How can christsoys recover?

This seems pretty explicit to me. I kow you retards will roll out the mental gymnastics though.

Attached: bible.png (708x338, 69K)

Other urls found in this thread:

newadvent.org/summa/3101.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Aethiopians
www106.zippyshare.com/v/K1YnmJ5P/file.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_New_Testament
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

being against open borders != being fascist you dumb fuck
kek

Get the fuck back to r/the donald fag lmao

t. shartblue

>Look, I took all these verses out of context!

Attached: No racemixing.jpg (1001x1050, 263K)

>Old Testament
>No longer under the Old Law, as it says by Christ in the New Testament
>Quoting what Liberals are saying when it's convenient to them to use the Bible even though they are degenerate heathens
So funny.

Attached: 1531706295514.jpg (1207x893, 922K)

t. masoracist dumb fuck

And yet the most xenophobic countries in Europe are the most Christian ones?

Attached: pli9lTE.png (541x448, 102K)

what is wrong with these verses? another atheist or pagan trying to twist them? you faggots see strength in a goofy, macho way that holds no honor, virtue or manliness. you see sacrifice, love and compassion as weak, not even knowing or living by courage.

you never read the sceiptures to understand their meaning, or the church fathers . you have never actually cared to listen.

Jesus, who came as the suffering servant, giving his life for our sins, is risen.

and when he returns, out of his mouth is coming a two edged sword.

It's this thread again.

Piety is the duty we have to our own families, country, and kin. Your random quote mining serves as no contradiction to this.

>I answer that, A special virtue is one that regards an object under a special aspect. Since, then, the nature of justice consists in rendering another person his due, wherever there is a special aspect of something due to a person, there is a special virtue. Now a thing is indebted in a special way to that which is its connatural principle of being and government. And piety regards this principle, inasmuch as it pays duty and homage to our parents and country, and to those who are related thereto. Therefore piety is a special virtue.

newadvent.org/summa/3101.htm

Yup
Yep
Mmhmm
All the typical shit lies I expected. Why can't you neojews ever bring anything original to the table?

Attached: 1530289593998.jpg (470x313, 22K)

Out of context for one, also it is not "foreigner" but sojourner, which means nomads. These people aren't temporarily staying as nomads.

Also, Romans 13.

You faggots have been at it for years.

Attached: leftypolyps.png (1806x1252, 125K)

amen brother. praying for you fascist fags

This isn't whole chan.

Attached: 1531590197570.jpg (700x734, 107K)

Didn't read. The word of God is pretty explicit on what you do to people who attempt to invade you.

>No longer under the Old Law, as it says by Christ in the New Testament
KEK, what?
>Scripture cannot be broken (John 10:35)
>For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. (Matthew 5:18)

it's honestly amazing when people who don't know anything about scripture try and use it against people who do

old scribal law from the OT was overruled when jesus himself worked and healed on the sabbath (among other things). this is why we don't stone children, avoid certain meats, etc like mudshits and jesus killers (jews)

the moral teachings are still intact however so the guy you're replying to is just using it as an excuse to ignore scripture rather than its scribal enforcement kosher hotdog style

>Old scribal law from the OT was overruled when jesus himself worked and healed on the sabbath
It's just that Jesus considered Law greater than tradition. Sabbath was create for man, not man for Sabbath.

Again,
>For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. (Matthew 5:18)
I wish they were intact today.

My only problem with Christianity is that it seems Jesus primary message in his teachings is how to live righteously, and yet the idea that Jesus came to give a moral message to mankind is overshadowed by the claim (in my opinion) that Jesus is God and that only through your acceptance can you be saved. So we can live the same moral law, yet have different theologies.

>the fascist worldview

Only an unironic commie would say awkward sentences like this.

Of course, the wholly contentless and empyheaded character of all subsequent replies is only further indication.

Why can't shills be smart people and not stupid people?

...and went home to his Ethiopian wife, kek.

Does that mean we should not mix fabrics ?

whats wrong with fascism?

Says the frogposting retard

I'm smarter than you memeflag

Attached: 354deaa3770912621bb816da070346ab.jpg (258x245, 12K)

That Jesus is God is a totally unimportant aspects of his teachings . He came to show us the way to the father , his moral teachings are important .Not the doctrine of the religion , If it was he could used at least a few pages of his book to explain the trinity

Only the Noahide Laws would be required unless you consider yourself to be a Son of Israel and Judah. That being said of course Jesus should be a guide for you as to how to conduct yourself. Who am I to say whether or not it is right or wrong to mix fabrics. It could change your life, who knows? Jesus definitely wants you to dress simply.

We are in complete agreement about that. Are you a fellow sect-less follower?

Cushite is a nigger btw

Attached: Screenshot_28.png (362x794, 315K)

Picking verses out of context is idiocy at its finest.

The most ancient sources record white aethiopians
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Aethiopians

Jesus was sect-less and so am i . Trusting the devil did not corrupt everything is a fools game.

I did not know that but does the bible not say that moses wife was black ?

I agree. How do you feel about Paul?

Your wrong.

i dont need a book to put my faith in god to lead me on the right path.

So, since this is a /Christian General/ now, how does Jow Forums feel about Catholicism? I am a recent convert to Christianity and I have been reading the Bible, and God is quite clear about His opinions on carved images, idol worship, and putting anyone before Him. I received some items from a Catholic website for free, including a necklace, a "Miraculous Medal". Upon researching this medal, I learned it was an image of the Virgin Mary and a odd symbol combining the cross and the letter M. Catholics apparently believe this necklace brings good luck.

At this point, however, not only are you worshiping a carved image, an icon, but you are also worshiping Mary over God. Is this not a direct contradiction with scripture?

Genuinely asking this question as a learning Christian, please do not be offended by it.

It says she is a daughter of Jethro, who was from Midian, between Israel and Arabia.

Paul is for advanced Christians only it has many pitfalls . It was for the most part intended for former Jews , and if anyone new to the religion would read it he would not understand.

>. It was for the most part intended for former Jews
Then why is he considered the Apostle of the Gentiles? He had quarrels with James The Just, who was leader of the Jerusalem Church.

But we where warned

>even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. 1

>christsoys

The left can’t meme

Attached: 6910E23A-DA58-4BA2-993E-78603CB5F699.jpg (540x534, 80K)

>Why can't you neojews ever bring anything original to the table?
Why can't you? It's always out of context quotes, I can do the same with the Edda or any other religious text.

He is the apostle of the gentiles but that means he also is apostle of the former Jew, paul rebuked peter , because a former Jew is a Christian also

Checked. Is it wrong in your opinion to think Jesus was not the Creator of the Universe and source of all Truth and Justice? I don't think it was implied by what he said, yet most Christians believe it. And of course there are places in John that speak of him being literally God, but this is the last-written Gospel and it contains things not contained in the others, who surely would have included it if it had happened.

Nah. Paul's works indeed clear upo misconceptions that new Christians had about Christianity. OP just takes them out of context.

For example: "There is no Jew and Gentile" etc. was written because Jews claimed to the new Christians that they had to adopt Jewish laws and customs like circumcision, food taboos and so on. Paul cleared this up by saying the Jews are nothing special, that's what the passage means. It denies the Jewish "Chosen" status explicitely.

That it triggers Jow Forumslacks that much indicates we have more Jews on here than people would commonly believe.

Fundamentalism is misguided. Read the following book and I guarantee you will not stay Protestant, it's impossible. You will either become Catholic or Orthodox.
www106.zippyshare.com/v/K1YnmJ5P/file.html

>muh random out of context verses
>checkmate, conservatives!

Nice shill faggot. Sage

>going off the KJV
>not realizing that because it was transcribed from Greek and then to Latin, that significant errors regarding doctrine were made (i.e turn the other cheek, walk the extra mile)

If such thing was important he would mention it, did the father create the universe? did Jesus create the universe , did they do it together ? That is probably the one together . But its not important for salvation , imagine youre being judged and you go to (((hell))) for not believing in a trinity he never commanded in the first place . i think the Holy ghost is the father ? but when i am wrong its (((hell))) time ... its ridiculous

Fuck off stupid nigger, christians never followed the old covenant in the first place. They formed a new one with christ. The only "christians" that followed the old and new were the original jews that were converted by Jesus, who then went on to form the catholic church. Modern christians have no obligation to the old covenant. It's not breaking scripture it's following the scripture of the covenant you and Jesus formed and not following one he formed with old jews.

>customs like circumcision, food taboos and so on. Paul cleared this up by saying the Jews are nothing special, that's what the passage means. It denies the Jewish "Chosen" status explicitely.

The food laws where pre moses , unclean animals existed in noahs time . adam and eve where forbidden to eat a apple , and you think temptation for taste no longer exist . hey lets smoke and get cancer totaly not a sign that unclean still exist

What is your opinion on the rich getting into heaven? I think this is one of those things Jesus isVERY clear on not being possible.

>Fuck off stupid nigger, christians never followed the old covenant in the first place
apparently you weren't aware, but the early christians were actually all jewish 100% including jesus himself. then paul brought christianity to the gentiles and ONLY THEN were a couple cultural customs loosened.
>For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. (Matthew 5:18)

Wow cherry picked passages that mean nothing on their own. What's next you'll tell me I shouldn't eat fruit either?

>What is your opinion on the rich getting into heaven? I think this is one of those things Jesus isVERY clear on not being possible.

Yes rich people go to (((hell))) because of the nature of money , Jesus preached being poor

our father is the biggest proof of that and many people are blind

Matthew 6:11-13 New King James Version (NKJV)

11
>Give us this day our daily bread.
12
And forgive us our debts,
As we forgive our debtors.
13
And do not lead us into temptation,
But deliver us from the evil one.
[a]For Yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.

>Modern christians have no obligation to the old covenant.
So faggots are ok now then, seeing how all the anti-faggot stuff is in OT and Jesus didn't mention them? Like racism, which is also all in OT.

It is incredibly painful to think about.

>…35Then Jesus asked them, “When I sent you out without purse or bag or sandals, did you lack anything?” “Nothing,” they answered. 3

We should trust God first

Fuck off Ali. The Bible is clear on there being no food taboos for Christians. It explicitely says so several times.

>I think this is one of those things Jesus isVERY clear on not being possible.
t. has never read the Bible

Paul says it, not Jesus. But yeah.

ok
i read the image

no go on, make your point

are you ok?
human meat is rather taboo
as is raw meat
etc
the NT made acceptable much more, but not to consume ANYTHING that may be non-toxic

Poland is civnat

Hold on now paul does not say eat a spider this is crazy . remember John the baptist and what he ate ? paul meant that . He did not say that unclean suddenly became clean .

>Yes, some people go to the lake of fire because of the fact they did not repent of their sins before their deaths

ftfy

>first quote
the fascist worldview maintains that hospitality is only possible in ethnically homogeneous states where the local population can be enabled to feel safe inviting the odd visitor in without worrying about competition for immediate land, resources and political dominance
and if you go around measuring the hospitality between diverse and homogeneous places, you will find that the christian/fascist worldview is absolutely correct in this assumption, so much so that a random mudhut village in Africa would be liable to show more hospitality than any diverse American city

I forget where I saw it but there is good evidence that the insect locusts is not what was meant.

Matthew 15:11
>10Jesus called the crowd to Him and said, “Listen and understand. 11A man is not defiled by what enters his mouth, but by what comes out of it."

>as is raw meat
wat

Acts 10:9
>9The next day at about the sixth hour, as the men were approaching the city on their journey, Peter went up on the roof to pray. 10He became hungry and wanted something to eat, but while the meal was being prepared, he fell into a trance.
>11He saw heaven open and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners. 12It contained all kinds of four-footed animals and reptiles of the earth, as well as birds of the air. 13Then a voice spoke to him: “Get up, Peter, kill and eat!”
>14“No, Lord!” Peter answered. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.”
>15The voice spoke to him a second time: “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”
tl;dr: You can eat what you want, there are no taboos.

Are you fags even Christians?

Its not really hell but you stop being a Christian when you preach for magog and do the opposite of what Jesus teaches

Do Not Worry

(Luke 12:22-34)

>25Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment? 26Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? 27Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? 28And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: 29And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? 31Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? 32(For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. 33But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

34Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

The second is meant for

The jews had diet restrictions within the kosher , this is what paul meant let no man judge you on food or drink

Jesus Testifies about John
>…33For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and you say, ‘He has a demon!’ 34The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Look at this glutton and drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and of sinners!’

Our women race-mix like crazy because thanks to Christianity they don't see race as being that important to being Polish. They may not like Muslims that much but only on religious grounds, not for what they really are, racially different invaders to our land and so our women willingly spread their legs to any godly Christian niggers straight from Kongo. Our women have one of the highest miscegenation rates in Europe. It's a growing problem in Eastern Europe thanks to a combination of poverty, media brainwashing and Christianity.

Attached: matki polki 2.jpg (2204x1592, 825K)

>Get up, Peter, kill and eat!”

Its good that you are a better prophet then peter

Peter Summoned to Caesarea
Acts 10:
>17Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean,

God said that to the jews

Yes they were 100% jewish as christianity wasn't even formed yet. Jesus being jewish says nothing about judaism, as christianity didn't even exist.
No, that is the most retarded way to interpret the bible. Just because it doesn't say "kill all homosexuals" doesn't mean that it allows gays. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_New_Testament
Also Jesus did mention that marriage was the joining of man and woman, and it is mentioned multiple times in the new testament.

Peter Reports to the Church at Jerusalem

1And the apostles and brethren that were in Judaea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God. 2And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision contended with him, 3Saying, Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them. 4But Peter rehearsed the matter from the beginning, and expounded it by order unto them, saying, 5I was in the city of Joppa praying: and in a trance I saw a vision, A certain vessel descend, as it had been a great sheet, let down from heaven by four corners; and it came even to me: 6Upon the which when I had fastened mine eyes, I considered, and saw fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. 7And I heard a voice saying unto me, Arise, Peter; slay and eat. 8But I said, Not so, Lord: for nothing common or unclean hath at any time entered into my mouth. 9But the voice answered me again from heaven, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. 10And this was done three times: and all were drawn up again into heaven.

> 11And, behold, immediately there were three men already come unto the house where I was, sent from Caesarea unto me. 12And the spirit bade me go with them, nothing doubting. Moreover these six brethren accompanied me, and we entered into the man's house: 13And he shewed us how he had seen an angel in his house, which stood and said unto him, Send men to Joppa, and call for Simon, whose surname is Peter; 14Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved. 15And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning. 16Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 17Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God? 18When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.

See how non of the text implicated it was about that was peter allowed to eat spiders

Ugh yes, Christianity is the foundation of all objective morals, handed down from the heavenly father, and his only begotten son Jesus Christ. Are we done here?

Attached: deus vult.jpg (631x710, 52K)

Show me the NT basis for "not allowing gays" then. Marriage is one thing, gaying it up is another. Also racism please.

So Peter was at fault he did not eat with the gentiles and God set him straight with a vision , it was never about eating spiders

Paul Confronts Peter

>11But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. 12For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision. 13And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation. 14But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?

>post 20th century christianity
>a religion

Pick one.

Here is the truth

>torture a devout muslim
>say that you'll fee him if he says "muhammad was a sob, fuck him and allah"
>he wouldn't say it even you burn him alive

>torture a devout christian
>say that you'll release him if he says "jesus was a sob, fuck god"
>he says it as soon as you touch him with your knife. (even jesus died for them)

you know this is the truth. you can't deny that. modern christianity is no different than a new age "lets feel good and all will be good" "religion". it got no value compared to islam or judaism.

you see people defending what they got with shit tier weapons vs top tech armies. it's because they believe in heaven, that's why they don't fear death. christians pretending to believe in heaven, but they are not sure and they do afraid of death because of this. e: that's why shellshock is a christian majority thing or they are more vulnerable to it.

christians go to church to show how /fa/ they are, or to make their neighbours not to talk shit with them or smth. muslims go to mosque to feel the god, to pay their love and respect. they even wake up at 5 am to pray while christians don't pray at all. oh they eat turkey and sing songs.

a muslim that went to kaaba and holy lands are the happiest of happiest. while christians go vatican or hagia sophia to fill their instagram album. also hagia sophia is the symbol of christ cuckery atm. just think about kaaba being a church or museum. it would be a massacre.

anyway modern christianity is no different than an average "lets feel good" new age religion. bible is no different than average osho book. it doesn't worth shit anymore, it's not that spiritual. it's degenerate. it's WEAK, it's LOW ENERGY and it will get more emptier, more new ageish and eventually will be forgotten.

that's the fact.

because race mixing isnt necessarily a bad thing unless it is done on a large scale like it is now. even worse is this is done on purpose by the elites.

the issue is that so many Christians want to be loved and accepted by the world, thinking that giving in to a few things will get the world off their backs. the opposite happens, though, the progressives loathe them more and more. the book of revelation calls these lukewarm believers, the worst and last of believers as they are apostates.

before the great and terrible tribulation comes, the great apostasy must play out completely. we are n that period right now.

interestingly the western federation in the last days ruled by the beast is symbolized as iron mixed with clay. an angel explains what tjis means to daniel and says it represents the partial power and relation to old rome, but that the clay represents the mass of mankind and that in the end rome will mingle itself with the races of mankind, losing some of its native strength

>0Jesus called the crowd to Him and said, “Listen and understand. 11A man is not defiled by what enters his mouth, but by what comes out of it.

Look at him posting the verse without context again

those are they that defile the man. 16If any >man have ears to hear, let him hear.

>17And when he was entered into the house from the people, his disciples asked him concerning the parable. 18And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him; 19Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats? 20And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man. 21For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, 22Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: 23All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.

>concerning the parable. 18And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also?

>race mixing isn't necessarily a bad thing
How can you say that? Miscegenation is the worst crime that can be committed and there are no exceptions when it's good or desirable. It taints your bloodline, for generations to come and blurs the lines between the races. It's an affront against nature itself. Only a Jew or a mongrel would defend race-mixing in any way, shape, or form. That abhorrent behaviour has to be punished no matter what and finding excuses for it is simply repulsive. If White Christians spend a quarter of what they provide feeding and clothing niggers in Apefrica helping their own folk instead we wouldn't get ourselves into this mess. Driven by religious zeal White Christians are putting the well-being of their own kind on the altar of diversity.

I already linked the wikipedia article which gives multiple examples and explains them, I don't see the reason to explain it to you any further. But here you go, since you were too lazy to look at the link I gave you at all.
Homosexuality in the Pauline epistles
Romans 1:26-27

Saint Paul writing his Epistles
Epistle to the Romans 1:26–27 (English Majority Text Version, EMTV):

“ For this reason [viz. idolatry], God gave them up to passions of dishonor; for even their females exchanged the natural use for that which is contrary to nature, and likewise also the males, having left the natural use of the female, were inflamed by their lust for one another, males with males, committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was fitting for their error. "

1 Corinthians 6:9-10
King James Version (1611): "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind"

The phrase "abusers of themselves with mankind" translates arsenokoitai also rendered "sodomites" (YLT), or "men who have sex with men" (NIV). Paul's use of the word in 1 Corinthians is the earliest example of the term; its only other usage is in a similar list of wrongdoers given (possibly by the same author) in 1 Timothy 1:8–11 The term rendered as "effeminate" is malakoi, with a literal meaning of "soft".[18] Nowhere else in scripture is malakoi used to describe a person.

Nice to know. It's a bit vague and ambiguous, but I'll accept it. Now do racism please. This is important because it's one of the key points of division on this matter.