Evolution

It is natural selection, the very basis of evolution.

The white rattlesnakes will have an steath advantage in the city, therefore more will survive to mate and a new urban species of rattlesnake will develop.

This is what you believe keep your faith , you cant proof nothing

I read this article.

pure hype,

nothing to see here,

move along.

Now take those adaptations over the course of 10k years or more. Evolution.

Just like you can't prove that your 'King of the Jews' ever walked the earth, or was immaculately conceived.

nice try satan

Attached: 1469638685802.png (323x325, 10K)

This thread is doomed to become a shitshow so it's time to shitpost. I believe in evolution btw.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-14 at 4.11.55 PM.png (834x99, 37K)

Its both faith ,screw you buddy

>doesn't understand the difference between micro evolution (very provable) and macro evolution (a literal fairy tale with 0 evidence to support it and in fact the evidence disproves it).
brainlet atheists everyone

>Urban Rattlesnek

That is so fucking cool.

seen this kind of thread so many times before. no one changes each others mind. nothing happens.

Tell us more, lucifer!

Attached: 1527174220293m.jpg (903x1024, 305K)

Attached: 1529126035128.jpg (716x300, 106K)

That's not how you use pick one, you dumb redditor.

Evolution is real...
and it's in God's plan.

But who is right and who is wrong?

Attached: 1521044962729.jpg (719x675, 117K)

This 100%.
Plus Atheists are pedophiles

This was on DRUDGE and you're either intentionally misrepresenting the story or you did not read the article.

That is a rare species of rattlesnake that adapted to hide better in rocks; it just so happens to also help against concrete. It isn't an "urban rattlesnake" nor did it "evolve concrete camouflage".

Attached: actually.png (680x680, 124K)

>muh microevolution
>we agree that it's possible to move an inch in a decade, but you can't move a foot in 120 years!
get out of pol you simpleton

A few black stripes, a primitive musical instrument and suddenly it's black lol.

if your asking my beliefs i side with evolution.

>can't prove that your 'King of the Jews'

Attached: 1497188078204.jpg (400x365, 20K)

But that is what adaptation is it is limited to adapt a bigger beak to eat harder food , it does not grown a elephant snout , you would have to take the elephant snout by faith

Attached: Screenshot_37.png (561x528, 479K)

You dumbass. We know animals ADAPT. what you don't have is a snake that "evolved" into a nigger so it could get on welfare.

Quit sucking the scientistic cock.

Attached: image.jpg (327x344, 26K)

And according the picture we can never change each other mind

Why do you retards choose some random, ridiculous thing and claim yourselves victor when the creature in question is not that thing?
>HAH! But elephants didn't evolve into niggers, despite living in Africa. Checkmate, atheists.

>>Urban Rattlesnakes have evolved Concrete Camouflage
>Doesn't know the difference between natural selection and evolution.

It was a example a beak is still a beak , all things past it you take by faith and is not verified by science

Sage and report rule-breaking threads

Attached: Da Rules.png (607x788, 446K)

Please elucidate. I'm sure this will be a treat for everyone.

It's typing also changed to Poison/Ground

Nothing is "verified by science". That's not how science works. You really shouldn't try to bring science into the question, as if it's supporting your argument. Science is based off of evidence, of which you have none.

/thread

Also
John 10
My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. I and my Father are one.
Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.

Attached: %5C_Six_Types_of_'Evolution'%5C__by_Dr._Kent_Hovind.png (1148x864, 1.09M)

Then we agree evolution is a fairytale .

nah it changed to poison/ghost
it's ghostly pale and you can't see it, obviously a ghost

>doesn’t even know what the Immaculate Conception is

Really did your research on religion.

Let me elaborate: variations within a KIND are not proof of one KIND changing to another. Darwinian Evolution asserts that(from rocks and rain) single celled organisms formed, then became all living multi-celled organisms from pineapples to pidgeons. You will not find 5 examples of MACROevolution. Not even 1.

Attached: 20180706_040347.jpg (1403x993, 492K)

Not at all, but I take it your understanding is too facile to have a discussion; I'm just here to laugh at the Christcucks and feel good about myself.

>/threading your own post
what a cuck

i dont want to change your mind. christians dont bother me

English is your 2nd language.

Joseph got cucked...

Christcucks get cucked

Its why xtian boomer men let white civilization get destroyed by women and Jews

please define kind

>posts some retarded christian propaganda + bible quote
>/thread
lmfao
The way you all try desperately to attempt to make science and scientific terms work in your favor is amusing.

That's a little faster then you say it happens.

they even make up terms like "kind"

Its adaptation and natural selection , evolution is a lie

Feel good about your self all you want its the christ cucks who will be having the last laugh

Are you retarded? Have you ever seen tumors? Imagine billions and billions of tumors growing (nothing magical there) upon single-celled organisms. Eventually, you have certain shapes being built, tumorous organisms merge together and eventually form organ systems. You probably haven't even studied cellular nature; it's no different than crystals growing in a cave. Only people that don't believe in evolution are just pathetic, self-worshipping retards who are taking up space in a very mortal world.

Maybe Jesus will save you when Urban Rattlesnake bites you on your fat ass.

Thats an adaptation, which everyone accepts as a possibility in nature.

Evolution would be if that rattlesnake somehow evolved into an entirely new species. This is what people deny as possible and what has yet to offer any solid proof. The best they can come up with is bacteria but in most bacterial cases its a grey area between adatation and evolution.

Tl;dr youre fucking retarded

>and a new urban species of rattlesnake will develop

This is not the case. This conversation is always presented by people who don't understand the difference between Natural Selection Adaptation and Evolution, and the Zionist Media preys on this misunderstanding to convince you that Christians don't believe in Natural Selection, or that it's the same thing as Evolution.

The rattle snake has always had attributes in it's genetics to appear with OP's color pattern. It is in most environments a recessive gene, and not suitable for survival. In an urban environment, it provides a competitive advantage and is selected for adaptation. The same thing famously happened with Moths in England during the industrial revolution.

>But no new sequence of DNA was introduced into the genome.
A recessive gene was selected to become the dominant gene. It's still a rattlesnake, and it always will still be a rattlesnake.

For it to "evolve" into something else would require genetic magic. The addition of a new gene into a species' genome has never been proven to happen. It has never happened in any laboratory or experiment. There is zero scientific basis for believing that a new sequence of DNA can be naturally introduced into a genome that will trigger an "evolution" into an entirely new species.

>doesn't even know this bullshit concept we made up is supported by another bullshit concept we also made up
What is there to research? You simply stated it was true with no supporting evidence.

define a kind faggot
we have scientific terms that tell you about relation between animals
so is kind synonymous with species, genus, family, order, class, phylum, kingdom or domain?

Real Bible says Christ was never crucified, and I wouldn't trust anything invented by the Jews and their Catholic priests anyhow. Look what happened to the Holy Roman Empire which invented the whole concept hundreds of years before Jesus... They were mass-exterminated by Catholic livestock.

adaptation is evolution but in smaller time frame

No, evolution has no set pace. When the environment rapidly changes, creatures within that environment have been documented to rapidly change as well, within a span of only 100 years.

I atleast learned more than 1 language
show flag christcuck

Please explain what the difference is between adaptation and evolution for my amusement.

adaptation is not the exact same thing as evolution. Its not like it changed into a bird its still a snake.

But species are not well defined, so your argument instantly falls flat on its face.

> (You) please define kind
>still cant define species
>wants me to define kind

The Bible says "bring forth after its kind". So any animal that has viable offspring. I.e. a dog and a wolf are different species, yet they can give birth to offspring which can also give birth.

> (You)
> (You)
>The way you all try desperately to attempt to make science and scientific terms work in your favor is amusing.

Not an argument fag. Would laugh if we posted qualifications.

>Are you retarded? Have you ever seen tumors? Imagine

Yes, I would have to imagine. Because your "science" doesn't adhere to the Scientific Method and your entire theory is inherently unfalsifiable. You guys must be from the kike 501c3. This is a Christian board.

Attached: 1530643761959.jpg (750x686, 71K)

Ok so you are telling me that life sprung out of holes in the ground or came for a single source of life that has always existed but the idea that life formed after a series of fortunate events is impossible?

It is more plausible in you mind that life, which is dependent on abiotics in the environment in order to thrive and exist, just exists and always have?

You are fucking retarded. We have fossil records that show slow progression of organisms. We know when and where countless species first formed.

You are actually retarded.

Even history tells us that Jesus was crucified , you can dismiss all the magic , but you cannot deny that a man called Jesus got crucified . Yes everything from rome is fake

So salty. Are you ok?

Attached: Saul Alinsky (1).jpg (937x960, 225K)

this meme of trying to differentiate 'adaptation' with 'natural selection' is reminding me of when feminists try to redefine the word racism to mean 'power and prejudice'.

You know DNA can get damaged, resulting in entirely new genes, right? Your DNA is constantly being bombarded by little particles, which is known as radiation. The radiation penetrates your skin, and can physically collide with your DNA, causing mutations.

>urban rattlesnake
Soon to be extinct urban rattlesnake.

You basically believe that flies spawn from rotten meat.

Being concrete colored is a physical trait that is no different than being a dog vs. cat. Humans share 90% of their DNA with 99.99% of all vertebrates A human could literally be turned into a hamster; given the right conditions and environmental factors leading to those evolutions (or adaptations, as you call them)

you're mixing SPQR with a german christian empire under the name Holy Roman Empire
SPQR wasn't mass exterminated by catholic livestoc, constantie as a smart guy needed a way to get whole breaking empire under his control, everyone in empire mindles zombie and all power was in the high priest-himself
smart guy was this constantine guy, shame he fucked up europe for the rest of eternity

Emerging of intellect is not possible by evolution. Humans evolving from apes is very stupid theory and it is not scientifical, it is dogmatic.

Adaptation is how it sounds a animal adapts to the food the environment heat or cold . evolution says a dinosaur turns in to a chicken for no good reason

>believes in Big Bang or Eternal Universw
>no regard for thermodynamics
>believes in spontaneous generation and will kvetch that it's not the same as abiogenesis(it is)
>ad hom
>snaek

Attached: images.jpg (298x169, 13K)

>source: my ass

>Yes everything from rome is fake
Jesus' tale is from Rome too, so I guess he is a fake?

The bible is a lie and you are a useful idiot for believing an ounce of bullshit from any religious person.

>adaptation is evolution but in smaller time frame
No it's not.

>Adaptation selects from the current genome.

>Evolution creates a new genome.

I really don't understand why this is so hard. I don't feel like I'm stretching my intellect at all in wrapping my mind around this concept, yet the line of people with cavalier ignorance is endless.

>evolution says what I say it says
I don't think so. I think you don't know what the theory of evolution says.

have they developed any new organs?
regardless, there are idealist/pantheist/panentheist versions of Christianity that have no problem with evolution.
but materialist + evolution doesn't square so well. because there's no persuasive positive argument as to why a being should be conscious at all. unless you think your calculator is conscious, there's no reason for any living thing that is strictly determined by physical laws to need to be conscious of itself processing information. a non-conscious, machinelike lifeform would be far more effective at survival and reproduction.

JIDF

Attached: download (2).jpg (275x183, 11K)

All dinosaurs were feathered. You are ignorant.
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/07/140724-feathered-siberia-dinosaur-scales-science/

Jesus tale is not only from rome there where the groups rome killed they kept the real teachings and the real bible

People are this gullible? OK bill nye....

see New genomes arise all the time, simply by virtue of the fact that perfect reproduction is not possible. Is that hard to understand? Is it hard to understand that a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy probably isn't the same as the original?

>You know DNA can get damaged, resulting in entirely new genes, right? Your DNA is constantly being bombarded by little particles, which is known as radiation. The radiation penetrates your skin, and can physically collide with your DNA, causing mutations.
I understand that is the theory. Has it ever been shown in any type of study or experiment in over 100 years of scientific endeavor? Ever once? Even with bacteria and simple organisms? Show us all one example.

>no source
>no results on Jewgle
>this many (you)s
I didn't believe that pol was stupid at first

Attached: Screenshot_20180714-134832_Chrome.jpg (1440x2960, 995K)

You do know what an albino is? Color morphs are well know and a big selling point in the snake breeding world. You should look up some videos on YouTube to give a better perspective of how wide ranging snake colors can be.

There are no "real teachings". Jesus was a homeless doomsday preacher. Christianity was heavily influenced by multiple religions to the point that any originality is here say.

It is heresy to claim to know the truth.

Projection. That's what you believe. I believe God created everything in 6 days about 6000 years ago.
>science discussion
>natgeo. No .edu
>snaek

Evertiem

Attached: 20180706_040426.jpg (1440x969, 595K)

Adaptation means the same thing as evolution, they are merely the terms for micro and macro counterparts of the exact same process. When we just solved relativity in the last century, having people who believe peasant propaganda from 500 A.D. tell you "evolution is crazy" is like some sort of satire... I mean, what's the problem? You do realize that God could easily be responsible for evolution? Were you holding our to hear Scientists say that humans evolved from radiant heavenly light or something?

That is not what your fairy tale version is , you make up something new each 10 decades .. oh wait dinos have feathers now ... Haha i cant keep up with you idiots anymore