Iq is not a measure of intelligence

You can’t just measure the intelligence of a poor African nomad living in the Sahara who’s never read nor seen a textbook in his life and compare it to the intelligence of a middle class white man living in a western country. I feel like those little small differences matter in these kinds of tests. I don’t even know if these tests are accurate. I read somewhere that the average iq of Ethiopia and Somalia is around 70... how tf is that even possible? That’s lower than some species of gorillas. How does one even come up with this number? Did they test a few people and just estimated for the rest or something? Were the instructions on the test in English and they couldn’t understand what was being asked of them? It’s just bizarre. Think about it, how is that creatures with almost identical brain size and processing power end up with a 40 point gab in intelligence? It’s bs.

Attached: 8DDC59C8-9D6B-4E1F-BE4F-645BB89AD1FA.jpg (5792x8688, 1.35M)

Other urls found in this thread:

technologyreview.com/s/610339/dna-tests-for-iq-are-coming-but-it-might-not-be-smart-to-take-one/
theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/15/israel-turmoil-bill-allowing-jews-arabs-segregated
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

hello jdif, what is being slid today ?

IQ doesn'tmeasure intelligence. It measures intellectual efficiency

>t. low IQ mutt
At least read the Wikipedia article on IQ testing. It's clear you don't even know how it is done, or what kind of ability it measures, or how it correlates to various measures of success, etc.
Even leftist rags are now beginning to throw the towel:
technologyreview.com/s/610339/dna-tests-for-iq-are-coming-but-it-might-not-be-smart-to-take-one/

accept burger, iq is real.
it does not nescessarily success or anythong but potential and capabilities
yes nogs are apelike, no surprise there sherlock otherwise supremavy would belong to them.
no writing skills, no significant culture, no significant civ, no niggersheakespeares around, so on and on
thats more than enough proof, also sagemashou

Attached: 1531337759489-1.png (1357x646, 48K)

First of all, most of what we are talking about has to do with blacks in the western world. We aren’t just non-chalantly comparing blacks in Africa to whites in Europe. Heritability is the measure of the degree to which genes impact the differences (this is important) between people or groups of people in a set range of environments at a specific time. If the environments are too radically different, environment might explain more of the difference between humans. Secondly, brain size and brain composition differs between the races, as shown by MRI scans.

Same thing

>burguer education

Iq tests are real
>ashkenazis are superior
Ashkenazis are dumb kikes
>iq tests are rigged

The thread talking about Trump and Putin naming the jew.

See

iq tests are for uncreative retards with no inherent talent.

like any test, you can study to increase your score.

>Hurrr you can't compare because they don't have texbooks n shit

Yes, that's why it's a perfectly accurate test. If you can't have basic educational infrastructure, and let's be honest, that's low on the list of things they desperately need but lack, that is a sign that you do not have the mental capacity to better yourself and your society.

You can ABLOO BLOO BLOO about it all you want but the fact is, Asians aren't western, have achieved lots without our involvement and even outperfrom us in certain areas. How can that be possible if it's biased to the western world?

It's even more lols than that, user - it encompasses the capacity to learn and comprehend too, so yeah, your low IQ mudlets are BTFO completely.

>You can’t just measure the intelligence of a poor African nomad living in the Sahara who’s never read nor seen a textbook in his life and compare it to the intelligence of a middle class white man
Youre basically justifying the need to measure the difference of intelligence between people by presenting an exagerated scenario

Attached: download (7).jpg (225x225, 7K)

Read the studys, nigger. Stop falling for kike propaganda.

You're right. It's pointless to give them an IQ test. If they weren't all borderline retarded they wouldn't all be stuck in the 8th century. Really the retards who need an IQ test to determine that are the ones whose mental capacities we should be questioning.

i took an iq test here in cuckmark and got 47 in score

then i spoke to a psychologist a long time ago and she realised that i am apparently not retarded and offered me a new shitty iq test that is so unprecise that i will pas it over anyway

psychology is a pseodoscience

the point of an iq test is just to measure of functional the nerves inside of your brain re, but an iq test has so many flaws that it's not worth it anyway, it's too unprecise

Maybe it's this little gem
theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/15/israel-turmoil-bill-allowing-jews-arabs-segregated

You've never been to an African country have you? They are so backward they struggle to grasp farming because they literally live in the moment with little thought of tomorrow. Without evil whitey their numbers would be in the low millions globally if we didn't feed them.

a good IQ test can be taken without the ability to read.

OP has no idea what an IQ test is and thinks it's something like the SAT.

>Iq is not a measure of intelligence
It's always the same with you people

Attached: 1530352953309.png (439x380, 40K)

>Iq is not a measure of intelligence

let me guess... being retarded is a measure of intelligence, right?

They control for variables like this in the testing. In psychology research, IQ testing is the gold standard of all the different types of testing. And, much of the other psychological research is based upon IQ numbers. Sorry dude, go look at the basic Wikipedia page and you’ll see.

You see IQ measures intelligence capabilities not knowledge, if you had either you would know this. Why do you think niggers in the third world do so much poorer than gooks in the third world?

I have a very high IQ. I have a good memory, and I’m good at puzzles. It doesn’t mean I’m better than anybody, or automatically good for anything.

Intelligence is a shapeshifting thing, you can't standardize it. Hence IQ measures performance, not intelligence. It can only reliable tell whether you're very smart or very dumb, but nothing in between.

IQ is the best measure of intelligence, other than skin color.

You realize that if he were intelligent and his ancestors were any little bit intelligent he wouldnt be a poor african nomad rhat has never read.. a white middle class person lives in such conditions because his ancestors were more intelligent than the poor. Survival of the intellectualy fittest

It means you're significantly more likely to be a benefit to the country and not a detriment. Most niggers are on welfare because they're demonstratably retarded.

>You can’t just measure the intelligence of a poor African nomad living in the Sahara who’s never read nor seen a textbook
you dont know how IQ tests work

Exactly.

>i took an iq test here in cuckmark and got 47 in score

jfc, that means you scored worse than 99.98% of people that took that test. How the fuck did you manage that, did you literally not answer a single question right?

Attached: Capture.jpg (899x580, 67K)

IQ measures abstract thinking ability. Notably, you won't notice a huge difference between someone with 100 IQ and someone with 130 IQ, but you'll definitely notice a difference between someone with 70 IQ and someone with 100 IQ.

Both environmental factors and genetic predisposition determine someone's IQ, and Africans from Africa are shit out of luck in both departments.

If you are questioning the role that genetics play in IQ, just ask yourself, why do the poorest whites have better average SAT scores than the richest blacks? It's race, plain and simple, and you're fooling yourself if you're giving any other answer.

IQ tests grade you on pattern recognition

It doesn't measure intelligence because their is no such thing as intelligence. It does correlate well with our perception of intelligence. The person you would call smart versus dumb will have IQ's corresponding accordingly. IQ is the single most valid predictor in all of psycho-analytics. You are retarded.

>their is no such thing as intelligence.
........
The brilliance of the left

Extreeeeeeeamly poor bait

>nomad living in the Sahara who’s never read nor seen a textbook in his life
If his race had invented some reading and textbooks and passed them down to him, that might be an initial indicator of potential IQ.
They didn't.

Attached: 5306277625_c9386cdbea_z.jpg (640x478, 98K)

iq is a measure of data retained that is of a pertinent subject matter. how many flies it takes to make a fly burger patty isnt considered worth while. how many men can rape the same ape before it bleeds to death isnt considered of value

im sorry your a dumb nigger. in a perfect world there wouldnt be any niggers but here we are and your a dumb nigger sucking up air slack jawed and stupid as fuck

test.mensa.no

this shit works. If you go through it super fast and random guessing everything you will get 90-100 (something any random person could do), but sub 80 IQ individuals will not actually manage to answer every question in the time allotted, and they won't get hardly any correct
>Pic related
I answered 27% of questions, all incorrectly.

There was a thread yesterday where everyone was getting 120+, my hypothesis is that Jow Forums is composed of young men who are much smarter and capable of great things than they realize, and collectively we are a nearly unstoppable force if we apply ourselves. Something (((they))) don't want us to know.

Attached: 27%OfAnswers,AllWrong.png (1232x384, 23K)

Are you retarded? Did you read and understand what I was saying?

> You can’t just measure the intelligence of a poor African nomad
> who’s never read nor seen a textbook in his life
> and compare it to the intelligence of a middle class person
That's exactly the reason why it's the most useful way to measure intelligence via observing a subject's capability to process through various patterns

>I read somewhere that the average iq of Ethiopia and Somalia is around 70... how tf is that even possible? That’s lower than some species of gorillas. How does one even come up with this number?
>you stated that a somali nigger has 70 iq probably because he has never seen a textbook
>then you stated that iq tests are unfair and partial because gorilas have bigger iq
>but most gorilas havent seen a textbook in their life too, yet they have bigger iq
REALLY TURNS ON THE SWITCH ON MY ALMONDS

Attached: 1531770972643.gif (185x168, 62K)

First and foremost, the IQ tests are probably done in the urban strongholds of Africa [it has a few of them, Dakar and Abuja for one] so you're literally testing the academic elite of the african nations.
I doubt they're going to a bunch of fucking tribal villages and making them do tests when they can't read.

Even if you don't think IQ isn't a objective measure of intellect [it looks at pattern recognition and general cognotive abilities' so i'd say it is], it still is a measure of success in western societies. Low IQ means low rate of success in the West, which means they drag us down.

Attached: F562AFD0-64E4-4465-9DB4-34338093A13B.jpg (771x1024, 195K)

Iq is a psychological meausurement, sure. But it correlates with physiological measurements like g. And it also correlates with success and is highly herritable.

And africans and Europeans are not identical. They are not the same population. Europeans have larger cranial capacities. This wouldnt completely explain distinctions, but we are not allowed to study population distinctions in neurology due to lysenkoism in academia

IQ without context doesnt tell you much. There are multiple forms of intelligence that are averaged into iq. AshkeNAZIS score highly in areas like verbal and mathemetically intelligence, but not so highly in spatial and other fields.

Have you even seen an IQ test? I don't remember there being instructions. Questions are things like sequences of numbers where you provide the next number in the sequence (no instructions). From what I remember, most of the questions are pictorial. Sequence of images where you provide what comes next.

Have you actually taken an IQ test before?

I have enrolled in a udacity class that is an introduction to AI programming with Python. The class after will be even harder. I have no programming experience, but I am certainly not going to deliver food for uber and doordash forever. I am going back to "school" again after getting a useless finance degree to finally have a truly in-demand skill. I just hope I don't have to move to a commie city when I eventually get hired. Learning AI programming is going to be a bitch. I took a queendom test that put me at 129. I should try mensa.

Attached: 7F92E465-C6E4-48E9-BC94-7F44DAA1C2A5.png (750x1334, 198K)

Right. I took one many years ago and I'm not sure there was even any text on it (though there were numbers).

This shit is obvious. You can't quantify intelligence because "intelligent" has many different contextual meanings. IQ simply tests for how autistic your brain works.

IQ was invented by a Jew.

>That feel when you would side with any other group if they were trying to assert their sovereignty
Fuck the Jews for wanting multiculturalism so that it's easier for them to blend in.
All the while bringing back literal segregation in their stolen nation

you do 5 consecutive IQ tests and you'll score better on each one. if you get the results showing you where you made a mistake you're gonna get even better results next time

But what it does mean is that they could put you in pretty much any job and you would succeed at it without much hand holding or instruction. People with high IQs are generally able to "figure it out" by themselves. The IQ test is generally a good measure of this.

The way I heard it explained was the IQ tests were developed primarily by the military to help with conscription. Specifically, to determine is someone was functional enough to be an asset, or slow enough to be a liability.

it's mostly pattern recognition which is not at all bound by processing capabilities of natural languages but okay....

>I'm not sure what IQ is anyway. Prof. Nemur said it was something that measured how intelligent you were-like a scale in the drugstore weighs pounds. But Dr Strauss had a big argument with him and said an IQ didn't weigh intelligence at all. He said an IQ showed how much intelligence you could get, like the numbers on the outside of a measuring cup. You still had to fill the cup up with stuff. When I asked Burt Seldon, who gives me my intelligence tests and works with Algernon, he said that some people would say both of them were wrong and according to the things he's been reading up on, the IQ measures a lot of different things including some of the things you learned already and it really isn't a good measure of intelligence at all.

Attached: 1529302357060.png (370x300, 70K)

you have the white quilt. you wish to handicap society rule and measures of logic to atone for a sin you never committed.

Yes, it is, but what you don't understand is that people tend to process whatever language they are hearing or reading into their original language. There are many African languages that do not have a concept of the future, promises, loyalty and other abstract concepts. Those that have those languages as their original language, can't grasp certain words even if they say they do. The word just becomes more of a Pavlovian programming based on how others react to it, as a result of that. You are now realizing yet another reason why Pride is the worst sin.

>You can’t just measure the intelligence of a poor African nomad living in the Sahara who’s never read nor seen a textbook in his life and compare it to the intelligence of a middle class white man

You can.

Literally high school psychology would teach you how experts take into account cultural differences and life experiences.
Example: my psych teacher gave our class a IQ test made for Australian aboriginals. Every single one of us failed it.

>which animals belong in a similar group: worm, eel, snake,

Answer is worm and snake. Abos categorize animals by land vs sea animals so while eel and snake are both animals and belong in that category scientifically, to them it is wrong.

>A boy, his father, and his uncle are sitting by each other. The father and uncle are talking. The boy is sitting behind his uncle with his back to him an won't look at him or talk to him. How is the boy acting towards his uncle? Rude, friendly, angry, respectful.

Answer is respectful. To abos a boy doing that body language shows respect to his uncle.

So sure, a retarded fucker who knows nothing about that field of psychology like you, should stay out of it.