"According to a recent survey, The three frontrunners for the 2020 race are current president Andrzej Duda, President of the European Council Donald Tusk and Biedroń. According to the survey, if the election were held today, 33.5% would vote for Duda, 33% for Tusk and 11.4% for Biedroń. Though that initially sounds low, it’s worth keeping in mind that the election is more than two years away, and the campaign has not yet begun in earnest."
hornet.com
Other urls found in this thread:
thecouplesstudy.com
nytimes.com
en.wikipedia.org
web.archive.org
theguardian.com
tanks-encyclopedia.com
foreignpolicy.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
We had a similar situation in 2012 or so. The final showdown was our current pres vs a gay from a green party. It wasn't that close though.
>implying
Wishful thinking. A nation doesn't shoot from one political side to the other in an instant. There won't be a homo prez for atleast a generation more.
discord gg/zEwXau
add a .
What goes on in that discord
gay stuf
I heard legends about bareback pozzpigs, that true?
Eastern Europe is degenerate, more surprising news tomorrow
Most of Jow Forums is under 40. That sort of thing was more common with an older generation who lived in the closet and were rejected from their families. Gay acceptance is key to reducing disease loads in sexual minority groups.
>Gay acceptance is key to reducing disease loads in sexual minority groups.
How do you figure?
Thanks for replying.
Would you say a homosexual reformation is possible in the next 10 years, drawing a clear line between regular people that just fuck dudes and the pride/fetish/excess-community?
BASED HUSSARS
When gays feel accepted by their friends and family they are more likely to have relationships than casual sex. When gays feel safe to have sex in their own home, they are less likely to seek sex in public or shared spaces that traffic more in disease. Gay acceptance is good for everyone, unless you somehow want more disease.
No I think that's divisive rhetoric by people who don't understand us and want us harmed.
Many gay people have subtle, mixed feelings about who they are and how they feel represented that are neither accurately represented by the self-hating gays on here and their religious/schizo enablers nor the boogeyman of leftist socially aware gays and their sloganeering. Most people are simply not as extremist irl than the people who are loudest online so any assessments you obtain off this website are inaccurate and flawed.
Gays being able to hold hands in public, have sex in their own homes without fear of reprisal, marry, have kids, and otherwise participate in civil society are generally good things overall, and certainly are in the long term despite hiccups. People sincerely wish us harm, and to underestimate that by their religious or other obfuscations would be foolish.
I've never met a monogamous homosexual. I don't think they are monogamous otherwise they'd be marrying at higher rates. All the ones that I've meet have been promiscuous.
Your personal experience is anecdotal and doesn't matter at all. Lots of gay men and women have long term relationships, monogamous and not, and you don't get to diminish their experience. When we weren't allowed to marry or live openly, of course that drove us away from monogamy. That's what you wanted, to make us lower than you, and the plan failed.
The study, titled “Choices: Perspectives of Younger Gay Men on Monogamy, Non-monogamy and Marriage,” was conduced by researchersBlake Spears and Lanz Lowen. They surveyed over 800 single, monogamously-coupled, and non-monogamously coupled gay menages 18-40 years about their relationships. A handful of “monogamish” men were also interviewed.
“The most striking finding of this study is younger gay men’s greater inclination toward monogamy,” the researchers report. “We see this in the overwhelming number of relationships that are monogamous (86percent). In addition, 90percentof the single younger gay men were seeking monogamy. This is a sea change compared to older generations of gay men.”
thecouplesstudy.com
forgot image
>New research at San Francisco State University reveals just how common open relationships are among gay men and lesbians in the Bay Area. The Gay Couples Study has followed 556 male couples for three years — about 50 percent of those surveyed have sex outside their relationships, with the knowledge and approval of their partners.
Another faggot here. Not gonna lie m80, gay people are more promiscuous than straight people, specially those who are older and somehow managed not to get AIDS some 20-30 years ago. What's worse is that these people tend to try and find young gay people to fuck them while they're still fresh meat, and that's how young gay activists are born... And this "young" that I speak of is getting "younger" every day, or so to speak. They do deserve the rope.
But in general, gay men that are do not make their sexuality the only facet of their existence suffer as much as the average young male with >no gf. Except it's far harder for us because you can expect that qt girl you have a crush on to be straight, but statistically I can't expect a boy I have a crush on to be gay.
What is a representative sample?
You know what's interesting? If you consider that homosexuals make up about 5% of the worldwide population, it's possible that at least about 10 heads-of-state out of 195 are possibly homos and we would never know.
I'm sure Trudeau is one of them though for obvious reasons.
Good insight, thanks mate. In my view the only sustainable solution for tolerance or acceptance would be the colonization of space so everyone can have their own planet (So that the eternal miniority-factor can be ruled out) or the magical separation of sexual orientation and the currently perceived lifestyle, whatever comes first. Although i have no idea how the latter could be realized in the current climate.
I think that is entirely possible and possibly has probably happened 100s of times in history.
>implying Tusk has a chance to show his face in open in Poland
There mere claim that Tusk and Duda would be neck in neck is hilarious. And a fag having a shot at all in Poland is just plain comedy.
>When gays feel accepted by their friends and family they are more likely to have relationships than casual sex
>When gays feel safe to have sex in their own home, they are less likely to seek sex in public
>Gay acceptance is good for everyone
>Gays being able to hold hands in public, have sex in their own homes without fear of reprisal, marry, have kids, and otherwise participate in civil society are generally good things overall
>Your personal experience is anecdotal and doesn't matter at all
>Lots of gay men and women have long term relationships, monogamous and not
Tusk can and he does.
Polacks are the biggest whores of the EU since day one. They dont want massimmigration for obvious reasons but they love the german money from the EU. They dont want to give up our german territory they have stolen wich the EU gurantees them to have and so on. Or why are they still in the EU and dont want to get out? If the EU fails they are fucked.
Do you honestly think Poland is that stupid? Are you that naive?
They get free money and get to keep their land. Not only that, it is they that dictate their own politics and not the EU. You honestly think they wouldn't have anything prepared for the EU's fall? Especially on harsh times as these? I swear, you Germans will fall for anything.
Those are just the media-led-people that pick their outrage out of the government mandated list of topics that you are allowed to hate-rage about as a German. There's 1000s of them here.
What will they prepare? They are dumb like monkeys and all "their" wealth is because of us.
>"Polands" next president will be a homosexual
Very unlikely if you know societal stance on the whole progressive shit. At the same time, considerable disappointment of the population in regards to the current political leaders gives him some chances. But if he'll win, his sexuality won't have anything to do with it - it's him being an alternative to corrupted establishment representatives from two major political parties that'll get him the seat.
I hope so. Not because I want another homo leader, but I get weary of the smug Pole posters acting like they are the saviour of the world.
Hating degeneracy is one thing, but there needs to be something good to degenerate from for this to cause much worry.
If you hope for political outcome on the basis of behavior of some anons (and some proxies) on this board, I must say it's a really unhealthy attitude you have there.
>>Gay acceptance is good for everyone
No it's not. First they wanted tolerance, then it was acceptance, now they demand to be admired with "pride" marches in every small town. Fuck that. I don't accept you and I don't want to see you around. Get back in your closet you fucking degenerates.
>I get weary of the smug Pole posters acting like they are the saviour of the world.
Let's be honest. At least half of the smugness comes from non-Pole posters shouting 'BASED!' every 5 minutes.
Fake polls and fake news
>Neoreactionary drivel
>OOOGA BOOGA
>SMASH THE GAY
>GRUG COOL ATHEIST
>ATHEISM NO COOL ANYMORE GRUG GO DEUS VULT
>33% for Tusk
You are retarded or you really don't know about politic in poland ?
>>Neoreactionary
haha go eat an ass retard
11,4% are the sum of all the votes left wing parties can win in parliamentary elections. Thry simply don't have any other recognisable person there anymore
Fag here. Don't let this happen. Most fags are pedos.
Regarding the candidate himself, I don't know anything about politics in Poland - is he against mass immigration, especially of Muslims? That's the greatest threat that gay people face today and no one ever talks about it because those activists are all in bed with lefties.
I look forward to the day when you people get gunned down in the streets
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Why does he look asiatic? Slav shit that got raped by Mongols?
>shitty memeflag
It's past your bedtime.
fake and gay
>Biedroń
Who?
I'll vote for king Korwin
No homo
Polish faggot= based faggot AND white faggot
>No homo
post pic of naked man......
Huge mistake.
He's a polish politician
Do you have any idea who this guy is?
faggots are literally the more extreme version of women. they have all the negative sides of cunts but none of the positive ones (which is actually only one: their cunt)
>They are dumb like monkeys and all "their" wealth is because of us.
Yeah. They're so stupid that they came out under of your and Russia's occupation, took a big chunk of your land that YOU are still paying for. What fools. Surely they will suffer a surprising defeat if the eternal EU falls.
No, but seriously. Poland is not to be taken lightly. Read history, user.
If it wasnt for the other jewpuppets saving them and holding Germania down they would live in pic related, if even.
Grooming of young/teen men by older pedos.
Jow Forums is bluepilled about the Catholic Question and eats up Jesuit lies
AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
To both Tusk and Biedron. Tusk is a traitor and PiS/K15/Wolnosc/even SLD voters will crawl over broken glass to vote against him, and Biedron is a faggot who is not taken seriously by anyone here, he's a Grodzkie-tier meme. It will be a 3-way race between some Duda, Kukiz and some liberal idiot (and Juda will win easily)
if you weren't chimping out niggers, we probably would...
good thing you are too dumb to even conquer land from literall peasants. great reich my ass
just waiting untill you start wanking each other with russia again so we can have another round
also
>implying (((Juda))) cares about Poland
If an anti-establishment figure gets in, it will be Kukiz, not some random queer
No, he's your average Western liberal. Pro-(((refugees))), pro-mass immigration, pro-sodomy, pro-queer rights, pro-(((feminism))), anti-Church
>poland metaphorically fucked in the ass
>polish president literally fucked in the ass
Its like poetry.
>leaf
More disease in fags? Yes please.
he is going to get less support than the far right korwin party
Will he be an Indian too?
Maybe you forgot but we conquered you peasants in 18 days.
Try 1v1 next time instead of begging Russia for help
discord gg/jgQnvhP
add a .
>18 days
>german education
It took 6 weeks and thats with massive help from the soviets.
One Kraut start nonsense discussion without even doing a basic research, and all shills jumping from joy. That's a poetry. Moar pls.
Haha, yes the glorious polish army that fought with horses against Panzers. Without the russians it would have take maybe 6 days more to take your whole shithole.
Ahahahaha, nope. Andrzej Duda is the most polish president you can get, his second term is ensured.
Also Bierdoń was beaten up for being a fag and didn't fight back, he have no place here.
>horses against Panzers.
This is basically "Trump has 1-2% chance of winning" says the (((expert))) mr. Silverberg.
now you're just trolling. Or are you a (((fellow white man)))?
>Juda
>most polish
I mean if being in bed with a jewess to advance your political career is the "Peak Pole"...
Duda's the most Polish from the potential candidates
>inb4 retard korwin
When will papists learn?
Did you even read the article? Theres literally no chance of him becoming president.
Homosexuality is degenerate. These people should never be accepted
Polacks send horse cavalry from WW1 against our Panzers just to get mowed down. They are even making a cult out of this to this day to show how "brave" they were.
You're full of shit you kraut
en.wikipedia.org
>Happening on the first day of the war, it was one of its first clashes, and part of the larger Battle of Tuchola Forest. The incident became notable as reporters visiting the site soon after saw the dead bodies of horses and cavalrymen which led to false reports of Polish cavalry attacking German tanks. Nazi propaganda[3] took advantage of this, suggesting that the Poles attacked intentionally, believing that the Germans still had the dummy tanks the Versailles treaty restrictions had permitted them. The scene of Polish cavalry charging the Panzers with their lances has become a modern-day myth.[4]
>Nazi propaganda[3] took advantage of this, suggesting that the Poles attacked intentionally, believing that the Germans still had the dummy tanks the Versailles treaty restrictions had permitted them.
>The scene of Polish cavalry charging the Panzers with their lances has become a modern-day myth.[4]
(((Wikipedia))) says its NAZI-Propaganda... Oh, ok. Want to teach me some more "History" you learned on the TV from Hollywood, mutt? Maybe from the realistic documentary "Saving Private Ryan" or something?
>reducing disease loads in sexual minority groups.
Mostly because white man payed for treatment of said diseases for bunch of fags and niggers
LOL, good joke
>implying putting some pairs of parentheses will dismiss my argument
You have the burden of proof, prove to me that the Poles charged tanks. Most Historians agree that they didn't charge tanks.
Though let me prove to you it is nazi propaganda
>web.archive.org
Imagine being so stupid you fall for your own propaganda. The "horse vs panzers" meme has been disproven over and over again. Polish cavarly did charge german infantry though. The krauts ran away screaming in characteristic german style.
Why am i in the "burden of proof"? Do you think your wikipedia shit is any more credible? Prove to me that this charge is Nazi-Propaganda without the typical Anti-german propaganda sites.
Some sources even claim that the polacks won this charge lol. Easy to find.
A more beliveable story: German Panzers stumbled upon Polish Horsemen and got mowed the fuck down.
>Why am I in the "burden of proof?"
Because you made a claim, and now you have to back it up. It's stickied on Jow Forums.
>Typical Anti-German Propaganda site
It's not even an Anti-German Propaganda site, it's an educational website about German Propaganda published by Calvin College.
>Easy to find
Then it should be easy to link them to me here.
There weren't even any actual tanks at the Charge at Krojanty, it's just krauts being dumbasses and using propaganda to make the Poles look stupid.
Based Janusz
You made a claim, now back it up.
I can give you links in German if you understand that.
>No u argument
That's fucking retarded, you stated that Poles were retarded and charged tanks. Then I stated that they didn't and provided a source. You dismissed that source by saying it's jew and can't be trusted. I link another source by a reputable college that clearly shows it to be Nazi Propaganda, and you refuse to see it.
But by all means, let me back up my claim with yet more sources.
>theguardian.com
>tanks-encyclopedia.com
>foreignpolicy.com
On top of that, there were never any fucking tanks at that battle to begin with, so how the FUCK did Polish Cavalry charge tanks? You must've overdosed on Onions or some shit. Classic Kraut.
And i said you should prove to me that its Nazi-Propaganda without the typical anti-german propaganda sites.
>comes with wikipedia and the guardien etc.
>thinks his allied-propaganda is more credible than german sources of soldiers who where there
Keep on going trying to push me into defense but you got nothing.
>Doesn't dispute my other two sources
>Using Anecdotal evidence which is yet another fallacy in the sticky post
Nice memes.
>Biedroń from Ruch Palikota
>Same Ruch Palikota that won only 7.55 % votes in Sejm elections while united with all other leftist parties
Yeah, so much chance to win
Also, even Korwin obliterates him. Skip to 7:21 in
youtube.com
lol no chance