Why are there no ACTUAL far-left groups in the US?

I mean actual anti-corporatist groups that directly attack corporate executives, shareholder meetings, etc.? This is a bit odd, since these groups certainly used to exist before the 1990's. But it seems like they've all been neutered and re-directed away from actual corporate power, and toward powerless, corporate-approved targets like "Nazis." How did the corporations pull this off, Jow Forums?

Attached: o_18o05d7c8178fcbktifljsk6ta[1].jpg (1000x1075, 472K)

because justice is real, not a meme like in europe
there are true consequences, e.g. life in prison, or death

What is the DNC?

Attached: clinton-haiti-open-for-business-246x300.jpg (246x300, 17K)

>too many helicopter rides

Attached: helicopter_rides.png (1137x509, 42K)

The non-meme answer is that capitalism is too strong here. The left themselves are just selling to a different market. That want in on the pie, they aren't interested in killing the pie. Too much money to be made to squander and stupid "anti-money" nonsense.

They existed in the 90s but after the Battle of Seattle they were coopted by the globalists and now do their bidding pushing borders = racism bs.

Corporatists.

They are uber-fucking-corporatist oligarchs. The difference between them and the GOP is that the Dem corporate oligarchy has a stronger base in California (tech in the Bay Area; 'entertainment' in Los Angeles) and has been steadily overtaking the financial services industry based in Manhattan.

That's what I thought occupy wallstreet might have been the start of. All we learned from that is that the machine has become strong enough to crush most movements against it. Everytime you associate occupy wallstreet with dirty hippies and not greedy jewish bankers you've fallen for the scam.

they are all trannys now

"Occupy Wallstreet" seemed kind of like a shill operation from the beginning - didn't it have its origins in a "campaign" organized by some glossy trendy magazine?

I dunno, it seemed pretty topical given that the economy just exploded at the time because of fuckhead bankers.

/thread
chrischan time

Once unions are dissolved they'll go back to killing the rich

To be a splinter party, you have to have something from which to splinter. The leftish party in the US abandoned the proletariat and became the NPR-sponsoring, liberal-arts-educated face of the Bourgeoisie; the workers went to Trump, but the union bosses stayed with the Democrats who fed them. It's painfully obvious to anyone who, bypassing the propaganda and the Bernie Bros, looks at the American political climate through the lens of the kind of Marxist politics that prevailed in the twentieth century—that there simply is no worker-owner divide that can be organized in any meaningful way. It's all chopped up and divided to hell and back, so that you couldn't run to the left or right of either party as an extremist group and get the support of both the unions or the workers, and nobody really wants to attack executives who are, frankly, doing a decent job keeping the standard of living high.

Adbusters. I used to subscribe back when I was a leftist scumbag. It was basically Jow Forums in print with shittier graphic design and a leftward rather than rightward bent.

Because communism is illegal, as in certain pillars of communism are against the law.

Yeah, but adbusters is basically dead and unheard of these days. People like "The Yes Men" are non-existent. There's not nearly as much work being put in to take the piss out of corporations these days and that's kinda sad.

Some of the most humorous/insane parts of the modern workplace (like conduct codes, diversity hiring, etc.) are off-limits to left-leaning comedians, and so they have much less to work with than is actually there.

I checked out Adbusters' web site. Same, tired graphic design that wasn't fresh in 2001, and still shilling the same "unswoosh" tennis shoes. The world moved on. Adbusters was a print rag at the dawn of a digital era, pushing 70's tier McLuhan memes as if no theory had been done since then. All the theory abandoned economics and class strife: it's now about privilege, race, gender, and most of all victimization. The victim has a need, and goods/power should be redistributed according to need (in the end, the same old socialist line about from each according to ability, to each according to need). Honest to God, Ayn Rand wrote most of the left's new theory into Atlas Shrugged's crony capitalist antagonists. That's all the bourgeois left, the college professors and virtue-signalling tech CEOs, will ever be, which is why they can't lead an old-style anti-corporate left.

The far-leftists over there are just used as useful idiots by boomer-Globalists (democrats). In the future though the """Hispanic""" majority will most likely form Communist parties which will compete against the dems 'n' reps.