Why does Jow Forums like dictators?

Because thankfully most people on pol don’t operate on your retarded ”muh freedumb” narrative. Become an anarcho communist or admit that ”muh freedumb” is a horrible foundation for a civilization.

>”muh freedumb” is a horrible foundation for a civilization
Eternal fintard strikes again. Somehow freedom and free association has improved our technology, productivity and life-span.

>Well uhmm it is because I say so, now give a tax cut to goldman sachs :)
You haven’t even defined what freedom is so how can you build a civilization on it lmao.

>admit that ”muh freedumb” is a horrible foundation for a civilization.
You're right people are dying to live in the shitholes like Venezuela or Russia.

I don't understand it either. Seems like most of Jow Forums wants to live under authoritarian rule. It is shocking how many people here want porn to be banned and other "degeneracy". Why do you want the government to monitor your internet access and control what you can and can't do?

Attached: porn_blocked_0.png (680x383, 166K)

>Why does Jow Forums like dictators?
Nothing wrong with them, the problem is Jow Forums worshipping the shit ones.
Putin isn't even a dictator, just some good goyim/bandit who got to the ruling position and knows very well that actually having actual opposion would put him and his cronies behind the bar.

>just some good goyim/bandit who got to the ruling position and knows very well that actually having actual opposion would put him and his cronies behind the bar.
I'm sure they could all tell a similar story.
It sounds like he just has his powerful internal propaganda explaining why he's not really a dictator.

Because they don't afraid of anything

Like sociopaths?
We shouldn't find sociopaths attractive.

Edgelords

>Dictatorship leads to corruption
I can't tell if shill or retarded

america is the most corrupt government on earth

>powerful internal propaganda explaining why he's not really a dictator
Wow so he is THAT powerful, some memeflag changed my mind.
All I can say a powerful dictator doesn't need armed security escort 24/7, especially if it's some basic task as putting flower to a grave (while clearing ALL citizens off the way beforehand).

Fatties unite

Attached: 1487826529173.png (233x221, 123K)

>All I can say a powerful dictator doesn't need armed security escort 24/7
They all need security, especially the dictators. This says nothing.

>They all need security
Hitler didn't.

>what was the SS

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assassination_attempts_on_Adolf_Hitler

There were 0 Putin's assassination attempts.

Every form of government leads to corruption
Because people are out to benefit themselves

You're probably wrong but you said dictators were safe.

So Hitler wasn't a dictator?

Absolute power should be limited in one way: everything should be for the benefit of the people
If you follow this one rule corruption is avoidable, private companies can function independently, and the state cant turn agains the people
Capitalism doesnt care about the nation, it will sell poison if it turns a profit
Even worse, it will sell it at a loss to destroy its concurrence creating a monopol
Capitalism is death for the nation just as communism, capitalism corrupts just as well as communism

Nobody gives a shit about your "muh statism" Libertarian cuck.

Go find something real to stand for.

This

JFK, Stalin, Ghandi, Tito, Lincon, Bismarck, almost all mediveal rulers... if you are a big political figure someone will try to assassinate you

This basically.

Attached: nationalists.jpg (708x1000, 201K)

Attached: Gasden Fag.png (900x900, 301K)

Mostly because they want to escape from the addiction that is the internet and it's facets, but don't have the willpower or self-discipline to quit themselves, and so ask the government to step in and fix their own personal problems

That's why competing groups that hold guns to each others heads are better than an unchanging elite. Aka Democracy is better.

Hello, memeflag, why did you ignore ?
>That's why competing groups that hold guns to each others
Does it mean when one side is trying to take guns from the other, it's undemocratic?

Small government works with white Anglo Saxon Protestants. Faggot Catholics and your collectivist autism, your religion would trade millions of Europeans for some “catholic” niggers

Not literal guns. I meant when the new government comes to power it will have an opportunity to prosecute previous crimes in court according to the law. They still have to convince a judge and win appeals, etc. but when the crimes are big and not political prosecutions they know they will go to jail. Having that knowledge is very healthy in Democracies.

Well it’s a good thing Democracy protects us from those awful things.

How do you prosecute corrupt judges according to the law of the previous "government"? Your libertarian faggotry will only work if these "governments" are the one and the same, which excludes proper "competition" and is undemocratic.

If all judges are corrupt then you fucked up and need to start anew. In existing democracies, to actually put somebody in prison you have to go through a judge and at least two more appeals court judges if the defendant disagrees with the ruling.
The governments shouldn't rewrite all laws every time. That's retarded. The constitution and most laws usually stay the same.

>If all judges are corrupt then you fucked up and need to start anew.
But that's a coup/civil war, not very democratic.

It can be a way to establish a democracy. Then you can be democratic for hundreds of years.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War

Why, what is the alternative?? Where is Russia heading in 2030 and beyond?

why are all of your arguments
>hurrrr u r stoopid

Then how would you call it when Jesus returns and sits for thousand years on is throne?

Half of those are not even me.

Attached: 1529717700146.gif (270x188, 1.78M)

>calling Duterte a dictator
>The guy literally gives free guns to people, he encourages vigilantism

my bad

Explain american civil war then. You did establish a perfect democratic society after all, what's with that war, a civil one, no less?
And you still didn't answer

>be dictator of some other mexico
>reports reach you of a growing famine among your people
>entire families forced to subsist off of a handful of beans and boiled berber
>fearing the worst you immediately spring to action
>using all the powers of socialism you send your troops out to sweep the city
>claim every cache of tacos, nachos, and burritos in the land from the greedy hoarding bourgeois
>secure the entire bounty of other mexico in the people's (your) name
>store it all in the people's (your) desk
>have a different drawer for every kind of burrito
>one drawer filled to the brim with bubbling queso
>visiting dignitaries note for generations later will note it as being the best smelling desk they ever had encountered
>the desk becomes part of your legacy, always appearing with you in portraits and dramatizations
>by your decisive action the crisis is averted
>the people (you) never again know hunger
>nachos in the morning, tacos at noon, and burritos in the evening, all of it dipped in queso and guacamole
>reports continue to come in of people starving
>obvious capitalist lies
>the people (you) are fatter than ever before, so how can their be a food shortage?
>anyone propagating these falsehoods is a spy
>proclaim that all such traitors are to be executed on live television
>eat an empanada in the middle of the interview to further mock the absurdity of the American imperialist propaganda

>And you still didn't answer >178703004
Read the thread, I don't have to answer that.

>Explain american civil war then.
Agricultural South and industrial North were having a minor disagreement. It was settled and they moved forward.The Republican got stronger.
It was fucking nothing compared to wars and purges that were happening all over Europe every couple of decades, including in your eternal dictatorship.

>Republican
Republic

One-ruler means 100% accountability. When people get pissed off enough about his shit, they WILL act.

(((Democracy))) means endless blame-shifting, endless pacifying deluded freedumbs that things will get better come the next election if they vote differently, endless revolving door of fuckers coming in to fuck up the country for four years and make as much money for themselves as they can.

That's what the communists did as well. They armed the peasants and told them to kill the evil intellectuals and landowners. How do you think a struggle session ended? Hugs and reconciliations?

Is this actually endemic to Democracy or simply what we've permitted to happen due to our laziness?

>Putin is shite
Nice Meme. Fuck off with this thread now. byebye

>One-ruler means 100% accountability. When people get pissed off enough about his shit, they WILL act.
They are STARVING in Venezuela and the regime is stable and tightening its grip. They. are. starving. In ... VENEZUELA!!!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_proven_oil_reserves

>Read the thread, I don't have to answer that.
You don't have an answer for Hitler being a dictator?
>Agricultural South and industrial North were having a minor disagreement. It was settled and they moved forward.The Republican got stronger.
It was fucking nothing compared to wars and purges that were happening all over Europe every couple of decades, including in your eternal dictatorship.
Why did you avoid the question, again? Why was there a civil war due to """minor disagreement""" in a democratic society in the first place? Just fucking vote over this disagreement and be done with it.
And it wasn't nothing, since it gave rights to the current voting backbone of democrats - niggers.
Why won't you elect him as your president then, you filthy germanic?

Democracy can lead to situations where actual change can happen. Look at the Delhi elections in 2013 when some random tax attorney decided he had enough, formed a party, won the elections and kept his promises.
In a dictatorship, the dude in charge only cares about himself and his clique. The opposition gets silenced one way or another.

In a dictatorship, you have one person to blame when something goes wrong. In a bloated bureaucracy, blame is diffused and no one is responsible. With representative government, nobody controls anything but your neighbors voted for the shithead in office, so society polarizes.

Venezuela isn't a dictatorship.

>You don't have an answer for Hitler being a dictator?
Both are dictators both have/had protection.

>Just fucking vote over this disagreement and be done with it.
It was a bit more complicated in that case. The South questioned the constitutional order itself because their whole way of life depended on slavery, or at least so they thought.

>current voting backbone of democrats - niggers.
That's a myth. There aren't many niggers to be a backbone. It's more true that Republicans rely on racism to make poor whites support tax cuts for billionaires so they pay by alienating most blacks. It's a shit deal I think and will cost many elections to Republicans in the future.

>Not real communism

>blaming dictators
>not blaming communism

Why do shills love memeflags?

He wants a based daddy leader to tell him what to do

Subservience is the basest form of degeneracy as it allows true evil to be birthed into the world. (For example child trafficking rings for the elite)

Power doesn't corrupt, it only reveals what was already within us.

Absolute power reveals the truest nature of who we are.

All of humanity is corrupted, some far more than others.

>Both are dictators both have/had protection.
There were no assassination attempts on Putin and he has 70% votes, so why does he need an escort 24/7?
>It was a bit more complicated in that case. The South questioned the constitutional order itself because their whole way of life depended on slavery, or at least so they thought.
Again, I am not speaking about republicucks or whatever. Why was there a civil war in a democratic society? Pretty sure you weeded out all power hungry imperialists during liberation war, after which you built a perfect democratic society.
>That's a myth.
You had 8 years of a nigger president and majority of niggers voted for him, what's your point?
>It's more true that Republicans rely on racism
KKK was founded by democrats.
>to make poor whites support tax cuts for billionaires so they pay by alienating most blacks.
>talks about a myth, while bringing another myth
Sorry to break it to you, poor whites absolutely loathe niggers more than billionaires. Also democratic party is chock full of champagne socialists too, so why did you bring that commie argument?
Proxies are too hard to set up.

Dictators are fucking kino

Attached: gaddafi-e1471358509410.jpg (1411x840, 155K)

Attached: נאצר.jpg (1157x1600, 313K)

Attached: Charles Taylor.jpg (1119x1500, 1.32M)

Then don't use a memeflag retard

Attached: texturas-cocoyoc-2009-158.jpg (1200x1600, 468K)

>be American; Land of the free
>wants a dictator believes will remain free

the Dichotomy of the average Burger

Attached: GettyImages-2809145.jpg (1702x2100, 319K)

I wonder what the Queen was thinking at that moment.

Attached: Queen-Ceausescu-2500x1667[1].jpg (2500x1667, 400K)

Aristotle theorized the best possible form of government to be a sole autocracy by a philosopher king, the most intelligent/wise person possible with the interests of his countrymen at heart. Its impossible to implement like communism, but it make sense that it would be the most ideal form.

This argument makes sense, and dictatorships arent inherently bad. 95% of people are insectoid NPCs, they need to be guided or they will just shit in the street

A very smart AI could care for everyone without bias. It could also decide to put us out of collective misery though.
On an unrelated note, young Ceausescu could have and would have fucked your bitch in a heartbeat.

Attached: nc-465x390[1].jpg (605x388, 49K)

> "Pulls out empanada from his desk during a live TV address."

Attached: Kek.gif (240x176, 538K)

>what are IDs
Learn to use Jow Forums retard.

And the starving peasants have to watch that fat fuck.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_proven_oil_reserves