So as a lot of people on this board agree its not natural and I believe it. Need advice in red pilling people in saying its not. Recently went to a bar with friends and had this debate. I said it is not natural because scientifically speaking, by nature, you need a man and woman to reproduce. While a man and man (obviously) can't. The counter argument one of my friends was that animals had sex with the same sex for pleasure, they say they are a part of nature therefore being natural. How would /pol refute this stupid counter argument.
Homosexuality
It's not a stupid counter-argument. Everything that exists is natural just by virtue of existing, but natural does not mean good or bad, it just is.
Doesn't it happen due to alcohol/drug abuse by the mother?
where are you getting at?
Yes. Sex is also a pleasure act, we can all agree on this. So when queers have sex it is strictly for pleasure. They can't have kids, so therefore my argument is saying it is not natural.
That it's a brain damage. Hence not wanted or natural.
so you are saying a pregnant mother who drinks and does drugs. Or she is raising the child and just a fuck up who abuses the child?
show them these
>so you are saying a pregnant mother who drinks and does drugs.
I have read that it happens during pregnancy, and that many homosexuals had certain facial features that are typical for the children of alcoholic mothers.
Fags reproduce by abusing children.
Rape and Murder also happens in nature. Your point?
Fags serve no biological purpose
We are meant to advance the species through procreation. Butt boys can't do that
just read through this
I believe that both you and your friends are wrong. Appealing to nature to justify human behavior can lead to certain claims such as that e.g rape (/actual/ rape, not feminist "rape") is OK because it happens in nature. Yes, as advanced apes we are also part of nature, but human beings are different from all other animals as in that we are capable of rational thought.
What you could argue is that if our whole species was homosexual, then mankind would be extinct in about 100 years. Homosexuality is not the default behavior of humans because of that, though some interesting theories claim that homosexuality is nature's way of counterbalancing human overpopulation. What you could also argue is that these days people are claiming to be homo, trans, lesbian or whatever just because it's a beautiful and tolerant thing, and that's wrong because they are lying to theirselves and to the world - sometimes to get privileges that they don't deserve (aka pulling out the "i am oppressed" card).
t. literally a homo helping you against homos, what a world
>I said it is not natural because
What do you m,ean by natural? It doesn't occur in wild animals? Thats not much of an argument because it does.
is bisexuality acceptable?
truly we are the most diverse group of cisgender, heterosexist, white supremacists in the world
>homosexuality isn't natural
but it is natural. Men will naturally fuck just about anything given the chance and the lack of other options, and if they're bored or perverse enough.
The whole point of civilization is set some sort of standard, i.e. 'fucking sheep is bad' and then you enforce by shaming people who break the standard.
All these standards build up to form a "morality" and things that ignore it are "amoral" whereas things that go completely against it are "immoral"
Homosexuality is as natural as anything else humans do, its just immoral. Progressives act as though its the way forward but actually its a huge step backwards. Every developed civilization on the planet left thousands of years ago.
Amen.
>tfw have a Jow Forums bf
life is good
shit good read user, read half but gonna read more. Saved.