn't responsible for one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: afsdafsd.jpg (1616x2864, 2.25M)

rowling btfo

>brave new world
>low tier

>atlas shrugged
>fucking capeshit
>god tier
>no dickens at all on the list

An ancap made this image

Remember how quickly she shut up when told to put the darkies in her empty mansions? Such a strategy needs to be used regularly on anti whites like her. The weakness of people like Rowling is that they want to sit atop the pile of humanity while virtue signaling to the Plebs below. By calling them out on their Slave Master strategy they become unable to preach their bullshit to the common man.

No works of Goethe either

Attached: angry dog noises.jpg (1280x720, 115K)

>Made all my own money

She was on the dole big lad till she wrote Harry Poofter

>made all my own money
Bitch had a job, got divorced and decided to mooch off of her sister and government taxpayers while she wrote a book.She did not make that money, taxpayers and her sister made it for her.

You talking about Harry Potter being a blatant ripoff of Gaiman's Books of Magic comics?

>investigated
Her come back was weak sauce

Except those wizard-kid books were written by committee, like all the big british "youth book series of a generation" propaganda campaigns. It's not really a secret.

See, I don't come here often, but sometimes Jow Forums just fucking delivers and makes it worth it.

Read up on Nancy Stouffer and what Rowling, Scholastic and Warner Bros. did to her for daring to point out the elements Rowling ripped off. They essentially flipped it on her, claimed that she started retroactively inserting "muggle" into her book (a book published in the mid-'80s) and the courts ordered Stouffer to pay a $50,000 fine for "willfully deceiving the courts" or some shit. They pretty effectively destroyed her career.

>moby dick not god tier
>ayn rand god tier
Kys my man

>1984 is more relevant than brave new world
>dostoyevsky in both the low-tier and in the god-tier.
this guy is retarded.

Holy shit she got burned. Kek.

>atlas jewed god tier
>tolkien shit tier
I've nothing to say on your analysis of Harry Popper, but that picture is the dumbest I've seen in a good long while.

>no tolstoy

Attached: the architect.png (173x181, 35K)

How do people still fall for this bait? It has "Clifford for President," Kanye West's photo album, and that one Jow Forums novel.

being investigated means you are guilty to this woman.
I hope she never serves on a jury

I love this version.

She's a liberal with attention.

hahahahahahaha

>Shitting on "Clifford for President"
Pleb

Attached: visibleconfusion.webm (450x472, 1.44M)

Real question here:
Do you think people will be reading the Harry Potter series about a hundred years from now? I ask this because a series like Lord of the Rings has sort of entered into 20th Century mythology while I don't think the same could be said for J.K Rowling's series.

Attached: 9d5.png (2688x2688, 173K)

Of course it's bait when Clifford makes it on the list on not The Very Hungry Caterpillar

Attached: The Very Hungry Caterpillar.jpg (500x350, 87K)

Probably not. Hell, most Harry Potter fans never even read the books, they only saw the movies.

Actually for fun just read this entire page.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_disputes_over_the_Harry_Potter_series

Realize how much of a Jew Rowling and the corporate owners of the Harry Potter franchise are. Highlights include: bullying a 15-year-old girl for running a fansite, suing the U.S. Army over a parody and stopping the publication of a dictionary of Harry Potter language or whatever because Rowling was totally publishing an encylopedia and that'd hurt the sales; that encyclopedia has yet to materialize ten years after the fact. Also suing a guy for writing fanfiction.

Rowling's crowning achievement in litigious jewry though is suing a company that built a replica Hogwarts for a Hindi religious festival, then claiming that she wasn't suing a a religious festival and in fact there was no religious festival it was just a corporate event that happened to occur at the same time as a religious festival.

J.K. Rowling is a shitty writer, a lazy welfare leech and obsessively litigious to the point where J.K. probably stands for Jittery Kike.

>Made my own money/got lucky and sucked the right cocks to get a movie deal
Same thing I guess

Oh no, why did you have to post that picture and reveal your low IQ levels?

Attached: 1011527601.jpg (455x700, 59K)

Attached: 304856.jpg (295x475, 38K)

Well Tolkien loaned prehistoric finnish memes. His creation will live on.

When it comes to childrens' literature she sure ain't no Kenneth Graham or Enid Blyton.

Attached: 9780684179575.jpg (292x423, 35K)

From russian version of wikipedia article about Harry Potter parodies:
>The author of this work Nancy Stouffer, was filing a claim on D.K.Rowling, accusing her of borrowing of base plot lines and characters from Larry Potter books but couldn't bring any proof of at least one of her books was sold before 2001.
>After that a counter suit was failed againt Nancy herself and she had to pay $50000.

Why this shit isn't written in the english version of the article?

Attached: 08c2dc5a8ef3f3967ca994865e77510312923bcf8372e24ed1917db6e5e5e2dd.jpg (615x456, 32K)

her personal twitter dumbledores army are the biggest sycophants ive ever seen

Attached: wizardcucks.png (412x704, 340K)

Man she can't even touch Wilson Rawls

Attached: 9780553274295_mres.jpg (800x1313, 164K)

Enid Blyton > Rowling.. by far, by far.

Attached: river of adventure.jpg (376x560, 139K)

Only a kike would do this shit.

Attached: 3E64F54C-C2BF-495C-9C22-27F468B3851C.png (586x586, 264K)

Oh boy, just because you made money while making the dullest franchise means that excuses you from any criticism. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1529449428903.jpg (1565x2823, 1.39M)

post these under every tweet that disgusting hag makes.

based

Man, I remember when the first Harry Potter movie came out, everyone thought it was the greatest shit ever and right before The Fellowship of the Ring came out (which came out a couple months later), all these critics said that it couldn't beat out HP...

Came out a month later I mean

You mean "continue", right?

I think it might achieve a status similar to John Carter of Mars. Simple trashy novels that people will try reading just because it was popular at one time and will probably be redone with other media properties over the years.

Like they're doing the sorta prequel series of movies now to Harry Potter called Fantastic Beasts, which since they're not limited to some poorly written children's novels will probably help to keep the Harry Potter universe popular for years to come.

After all, what are Harry Potter books ABOUT??

This is my take on them and it ain't pretty. JK Rowling is a lower class woman who hates her own class and worships the British upper class.

If you look at the essential drama of Harry Potter, what is it? Harry's parents have been murdered, so he can't attend this school for "wizards". What do the children do at this school for wizards? They learn arcane languages in an ancient and august setting. These arcane languages give them mysterious powers. IOW, they're upper class children that go to Eton and Harrow and learn Latin and Greek and this endows them with the magical power to ascend into the elite classes.

Harry's tragedy is that he has been unjustly cast down into the proletariat a hideous fate. His adoptive family are lower class with wretches accents, bad clothes, treacherous sly idiotic personalities and hideous genetics. They're despicable. Harry's quest is to ascend back into the elite classes of Harrow and Eton which he has been unjustly denied.

Thus I'm always amazed when I see British kids of Hindu or Chinese extraction eagerly embracing this shit. It's like American niggers wishing they could grow up to join the KKK. haha.

It's almost as ridiculous as Andrew Cunanan being obsessed with Evelyn Waugh's Brideshead Revisited. A flip faggot in a rep tie for a private school wanting frantically to be a part of a class system that died around August 1914.

What a world we live in.

Attached: download.jpg (310x162, 7K)

Attached: 0B21F74A-4A6A-409F-9BF9-A81198563DD1.jpg (480x619, 28K)

she called pewds a fascist and got btfo, fucking cunt

>Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, j
had that happend hermione would have been raped by spielberg, at least we can be at ease knowing that she was a virgin until eighteen :o)

Attached: o8.jpg (682x675, 239K)

He gets 90% of his material from this site so he'd better read this and beat the shit out of her again.

>Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, j
had that happend hermione would have been raped by spielberg, at least we can be at ease knowing that she was a virgin until eighteen :o)

Raped? I am sorry but nothing that conventional for a twisted jew pedo phreak like Speilberg. He would have inserted some plastic object in her anus impossible to retrieve without an emergency surgical procedure and she would have died at age 11 bleeding uncontrollably from her anus.

Attached: steve.jpg (279x465, 66K)