He's got a point, you know.
He's got a point, you know
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.org
twitter.com
But they've repeatedly said that the President is not the target of a criminal investigation
he would have a point if politics was still a layman's game.
it's not.
it belongs to the horsemen now, op.
and in what case will they be ruling?
You and he are both idiots. The POTUS cannot be under criminal investigation. Ever.
>"effectively"
Trump either is or isn't and he ISN'T under investigation.
>“effectively under criminal investigation”
What the fuck does that mean user?
Either charge Trump with something (anything!) or BTFO
Check your history fag yes he can
but he's not
No, he doesn't. The responsibility of removing, charging, convicting, and sentencing a President lies with Congress. The Supreme Court has zero say in it.
He isn’t under investigation and he isn’t picking a judge that’d be deciding cases involving him.
B-but why are my feelings hurt drumfilstiltskin? Checkmate
>pick his own judges
does he think someone's just going to hand the SC judges a piece of paper that says "Impeach Blumpf: Circle One YES NO"
Leftist nuspeak is a trip. "Not" = "effectively," gotta add that to the repertoire.
checks and balances
Trump isn’t under investigation at all
He isn't under investigation. How have liberals still not figured out that the Mueller investigation has already given up on indicting Trump?
>I don't think
Good thing that's just his opinion then.
At the same time wrote the impeachment of Clinton...?
Well technically the Chief Justice of the supreme court presides over the trail in the Senate. But yeah.
I totally forgot a Mueller, btw. Seems like backpage news at this point. I'm sure Roger Maddow is still talking about it though.
>vote to investigate election that trump was a part of
Now that trump is EFFECTIVELY under investigation he doesn’t get to exercise presidential power
just say it. the computer expert was barron
>He's got a point, you know.
Fuck off, snowflake.
Two terms
Two genders
Two Koreas
Two scoops
Two SCOTUS picks
True, but that is just a procedural thing, to have a judge manage the thing properly. He doesn't actually decide the case.
and even if he did neither of Trump's picks a chief justice
>Jeet heer
archive.org
Only to retards that know nothing about the US constitution.
Wait.. when did "collusion" become a criminal act? Conspiracy is an illegal act. He's not being investigated for conspiracy.
Let's just let AI pick the nominees from now on.
>The President of the United States cannot be indicted for any crime and must be impeached
DOJ re: both Nixon and Clinton impeachments
This is correct. Doj cannot usurp the authority of congress.