Grindelwald did nothing wrong.
Grindelwald did nothing wrong
Noah Adams
Alexander Cook
Here come the reviews
>Crimes of Grindewald is a cinematic with a plotline very relevant to America in 2018
>What Crimes of Grindewald tells us about how we can stand up to fascism in today's world
>Crimes of Grindewald ignites a spark of light in the resistance movement, as Hollywood shows us we can stand up to tyranny
>10 reasons why Crimes of Grindewald is a symbol of Trump's America in 2018, and that is a good thing
Henry Jackson
Who the fuck is this dude, some 12th century faggot?
I know you Italifags are too based to have anything more important to worry about, but fucking hell man
Josiah Parker
Ah, so he's a movie villain?
Camden Hughes
literally Hitler in Harry Potter
wanted full aryan mage blood lines,
no mixed mutts
Hunter Green
Nothing wrong if you don't count being part of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Easton Campbell
basato
Jackson Allen
"No!"
Chase Cruz
I was exited to read Harry Potter at age 15, because my mother was reluctant to let me read it due to "normalization of witchcraft". All my friends were reading it and singing it's praises so I assumed it was going to be amazing.
Then I read it and thought "wtf is this garbage" my mom was like "vile satanic refrences..?!" when she saw my dissapointed face.
I told her "if only it was that interesting!". It was a huge dissapointment. Completely unimaginative. I was pretty sure I had seen the same setting and plot in various manga and obscure juvenile fiction. The characters were not very likeable or interesting. The writing was GARBAGE. I've seen far better word crafting on some of the better Wattpad stories before Wattpad became so Thottpad.
A total dissapointment. I read the whole thing expecting some sort of twist or increased depth. It increased in edgyness, but not depth. The only twist is that it really was that boring, and it all played out as expected.
Jack Reyes
>Voldemort was an autist who misunderstood Grindelwald's message and fucked everything up
Where have I seen that before
Julian Davis
It saddens me that adults care about Harry Potter.
Adrian Morales
it saddens me that reddit posting is now the norm here
Noah Martin
Ryan Wood
Jonathan Torres
Christ
Adam Walker
Evan Miller
>normalization of witchcraft
>vile satanic references
What ass backward village did you live in?
Thomas Peterson
Nathaniel Cox
Luke Ross
John Gomez
Ryan Miller
I read book 1 when I was 11 and it was fun but I only stuck around because I was invested.
Movies were okay i guess
Alexander Perez
Hunter Miller
Jackson Rivera
Samuel Ramirez
>top tier books are books about normal life on normal earth with no magic, wonder, fantasy, sci-fi, NOTHING, just a normal person doing normal stuff
epic
Hunter Myers
Christopher Nelson
Harry Potter was always about fighting the nazis who wanted to have only purebloods around and not mutts.
So I don't see how this comes as a surprise to anyone.
John Miller
You've missed the point of the 1st movie. Grindelwald is the minority extremist who points out his community is oppressed by the muggle majority. To solve that problem he wants to establish a supremacy of the minority.
It's the same moral stand as in Black Panther: the vilain is shown as being right in his analysis, but wrong in his methods and solutions.
Cooper Roberts
Leo Scott
literally Voldemort
Robert Brooks
Jordan Hughes
you didn't see/read HP, right?
Voldemort is just parroting Grindelwald
Parker Myers
It's all about making shekels
Alexander Nelson
>Trump, Death Eaters - I got this!
>Trump is more powerful than ever and still growing
Samuel Lee
"Leave the mongrels to me"
What did based Malfoy mean by this?
Cameron Barnes
>but muh pop culture references!
Gabriel Sanders
Carson Edwards
#triggered
Zachary Moore
Gabriel Kelly
The Count of Monte Cristo is hardly about normal people doing normal stuff. Anyway, the chart is random, the books have nothing in common with each only her in any of the tiers. Looks more like some guy's personal opinions on a bunch of stuff he read
Brayden King
Unironically true. The international statue of secrecy needs to be abolished.
Kevin Lopez
Fuck the next potter is out? I didnt know this movie was near ready. With peoples disconnect from cable they dont get blasted with as much advertising. God hollyjew is fucked.
Jaxson Miller
>Dumbledore's army was a secret society
>these guys advertise it on Twitter
Uhhh
Levi Watson
It's barely Harry potter
It all went downhill after chamber of secrets
William Thompson
it's a meme list
Parker Roberts
He was a fag. It is very wrong.
Henry Myers
Dirty MUD BLOODS spoil everything!
Owen Wright
Based
Daniel Parker
this entire thread is why I support genocide
Connor Clark
Is it cringe thread now? I swear, i did not cringe so much since I ate aloe.
Christopher Morgan
When is Jow Forums gonna ban these reddit tier posts? Nothing more annoying than trying to have a civilized thread and then some magapede comes here to dump all their meme folders ruining any possibility of conversation.
Jose Rogers
>oppressed
>wizard can do literally anything to muggle as long as no one reports him
The same way as you oppress pedophiles in white house
Charles Stewart
How is confederacy of dunces not above god tier, sitting alone on that list, best book with an incel protagonist
Oliver Bailey
>"No!"
They're very different. Grindelwald is focussed on his relationship with muggles that he sees as inferior oppressors. He doesn't care about pureblood or mudblood. To the left's vision of the world, he's some sort of minority extremist like black power.
Voldemort focusses his new order within the magical world, he wants to establish a racial hierarchy and a cleansing within it. As such the author was clearly inspired by the liberal vision on white supremacy and nazism.
The only thing they may have in common is their desire to undemocratically size power in order to achieve their ideals.
Kayden Jones
Yes it's absurd, but that's the Obscurus plot in the Fantastic Beasts movie with Credance being beaten and the african girl who died in Newt's arms. It's the continuation of the Deathly Hallows story about the Dumbledore family being destroyed by a few muggle bullies.
Brandon Perez
We all understand that this is the typical (((Hollywood))) narrative, trying to psychologically destroy any notions of Blood and Soil in the minds of the Goyim, to pave the way for their Globalist World Order, correct?
Narratives like this are so common in their Media, that they could easily be called sub-plots.
Wyatt Reed
>bitching about sci fi photoshops in a thread where the OP is literally "Grindelwald did nothing wrong"
what do you, oh anarchist intellectual? a proper circle jerk about how the msm is using film to trick the citizenry into not wanting to return to the days of feudal europe?