Do socialists actually believe this?

>>He obviously has never meet a nigger.
or literally any weed abuser, it's why im against that shit, you cant expect apes with double digit iq to have self control

He's right, everyone is "working". If streaming can be considered a job, then anything can.

However, the thing is that they want people to hire them based on their toliet paper degree and worthless skill set that anyone else can do.

that's not what they're saying. all the steel workers whose jobs were shipped to china aren't academic elitists, they probably dont even have degrees

>the job tree

Yes. It's really disappointing and those that I've talked with bought this marxist narrative hook line and sinker.

I have a friend that's anarcho-socialist. What she thinks would be best is co-op businesses where the workers also own the business. They all have vested interest in the business so everyone tries and distributes the profits equally. Just like every kind of socialism, it would only work on paper.

That's literally COMMUNE-ism and yes it only works on paper

The worst part of neo-communism is that their gulags will be starbuck stores

but co-ops already exist in the real world

Massive greed hoarding is the world’s #1 problem, and the 1% should be plundered, but you can’t just assume that everyone wants to work.

There aren't many of them.

Just shows you're economically illiterate and don't know how money works.

Why to you want to "plunder" Musk?

BASH THE FASH. DISMANTLE CAPITALISM.

because most people would rather make a lot of money than grow potatoes with hippies. but it still proves that it can work outside of paper

Of course they believe it. Idiots actually believe what they think.

why would (you) defend someone with 100 times more money than you will ever make, whose main goal is to make more

You get mad when somebody gets 2 scoops don't you

Yes, socialists are retarded.

Because it requires a decent sized group of people who understand the economic realities of part-ownership in a business.

you have no idea what you're talking about. sad!

>I created a new brand of caffeinated sugar water, it is non-GMO organic and I put a cartoon donkey on it and sell at 200% profit
>company worth a few billion dollars
>I "created" thousands of jobs bottling my sugar water
Uhhh, did anyone really need more sugar water?
Does this lead to a healthier society?
What would those workers be doing if they weren't bottling an unnecessary, unhealthy product?
This is the norm in capitalism.

Now, when a scientist or inventor creates a light bulb or transistor or bottling machine, he either creates jobs for people who will work making things that add real value and utility to people's lives, or he eliminates jobs by making some work automated or easier to do. This is good, but it has nothing to do with capitalism. It happens in any economic system.
But when jobs are automated in capitalist system, instead of more people being free from work, they just have to find dumber, less meaningful jobs to do, like standing around patting down travelers at airports.

If a company is worth all that much, than there has to be a customer who are willingly wanting to buy those products.

And if a scientist makes something useful or discovers something then it will be used by companies in a competitive market, if it is truly useful that is. The majority of science papers today aren't even read by a single person, do you expect every single one of those ideas should be put to use, when hardly anyone even cares about them.