Can somebody please assassinate her?
Honestly tho before Canada turns into a total cuckhold disgrace
How stupid is this dumb bitch ? Can you imagine the crime nobody would work everybody would become an addict or dealer , can you see how this great nation would turn to shit
>I'll pay 1 bottle of maple syrup if somebody shoots her even an injury would be acceptable
Other urls found in this thread:
sciencedaily.com
twitter.com
this is a good idea
the retards who think everyone will join them in drug suicide will fuck off and die while the cool kids do coke and smoke joints on the way up
In her defense, it's seemed to have worked out for the better in the countries that tried this.
My hope would be that decriminalization like this would result in more personal responsibility for usage tough, such as reduced access to the healthcare, or the need to pay a premium or something.
Feel free to email the city about what a great idea this would be , I hope her children get rapped and beat down by some junkie and then when she goes to visit them at the hospital she is robbed and pistol whipped by a drug dealer
I want to do lsd and dmt once
I also want medical lsd for when Ill be on my dying bed
Can legalize rape and child porn then? It would really bring down the crime rates and make it better for everybody . Pimps would come back from the past and we could all do drugs and not work... but murder would need to then be okay as well b/c I want my own turf and lolis
Remember when /pol was libertarian?
You actually want ketamine for when you’re dying, look it up
I'm still pro legalizing all of it. OP is a brainlet
Eh sure thing bud, I can hook you up with some pretty nice assassins and stuff. Just email me at [email protected]
>kill those who disagree
tolerant nazis everyone
>one bottle of syrup
Thats like $13. Send me 400 bottles and we got a deal
Anyone who thinks other people will suddenly start using drugs, even though they themselves will not, is an utter fuckwit.
nope i dont because it never was. I think you meant ''remember when pol had more libertarian''
>In her defense, it's seemed to have worked out for the better in the countries that tried this.
Mexico is practically paradise.
I want it to be legal to kill people, I mean WHY NOT ??
>canada is such a free caring nation !
send us your immagrants so we can work even harder to pay MORE taxes !!! Bring all your drugs here and destroy our society!!
I kinda agree with her.... I don't care what drugs you take in your home.
Problems is you will come out of your home once you're high and start fucking everyone's shit up.
Jow Forums IS A BOARD OF PEACE
GLOW IN THE DARK CIA NIGGERS FUCK OFF
Too late
Rape or child porn automatically require a victim, unlike drugs. This is a shitty strawman.
I guess child porn if it's the drawn anime stuff would be OK since there's no victims in this case, and I believe some euro country made it legal and saw reductions in actual child sexual abuse.
If legal drugs results in less drug use, less OD, less cost to society, then it's good. Otherwise, it's bad.
Your peaceful life is now disrupted by swarms of addicts dealers and crime
But you user are still a good hard working user , oh shit your house is not worth nothing and your job is gone because the area cant sustain itself due to degenerative activities 24/7
Your right I forgot that drugs are just created out of thin air and dont affect anybody but the user.
My mistake.
But she is totally and completely right. Criminalizing drugs is bullshit. Start by banning morphine. Then you’d have to also ban heroin. Then you’d have to control opioids of all kinds. Then you’d have to control precursors including outlawing possession of plants. Then you’d have to invade privacy to enforce the rules. It’s a slippery slope we don’t even realize we’ve gone down. And the crazy shit is that drugs are still available and everyone acknowledges it while having the negative effects of criminalizing.
Fuck k just don’t get the prohibition-tards
I don't think Mexico's problems are due to personal possession of up to half a gram of cocaine being legal. Otherwise Portugal seems to be doing ok with it, last I read, use among adults increased slightly, usage among underage reduced drastically, ODs reduced as well.
Also it's only personal possession of very small amounts that's made legal, not sale, transport or cultivation (outside of a few south american countries.)
>before Canada turns into a total cuckhold disgrace
It's not already???
I'm all for legalizing all drugs. Like abortion, it'll lead to niggers and spics killing themselves in droves. Also, I want OTC Adderall: the white man's drug.
Cocaine and morphine both come from plants, user. Unlike rape and CP.
Normally I would agree with her but since we have universal health care and I will pay for drug overdoses, no.
Fuck can we get a tribute on this
delet b4 u get banned
The dirty pork chops ship all the coke from their shit hole country to infect other parts of the world , what a great denift that came out of legalization
If drugs were produced legally then cartels and CIA niggers wouldn't profit off of them. That's not even what she is talking about in the OP though, she is discussing Portugal-style reform, which basically did zero bad things. Stop being a retarded illiterate nigger you fucking nigger.
google "cartel"
"cartel murders" if you want your innocence shattered.
So if possession will be okay then what about manufacturing transporting pricing distributing storing ?
Toronto is going to turn into even more of a shit hole lol
Why? This is a good idea. I have wanted the US to do this for a very long time. The war on drug is an empirical failure on all counts.
I
HAVE
THE
SOLUTION
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
That's all illegal. Tough surprisingly, sale, transport and cultivation is currently legal in the USA, Canada and Australia as long as it's medically.
While in places like Switzerland, personal possession is legal, but sale, transport and cultivation is illegal, even medically.
This isn't an intrinsic trait of those plants, user. Coca leaves don't fruit out cartel members.
Rape intrinsically requires a rapist and a rape victim. Or at least it used to. Now rape doesn't seem to really require anything but hurt feelings.
Drug addicts should move to Mexico and their they can do whatever they want then get killed because their country is a joke
>Can somebody please assassinate her?
This policy is actually a very good idea. Almost all drug crime happens as a result of people needing to get money to feed their habits. Make drugs legal!!
>CIA niggers glow in the dark
Do Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) niggers, like op, glow too?
The use and sale of those drugs require Cartels and violence. unless you are proposing that canada and the US subsidizes or the governments grow and distribute and sell heroin and cocaine after it's legalized.
If not then the murders and narco states will continue and even worsen, no matter what benefits your country gets from legalizing drugs
naw.
as a townie, we'll vote the douche out next erection cycle! shame she is not in germany or sweden... blacked!
awe thanks, makes me feel right at home.
#shitsandgiggles anonleaf
>The use and sale of those drugs require Cartels and violence
>Planting and growing something requires cartels and violence
Fuck is that why I've been getting into shootouts whenever I go to weed my tomatoes and water my carrots.
so then your answer is "yes" to >you are proposing that canada and the US subsidizes or the governments grow and distribute and sell heroin and cocaine after it's legalized.
and then what about the spike in violence, health issue costs and crime from legalized hard drugs currently illegal? it will be 100x's more than the deaths and crime caused by alcohol.
for
you''ll be fine with everyone having a cocoa plant and poppy and weed garden in their backyard? what about chemically derived drugs like meth or benzo? should those be legalized too? what about canned air? I'm just trying to picture your drug utopia. as it is what your talking about sounds like the ramblings of someone high on weed when they think everything they say is genius
ay yo let me stop u roight ther
>implying Canada is not already a cuckhold disgrace
>implying Canada is great
take your pink glasses off leaf, we lost all respect the moment (((we))) imported the third world here
>Can somebody please assassinate her?
Dont post this kinda shit. It's not smart. You arent a liberal on twitter. You cant openly call for that
>so then your answer is "yes"
No it's not. Fuck the government. People can grown their own coca trees and make their own coca teas and chews.
>and then what about the spike in violence, health issue costs and crime from legalized hard drugs currently illegal?
Those haven't materialized following legalization of personal use in countries that have done so.
she has the face of someone who's had multiple black dicks in her ass
>tackle drug addiction
>by legalizing drugs, leading to more supply, lower prices, and druggies all over
nice...
>you''ll be fine with everyone having a cocoa plant and poppy and weed garden in their backyard?
Yes, I don't care what people grow or consume on their land and for themselves. Why do you? Do you equally care about the people currently killing themselves with sugar or prescription drugs in much greater numbers?
>what about canned air?
Canned air isn't illegal.
there is literally nothing wrong with her suggestion.
you retarded niggers want to keep these drug addicts alive, when you could take more burden off of all tax payers by letting darwinism take effect.
you're worse than a white liberal arts professor at a blm rally.
>leading to more supply, lower prices, and druggies all over
Supply has increased over time, prices have decreased over time (relatively. Price of a baggie of cocaine is still 20$, the same as it was 20 or even 20 years ago.), and there are more druggies than ever. So clearly the illegal status of drugs hasn't had the desired effect.
Of course you could make the argument that all these factors would be worst still if they were legal, but that's not how it's been going where it's been tried.
Yeah good thing guns are illegal and the drugs are still worth something in canada and usa.
it gives the cartels all the more incentive to continue production instead of just making the drugs legal to the point they aren't worth dealing.
so because more people kill themselves with sugar and Rx drugs we should legalize hard drugs which have stronger addictive properties, immediate negative health and crime outcomes so that people have more legal options to kill themselves in even greater numbers? sound logic.
instead of worrying about a drunk driver hitting you you'll have to worry about a high or coked out person killing you
look at portugal
legalizing everything improves EVERYONE's quality life
everyone except drug dealers/drug lords because they can no longer gouge
use your fucking sense
>driving under the influence charges will completely disappear
you should just kys.
People on coke/speed don't have car accidents.
Too paranoid/attentive.
well no, look at portugal
in the usa for instance its been demonstrated time and again that every dollar spent on support/treatment is worth more than 10 spent on enforcement
it is the quintessential illusory paradox to conservatives just as most of what is clear to conservatives likewise SEEMS paradoxical to libs
they won't disappear they will increase 100 fold dumbass because of easy access to more drugs. most people would use hard drugs but don't because they are illegal
>Im too irresponsible to not be a criminal
>Im no longer a criminal so Ill stop doing the thing that made me one
Leafs everyone. How about the retarded MDs stop handing out pill like candy.
Maybe we just didn't try hard enough
>crime
no, it goes down when drugs are legalized
they dont need 1/100th the funds for 10x the mass of drugs
and with all stigma removed there is little incentive to ever try
youre not thinking it through
see
and
>instead of worrying about a drunk driver hitting you you'll have to worry about a high or coked out person killing you
At low levels of use, the alcoholic is much more dangerous on the roads than the pothead or coke addict, so unless the scenario is a pure addition of impaired drivers and not a replacement or semi replacement, I won't be in more danger.
>people have more legal options to kill themselves
That's their choice.
this is the retard logic of safe drug use spots. where you can walk in and "safely" shoot up heroin. they have these in Canada already. The world has gone insane.
those are ALWAYS harmful to non-consenting parties
which is why that is a strawman
drugs are not necessarily harmful and not inflicted on non-consenting parties unless someone is force-administering
>most people would use hard drugs but don't because they are illegal
You're a naive fool if you think the law stops anyone from using drugs.
FFS I can get the equivalent meth completely OTC at any walmart.
Or, if I want actual meth, just go take a ride into the scrub and look for some guy in a ballcap.
I said neither of the things you say I did.
He hasn't done shit to the drug problem on those islands.
And he has the benefit of actually being on an island and having strict gun rules and a poor populace. You try that shit here and you'll have DEA full of fucking holes all over the country. We have guns here and people can afford them.
but hard illegal drugs are just as or more addictive so if you legalized them you will have a ton of more addicts, not a ton of more casual responsible users.
and yes it would be there choice, but while high and killing themselves they will impact other people with medical expenses, accidents, violence and crime. which will affect everyone
Better to have them shoot up in places like those than in the streets. Less needles littering, for one. Less ODs, less deaths. No increase in usage. What's the downside, other than your moral outrage?
>it's a "people don't know the difference between decriminalization and legalization" episode
Decriminalizing something for personal use is not the same as legalizing the sale of it. Figure out what's actually being proposed before you start arguing against it.
the evidence of any proposal is in the "fruits"(results) it produces
look at where they have legalized drugs, most prominently portugal
all of the doomsday FUD from conservatives is shown to be fallacious
re-read my post and you will see you just repeated argument i replied too
i use to be a talking ego regarding drugs
but truth/fact/reality must trump feelings/biases every time absolutely
and so i looked at the fruits of drug legalization and found it was entirely counter intuitive
if you cling to your anti drug stance you are exactly like any psycho lib sticking to their ego's position in the face of reality, which is tantamount to schizophrenia
>so if you legalized them you will have a ton of more addicts,
That's your theory, which goes against reality. Do you have proof to support your theory?
you aren't most people. you are a degenerate who would risk prison or getting stabbed in alley to get high for 20 minutes. most people have jobs, careers, family etc and are responsible not to break the law to get some drugs. you sound like a nigger
no. i remember when you cuck fags were here before we sent you homos back to leftypol, though.
>Decriminalizing something for personal use is not the same as legalizing the sale of it
You're retarded.
of course he doesnt
he is a talking ego
FEELINGS (passions/prejudices) are more important to him on issues he holds dear
reality be damned
just like libs on ALL issues
It doesn't make a difference to them because they're arguing on the slippery slope too.
those are not the same thing
he is the messenger
so lets shoot him
seriously
sciencedaily.com
Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. In addition, the study found that the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible -- a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan.
there is an increase in usage because it normalizes it. its not better to die from an OD in a will lit building than an alley. theres a limit to what narcan can do. it actually prolongs suffering because addicts just keep coming in and using thinkings it's not a problem because someone is there to resuscitate them.
You legalise them by making them prescription only for long term addicts. When they did this in the Netherlands the number of new users plummeted because the business model was broken.
You can't be this stupid leaf.
Once all drugs are legal, there´s no more criminal drug dealers, in the same way there are not armed criminal buzz dealers or tobacco dealers.
War on drugs is 10 times worse than drug legalization.
yeah your going to have to realize that this flies in the face of white-knuckled "for the children, etc" crusaders who have decided drugs-are-bad-mmmkay and therefore it is incorrect
because of reasons.
no, that is a half measure
Thanks for proving my point, friend.
>you are a degenerate who would risk prison or getting stabbed in alley to get high for 20 minutes
Most drug dealing is this-
1. want dope
2. call dealer
3. go over to his crib
4. talk shit, laugh at fags, buy dope
5. leave
6. go home, vape dope
That's drug dealing for most people. It's not hollywood, boy.
and the extra crime that is supposed to happen is reliant on the insane current super high value of drugs (stealing them, or to get them, and injuring or killing those who posses drugs or whatever you are thieving to pay for them) which vanishes once they are legal, as their cost goes down 95-99%
>Drug use compared to things like rape and murder
Every fucking time. So many retards on this board.
see:
and
you are not talking to objectively-thinking, rational people
they have pre-decided that it is "such and so and thus" and no evidence will sway them, let alone solid proof
>He hasn't done anything to fix the drug problem
I dunno user, curbing the degeneracy ala punisher in his own city sounds like a pretty solid track record to me
>2. call dealer
>3. go over to his crib
Huh, around here it's
>Call dealer
>He sends a delivery guy to your house or meeting place of choice to bring you your order.
Maybe the local dealers are more service oriented. I was surprised to learn that biker gangs also insure the drugs their sellers buy off them, so if they lose their stash to a violent junky or rival, the loss is replaced at no cost. It's strangely corporate.
yes but the off chance someone hits you on the way home or you run a stop sign and shit happens and the police will add possession charges. that's real life. you are just early in addiction and because you havent been caught yet or havent had major negative consequences you don't see a problem
hundreds of sites online that illuminate every common fallacy but..... we dont talk about that
ah yes force and authoritarianism and punishment is always preferable to freedom and openness