Why don't women "date down"?

Back in 2011, a hedge funder was asked why he dated less intelligent women. His response:

"Dating a less successful woman isn't about wanting women to be dumb. It's about wanting someone who prioritises their life in a way that's compatible with how you prioritise yours. I love my job, but I work all the f---ing time. If I date an equally driven woman, we're both working 18 hours days, when do we even have time to see each other?"

It makes sense, but I'd never considered it. I've been involved with men taller than me, shorter than me, older and younger, but every single one has been extremely intelligent. I assumed that I "needed" to be with a very smart man. I want to be challenged in a relationship on an intellectual level.

But highly intelligent men can make for very difficult partners. They can be narcissistic, obsessive, rigid and demanding. They may have little time and energy for family and relationships. If you're looking for a supportive and nurturing partner, a highly intelligent, successful man may not be the go.

As the hedge funder observed: "Every alpha woman I know wants to be with a man who is as successful as her or more so. And co-ordinating that stuff is almost impossible. Why don't they just date some beta male who works in a bookstore and will make dinner for them every night? Doesn't every successful person – man or woman – see how that's easier?"

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-14 at 7.47.33 PM.png (1318x1088, 872K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3689109
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Feminism collapsed the economy and the dating market.

>women
>liking men more intelligent than them
Uh, no sweaty.
They like men who make more money than them.
But after a certain intelligence level women absolutely CAN NOT STAND being the dumb one in the relationship. The ones that got C's in school and don't pride themselves on their intellect are fine. But you get a girl that with to AP classes in highschool and college and she got A's because she is obedient and was able to do what was asked of her per the syllabus, these girls with a slightly above average intellect have egos the size of Jupiter and are the kid of girls that you can't say ANYTHING to without her trying to find fault with what you said and for her to try to prove she is more intelligent than you.
It's irritating and not what men look for in relationships.

I've always found highly intelligent women to be attractive. However, as your hedge fund manager points out, they have their own priorities.
My wife is above average but still no where near my level. She got a job doing chores at a vet hospital. I pointed out that between gas and daycare and taxes, we were losing money.
"Buah muh career!"
>But highly intelligent men can make for very difficult partners. They can be narcissistic, obsessive, rigid and demanding.
My sisters literally marred retards. Such faults are not exclusive to intelligent men.

it all seems like a pain in the ass. being alone is great once you get used to it, women can go fuck themselves or better yet find some nigger buck plaything.

agreed

>dating smart women
Yikes
Everyone knows that dumb women are the best

>the fish hole need chad chowder

Attached: goBT7rn.png (764x313, 31K)

Dumb trailer park grill beats an intelligent college working woman as a long term prospective mate. Bring her filet mignon every once in a while instead of balgona sandwiches and you'll never want for anything.

There's a reason state laws were made for monogamous marriage and there's a reason there were made harsh laws for adultery.

Women are meant for physical and emotional stimulation, not intellectual. That's what Jow Forums is for! :^)

Hypergamy is a biological imperative to compensate for the risk of death in pregnancy.

Intelligent people define the parameters of their personal "success" and pursue them

Wasting the most fruitful years of your life pursuing material wealth and "status" like it's going to be your salvation is something soulless consumerist slaves with a class struggle mindset do.

My mother is a Mensa member and she's a petty bitter lady full of regret.

>ALPHA women
Wtf

>Women
>Logic
Pick one and only one

>being alone is great once you get used to it

I realized this as well, but I still wanted a girlfriend to do things with and for companionship. I didn't want to date women with no prospects in life because that means I had to take care of them to live the life I wanted. Been there, done that. I was able to fix this problem by dating a woman that was unable to have kids, was smart and independent, has a decent job, and we each have our own homes. We can hang out as much as we see fit and then we go back to our own places. We don't have to worry about how much each other makes and our independence removed many of the burdens I faced in previous relationships.

>trying to explain female logic processing
lol

Attached: 1440997910181.jpg (630x721, 65K)

Could someone explain this image please? Thanks in advance

>He's right

t. someone who is trying to date one of those women.

It's horrible.

>Alpha
>woman
pick only one

Females only respond to really attractive men. That's the summary of all you need to know. There's so many horny men on dating sites that they can be as nit-picky as they want and even the fat disgusting slob women get messages from careless guys who will put their dicks in anything.

I dated a lawyer for a month.

...yeah imagine how that was.

Thanks

It is hard to find a women with a strong personality these days, intelligent or not. Most of them don't even want to show they have strong will or that they can impose or stand out among men.

>smart women

Attached: 1446158400417.jpg (1600x873, 126K)

Did incels just win? This looks like it is the beginning of the redistribution of the pussy market

Attached: 1934431256.jpg (465x695, 35K)

My sister is like this. She legitimately believes GPA=intelligence. She has no ability to imagine someone being smart because they read books instead of going to university.

lol no it's not. Literally nothing is going to change because of some article that'll rack up a couple thousand views. Women will continue to be put on a pedestal and life will go on as usual. Incels will never win anything.

Attached: abandon god and you shall be punished.png (652x1466, 383K)

The image seems to imply the opposite. Male->female messaging distribution spikes towards most attractive and female->male distribution spikes towards less attractive.
What surprises me more is the distribution of the attractive rating. Male's seems more uniform, famale's is very biased.

This. Who would want to be with some pseudo-intellectual with a chip on her shoulder, challenging every little thing you say or do?
The "dumb" woman is much more valuable to me than the "smart" woman, who finds herself childless, alone, and hanging from a noose at 35.
I'd rather have the "dumb" woman. I'll give her children to raise, a household to maintain, and a family to feed - very menial tasks, but ones that must be done.

females judge most men as below average. They realize this and will message average men the most.
Men have a fairly typical bell curve distribution.
They message women at a higher rate until you get to a 10, where it seems not attainable.
6-8's are typical game shit. 9 is extreme level game. 10's sometimes want you to treat them like a normal person because they never get that. Instead every door opens for them.

Not sure why women think freezing eggs is a viable process for them in comparison to sperm. It's like 10 eggs tops vs the literal millions of sperm a man can produce with one load.

lel all it means is women will then prioritize other attractive traits, namely height. incels will still be btfo.

Women want men who are better than them.

It's called hypergamy.

Men want women who have something less than them.

It' called ipogamy.

kek, get fucked

>It is hard to find a women with a strong personality these days, intelligent or not. Most of them don't even want to show they have strong will or that they can impose or stand out among men.

What the fuck are you talking about? Women try hard at that and either fail or make themselves unbearable, these days more than ever

Women are the destroyers of countries because men give in to their weakness that is woman. History has shown this time and again. Our society is no different. Women corrupt men and men are easily corrupted. Cycle repeats.

hypogamy*

?

Women want men that can take care of them. Aka, rich and successful.

Men want women that are attractive and fertile. To pass on good healthy genes to offspring.

It's biology.

>Men want women that are attractive and fertile. To pass on good healthy genes to offspring.

Would you date a woman who is stronger and taller than you?

Women date or marry sideways and ''up'' (in terms of social status), but plenty fuck down for quality genetic material, as an electrician who has fucked many wealthy housewives I attest to that.

Society doesn't value strength as much as beauty.

If she had huge tits and the widest fucking hips, yeah. But I'm 6'0" (phew, barely made it) and in pretty good shape myself so she'd make a good gym partner.

I don’t know what you mean, I’ve seen plenty of women date niggers

How is that relevant?

Good for you, the great majority of men would never do that

Nah, it's not that the men wouldn't- she would never choose a guy who is scrawny or not at least as built as her.

Do keep in mind my Italian friend that 99% of women are physically weaker than the bottom 1% of men. There's almost ZERO overlap between men's strength and women's strength. For a woman to be stronger than me, she'd have be lifting very heavy in the gym basically all the time, and eating tons of protein.

I'm probably in the 90th percentile or so of men for overall strength, so it's literally impossible to find a woman who's stronger than me. But I wouldn't be put off by it.

Which is exactly what hypergamy is.

But men would avoid her on purpose for the opposite reason.

>Do keep in mind my Italian friend that 99% of women are physically weaker than the bottom 1% of men. There's almost ZERO overlap between men's strength and women's strength.

Which is not relevant since we're assuming there's a woman stronger than you?

>driven woman

wtf does that even mean?

But if you marry a dumbass won’t your kids pop out less smarter than you? Or do you just have to discipline them to greatness?

Oh, yeah. Men would mostly self select and say "she wouldn't pick me" not "I hate that she is stronger."

Yeah. The thing is hypergamy is evolutionarily valid. The problem is our society doesn't acknowledge it exists because "muh equality" which is where all the problems arise.

>Women try hard at that and either fail or make themselves unbearable
That is not what I see around. Sure there are a lot of girls who *think* they are better and can stand out, but they don't really have the kind of personality to impose themselves or hit back at men and most of the time these girls end up getting disrespected without saying a word.

>not "I hate that she is stronger."

Actually this, because of hypogamy. Why is that you acknowledge hypergamy but not hypogamy? They are necessary to each other to appear in real life

lol who cares what women do? MGTOW is the only chance that a man has to not be miserable in the western world.

>it's this thread again
>hey guise, how about dem Fuckbotwaifus ?

Attached: 1510866159019.png (399x322, 42K)

Then why did you write "these days"? These are normal women

It is a new model from Tesla.

I know I was just pointing out that the assumption is not even close to reality.

>But men would avoid her on purpose for the opposite reason.
Let me normie out on you for a second. Most normies don't care either way if a woman is stronger or taller than them (unless it's a huge height gap, like 8+ inches). What they care about are tits, ass, face to a lesser extent, and whether or not she's fat. That's literally it. They don't care about intelligence, or wealth, or if they're stronger or not. It's all about Tits, Ass, Face, and BMI.

Because you're mis-attributing it. I do not believe men actually have a problem with women who are "better" than them. They simply self-select and realize so don't bother. In the case of the hedge fund guy, he self-selected for other reasons such as "time we can have for eachother" he didn't say the problem is the woman is successful.

The funny thing is women who want "driven, educated" (read: rich) guys think that guys actually give a shit about their career accomplishments.

I'm 30, make 6 figures, own a house, etc. And I'll take the hot bodied 21 year old waitress or barista over some 30 year old post wall career woman any day

>Let me normie out on you for a second.

This is absolutely not normie behaviour, most men would never date a woman stronger than them because of hypogamy, it's why you don't see Ronda Rousey dating a normal Joe or a ultra-beta dating a bodybuilder.

Come back on Earth, dude

>Then why did you write "these days"?
Because I live in a place where women older than 50 are the scariest shit. They used to have very strong personalities and could stand up, not these days.

>hedge funder
>alpha

god these people are insufferable

>I do not believe men actually have a problem with women who are "better" than them.

They have a "problem" as much as women have a problem with men who are worse than them. I am not mis-attributing anything, it's how it is

that's why women shouldnt go to school and work, that way they have a much bigger dating market

>I do not believe men actually have a problem with women who are "better" than them.
Pretty much this.

Driven used in this context means something like "extremely self-motivated". A "driven woman" would be a woman who very much wants a career and wants to advance in that career as high as she can go. For example, a woman who attends law school, joins a law firm and works 100 hour weeks for 5 years because she wants to make partner, would be a "driven woman".

Attached: 2-of-10-would-not-bang-1[1].jpg (584x558, 227K)

>strong personalities
>older than 50

Something tells me you are just mistaking the rudeness and volgarity that accompanies the aging of ignorant women with actual personality traits

Attached: laughing-pepe.jpg (399x385, 27K)

They do. It’s called dating niggers

I can save you all the time of having to read these type of articles. The headlines should always make it obvious.

>Women finding something to complain about.
>Men tired of listening to their shit.
>Women complaining more and blaming men.
>Rinse
>Repeat

Disregard women, acquire currency, call the shots when they come to you.

No, they don't. Men will absolutely date up, it's just a rare occurrence because of selection pressures.

>Most normies don't care either way if a woman is stronger or taller than them
I'm pretty normal. No woman is stronger than the average man. And no way in fuck i would date a girl taller than me. That is just asking to have a cucked relationship.

>Men will absolutely date up

[Source needed]

Women aren't as attractive or intelligent as they think they are. The problem isn't that they're not dating down. It's that they're not dating on their own level.

Google "Ronda Rousey asked to" and you'll see that she's been asked to Marine Balls and Proms tons of times. Sometimes she even goes. What strong women do you know of who don't get approached all the time because they're "too strong"?

>I wanted a girlfriend to do thingns with and for companionship

Why do I see this point crop up all the time? What is with this epidemic of socially inept men unable to form lasting friendships so they have to get into a romantic relationship in order to simulate one?

I have a close group of amazing friends - it’s not that hard. I have friends I go hunting and fishing with, friends I work on cars with, friends I do tabletop gaming with, and I always love to grab a beer and just talk current events, philosophy, etc. with the guys. I’ve been close to most of these guys for over a decade. Some I met in school, some in the military, etc.

There is a SERIOUS trend of guys saying they are “lonely” or want to date because they “want someone to talk to”.
Jesus Christ fix your life

>normal, well adjusted individual
>engaging in romantic relationship because they need companionship

Pick ONE

Attached: FCE7C541-01AC-4338-A527-275D0189ABC9.gif (317x317, 3.93M)

>dating
>being asked to dance

Just stop it, please

Lol, I don't need to cite anything, what have you cited?

Men will date nearly any female regardless of her status. Women are the selectors. Why don't you seem to understand this?

Correct fellow Leaf. Instagram and social media took the already inflated female ego and fucking ballooned it.

You sound like one of those faggots from the North. Come South and see for yourself if they are vulgar and ignorant.
And there is nothing wrong with being rude. Too many young girls are worried about being rude and hurting their social status and end up not standing up to anyone. Unless you are ugly, then they will be as rude as they can be.

user what if I told you I honestly don't understand the difference? What is a romantic relationship supposed to be if not a companionship?

IS romance even required? One part of coupling that is still strongly in effect is 2 people can profit/create more wealth than one. I am this autistic.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3689109

"Increasing SES tends to enlarge the pool of acceptable, available sexual and marital partners for men while it tends to reduce the pool for women"

This article will fall on deaf ears and change nothing, partially since it is a rather innocuous article. What this man said is the tip of the redpill iceberg and roasties will only realize how prophetic he was here when its far too late.

Right. Because men will date any women an women only select across and up.

And more and more they only date up.

What does that have to do with a "strong" woman? It exactly makes my point.

There are no smart or intelligent women. There are cunning women, and they usually get good grades because they understand the system and see through it.
As others pointed out, women usually get by because they are obedient, agreeable and create a good/passable atmosphere to be around.

They are completely useless when it comes to facing challenges that require perservance, aggressivity or where they start from a handicapped position.

Your pic is indeed weird. Females message ugly guys more than chads?
How is that possible?
Check the source of data on your pic pls.

An unwillingness to consider evidence that contradicts your pre-conceived notions is a sign of cognitive dissonance. Have fun with that, bud.

>And there is nothing wrong with being rude

Spoken like a true subhuman. Go back to your cave and let women act feminine and not like the cavewomen you appreciate, degenerate.

men find most girls good looking.

but women find most men to be ugly.

so you are naturally attracted to a semi cute girl because of her face and body even though she's average.

but she will find you ugly unless you are 6'0+ and look like a male model.

>There are no smart or intelligent women. There are cunning women, and they usually get good grades because they understand the system and see through it.
>As others pointed out, women usually get by because they are obedient, agreeable and create a good/passable atmosphere to be around.
this

the most high achieving women were still just blank slates for the institution they worship to mold them as they see fit. That used to happen in a relationship but they willingly submit to where the zeitgeist is. Those I speak of nary had an original thought or spark of self reflection.

>Because men will date any women

>I get more money, my pool increases
>this means that when I had less money my pool was smaller
>this means that men will date any women

Are you feeling well?

Interesting words. Point considered. Thanks fren

Attached: 1531312288115.jpg (750x597, 34K)

He's made some good posts and clearly "gets" the idea he must has a misunderstanding he won't let go of, and the funny thing is his misunderstanding is semantic only.

Is dating someone because you consider him/her a good partner the same as inviting a celebrity at a ball?

women's vote has been much more disastrous than that.

*snap* yup, this one's going in my sage for 1 post by this ID folder

Attached: Untitled.jpg (1871x66, 51K)

>I want to be challenged in a relationship on an intellectual level.
she want a relation to fuck or to play chess?