Why can't we just send the refugees to Dubai and to live with all the arab royalty?

>what are private borders

This, syrians are a disgusting folk.

but borders and property would need to be enforced by a group of people that agrees on how and what to enforce.... however, that is what we call a government. OP's pic is not a strawman as it shows how paradoxical and unstable this brainlet ideology is.

Attached: polinanutshell.jpg (900x729, 96K)

that's why you have anarcho-fascism

and who gets to do the fascisming in an anarchy? the sandniggers.

but the sandniggers are all removed...

then you have to use a non-anarchic system beforehand to do so, and I doubt the arm of that unit with all the weapons would give up their goodies and positions freely. I'd be honest, I'd become a general in a league for that goal and than go Junta too.

Because Gulf Arab was for Gulfies & White Only

this, scorpion and frog > farmer and viper

Attached: tfw drive.png (500x500, 205K)

Borders will be protected by company cartels and child soldiers.

and then you breed a generation of PTSD or even psychotic serial killers. Children also are not naive at all and couldn't be manipulated or tricked by ultra-rich arab oligarchs and their 135 wives. If you want a group to operate safely and loyally, you want Mutual dependance with somebody. That's why the Russian gas trade is good for both NATO and Russia. we need eachother and thus won't go to war.

LMFAO!!!

Attached: 4cPSH5z.jpg (482x539, 185K)

yeah that's totally sustainable and profitable

Dont worry about the arabs user, and I am not worried about the Russian either. Truth is, they got atleast 10 years to do something before their opportunity disappears. What Americas real problem is Mexico. They are a problem today and will only get worse if the do get their shit together. They are after all next to a very rich nation with plenty of technology.

And your problem is not Russians but the niggers that would breed like rats on, maybe not your country but the EU. You will see the difference between an 100 IQ person and a 80IQ nigger in your lifetime.

well, Mexican cartels got concentration camps and i'm sure you had the pleasure of seeing their gore pics what they do to their victims. Trump is a cuck when it comes to true warfare, Assad's poisonmongering tactics demonstrated so. The USA has fantastic aerial surveillance and plenty of oil for processing into napalm. Go do some foreign aid, isolationism won't solve the anarchic cartel situation.

>Implying the ancaps wouldn't shoot the jihadists

''shoot your allies for gold bar''

ancap turns around
''yes master Abdellahaslamihammad''

>open-borders with private property
>letting in aggressors when in any sane society with guns they would be shot out of self-defense.
Hmmm, why does every arguments statists have against ancap, it's always fundamentally flawed as to show they don't even know what the fuck they are arguing against.

anybody that argues for anarchy or total capitalism, not the modern planned economy + free market mix, is not sane. Humanity in it's modern form is not sane. all I need to do is throw a shiny rock at your fellow ancaps and I can get them to skullfuck children through their eye sockets. Capitalist means amoral grubber and communist means amoral gun-toter.

I kinda agree with your point, and I feel that this problem is failure of democracy. We have to jump too many hoops to get a land invasion running on Mexico, and then theirs going to be backlash from our "allies" for defending our border. I want us to pull back from nation, and after we, do you will see Russia's true face. Your country will be fine though, most likely Poland and Belarus and the surrounding country won't. The military difference is just too big.

I hate to admit it but our problem will never be resolve on time. I can see the future.

>not the modern planned economy + free market mix, is not sane
Not an argument. Also if a market has planned elements within it, it is not free. You can't save your penny and eat the cake. It's either free or it isn't. Planned economy has been tried before, in it's moderate and extreme forms, and it hasn't worked has optimally as most would hope. Why is it not sane to look for an alternative to a flawed system.
>Humanity in it's modern form is not sane.
Then why is it sane to want the *modern* mixed market?
>all I need to do is throw a shiny rock at your fellow ancaps and I can get them to skullfuck children through their eye sockets.
A meaningless strawmen that only recognizes the want for monetary value, but completely flies over social ramifications.
>Capitalist means amoral grubber
Meaningless statement.
>communist means amoral gun-toter.
What??

Attached: 1520235702102.jpg (600x420, 38K)

Dubai didn’t create that mess. Why should it deal with the consequences, you irredeemable faggot?

Attached: D15AF34E-B74A-4D7B-8171-BFED2A03F1F7.jpg (453x230, 83K)

if not Dubai, then why not Qatar or Saudi Arabia?

i'm sure they can afford it. and they share the same religion.

Truth

there are no social ramifications if there are only 3 people involved in a anarchy. Do you know what a totally free market led to? The New Deal, and that transformation saved the very economy of the USA. Modern freedom is a disease that allows uncertainty and idiocy to fester like maggots in a corpse. Russia has a ''zombie gun'' that implants suggestions into brains. Only a cuck would not use power when they have it, only a cuck would not eliminate their enemies if they can do so practically.

Attached: zombiegun.jpg (475x475, 34K)

>there are no social ramifications if there are only 3 people involved in a anarchy.
First off, why would there only be three people in a hypothetical Ancap world? Were you going off of OP's pic, toothpaste? Secondly, it wouldn't even matter if there was only three people, hell it can only be two. People are socially discouraged to do certain shit, whether there are 3 people or 7 billion. You must not be that bright.
>Do you know what a totally free market led to? The New Deal, and that transformation saved the very economy of the USA.
The US wasn't a "totally free market" during the Depression. The Federal Reserve had control over the money supply; something that wouldn't exist in a free market. Also the Fed was a major factor in the Depression. They created an artificial boom in the 20's by lowering interest rates, and it wouldn't last forever. The money supply also increased by 60% between 1921 and 1929. The crash was because of their interference. Most of the "saving" the government does is from it's own mistakes.
>Modern freedom is a disease that allows uncertainty and idiocy to fester like maggots in a corpse.
That's odd that you call it freedom, because we are certainly less free than in the past, at least in America.
>Only a cuck would not use power when they have it, only a cuck would not eliminate their enemies if they can do so practically.
But who would be the cuck in this situation, you or the government? Because certainly it wouldn't be the government.

THEY REFUSE THEM.

population density exists you idiot, the wilderness has zero surveillance and Mexico shows that the true nature of humanity will come out. The cuck would be the person that either refuses ot use an upgraded zombie ray, or fails to get it to do so. The current united cucktions is too weak spirited to deploy such a weapon. The EU certainly is too weak to do so. Why do you think we are less free than in the past? the scandinavian invention of universal Healthcare has made people free of financial worries when they fall ill. somehow americans are too stupid to implement this system properly, or they are too afraid of normalizing the wages & profits of doctors and big pharma. Something we did with enormous success. Freedom is not just being able to do what you want, it's also abscence of cruxes that limit your ability to act. such cruxes are overpriced tuition fees for outdated and indoctrination filled information and then get a paper you need for a job if you rehearse that info like a good goy. If an oligarch refuses you what you need because you can't afford it, and I mean actual need (pyramid of mazlow for reference) I give you every moral greenlight to machete-butcher that swine for what he is and present (((his))) body from the tallest Cathedral tower there is until the rot makes it fall and gives a satisfying explosion. fencing off suggested prior. If you need donor blood to survive but a hypocritical faggot is taking blood without donating because ''muh morals'' you have every right to stab that idiot and take what you have more right to than him. Freedom comes at a cost of somebody else, and if you truly find freedom so important I'd suggest going for the everyman. I don't think that's possible as the everyman is a gigantic group. I personally, would maximize freedom for pragmatists at the expense of everyone else. Unpractical ''muh morals'' and ''muh feelings'' people are already slaves to emotions. They get treated like what they are. Slaves.

Attached: glendaglitterpoop.jpg (1280x720, 55K)

Bonded insurance companies with standing armies. Remember that defense is 10x cheaper than offense.

Some people will try to freeload, but it's in everyone's interest to sign mutual anti-freeloading contracts and thereby increase their property value. There'll even be people who go around "flipping" properties that have no anti-freeloading contract for a profit.