/HPH/

C O N S E N T

Home movies to preserve memories is one thing, but you have to be a pedo to think "when they're naked" is an appropriate time to film a toddler with the intent of sharing it with millions of viewers. Those children did not have any ability to consent to having nude images of them online forever.

It's hard to follow, because the real satanists are atheist Jews that run charities, but most people think of satanists as the goth fags that hang out at Hot Topic.

wrong target. who does he work for? he makes netflix specials now and I don't think he cares. plus his whole set is about being super edgey.

consent as well as absolutely distasteful, but just exposed child pretty much makes it pornography....
for instance, 15 exposed breasts porn 20 exposed breasts porn I mean shit man

weed them all out, this one, that one, the other one

Jimmy Kimmel gleeful about kids on a very adult and definitively "not a place for kids show", Howard Stern. What's wrong with these people? Who in their right mind would be happy to see kids there? In the same studio where Sulu jerked off a guy live on TV. Jimmy Kimmel is a sick bastard.

archive.is/qHodA

have the Kimmel connection

>2015 pizza gate skit
youtube.com/watch?v=DZm_aPiVP8M [Open]

WARNING, UNUSUAL JIMMY KIMMEL FOOTAGE OF HIM WITH VERY YOUNG CHILDREN

youtube.com/watch?v=RK-oQfFToVg [Open]

Another reason it makes sense to target Kimmel next, is it keeps the pressure on Disney, the same people who fired Gunn. Disney owns ABC, thus employees Kimmel. Thus this video # is child pornography uploaded and endorsed by Disney.

His biggest inspiration is David letterman

answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090611130858AAfckwd&guccounter=1

google.co.uk/amp/s/www.tapatalk.com/groups/peoplespoliticsiii/viewtopic.php?t=6567&=

>Weinstein Junior
thegatewaypundit.com/2018/04/boom-hannity-unloads-on-weinstein-junior-jimmy-kimmel-promises-more-on-pervert-kimmel-tomorrow-night/

Attached: Jimmy Kimmel Pizza Gate episode.jpg (1024x984, 107K)

WARNING

JESELNIK IS A RED HERRING TO TRY TO GET YOU TO DISCREDIT THE REAL PEDO EXPOSE

HIS JOB IS TO DO EDGY HUMOR

IGNORE JESELNIK AND FOCUS ON THE REAL PEDOS

Attached: 1530309589290.jpg (614x767, 109K)

Quality copypasta info, add this though

desu if u look its right here

>ARNING, UNUSUAL JIMMY KIMMEL FOOTAGE OF HIM WITH VERY YOUNG CHILDREN

youtube.com/watch?v=RK-oQfFToVg [Open]

ill add your pasta in there too

HOLY SHIT IT JUST HIT ME
>INB4 >>>/X/, FUCK YOU
THE (((MEDIA))) BLEW UP THE WHOLE "PIZZA IS SO GOOD" MINDLESS POSTS SO WE COULDN'T SEARCH THE ARCHIVE EASILY FOR THEIR CODEWORDS

goddamn my g that's quite the thought

ok first of all none of these children were nude.
you are talking about the topless girl at 5:40

alright, you have to establish why it should be taboo for a 5 year old girl to be shown without any shirt on.
women usually start developing breasts at aroung 10-11 years, which is also the age in which they become more and more reluctant to share view over their private parts.
therfore there is no difference between a boy's and a girl's chest before puberty

this is foreign to us mainland europeans because we know americans love to sexualize everything, even when they're not pedophiles.

You ever watch his stand up? No one is going to care about this.

so what is your age range to deem it unacceptable user??
you sound a little sus user...

jeselnik's entire career as a comedian is based on those sorts of jokes

...there is no age range, if a girl starts growing breasts, she should start hiding them.

>topless girl

In Principal, I'm all for changing our culture to make it so that female nipples aren't a sexual thing. But, that change has not happened yet, so a female still needs to be an adult in order to give consent for her nipples to be exposed to millions of people on national television, and on the internet forever.

>alright, you have to establish why it should be taboo for a 5 year old girl to be shown without any shirt on.

No we don't. That's the whole point of laws protecting children. A pedo can't "establish" that his victim enjoyed it, because statutory is based purely on age, to protect people too young to consent to certain things.

There's a big difference between parents putting a picture in a scrap book of their child growing up, and intentionally making a video of your naked children crying for Jimmy Kimmel's entertainment.

And Kimmel can claim his enjoyment of naked children crying isn't sexual, but I will never be able to believe that. And EVEN IF he's honest and it's not sexual, he just loves crying nude children in a completely non-sexaul way, it's still creepy as fuck and a huge red flag.

sounds like a sketchy career
>comedy is based on truth

...

this

Wow a lot of kikes are on here trying to protect this faggot - why didn't you post an image of the actually atrocious shit he says?

Attached: archive.is%2FparTR.png (797x1021, 604K)

>Next thing you know the media declares it's all fake and just a satanic panic by superstitious Christians.

This. And nevermind all the babies with STDs in San Fransisco, The Manhattan Beach one was fake so they're all fake.

I'M POSTING IN ANOTHER BREAD DESU'S COME JOIN. WE'LL HOP BACK HERE ONCE ITS FULL

Thread reminder pedos are swarming all HPH threads to derail them. They "try to reason" with you using leftist tactics but get triggered quickly and soon snap to rage, calling you Nazis, racists and pedos yourselves. Stay the course, lads. Pedos are even easier to trigger than trans creeps. Continue bombardment of all pedo fortresses and take no prisoners alive. Non-pedo Hollywood thanks you like you wouldn't believe!

Attached: pls just stop.jpg (1340x954, 567K)

He's actually a standup comedian that is known for his edginess. Also, going after to humor is fucking gay. I saw the same soccer-mom tier outrage from you faggots after Chris Rock said that he wanted racial equity in teenagers being shot by gang bangers at a comedy show. Not a good look, fellas, not a good look.

Is this autism?

>going after Jeselnik
Didn't take long for you guys to go full retard on this huh?

CP on bing images, search for "image tag"

>In Principal, I'm all for changing our culture to make it so that female nipples aren't a sexual thing. But, that change has not happened yet, so a female still needs to be an adult in order to give consent for her nipples to be exposed to millions of people on national television, and on the internet forever.
and this generalization is valid, how? we can differentiate a little child's nipples from an adult's quite easily. this seems more like a problem on your end.

>No we don't. That's the whole point of laws protecting children. A pedo can't "establish" that his victim enjoyed it, because statutory is based purely on age, to protect people too young to consent to certain things.
once again, I don't see why we're generalizing again. why stop there? I bet alot of these children didn't consent to the video in the first place, should they not be protected just as well?

>There's a big difference between parents putting a picture in a scrap book of their child growing up, and intentionally making a video of your naked children crying for Jimmy Kimmel's entertainment.
why just protect the naked child, then? this is less about nudity and more about the child's consent to be in on television in the first place.

It's a shill trying to discredit the movement

Ignore Jeselnik and move on to real pedos

"And to think it was just another pedo posing as an user the whole time!"
"I woulda got away with it too, if it hadn't have been for you meddling Intelligent Normal People.... (I already raped and murdered the kids)"

scared jews

articles.latimes.com/1987-08-11/news/mn-846_1_child-molestation
articles.latimes.com/1987-08-15/news/mn-258_1_chlamydia
Image is what is on the land where the children mentioned in the above links were raped/tortured.

Attached: presidio temple on the hellmouth.png (1526x994, 3.23M)

Attached: Screenshot_20180722-002729~2.png (1080x1400, 216K)

How about you boomers focus on abortion, an act that actually kills babies. Instead of schizo posting about pedophiles on board known for pedophilia.

I made pic related, pedokike.

Attached: aborted older brother.jpg (776x529, 77K)

>and this generalization is valid, how? we can differentiate a little child's nipples from an adult's quite easily. this seems more like a problem on your end.

This post has already exposed your tactics.
We are here to protect and defend children, not to twist ourselves in logical knots finding ways to avoid protecting them.

>I bet alot of these children didn't consent to the video in the first place, should they not be protected just as well?
>why just protect the naked child, then? this is less about nudity and more about the child's consent to be in on television in the first place.
Yes, I think trying to upset your own children just because a celebrity told you to is extremely fucked up, and though it's only my opinion I think it's more than enough reason to have Child Protective Services take children away from a parent who would do that.

It's fine to share jokes with your kids, as a way of teaching them to enjoy humor and how to do it themselves, but pranking them in a way that might be, and often is upsetting to them for the purpose of getting 15 seconds of fame on Jimmy Kimmel...yeah that's fucked up and not a sign one is qualified to be a parent.

Yes, clearly people who are scared of losing their careers for old tweets that will seem unsavory in this new outrage culture will delete their tweets.

bump, so many shills trying to slide this

>This post has already exposed your tactics.
>We are here to protect and defend children, not to twist ourselves in logical knots finding ways to avoid protecting them.
I am legitimately doing this because it's fun to argue, such a shame you're admitting to stop arguing.

>Yes, I think trying to upset your own children just because a celebrity told you to is extremely fucked up, and though it's only my opinion I think it's more than enough reason to have Child Protective Services take children away from a parent who would do that.
>It's fine to share jokes with your kids, as a way of teaching them to enjoy humor and how to do it themselves, but pranking them in a way that might be, and often is upsetting to them for the purpose of getting 15 seconds of fame on Jimmy Kimmel...yeah that's fucked up and not a sign one is qualified to be a parent.
so why overblow the whole scenario by focusing on the topless girl?
this seems more like a quest for relevancy.

>Managed by Non Plus Ultra, San Francisco’s premiere events management company, the Palace of Fine Arts is conveniently located just moments away from the Golden Gate Bridge.

>personal friend of Epstein
That’s weird, where have I read that exact line before?
Oh yeah, in your bullshit slide pastas about Trump and Epstein.
Fuck off and kys, pedo scum.

Attached: E56F5116-28FE-434B-AA0E-3054F81AE629.jpg (1400x750, 231K)

Yeah. This faggots needs to go down.

Fuck.
You're right.

You're "arguing" with a person who's only point is "pedophiles are bad" so what position does that force you to take?

We focus on the most egregious things. If I punch a normal guy so hard I knock him out and he losses a tooth, then slat a little girl in a wheel chair and make her cry, who was injured more? The normal guy. Which one shows what kind of dangerous person I am better? The one where I attack someone weaker and more helpless.

This is basic logic, try to keep up.

Fucking pedophile nigger loving faggot right here.

I was sperging out forever trying to figure out why this shit was trending and all in explore...

Earlier, Cernobitch retweeted him then immediately undid it. Then Jeselnik addressed the accusations. Pretty sure the kikes originally planned to have cernobitch and jeselnik to fight at first, then decided last-minute to have jeselnik squash it himself

here's a tip.... pedophilia isn't funny

Retard look at this logically

Jeselnik has literally made his entire career focused on edgy jokes, it's stupid to "expose" him for what he's always done on purpose

It discredits the other exposes of real pedophiles

>You're "arguing" with a person who's only point is "pedophiles are bad" so what position does that force you to take?
this is wrong, you have clearly not paid attention.
One of his points is that all female nipples are sexual, which is obviously something that is derived from degenerative American culture

>We focus on the most egregious things.
nice metaphor you've got there, but you still have to convince me how the topless girl has more intimate body parts showing than the topless boy.

We need to go after that faggots loving Joss Weadon as well. Don't know what dirt can be dound, but he's been normalizing this degeneracy for years. Making shows about human sex slavery, and teenagers fucking monsters since the late 90's.

It’s easy to see why they act this way. It requires an INSANELY weak individual to prey upon the most innocent and defenseless people in this world and derive joy from it. We’re talking about absolutely pathetic and abhorrent individuals that think the world of themselves. It’s no surprise that they shrivel up when we shine an unadulterated mirror on their true identities.

but..that tweet is actually funny

>t. Pedo Internet Defense Force

>all female nipples are sexual
I don't recall anyone saying that. Can you link the specific posts. At least in the case of my posts, this is about consent, and that's all it's about. Whether or not a female nipple is or is not sexual, if a culture exists where it is sexual, it's a bad idea to take video of a topless girl without her consent, which she's too young to give, and spread it to millions of people.

If you leave your wallet on the table, and I open it just being nosy and look at your SSN. Have I done something wrong? Yeah, a little, I violated your privacy which is rude, but I'm just a jerk. Now if I take a picture of of your SSN and post it online so anyone and everyone can steal your identity, have I done something much worse? Yes, I'm way more than a jerk, probably a criminal now.

>you still have to convince me how the topless girl has more intimate body parts showing than the topless boy.

Ha! No I don't. I don't have to convince you that a crime is a crime or that violating consent is wrong. If you don't have the basic empathy required to comprehend consent, then you're outside the agreement "I won't harm you if you don't harm me." You somehow can't comprehend how things make other feel. You think you're the only sentient creature in the universe and everyone else is just your playthings, children or not.

Keep on talking, you're only making yourself look worse and bumping the thread so the rest of us can continue to expose pedos.

are you arguing that there is no sexuality inherent to what you are biologically wired to be attracted to? i.e. mammary glands

shills for days with this one
KEEP DIGGING

the holocaust was a hoot, what does that have to do with this?

The only reason why it worked on James Gunn was because he was tied to big-budget movies like Guardians of the Galaxy and its sequel. Do you think doing it to some less-relevant celebrity cuck's going to do anything?

one less pedo

>I don't recall anyone saying that
>In Principal, I'm all for changing our culture to make it so that female nipples aren't a sexual thing

>if a culture exists where it is sexual, it's a bad idea to take video of a topless girl without her consent, which she's too young to give, and spread it to millions of people.
My original post challenged your moral standpoint on how nipples are sexual.
The liberals this video is supposed to approach seem to have been fine with it and saw it as something non-sexual, rather than make a scandal out of it.
So it is pretty clear that not all Americans think as you guys do.
Tell me, does not your reaction to this topless child cause more harm than good? You are all for changing the culture which doesn't sexualize pre-puberty nipples, so why don't you represent it?

>If you leave your wallet on the table, and I open it just being nosy and look at your SSN. Have I done something wrong? Yeah, a little, I violated your privacy which is rude, but I'm just a jerk. Now if I take a picture of of your SSN and post it online so anyone and everyone can steal your identity, have I done something much worse? Yes, I'm way more than a jerk, probably a criminal now.
I don't get it.

>I don't have to convince you that a crime is a crime
appeal to the law

>violating consent is wrong
we're not making any progress on this argument because you are too stubborn to realize that this can also be applied to filmed clothed children in general.
how does a topless 5 year old girl make the situation considerably worse that you can call it child pornography.

think before you write, sweetie

All these shills comin out of the woodwork to protect Jeselnik. Shut it down goys- i mean guys! """We""" don't want to look bad do """we"""?

Burn all pedos.

>My original post challenged your moral standpoint on how nipples are sexual.

Which is not my standpoint at all. My standpoint is and has always been that children at too young to consent and should be protected from exploitation and there should be consequences for those who violate that. You keep twisting things to try and derail the anti-pedo thread, but I'm not letting you.

>You are all for changing the culture which doesn't sexualize pre-puberty nipples, so why don't you represent it?
There you go, exactly as I predicted before I even read it, twisting things to try and make straw man arguments. You keep trying to make this amount nipples, thinking you can win that argument and we'll all just let pedophilia slide "cause nipples."

>appeal to the law
It's not an appeal to anything. I'm not in favor of jaywalking being a crime, but if I can get a pedo locked up for it, that's at least a few days he can't molest any kids.

You can't slide this thread, you can only bump it. We will stay focused on stopping pedos no matter what you try and say to stop us.

Would be a good time to remind everyone what a womanizer he is from being on The Man Show

It's not than damming, he's said before it was a satire of mysogyny and people let it slide. Doesn't hurt to mention it, but I don't think it helps much either. the pedo stuff is the damning stuff.

are theses guys memeing or serious
twitter.com/ProstasiaInc/status/1007370620705730560
>The CREEPER Act would prevent the distribution or importing of such child sex dolls in the U.S.

>pedowood twitter hunting spree goes at full overdrive
>suddenly, this tripfag larper suddenly shows out of nowhere
smells like classic d&c right here. don't lose your focus and keep digging

PATTON OSWALT OY VEY

What sick fuck makes analogies to toddlers fucking, to get his point across?

archive.is/3zP8f

PATTON OSWALT: "Uncle Touchy's Naked Puzzle Basement"
Skip to 07:25
youtube.com/watch?v=U_GzGsHSDqY [Open] [Open]

Transcript from 7:00-8:00 minute mark
>I’m afraid one of these kids will show up as Remy (Patton’s character in Rattatouille) and just out of enthusiasm I’m going to go “You’re inside me right now did you know that? How about that? You’re walking the night in my skin, how does that feel?”
>”That is very well meaning. And that is a step away from ‘Does this washcloth smell like chloroform to you? What do you think? Doesn’t it smell like chloroform?’ (Smiles and walks with his back to the crowd) ‘Take you down to Uncle Touchy’s Naked Puzzle Basement’

Murderer Patton Oswalt Releases
do yourself a favor and see if his wifes autopsy report ever can back....why is taking so long? When we say murderer we mean that he killed his wife...
>Details of Wife's Death to Establish Alibi and Throw Off Investigators
vulture.com/2017/02/patton-oswalt-reveals-wifes-cause-of-death.html

(OP) #
OSWALT FULL DAMAGE CONTROL DELETED ALL TWEETS BEFORE MAY 17

Oswalt's creepy Karate Kid fanfiction:
archive.is/at7Vq#selection-1041.1-1049.1
>What was this new, sexual charge he felt? He was a bad boy making a big messy-poo, and seeing things splash and make a stainy-wainy made him want to be punished, paddled, humiliated. He didn't like thinking too deeply about it. But he was happy.
>For a while. Because sure enough, another skinny, olive-skinned boy hove into view. He even looked like Daniel LaRusso (even though he dressed like Elvis Costello). This new kid seemed more…delicate. Feminine. What were these feelings?

Attached: Patton Oswalt Tweet 2.png (628x373, 70K)

>children at too young to consent and should be protected from exploitation
agree, it's sad how you can't argue with logic but with muh feels instead

>There you go, exactly as I predicted before I even read it
ok fortune teller when am i getting married

>You keep trying to make this amount nipples, thinking you can win that argument and we'll all just let pedophilia slide "cause nipples."
no
this has been about the video you have posted, specifically the last part where they show a topless girl
you have yet to prove how it's related to pedophilia in the first place, yet I only get childish annotations such as
>No we don't.
>This post has already exposed your tactics.
>This is basic logic
>not to twist ourselves in logical knots finding ways to avoid protecting them.
>Ha! No I don't
just some highlights of your failed argumentation

all in all, the video you are using is just a way to obtain relevancy in pizzagate, unless you can prove to us there's a connection, of course.
your use of ad hominems and DIRECT ADMISSION that logic is not a way the way to argue says alot about your intelligence

this trip posted hollywood user info which was pretty interesting. I DOUBT its the same poster though. leftyjidfhasbarapol has been moving pretty quickly

/////
...renegade !x1aoOS1SNE (ID: G6jwxxBH)
07/21/18(Sat)13:06:11 No.179577072
OK FUCK IT!!! I'LL DROP SOMETHING!!

CASA DE HOGAR NUEVO LAREDO! HUGE TRAFFICKING HUB! AND THE ORPHANAGE IN LAREDO IS ALSO COMPROMISED!!

ITS THE REASON THE TERVINO-MORALES BROTHERS HAVEN'T BEEN EXTRADITED!

ITS THE REASON MIKE TREVNIO MORALES WAS TRANSFERRED TO PUENTE GRANDE PRISON!!!! THEY'RE SCARED HE MIGHT POP THE LID ON THE PEDOSHIT SO THEY SENT HIM THERE SO HIS RIVALS CAN WHACK HIM AFTER HE REJECTED A DEAL THAT WAS BEING MADE UNDER THE TABLE!!!

SEARCH FOR THE BETANCOURTS BASED IN IN TAMAULIPAS AND THE VALENCIAS FROM NUEVO LEON!!! THEY ARE THE BIGGEST HUMAN TRAFFICKERS IN MEXICO!!!!

THEY WORK WITH NGOs BASED IN THE USA!!!!

ok guys i gotta go now peace i'll be back tonight or tomorrow
///////

Attached: 1505754966290.gif (420x314, 755K)

>it's sad how you can't argue with logic but with muh feels instead
Protecting children is logic, it's how the human race kept from going extinct. But you know that, you're just trying to slide.

>ok fortune teller when am i getting married
Hopefully never, I wouldn't trust you around a child.

>prove how it's related to pedophilia
I'm not going to "prove" the definition or words to you. And you're not going to trick the people in this thread into give pedophiles a pass because you know a few basic Sophist tactics. You keep losing over and over, but you can't give up, it's self preservation, if hunters are coming for pedos, it means your days are numbered, so you'll always fight. And everyone here can read all of this, learning how to defeat you.

bump

right in the feels, fellow kraut user.

>I'm not going to "prove" the definition or words to you.
So you are not going to provide any arguments because you are afraid of "logical knots" and "basic Sophist tactics".
Got it.

There's never a time when there isn't at least one /hph/ thread up. The hunters are coming for the pedos, it can't be stopped, not by anything you say.

ok
I will stop trying to hinder hunters from hunting down pedos, I just want to know what's child pornographic about the video you posted.

you seem oddly invested in this user.....
don't drop the soap

>don't drop the soap
you seem oddly comfortable talking about dicks involuntarily shoved into your ass

did that one trigger you?
have fun Jimmy

If I take a video of someone in line at the bank, just standing there, and put it online without their permission. I violated their consent, but even if they care, no one will care that they care, it's them in line at the bank. If I pull back their shower curtain and yell "Boo!" to they react and then put that video online of them naked in the shower screaming cause I though it was funny, without their permission, now more people will agree I've done something wrong. There was nothing"sexual" about the shower video, but still, putting the video of them naked online without consent matters, the video from the bank...you could make an argument that it matters, but no one will care.

But you know this, no one is as dumb as you're pretending to be. You're trying to slide the thread and I turn everyone one of your posts into another effective argument to shut down pedos. So keep bumping the thread.

american homosex is the peak of ur comedy it seems

Attached: jimmy-neutron-show-thumb-web.jpg (480x270, 15K)

Attached: ItsJustJokes.png (1197x2324, 815K)

7.27.2018
No Twitter macros
Reclaim the mantle of Original Content
Make Jow Forums great again

What's comedy is how much of your life you're wasting getting nowhere in an argument
go read a book lol, we're gonna stay at it Jimmy

Look, it's the new astroturfed cbts thread!
Low IQ Predicted!

Attached: 1518411740747.jpg (689x530, 80K)

this is what jeselnik does. don't go after him, it would be pointless

lol he's a fucking comedian you retards

>There was nothing"sexual" about the shower video, but still, putting the video of them naked online without consent matters, the video from the bank...you could make an argument that it matters, but no one will care.
Good! Now tell me how a 5 year old girl's breasts are intimate parts of her body.

>But you know this, no one is as dumb as you're pretending to be.
basically the same as saying
"ARE YOU KIDDING ME DO YOU EXPECT TO EXPLAIN MY REASONING"
youtube.com/watch?v=tvfhmhITkYY

I try to enjoy every single second of life.
For example, arguing against people ten times less intelligent than me brings me great joy.

FUCKING MORGANITES