Ted kaczynski

Years ago I wrote him asking him about how his views coincide with Occupy Wall Street. He wrote back stating in 2 sentences that even though he is in jail for life it would be a waste of time to explain to me his views because I'm a retard. I should frame it.

no ,
thanks for bumping my thread pavel

Lmao. He is truly redpilled. He will criticize you for bad handwriting and grammar errors.

You should actually also read his 2015 book Anti Tech Revolution, where he goes more into detail and shows his updated views.

what are your political views, out of curiosity?

Unironically pretty similar to his minus the bombing innocent people part.

Agrarian isn't a political view.

I'm guessing since he's on/pol/ now, he's a far right conservative. If he was with occupy before ((certain elements)) coopted it into a movement about trans rights and shit probably the same. Occupy could've been a psyop the whole time to desensitize Americans to the idea of socialism though. At the start of it they had my full support. Once they let in the nudists and gay process I was out. I'm guessing it's the same for this guy.

He was extremely smart, a math professor at Harvard or something at 19. His writings are spot on. He only thing he missed which is shocking it that you can't put technology back into the ether after it's been invented. You'll never stop technology from advancing. He tried though.

Looks like he would have been good friends with Paddock.

I was never with OWS. I was laughing at them from the start, and I was curious what uncle ted had to say about them.

Why are you on Jow Forums and not innawoods then?

>minus the bombing innocent people part.

yep, the fact you felt the need to include that while claiming you share views with Ted Kaczynski shows you're a brainlet. Have you even read anything by him?

I will leave after you pay your nato debts

Attached: 24d.jpg (490x564, 87K)

Given that I was 16 at the time and still in the propaganda machine known as high school, cut me some slack. Also, what's wrong with demanding the ((bankers)), ((real estate investors)) and ((stock brokers)) be held accountable for the 2008 crash? Thats what the movement started out as and why it was co opted.

No, i've never even heard of the guy before. What's he famous for?

He's the Unabomber

We will pay when you go home.

Attached: 1531327600736.jpg (800x705, 195K)

I wish he were married to Pam IRL. Emily blunt is bad at being hot.

Attached: 86FE7235-01F9-4DBE-BA20-2BBA589E26CA.jpg (750x391, 271K)

You literally asked us to be there you retarded fucking kraut.

Attached: 35753745.jpg (498x549, 47K)

Can I have a quick rundown on who he bombed and why?

Attached: 63C092E8-A8AC-4381-B66A-4705169D48BF.gif (300x228, 1.44M)

*grammatical

It's a good read.
washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm?noredirect=on

Autism

read industrial society and its future.
he bombed people to get a message out first and foremost, kept bombing people until newspapers agreed to publish him.

So it was purely for advertising?

He targeted technocrats which the New York Times had covered. The NYT published his message.

What he did was very very bad, and should never be replicated and/or have the victims targeted better and more politically.

not just that, the user below explains the other reason he did it

and he threatened to keep bombing until the NYT published his message, didn't he? I do know he recognised that the only way to get people to care about isaif was to bomb people.

nuffins

Attached: 220px-Unabomber-sketch.png (220x293, 38K)

Cheers.

READ SIEGE FAGGOT

Doesn't it make his writings redundant?

There are many problems technology is bringing, but ultimately it has a chance of bringing mire liberty, too. Venezuela as example - cryptos allowed the people to avade the consequences of socialism.

Another example is the internet, allowing us to see through propaganda/manipulation and educate ourselves on any subject, even challenging universities/colleges, history narratives and ideas of technology all around the world.

Technology allows governments to be more authoritarian (without the population realizing), but IF we ever manage to get the power back to the people, we can create freedom that has never been though of in any civilization before

he made shit bombs that barely works, shoko asahara should be an inspiration to all of you

smart guy but wrong in his assumption that it can be stopped. he probably knows the ins and outs of what will happen but read man and technics to understand why it will be unavoidable.

We miss you Uncle Ted!

>but ultimately it has a chance of bringing mire liberty, too. Venezuela as example - cryptos allowed the people to avade the consequences of socialism.
read the section about reform vs revolution in the manifesto

No one is claiming he got everything right but the man makes a great point in his manifesto. He predicted the rise of current leftism/cultural Marxism, called out conservative politicians for being cucks and a whole lot more. It was really well written. The only thing missing in his theory was naming the Jews, but I don't think he was red pilled on that.

he's done nothing overall spengler didnt do before him.

I sense sarcasm leaf.

Attached: 1531338839849.gif (304x318, 2M)

Have you read the manifesto?

i need someone like him to help with my problems maybe ppl would listen then.. its just sad that ppl build this shield not looking to the things that rly matter. sometimes you need to blast that shield away. for them to see thats happening

...

I think he was right in his belief but in practice was an idiot.

not yet but some of his writings seem to know the smaller details of the situation in finer detail most likely due to actually being a part of the eventually machine culture.

Read and be liberated from delusion.

washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm?noredirect=on
Read it.

the main conflict I find is that him and spengler both predicted it would be a disaster.
but spengler predicted it would be and why it would be as well as why it would happen before it even did.

Alright, thank you.

This boards is hyping too many schizos and fools to check out everything.

Does it include specified details about the nature of humans, too or rather generalizations regarding the collective?

>Does it include specified details about the nature of humans,
thats one weakness i think he does have
people are always going to push for progress

I will give it a read, thank you.

The thing is that the political/cultural atmosphere is similar to weimar republic and I had to spend years studying the world wars as well as cultural developments, but very very few critiques had new 'viewpoints' nor understood the nature of humans/collectives.

The result was hitler, creating an incredible system, but lacking knowledge of the natural needs/instincts of people, which created an utopia in the theory, but an unhappiness never seen before

Much appreciated

imagine having this bad of a case of autism

All things organic are dying in the grip of organization. An artificial world is permeating and poisoning the natural. Civilization has itself become a machine that does, or tries to do, everything in a mechanical fashion.
I would argue the notion that it must be broken down before would be correct however.
it stems from our relationship with technology and thats the problem it stems for the overarching societal worldview that cant be changed. this is not merely a feat of changing attitudes it means changing an innate almost spiritual drive that has remained constant for hundreds of years. this is what makes it irreversible and what keeps uncle ted's writings from gaining widespread traction.
the west is on a spiritual mission that cant be stopped.

I 100% agree considering I'm using a device that tracks my every movement and a web browser that caches my every typed letter on a CIA backed and funded venture known as the internet to post on an anonymous anime image board because it's the only place where "real" discussions are held anymore. Jesus, how far we have fallen from Gods grace.

Probably had a 160+ IQ, and was two peanuts short of a cracker jack box.

real hero
and a real human being

This is not how it works. You are right about the path, but the consequences are observable

West:
Depression rate of 60%.
80% dislike their jobs.
30+% arent voting anymore.
20% want civil wars.
Testosterone decreasing dramastically
Marriages/LTR destroyed

The people realize whats wrong, but we lack a solution and overlords ignoring the problems inevitably leads to societal changes

We will most likely see wars again to scapegoat foreigners for the civil unhappiness, but this distraction works temporarily only

What if I told you that was all by design and not incompetence?

I would tell you the design itself exists through incompetence.

Some people are great at identifying problems and exposing them brilliantly. Other people excel at finding solutions to those problems. Very few people are both.
Uncle Ted fits the former, but not the latter. His analysis of the left and the problems he foretold are excellent and scathing, but he leaves little actionable solutions.
That'll be up to someone else.

I have a solution to the Jewish problem but it's not pretty and would result in a massive amount of death and probably the destruction of life as we know it, including technology.
>The funny part is, the way to beat them is their own Trump card. I have a feeling that they are holding the global economy hostage with the vast amounts of wealth that they have kept out of circulation and by releasing it, they would inflate the dollar's/Euros values so exponentially that it would crash the system and cause civil unrest and upheaval everywhere at once, allowing them to take back control through force once the ashes have settled. It quite sickening to think that most politicians actually think they are doing the world a service because of this. So, the only way to truly be the victors would be to crash the system on our own terms and expose the world to what has been going on for centuries so we can all unite and "peacefully sunset" the kikes. Now coming up with a plan such as this is easy, putting something like this into motion in a kike controlled country is a very long and drawn out process that we don't have time for due to advancements in technology occurring so rapidly and that technology being exclusively in their hands. Think AI and Robotics. We could have a literal battle with kikebots in the future if we don't wake up enough people to do this soon.

It is designed, but populations are ressources. You want to keep the collective from resisting, but keep it healthy and strong nontheless.

Ideologies failed in this sense, so they rely on reactionary politics to keep the cattle in balance. There is just not one big power at play, but several interests within and this results in corruption inside the 'elites' aswell.

Elite is merely a person with major influence and this requires a strong ego and goals. Anyone can be influential, though - these people just have an huge advantage of their tribe/upbringing as can be seen with the percentage of jews in powerful positions

It is designed, but populations are ressources. You want to keep the collective from resisting, but keep it healthy and strong nontheless.

Ideologies failed in this sense, so they rely on reactionary politics to keep the cattle in balance. There is just not one big power at play, but several interests within and this results in corruption inside the 'elites' aswell.

Elite is merely a person with major influence and this requires a strong ego and goals. Anyone can be influential, though - these people just have an huge advantage of their tribe/upbringing as can be seen with the percentage of jews in powerful positions

Someone unironically blaming the powerful elites for everything instead of developing himself to fight for his individual life, is no better than a nigger chimping out for more welfare

He is right.

bump