Sexism is when you get treated differently just because of your gender, OR stereotyping genders OR making a person into a sex object.
A lot of people here don't understand that sexually objectifying is sexism, too. Also in media. Look at OP pic. They're portraying her as a sex object, therefore her design is sexist.
Yet, sexism doesn't have the same stigma as the equally bad racism. Why is it that society still treats women like shit in media, while black people are treated with respect?
Other urls found in this thread:
knowyourmeme.com
twitter.com
sexism=being an evil white male
No. Read what I'm writing.
Sexism is treating women like equals when they are nowhere close.
Ok is a massive faggot this thread is gutter-tier trash. Who the fuck let you use the internet my god
OP*
Sexism and racism are both good, and the proof is nigger women. They are dumb on levels that are incomprehensible to the average human being.
That was made by men for men
It does not violate anyones rights in any way shape or form
Now go away retard
>made by men for men
This is not inclusive thinking. Why would you shut out half of the demographic by designing your lead female in a sexist way?
Nature provided it, we merely imitate what we can in art. Beautiful women are beautiful, ugly ones are ugly.
What women want is for ugly people to be treated like they're beautiful and for men to fuck men dressed as women even if they're not mildly attractive due to their masculinity.
Ok women want or think they want to be treated equally, I want to see women becoming waste managment workers, construction workers oil workers, and all the other shit men do that isn't sitting in an office in air conditioning sipping starbucks coffee crying about how hard they are working, where if you make a mistake you will probably be maimed or maim others. I am waiting.
Op talks like we care.
look aroun you. Highly likely everything invented by man.
Why not?
Being sexualized does not make something inherently bad. What you are hoping for is some sort of sexless, neo-puritanical future where only what you deem as "ok" can be sexualized.
I'm sorry, but we will defy you, and more importantly, human nature will defy you until the day you die.
Did you make this up from your ass?
That's another issue, but has nothing to do with the subject of this thread
Don't come here and shill your bullshit. That user gave you a fair and objective reply, and you immediately escalate to attacking their intelligence.
We don't even want to see your tits. Just get the fuck out.
Equality is Equality, or are some more equal than others?
Why make a product that is only suitable for some, when you can make a product that is suitable for all by thinking in inclusive terms?
It's not about sexualization. Sexualization=/=sexism. This specific case is about how they portray her body (butt) that is not believable in the slightest. And the reason they do that is because they have a mentality where women have to be sexy in order to be good. They don't treat men with that mentality.
>fair and objective reply
It was his opinion, stated as some kind of universal fact
I objectify clerks because although I know they are people with hopes and dreams what I need them to actually do is to ring my stuff up so I can go along with my day.
I objectify taxi drivers for the same reason etc.
When a sexually attractive woman is near me I tend to look up the goods in the same manner. Although philosophically I understand all of the above have personalities encompassing more than their utility to me, personally I do not care. I cannot care as we are 7 fucking billion of us and caring for strangers personally will get you insane within the week. When I want some eye candy I consider that to be a social commodity and I'd be damned if I allow some static noise from the left will change my outlook on life.
Cucks out in full force tonight.
Its makes more sales than a so called inclusive version so clearly more people enjoy it this way
If women actually liked video their would be a market for them
Sexism is when you get treated differently just because of your gender, OR stereotyping genders OR making a person into a sex object.
A lot of people here don't understand that sexually objectifying is sexism, too. Also in media. Look at user pic. They're portraying him as a sex object, therefore his design is sexist.
Yet, sexism doesn't have the same stigma as the equally bad the stupidity of OPs. Why is it that society still treats men like shit in media, while black people are treated with respect?
women are property
fuck off
>goes in options field
_ism is when you get treated different just for being different. How can people justify treating someone differently just because they are different? It's terrible!
Earlier today, I saw a nice young man help an old lady cross the street. Then he just turned back and walked right by me. I was going to cross the street, but he didn't help me. I shouted, 'ageist!' as he walked by. He acted all confused like he didn't know what he did. Then when I was at the store, I was grabbing some cereal off the top shelf, and this little woman asked me if I could grab one for her too. I looked at her an rolled my eyes. I said 'why? because I'm tall?' And she just straight up said 'yes' and had this puzzled look on her face. It's like she didn't even know what she'd just asked me.
It's crazy. I get treated different all the time just because of certain traits I have that are visible for the world to see. People think they know things about me based off of the outward face I present to the world. It's nuts!
>Why make a product that is only suitable for some, when you can make a product that is suitable for all by thinking in inclusive terms?
You can either have a product being distinct or inclusive, you can't have it being both. If you want to make an asian themed restoration and pour in mexican, african and european decor just to be inclusive, you do not have an asian themed restaurant anymore, you have an unappealing clusterfuck
Either search for a target audience or cater to the lower common denominator - thus satisfy carnal delight. It shows why the left is so degenerate, it tries to find commonality among all groups. That commonality is fucking, eating and shitting, thus that is what they glorify.
>This specific case is about how they portray her body (butt) that is not believable in the slightest.
It's artistic expression. It doesn't need to be believable, it just needs to inspire or illicit interest.
>And the reason they do that is because they have a mentality where women have to be sexy in order to BE MARKETABLE
Fixed your sentence for you. Yes, things need to be attractive to sell well. You will never change this. I will never change this. Some dude rocking a dad bod on tv is not going to illicit the same response from women buying products as a well toned dude bareback riding on a horse. (unless they have a specific fetish for dad bods). This is human nature, and it is not wrong.
>They don't treat men with that mentality.
Absolute lies. See above. The only men women tolerate in media to be fat or ugly is comedians.
>Sexism is when you get treated differently just because of your gender, OR stereotyping genders OR making a person into a sex object.
unless you're a man.
fuck off roastie
>Sexism is when you get treated differently just because of your gender
you seem to think that women are getting the short end of the stick in the gender differences which maybe be true for somethings. But the real issue with your thinking is the way you fail to understand that there are also gender differences where men end up losing out. This creates a sort of agreed upon equal balance of shit that the genders deal with.
>making a person into a sex object
Good thing women aren't people then.
Evolution shows that the attractive procreate, and the unnatractive are far less likely to. This can be practically shown in nature in birds and mammals. The attractive ones mate and pass their genes on, the unattractive die and thats the end of it.
A man cannot procreate with another man, only with a woman. Most men are attracted to women because of biology, just looking at one causes a reaction in them to want to mate.
A superior version, because you deserve it ;D
>not because of your post, I didn't read it, but because your picture is inferior.
>Sexism is when you get treated differently just because of your gender, OR stereotyping genders OR making a person into a sex object.
Does that apply to men too?
why does it matter?
so᠌yboy
>Why make a product that is only suitable for some, when you can make a product that is suitable for all by thinking in inclusive terms?
Because that would be incredibly inefficient. Have you never heard of the Pareto Principle? 80% of business comes from 20% of consumers, the whole point of a free market is to provide different products to suit different needs. It's really not that difficult to understand
Sexism is fake jewish bullshit.
>I objectify clerks because although I know they are people with hopes and dreams what I need them to actually do is to ring my stuff up so I can go along with my day.
As someone who works as a cashier, I want to be objectified and not treated like a human being and forced into awkward as fuck personal conversations with customers.
>Sexism is when you get treated differently just because of your gender
Wrong.
>OR stereotyping genders
Correct. Acknowledging the inherent and natural differences between genders, also known as 'reality', is what marxism calls "sexism".
>OR making a person into a sex object.
Also wrong.
Not everything needs to be inclusive.
It's okay to have separate media for men and women.
They like different things, it's perfectly natural.
Moreover, what modern feminism fails to realize is that these preferences are not the result of a prejudiced hierarchy, but the market. These products exist because the public buys them.
Yawn
Because sexism should be banned. If they can't portray women in believable ways, they should stop making games
We don't care!
>should
>should
>should
Why?
Maybe women are the problem and they're what should be banned or at least reformed for being such unlikable characters?
Well you should! Sexism is no better than racism.
Do people here even understand why OP girl is a sex object, or is it maybe a lack of education and knowledge that is behind this terrible attitude here?
Good luck in the world cup. Kill the gauls, amen.
truth
OP girl is supposed to be a mercenary. Does her butt look athletic to you? Or does it look sexy?
Thanks man, it's going to be tough
>Does her butt look athletic to you?
Oh shit, are you the guy that made all of those threads on /v/ about Samus and Vanessa's ass?
Anyway, it's a videogame, user. Doesn't have to be realistic.
Athletic butts are sexy
Rooting for you too
Yeah the floating fucking sci-fi ninja wings are fine but I saw her but jiggle a bit so the game should be banned and the creators prosecuted
>t. you
>Sexism is no better than racism.
Agreed, because both are invalid concepts with no intellectual merit, they're merely emotional slur words thrown at those with views on sex and race at variance with leftist dogma.
I claim this thread for croatia and the lord. Let us gather in prayer;
O heavenly father who has given us, mere men, the opportunity to fight in your honor. May thou please guide Croatia in their path of glory in the purging of the unclean Gual population. May their victory be swift and merciless, like your own wrath.
Amen.
The floating wings have nothing to do with her body. She's supposed to be fit, but the sexist developers insisted to let sex appeal take priority over everything else.
That's what sexism is. Instead of giving her a fit butt, that would make sense for her profession, they just see her as an object to look at.
Sexism is the radical notion in the current era, which was once common place, that admitted that men (males) and women (females) are suited to different tasks, and shouldn't be held to the same standard on these tasks, and that biologically they can't compete against each other because it's a waste of time and resources.
People decrying women for looking good are either jealous of these women, or simply want to exhibit control over men.
The example in your OP is point B.
>lib
>static definitions
we are all furiously taking notes about your sermon
Why is sexism or racism bad
Maybe it's good to acknowledge the truth
Maybe white men just have more potential than black women
Prove me wrong, if you even have the capacity. My proof is reality. You already accept my premise by accepting that white men have any form of social privilege.
>Does her butt look athletic to you? Or does it look sexy?
yes
She is an object to look at, she is a character model, and the point of character models is to be appealing. The only reason to put realism over appearances is if you prefer a realistic looking character to an attractive one, but if you are doing that you should also object to the floating wings.
Of course you aren't, you aren't some autistic /v/irgin that goes into a fit over realism, you just want some brownie points for figuring out a reason to be annoyed at video games. I don't know why, people will theorise all kinds of shit but you can just tell me.
My advice to you is just forget about it, there's no point living by double standards, it just gets tedious. Either pick realism or aesthetic.
does the left?
the definition seems to be changing every day
>sexism is acting like a normal human being
Okay gotcha faggot
Lol Your bait is weak.
>women are the most evil of the sexes
>blacks are the most evil of the races
like martin luther king said "they will not be judged by the color of their skin (or sex) but by the content of their character"
it just they were found to be lacking in character
I'm surprised this isn't a slide thread. I'm even more surprised someone as stupid as OP could figure out how to post on /pol.
Yes, nearly everyone on the planet understands what feminists think sexism is. They just aren't dumb enough to believe that nonsense.
You make a good point! I'm an ironclad man of the lord. If nintendo can't get their armor game on point they should just stop making games.
Women get to treat men like shit most of their lifes and, while it's illegal and socially unacceptable to treat women poorly and you can get in a lot of trouble for it, there are no legal measures or associations for men.
Hollywood treats everybody like shit. There are many men and women that benefit from it and many adults and children that suffer the consequences.
words have meanings
also
thats not sexism
>Believable way
So a stupid vapid thot? Gotcha faggot
We think both racism and sexism are necessary and based on scientific proof. So why exactly are you telling us things we already know and don't care about?
posr more
Why get upset about it? Do you want to put an end to free will? If we are I vote we remove the free will of people who desire to remove other people's free will. This isn't a paradox, desire and reaction are not the same.
fuck off, in show we want sexist stereotypes , cause that's what normal people like to see
> Do you want to put an end to free will?
yes
they do
see
sexual
not sexist
Sexism is the backdoor from Jews to place their wives into positions of power in politics and industry and push white men out of their countries.
>mfw OP gets swamped by one post by this ID autists so she leaves the thread in panic so I don't get to finish BTFOing her
fuck you autists
sniff my cheesefarts
go on
>two posts by this ID
you aight white boi
>Why make a product that is only suitable for some
Is this bait? If you try to please everyone you end up pleasing no one. This is retarded on several different levels, first off try to apply this logic to shoe sizes, secondly, try to apply this logic to movie genres, lastly try to apply this logic to food. Taste is taste, you need a core audience or you won't have an audience in the first place.
only stupid abbos, like yourself, need more than one post to counter a stupid question like the one op asked
I don't, but if they reply to you they become invested so you can hit them with the BTFO and they have to reply or accept the BTFO.
What this faggot said.
Shameful display for an Austist to take several posts to BTFO a leftist shitposter.
*shamefur dispray
If you got banned for posting porn on Jow Forums, that wasnt porn, and mods are fags
if not
POST MROE
shamefur?
owo
See
Once they reply you're having a conversation, and they can't just walk away from that without leaving the thread. I hit them with a pretty solid BTFO and because we had already replied to each other they had to address it and when you type a reply you have to think about it more, and realise you're wrong, as opposed to just disregarding random posts as sexist russian bots.
Are you a jap or something? Say it properly, newfag.
Not worth the time, I hope you're saging these shitposts as well. This thread doesn't deserve life.
how long have you been here?
see
note:
dates
Woah kid! put the image macro down, it's just a joke.
>air conditioned
Even there they complain that it’s too could
Meanwhile the guys installing the new ac unit on the buildings black rubber roof in 95 degree heat are not allowed in the building because they might look at a woman for more than a second and make her uncomfortable
>only pretending to retard
*zzzzzzzzzzzzz*
Thats not a person
Please look at the flag change in the upper right hand corner you heretic.
no
im fine
>not worth the time
winning arguments on Jow Forums is a hobby
announcing sage is a bannable offence
and i like breaking captcha to fuck google
>Sexism is when you get treated differently just because of your gender, OR stereotyping genders OR making a person into a sex object.
Do you want me to fight a woman like a man if she looks at me the wrong way? in the same way I do a man? Women DO NOT want to be treated like men (and no woman I have ever met wants to be), trust me.
Do you want women to fight men in the UFC?
Do you want me to understand when a woman is on a period and wants time off or shall I treat her as I do men and tell her to toughen up and stop acting like a fucking baby?
If you're a woman and you're being attacked, then you call for a man to help is she being sexist for not asking the woman next to me instead?
See the problem is that women and feminists are just as sexist as men, when do feminists get angry when men are objectified to pander to gay guys? never, they find it amusing. When you do this you're never going to get what you want because you aren't making allies with people on the opposing side. All you do is toughen resolve against you.
Also mens brains are "thing" orientated so they objectify women into a sex object naturally, you can't change that and it's not wrong. Just because womens brains aren't the same it doesn't make it bad.
When I bust a nut I'm not thinking about a womans personality or how they feel when cuddling, I'm staring at the shape of her tits, her legs, her hips and her ass. Almost all men are like this and it's not even optional, it's how we are hardwired to be turned on.
Our society simply cannot function without sexism and objectification.