PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP
whitehouse.gov
donaldjtrump.com
promiseskept.com
>b-but Trump hasnt done anything!
pastebin.com
pastebin.com
PREV APPEARANCES/LINKS pastebin.com
DAILY SCHEDULE (WH Press Corps) publicpool.kinja.com
TrumpTV Weekly Updates: pastebin.com
NEWTRUMP NIGHTLY NEWS pastebin.com
NEW APPEARANCES
>Pres Trump/FLotUS Melania arrive in Helsinki 7/15/18
youtu.be
>Pres Trump/FLotUS Melania depart Scotland 7/15/18
youtu.be
>WHVideo: Pres Trump/FLotUS Melania visit the bongs 7/13/18
youtu.be
>Pres Trump/FLotUS Melania arrive in Scotland 7/13/18
youtu.be
>Pres Trump/FLotUS Melania meet w/Bong Queen Liz 7/13/18
c-span.org
>VP Pence @America 1st Event in Chicago IL 7/13/18
youtu.be
>DefSec C.H.A.O.S. Mattis remarks en route to Oslo 7/13/18
defense.gov
>UNAmb Haley @UNSC on South Sudan 7/13/18
youtu.be
>Army Officials Announce New Army Command 7/13/18
defense.gov
>DNI Coats @Hudson Institute 7/13/18
c-span.org
>DepAG Rosenstein on muh russian indictments 7/13/18
youtu.be
>This Week @State 7/13/18
youtu.be
>Pres Trump/British PM May joint presser 7/13/18
c-span.org
>Pres Trump meets w/UK PM May 7/13/18
c-span.org
c-span.org
>Pres Trump departs Chequers 7/13/18
c-span.org
OP pastebin: pastebin.com
prev
/ptg/ PRESIDENT TRUMP GENERAL - FIRST LADIES EDITION
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
marketwatch.com
twitter.com
youtube.com
codoh.com
archive.is
codoh.com
archive.is
twitter.com
MAGA!
What does Melania smell like?
I fap to Melania's legs and heels.
What does Barron smell like, /ptg/?
Vaginal vanilla
vanilla
I hate Mika Aaltola ööö ööö ööö öö ööö ööö öö öö
you think Trump is thinking about his dead friend right now?
She cute
Heaven.
Sniffposting was a mistake.
i like her eyes
>tried to make constructive, informative posts last thread
>got no (You)s
G-guess I'll just go back to drinking and XCOM then. ;__;
I hope boomers live long enough to endure the hell they've prepared for us: youtube.com
She's cute in an approachable sort of way. Melania is stunningly beautiful but you have to be a billionaire to land her. This Finnish lady looks like she could live next door and is obtainable. Very cute!
who drinks at this time of the day?
>307
>Trump meeting a literal nobody
Anyone else sleepy? Christ this night sucks
ur moms possy
Cry more kike :)
ALL HAIL THE GOD EMPEROR
Who's the Japanese woman on the right?
she looks like what a cyborg dick suck bot would look like
Why Finnish president looks so fucking autistic in every photo of him
Hey its 9 in the morning somewhere.
post the rest of the scene and you'll get your (you)'s, aunt diane
idk but it should be studied on genetic level
JEWS
WILL NOT
REPLACE US
>making constructive comments ever and expecting to get (you)s
AND THEN I WAS LIKE
FUCK DRUMPF LOL TWO SCOOPS
BRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPFFFPTFFFTFPFPFTF
The matrix is fracturing.
>ywn have an aunt like Aunt Diane
cheeky
He has assburgesr and he also grows weeds and smokes pot
what the FUCK did he mean by this?
i dont think they are replacing anybody other than Palestinians specifically
The Migration or Importation Clause states that
> “The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.”
In and of itself, the Clause does not grant Congress any additional authority.
To the contrary, it is a limitation on power.
However, it could be argued that the limitation on congressional power to prohibit “migration or importation” of persons until 1808 implies that Congress had such a power to begin with.
The word “migration” suggests that that power extended to the prohibition of voluntary immigration, as well as the importation of slaves, which the Migration or Importation Clause was intended to protect.
But the inclusion of the term “migration” was not meant to imply a general federal power to restrict migration, but was a euphemism intended to bolster the pretense that the Constitution did not endorse slavery.
As John Jay – the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers – pointed out in an 1819 letter discussing the Clause:
> It will, I presume, be admitted that slaves were the persons intended. The word slaves was avoided, probably on account of the existing toleration of slavery and of its discordance with the principles of the Revolution, and from a consciousness of its being repugnant to the following positions in the Declaration of Independence, viz.: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among them are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
Its probably the autism.
t b f I just got here
Does anyone have that meme about the first speed oversdose of a Finn who killed a shit load of commies?
He's Finnish. They're all a little...off.
What's with the metalhead dude wearing sunglasses inside?
Muhh, Trump master mind 4D chest.
>Trump is the prime example of the Dunning–Kruger effect. Prove me wrong pro tip, you can't.
NATO
>Only focuses on monetary value.
>What is soverein state with slightly different interest (does he expect to dictate all of the west)
>Only want to make a shortsided deal, doesn't understand long term relationships.
>What is arms Sales to allies. And control over supply of equipment and spare parts.
>Does a bigger militairy marktet gives the US a competative advantage in inovation?
>What is clout?
>What is power projection? (why does the US spend so much more)
>What is reserve currency?
>What is foreign trust in T-bonds.
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
KICKS OUT ILLEGALS
>Labor gets in short supply, Wages go up for the lower class.
>Higher consumer prices.
>Has to import them legaly, has to give them voting rights
>Has to pay them properly.
TRADE WAR
>US "wins"
> US gives up its leverage over China.
>American investors get worst ROI, American esteblisment loses global power.
>Loses acces to markets, less money flows back to American multinationals, loses competative advantage in inovation.
>Higher consumer prices.
>Labor gets in short supply, Wages go up for the lower class.
>Niggers demand more money.
>More US niggers get jobs, and more wealth. More clout.
>Niggers get uppity. More money to suport more niglets.
ROE VS WADE.
>States decide about abortion rights.
>Nigger infested Red states.
>More Niggers
>Loses redstates.
>Make America Black again
The US holds all the cards.
>Folds aces cause he doesnt understand the game? Why is he so hellbent on destroying Pax Americana? Yeah 4D chest so brilliant
Goodnight /ptg/! Sweet dreams!
MAGAs in the back?
user...
nn
Apart from working in Niinistö's party Kokoomus where they met, she's been a professional poet and teacher of creative writing.
You mean his dead friends?
Yes, I would imagine he thinks of them every day.
Yeah, but how many times have you died for Israel, goy?
She passes for white in Finland.
James Madison similarly argued that the Clause was intended to protect the slave trade against limitation prior to 1808, and that its phrasing was due to “scruples against admitting the term ‘slaves’ into the Instrument.
Hence the descriptive phrase ‘migration or importation of persons;’ the term migration allowing those who were scrupulous of acknowledging expressly a property in human beings, to view imported persons as a species of emigrants, while others might apply the same term to foreign malefactors sent or coming into the country.”
This suggests it is likely that the term “migration” was included only in order to avoid direct reference to slavery, and did not imply any general congressional power to restrict migration.
In Federalist 42, Madison decried
> “[a]ttempts [that] have been made to pervert this clause into an objection against the Constitution, by representing it…as calculated to prevent voluntary and beneficial emigrations from Europe to America.”
Even if the Clause does imply a power to limit the “migration” of some voluntary arrivals, it does not follow that Congress was assumed to have a general power to forbid immigration.
In addition to the importation of slaves, indentured servants were also commonly brought into the country during the colonial era and the early republic.
Unlike slaves, indentured servants came of their own free will, and therefore might not be described merely as “imported.”
But their passage was paid for by employers in America, and the indentured servants were thereafter required to work for them for several years to pay off their debt.
The transportation of indentured servants across the Atlantic on the basis of indenture contracts paid for by Americans was considered an international commercial transaction subject to regulation under the Commerce Clause.
>Journalism in the current year
i guess fan fiction is now considered journalism now what the fuck
>twitter.com
catheter
While true, rude.
I actually bought a fake maga hat from LAX when I visited u're country in 2016.
Never get to wear it though.
Indeed, eighteenth century Americans often did in fact consider indentured servants to be “articles of commerce,” and therefore within the scope of the commerce power, even though their migration was voluntary.
During the Founding era, the Foreign Commerce Clause was generally interpreted to give Congress power to regulate the international shipment of articles of commerce (including slaves and indentured servants), but not to forbid mere migration, as such.
Similarly, the interstate Commerce Clause was not understood to give Congress the power to forbid the migration of Americans from one state to another. The Constitution literally uses the same phrase to cover both, giving Congress the power to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States.”
What is true of the interstate commerce goose must also be true of the foreign commerce gander.
The migration provision of the Migration or Importation Clause therefore was likely either a euphemism intended to avoid referring to slaves, or a tool for preventing Congress from using the Foreign Commerce Clause to ban or heavily tax the in-migration of indentured servants until 1808.
At the very least, its language does not require us to conclude that Congress had any general power to regulate migration, as opposed to a few subsets of migrants whose activities come within the scope of Congress’ other enumerated powers.
Goodnight & pleasant lucid dreams
OH SHIT
BASED AF
They rigged it! The cat is vindicated!!!!
God can you imagine her disappointed look when you blow early?
>What is sovereign state with slightly different interest (does he expect to dictate all of the west)
This is why bilateral trade deals are better than trade blocks
Obviously, much of the above has only limited relevance to living constitutionalists who believe we should adopt a broad reading of congressional power regardless of what the original understanding may have been.
But it is relevant for originalists, and others who believe that the original meaning has an important role in constitutional interpretation, even if it is not the only factor that should be considered.
And, obviously, many of the modern advocates of highly restrictive immigration policies are conservative originalists who, among other things, advocate a narrow interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Clause.
The Migration or Importation Clause is one of several parts of the Constitution that illustrate how the integrity of the Founding was in some ways perverted by the evil institution of slavery.
It was adopted for the purpose of giving the southern states an opportunity to import more slaves, before Congress could shut the door on the slave trade.
As Jay’s and Madison’s comments suggest, it was an embarrassment to many of the Founders themselves.
We cannot simply ignore this evidence of the nation’s original sin. It should not, however, lead us to adopt an expansive view of congressional power over voluntary migration.
>shamdn
huutista :DD
NEW
NEW TWEET!!
I imagine she would take it as a compliment and lick you clean before bringing a nice comfy blanket over to cuddle with
>REEEEE STOP DRUMPF IT HURTS
THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF CHINKS
huutista
I'd put my tide in her pod IFYAGEWHATTAMEAN
Wow, lurk more faggot. Jews are behind the push for mass immigration from third world countries into white countries.
Sale is a good guy even if a little odd
>effortposting on Jow Forums
the fuck you do that for
This post is well considered.
I meant replacing with themselves. Their population is stagnant
The Supreme Court ruled in the 1880s that immigration law is a federal thing, after many individual states started banning immigration
Of course. She would still chastise you though.
Cool it with the anti-semitic remarks fella...
Okay then, can EU start negotiating bilateral trade deals with singular states?
Rude!
Don't lewd the campers.
Finnish first lady should take US first lady to a lovely lake and show her how we wash our carpets.
the fuck else is there to do camping other than get drunk and fug
>running to the WTO
bunch of weak ass chinks
youtube.com
David Cole, jewish historian tells the truth about some of the holocaust lies. In 8 minutes, your world is going to be rocked by verifiable factual information coming from a brave jewish historian that had to go into hiding for a while for his commitment to the TRUTH.
Must see.
He also wrote this list of questions addressed to the Holocaust Museum that received no response (because the holocaust official version is a lie). Read the list of questions here:
codoh.com
archive.is
Also note that he received death threats from jew supremacists for his work. You can read about the David Cole Affair here:
codoh.com
Frenly reminder to everyone that I would gladly accept the fake official version of the holohoax if it was true and my life would be much easier if I could accept such a bullshit fraudulent perversion of the truth but decided it was immoral to defend such blatant lies that have destroyed our civilization…
Also take notice that the big fraud that is the holocaust results in the payment of 500 million euros to “survivors” coming from German tax payer’s pockets each and every year.
Proof:
archive.is