>Survive The Jive - What does it mean to be English ?
youtube.com
>History With Hilbert - Who were the Anglo-Saxons ?
youtu.be
>Kai Murros - The Coming British Civil War
youtube.com
>An introduction to off grid living in the UK
youtube.com
>Oswald Mosley - There Is Still Hope....
youtu.be
Other urls found in this thread:
bbc.co.uk
newscientist.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
thealternativehypothesis.org
thealternativehypothesis.org
twitter.com
Lads these markings are shite
How long until Theresa the Appeaser is out?
Rees Mogg for PM when???
>Brexit means exit
>We're totally leaving guys
>Britain is saved
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Oh man! Britcucks, not even once!
The elite wins again! As they always do!
Never even had a chance.
I'm seriously confused about genes and what actually makes someone ethnically English. Surely genetically we share just as much in common with ALL other human beings in general.
This questioning never applies to people with brown skin though does it.
Hmmmmmmm
>GIVE ME ATTENTION
fuck off back to Jow Forums
The whole cheddar man thing had me even more confused
bbc.co.uk
Not at all, I'm genuinely trying to understand how different genetic groups are categorised and what specifically qualifies someone to be apart of a certain group
You'd better bin those rights, bucko.
You're the property of the EU now!
there is literally a video in OP answering your question
Forgot pic
Cheddar Man was dishonest bullshit to make the non-europeans think they have a deep rooted claim to living here
pic related
What do you want you cunt fucking Panini He-Man and football stickers?
Is "Survive the Jive" a genealogist? I don't really trust what this random YouTube intellectual has to say to be honest
Our best option is to suck the cock of the European Union. Whether we want to or not!
The public doesn't get a say in the matter, because Britain is a Democracy.
Really makes you think, what you're asking is a pretty fundamental thing, that you have a genetic link to those who live in you're nation prior to you, spiritually and in blood, and those before them, and that you carry forward the torch, and your descendants. It's been written about extensively, is this a concern troll?
should I go for wank number 3 lads?
well he's right here
>Rampant papist
No
But I don't a have genetic link to descendants that existed before my nation did?
Do I not have a genetic link all the way back to the earliest human beings?
Is he right though? Or is that just what you want to hear? What gives him the authority to speak on a complex subject like this?
Yeah you can trust him. I don't think he is a genealogist though.... but neither were the guys who made the cheddar man reconstruction lol. Even though he is not a genealogist he must take time to look through studies so he can make his videos
So I'm confused, why hasn't Theresa May been executed for treason yet?
I think you need to understand what is the study and what is the spin. Suppose there were people with darker skin living in Britain 10000 years ago as the study proposes. What then?
The geneticists who worked on it admitted it was bullshit. Any contemporary "pop science" about race and ethnicity is coopted propaganda used in an agenda to deconstruct European ethnic identity for the sake of globalism. Once European ethnicities are deconstructed and can include anyone regardless of genetic, cultural or historical background, they become meaningless.
newscientist.com
>Pale skin probably arrived in Britain with a migration of people from the Middle East around 6,000 years ago. This population had pale skin and brown eyes and absorbed populations like the ones Cheddar Man belonged to.
>Prof Chris Stringer had studied Cheddar Man for 40 years - but was struck by the Kennis brothers' reconstruction
>No-one's entirely sure why pale skin evolved in these farmers, but their cereal-based diet was probably deficient in Vitamin D. This would have required agriculturalists to synthesise this essential nutrient in their skin using sunlight.
>"There may be other factors that are causing lower skin pigmentation over time in the last 10,000 years. But that's the big explanation that most scientists turn to," said Prof Thomas.
>But I don't a have genetic link to descendants
Neither does anyone. Ancestors, however...
Most English people have ancestry on these isles going back past the Romans, as most invasion forces leave little in the way of genetic history. Even so, it would only localise to northwest Europe.
I can't read this article without subscribing. Can you copy and paste it?
No bladed weapons mate, not able to.
Just fuckin stone her.
Okay, but you go back far enough, and our ancestors are from the Middle East, right?
Yes. And?
oh gee never thought about that, i guess youre right
Which is why you've never heard about it until now. The lie is on every front page, the truth is behind a paywall - but they published the correction so you can't accuse them of propagandising.
If you go back far enough we're related to apes. We share 98% of our DNA with chimpanzees. That 2% is the difference between poop flinging and space exploration.
You have a genetic link to all the living creatures that have ever existed. That doesn't mean yore a jellyfish. Or that jellyfish should thrive in London. Grizzly bears, polar bears, different evolutionary niche, but can interbreed.
Yes
need a licence for stones m8
Well it explains how fair-skinned people came to be in Britain. They absorbed the smaller Cheddar Man population's that supposedly already existed in the UK
if i remember correctly, its more towards where Kazakhstan today meets Russia.... the tribes who lived around there moved west into europe and mixed with neanderthals
Lads what are your thoughts on Iranian women?
Why are you asking?
I appear to be dating a (third generation) one.
I'm not going to stop you
I've heard they can be crazy though
is she cute?
Doesn't that illustrate how the whole construct/concept of different genetic groups (races) is kinda stupid
More so than usual?
>burned out of politics a few years back
>took a ‘igornace is bliss’ brake
>currently confused AF trying to catch back up
can anyone give me a quick rundown on PM May?
what has she done to betray us?
Well remember that girl that shot up google?
depends
some could be considered honorary aryans, others are middle-eastern mutts
Yes. 5'8 with Caucasian features (though almond eyes) and long legs.
She seems to be white Persian and I'm weighing up Jow Forums vs my dick.
what material you got for me?
gee i guess, wtf im an intersectional materialist now
Ah. It all makes sense now.
We all have so much more in common genetically as human beings rather than the trivial genetic differences that we use to categorise one another. I don't know, it all seems so insignificant to me.
Sometimes I want to identify with other white people ("my people") as a sort of reaction to the tribalism I see from other races
>tfw desperate for a woman's touch
I just want to feel loved, lads. I want to hug a woman and have her hug me :(
>A challenge wank
dumb frogposter
She's turning Britain into a vassal state.
That's the best description I've heard thus far at least, you'll be subject to all European regulations, without having any say.
Sure must suck to be cucked by the elite.
I really like this image
It's not something you fix in a day. Start with the obvious, shake them by the eye etc. Lift. Study. Work.
your dick
No it shows the opposite. Those differences are hugely significant, but they can disguise them in absolute terms because 1% looks like a small number to a layman. Europeans and Sub-Saharan Africans for instance have been genetically separated for around 70,000 years in completely different environments. That's the same amount of time as grizzly and polar bears. When they say "races have more variation within than between" that's true, but they don't mention that it's also true for practically every other subspecies of animal on earth - and these subspecies also have vastly different behaviour, temperaments, intelligence and other heritable qualities.
>Doesn't that illustrate how the whole construct/concept of different genetic groups (races) is kinda stupid
No. How else would you scientifically categorize the differences if not by genetics ?
I think I acquired it on Jow Forums unlikely to have been /out/, /tg/ and definitely not /lit/.
Also important, did her parents leave before or after the Iranian revolution?
Brexiters, area little worried that her latest proposals to Europe. That the British should show respect to Europeans by touching their forlock and calling them massa, goes too far.
I'm 5'4", senpai. It all feels hopeless. I feel suicidal
Madonna
hit me with your best
Not really user. We share something like 70% (actually is this higher?) With a banana. It's the top few % that really matter.
Regarding differences in intelligence, is there any actual legitimate scientific research/study that supports the claim that say Sub-Saharan Africans are less intelligent that Europeans purely as a result of their differing genetics?
Come over here you cute twink.
I want to put you in a cute dress before bending you over and ravaging your anus.
>We all have so much more in common genetically as human beings rather than the trivial genetic differences that we use to categorise one another. I don't know, it all seems so insignificant to me.
You can make the exact same argument to deconstruct the concept of species it's a shit argument
Before.
What's wrong with that? It's only a problem if you let it be.
>this isn't boomer posting.
What I mean is don't be panicking about your height. Can't fix it. Be the best user you can be otherwise. Tom cruise gets laid and he's a midget.
2D or 3D?
Why is such a high standard required for the radical idea that intelligence is inherited? What about height? By the way, either trait cannot be pinned down on specific genes.
wtf she doing
3D
en.m.wikipedia.org
Start here. It's 1am and I can't be arsed.
Fun fact - the legal definition of retardation in the US was dropped by 15 IQ points for the sensitivities certain demographic.
What in your view accounts for the difference in intelligence between humans and other organisms?
Looks like she's eating pizza user
Clearly it's nurture.
Koko the gorilla was socialised with scientists and educated, she was smarter than many ethnic groups of humans.
They can't definitively say that until they've fully mapped the genome and determined the genes and genetic interactions which are actually responsible for intelligence. We'll get there eventually, but it's a very complicated relationship to unravel.
If you're actually interested in investigating this, I'd recommend starting here.
thealternativehypothesis.org
And here for race and crime:
thealternativehypothesis.org
As far as I'm aware, nobody has caught alt-hype out on bullshiting in the 10+ years he's been doing this. Read the articles, read his sources for yourself and come to your own conclusions.
I reckon that koko stuff is bollocks
Why else would they be less intelligent ? Everything else is down to genetics... I mean, sure... a good education and the right up upbringing can make a small difference
Europeans separated from blacks, for example, around 50,000 years ago. In those 50,000 years, we have evolved under very different circumstances and our bodies (including our brains) reflect this. We are different sub-species.
Probably because something like intelligence can be used to justify discrimination and segregation
nah senpai were all the same, the only thing that has moved history forward is material conditions and the ownership of production, this is why we must level the playing field and break down oppressive institutions
She seemed to do better in her environment than many Somalilans.
I'm also seething that the average Somali costs (in Finland) about 20K euros a year.
You don't need differences in intelligence to justify that
But what actually specifically is the cause of difference in intelligence in humans, what is the "gene" responsible? How do we even define intelligence?
>purely
of course not because nobody is making the claim that it is purely genetic and no other factor contributes to intelligence, only that it is PRIMARILY or nontrivially genetic in origin
We generally define it by IQ.
>stop chasing women
if you are actively searching for a woman, clearly you are not a ‘catch’
>stop being overly nice
women don’t want overly nice beta losers, they want men. this doesn’t mean you should be an asshole, be a man.
>make eye contact and give a small smile
Leave the rest to her
Women are basic creatures who want to find a real man who will hold them down and fuck them raw. The ones who claim otherwise do so to virtue signal only. Behind closed doors they are as cock hungry as the rest of them. Anyone who’s fucked a few ‘feminist’ types will tell you this... it’s all a front for attention.
They want your dick user, just not if you offer it freely.
Guess you aint English den
nutted in 2 seconds thanks
>what is the "gene" responsible?
Insane standard of proof that I've just called you on. We don't know stuff like that about anything in terms of genetics, but we go on far less for other stuff.
Read the wiki article (with your Jow Forums glasses on). It's actually an alright summary.
Am reading now