Ignored and covered up for political (((reasons))) unknown.
>carbon 14-dated to 5202 (± 123) BC. It was discovered in 1993 in a Neolithic lakeshore settlement that occupied an artificial island near the modern village of Dispilio on Lake Kastoria in Kastoria, Western Macedonia, Greece.
Now compared this to the Celtic and Viking writings (will post below) of 500-800AD…
>Ok what am I looking at senpai? The oldest known writing ever found. It was found in Macedonian region. It matches Vinca (oldest known advanced culture in the world), Celtic, and Norse writiing.
It dates to the time of Globeki Tepe, so Joe Rogan fags might be interested to know that this is proof of a real culture.
I fuckin love looking at those. The one for turtle is my favorite
Mason Robinson
You are an imbecilic Nordicist if you think those characters even REMOTELY resemble Celtic or Norse runes. Neck yourself at once. It looks closer to fucking Mandarin.
Man thats fucking retarded. No wonder they never got anywhere if you gotta write all that shit out for a b and c. You'd need a fucking wall just to write your own name
Listen up you mongs, there's a good reason why early writing all looks the same. You ready to get your minds blown? Hold onto your butts because knowledge is coming at you.
It's because it's really hard to do anything other than straight lines when you're carving into wood, bone, or rock. All early writing started out being carved on those media. Wood, bone, or rock. Round shapes came with the advent of clay pottery. Some cultures never used clay for writing, even when they had pottery. Look at the Vikings. Futhark is all rigid lines. Ingwaz is as close to a circle as they used and it's a diamond.
So stop being dummies imagining Atlantis or Hyperborea or some shit. It's a mechanical limitation of how writing started out. You HAVE to use a bunch of lines for your writing early on.
Now don't have an aneurysm when you think about why pots are almost always round.
In its later phase the centre of the Vinča network shifted from Vinča-Belo Brdo to Vršac, and the long-distance exchange of obsidian and Spondylus artefacts from modern-day Hungary and the Aegean respectively became more important than that of Vinča figurines. Eventually the network lost its cohesion altogether and fell into decline. It is likely that, after two millennia of intensive farming, economic stresses caused by decreasing soil fertility were partly responsible for this decline.[14]
According to Marija Gimbutas, the Vinča culture was part of Old Europe – a relatively homogeneous, peaceful and matrifocal culture that occupied Europe during the Neolithic. According to this hypothesis its period of decline was followed by an invasion of warlike, horse-riding Proto-Indo-European tribes from the Pontic-Caspian steppe
I thought you were that anthropologist larper that chimed in with some deep insights in a couple of threads not long ago, but apparently not. I wonder if that guy still posts here.
I'm familiar with these. Apparently there was an ancient connection between Europe and the Chinese mainland, a series of valleys or steppes which predate the silk road; it went all the way from Ukraine, to Crimea, Caspian sea, (central asia) and last the xinjiang desert.
I'm fairly confident that earliest Europeans were of central asian descent, inhabiting those regions before the ascent of turkic tribes from Mongolia.
I didn't say it was impossible, I said it was hard. There's a big difference. More often than not people take the path of least resistance. If your writing system has a bunch of round shapes, you're probably going to change it to more angular ones and just tell people "Yeah, that diamond means what circle meant before". That's true of spoken language too, by the way. Phonemes in a language general slide towards simplicity
Of course the Chinese are the exception their writing system is intentionally difficult to both write and learn. Because they've been a bunch of bureaucratic assholes for 3 thousand years. If your writing system is pointless complex, only the elite can ever really learn it.
The Danube is an Irish Gaelic word meaning 'Black River' (Dubh Abhainn/Danube). Ancient Phoenician is more or less phonetically indistinguishable from Irish Gaelic. Irish is known as the oldest still spoken Indo-European language on the planet. The city of Vienna in Austria just mean 'Finn', as in Finn McCúl. It is likely that From Ireland right down to Mesopotamia and beyond was all just one big Empire, before the Adamantine races invaded in India and fucked it up.
But there were no Hebrews. There is no writing or lands or left-over pots, coins, buildings, scrolls. It all starts around 300BC.
At best they have some piece of silver everyone says is 200BC but they got one guy to lie about it at the University of Austine and make it 600BC but you can't carbon date silver.
HEBREW = "NOMAD" = MEME invented in the time of Greek occupation of palestine.
Also phoencian is a bible meme. They're not that old and not that wide spread. It's been promoted by Jews and christcucks.
>Hebrew. But there were no Hebrews. There is no writing or lands or left-over pots, coins, buildings, scrolls. It all starts around 300BC.
At best they have some piece of silver everyone says is 200BC but they got one guy to lie about it at the University of Austine and make it 600BC but you can't carbon date silver.
HEBREW = "NOMAD" = MEME invented in the time of Greek occupation of palestine.
i cant tell if bongs are really that retarded or just have a pathetic sense of humor
Alexander Sanchez
Phoenician (Canaanite) is Hebrew. It's the same language. Therefore, Hebrew is the first language with an alphabet. It's also the oldest language spoken today that is intelligible with the ancient language. I know you'll try to dispute this, but it's all true and verifiable. Stay mad goyim.
That's no radical history. That's generally what's accepted. The Celts controlled all of central Europe with the proto-Germanics in the North and the Greeks/Italics along the Med. Then the Germanics began moving south and started pushing the Celts out of central Europe, not any Indians. That Germanic invasion caused a destabilization of Celtic "society" that led in turn to the Celtic invasion of Italy and the first sacking of Rome by Brennus. The Celts were eventually pushed entirely out when Rome started to push up from the South. Eventually, the only Celts left were in Britain and then only in the north and east of Britain
Lincoln Jones
We can finally tell people that unironically believe that the Sumarian texts are historical fact because they were first to shut up
Parker Hall
>What are the implications of this? History attempts to tie everything from "out of African" and then into Sumeria. Academics, even Communist "Academics" are tied to this bible Jew meme. It's not real. Culture is older than Sumeria.
"Aryan" is actually the Sanskrit word for Lord. It is cognate with those words too.
Adrian Gonzalez
HEBREW = ARAMAIC FOR NOMADS They have no historical proof or artifacts. ZERO... It's just the (((Bible-TORAH))) stolen from Zoroastrian and Cannanite culture.
As far as Pheonicians go, they were extremely widespread. Their empire stretched from Akkadia all along the Mediterranean to Morroco and up North. The age of the Phoenician Empire, is irrelevant. It is like saying that the Irish language isn't old, because it is still spoken in a few places. The point is that both Irish and Phoenician share a common ancestor, which is even more ancient. Funny that you make a thread about white European languages being extremely old and then cuck yourself trying to make them seem less old.