Starts deregulation

>starts deregulation
>never declares a single war

Name me a better president

Attached: JimmyCarterPortrait2.jpg (1650x2027, 1.56M)

Other urls found in this thread:

occasionalplanet.org/2011/12/16/lincoln-and-the-socialist-roots-of-the-republican-party/
abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/fair.htm
marxists.org/archive/marx/iwma/documents/1864/lincoln-letter.htm
books.google.com/books?id=XKxYAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA288&lpg=PA288&dq="there is meat in that suggestion"&source=bl&ots=57MtGa7eHo&sig=BYduybaifwqobqf0SI1quq0IzDU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiBkP7r17HcAhUDQ6wKHbBuBmcQ6AEwAXoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&q="there is meat in that suggestion"&f=false
teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/cornerstone-speech/
medium.com/@jackiethornhill/how-the-united-states-created-al-qaeda-2bbe129faf57
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

white obungo?

Attached: williammckinley.jpg (206x245, 4K)

>starts deregulation
How the fuck is that a good thing?

Truman. But Carter was a decent guy, too.

...

>trump king of deregulation
>evaded war with russia and nk, most likely china as well
See ya in 6 years bong, make the same thread again.

>the first neocon
>fought Spanish American despite it being obviously over a pretext that makes Bush and Iraq look good

Donald Trump

He launched the jihad in Afghanistan. I will still say the collapse of the Soviet Union was worth it, but it hasn't been without...consequences.

He had some sound energy independence ideas...
But he kinda blew it with Iran.

Attached: RH-53-Desert-One.jpg (620x388, 74K)

Get fucking real, this President was so based the commies had to pop him to avoid four more years of greatness. Also, that war was nothing like the Iraq war so stop making shit up.

FDR

TRUMP
you stupid motherfuckers why I am I the first to say this????

The Spanish American war was just for the lolz.

most of that problem was every service wanted to be in on the action so like 6 different agencies were together on one operation with no cross training or rehearsal

Nixon.

One thing you can say about carter you will never see another x president on top of a house fixing a roof for poor people himself. Other presidents just make photo ops in flannel shirts with really crisp new lines

Grover Cleveland was the best president we've ever had in terms of adherence to the constitution.

Prove me wrong. Protip, you can't

Attached: 71041-004-B475207F.jpg (301x350, 11K)

>Pays off Egypt and Israel to stop killing each other
>Gives away the Panama Canal
No. He's a fucking moron.

>Stagflation

Polk was better.

This

All these based democrats

Never had one single scandal during his entire Presidency.

Attached: WilliamHenryHarrison.jpg (402x480, 41K)

his brother accomplished more.

Attached: BillyBeer.png (500x677, 668K)

>starts deregulation

That makes him neoliberal trash

>never declares a single war

But he did arm Jihadists in Afghanistan

Attached: FireShot Screen Capture #568 - 'How Jimmy Carter and I Started the M_' - www_counterpunch_ (732x2310, 541K)

TR
FDR
George Washington
Ronald Regan
Donald Trump

Dude James "The Adonis" Polk was better than everyone

I said pretext for going to war dumbass.

>Name me a better president
>Unemployment 20%
>Inflation 18%
>Affirmative action
>Energy Crisis
>Automobile prices increased 72%. New house prices went up 67%. In 1979 alone, gasoline prices increased 60%.
>Cut the defense spending by $6 billion (1970s money) destroying the readiness
>Iranian government's seizure of 52 Americans held for 444 days
>Disastrous military rescue
Yep, really good prez....

McKinley had a great domestic and economic policy he was like a rebirth of Lincoln/Henry Clay economic nationalism, it's too bad about his foreign policy

Carter sucked as a president, but as a human being he's pretty rad

The Energy crisis was caused by the Israelis bombing Arabs, not Carter

Carter was still a piece of shit though as he used the Energy Crisis ad an excuse to deregulate everything.

Lincoln was a Marxist.

Andrew Jackson

His administration allowed General Motors, the richest corporation in the world at the time, to move plants to Mexico so they could make even more money. One of the most traitorous acts in US history.

only congress has the power to declare war

again, congress has the power to vote, and decide regulation vs deregulation

Im pretty sure congress in 1920 was pursuing deregulation

yoo a fookin muppet mate

Lincoln was an American Nationalist like Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, Alexander Hamilton, Henry Carey, and to a lesser extent John C. Calhoun.

>Lincoln was a Marxist.

Attached: 1495341843605.png (2579x1333, 1.93M)

literally any of them

occasionalplanet.org/2011/12/16/lincoln-and-the-socialist-roots-of-the-republican-party/
You can also read several speeches where he talks about capital and labor in a clearly Marxist tone like this one.
abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/fair.htm

Why would that be separate from the war, I know what you meant.

>Carter was a decent guy
But a horrible president. He was my first CIC and nobody respected him

He stood up to OPEC causing oil prices to plummet soon after. He was the president that defeated the USSR.

marxists.org/archive/marx/iwma/documents/1864/lincoln-letter.htm
You know he cucked out on niggers right?

>had some sound energy independence ideas.
Wear a sweater

>say pretext was worse than Iraq WMD pretext
>somehow thinking I was saying they are the same

Attached: 1524448975705.png (376x476, 254K)

the president does not have any sort of special sort of "powers" to change ECONOMIC policy - thats entirely the market fucking you because they don't like things going on in happenstance
Now all these "poor" big corps are getting ass fucked with tariffs as they should - good riddance and fuck'em too they're overreaching welfare kings and queens

presidential speedrun record holder

The Republican Party was built on the ashes of the Whig party which was an entirely nationalist party that only died out because two of the Whig presidents that were elected died early in their terms.

> Marxist tone

Republicans in the north believed in acting in the interest of the white working class because it was far better than having a large non-white slave class like the South.

They also saw it as far superior to Marxism. Republicans believed in private property which is anathema in Marxism. There was nothing Marxist about Lincoln he was a nationalist in the same vein as Bismark or Napoleon III.

He didn't

Up until his last days he wanted to deport the non-whites.

books.google.com/books?id=XKxYAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA288&lpg=PA288&dq="there is meat in that suggestion"&source=bl&ots=57MtGa7eHo&sig=BYduybaifwqobqf0SI1quq0IzDU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiBkP7r17HcAhUDQ6wKHbBuBmcQ6AEwAXoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&q="there is meat in that suggestion"&f=false

Marxists are not against people owning homes or whatever, they're only against the ownership of the means of production by a few. Republicans were not for the white working class they were for niggers and shills for certain industries appropriating federal money for their benefit over others.
>Allow me briefly to allude to some of these improvements. The question of building up class interests, or fostering one branch of industry to the prejudice of another under the exercise of the revenue power, which gave us so much trouble under the old constitution, is put at rest forever under the new. We allow the imposition of no duty with a view of giving advantage to one class of persons, in any trade or business, over those of another. All, under our system, stand upon the same broad principles of perfect equality. Honest labor and enterprise are left free and unrestricted in whatever pursuit they may be engaged. This old thorn of the tariff, which was the cause of so much irritation in the old body politic, is removed forever from the new.
teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/cornerstone-speech/

>We of the South, generally apart from considerations of constitutional principles, opposed its exercise upon grounds of its inexpediency and injustice. Notwithstanding this opposition, millions of money, from the common treasury had been drawn for such purposes. Our opposition sprang from no hostility to commerce, or to all necessary aids for facilitating it. With us it was simply a question upon whom the burden should fall. In Georgia, for instance, we have done as much for the cause of internal improvements as any other portion of the country, according to population and means. We have stretched out lines of railroads from the seaboard to the mountains; dug down the hills, and filled up the valleys at a cost of not less than $25,000,000. All this was done to open an outlet for our products of the interior, and those to the west of us, to reach the marts of the world. No State was in greater need of such facilities than Georgia, but we did not ask that these works should be made by appropriations out of the common treasury. The cost of the grading, the superstructure, and the equipment of our roads was borne by those who had entered into the enterprise. Nay, more not only the cost of the iron no small item in the aggregate cost was borne in the same way, but we were compelled to pay into the common treasury several millions of dollars for the privilege of importing the iron, after the price was paid for it abroad. What justice was there in taking this money, which our people paid into the common treasury on the importation of our iron, and applying it to the improvement of rivers and harbors elsewhere?

>Marxists are not against people owning homes or whatever,

Marxists are against all private property. If you believe in private property you can't be even close to a Marxist

>, they're only against the ownership of the means of production by a few

Wrong they are against all private property.

>Republicans were not for the white working class

Lincoln was for the white working class

>The South

The South hated white workers and wanted to replace them with negroid slave labour. The south's dislike of tariffs came from the fact they wanted to remain a backwards agriculture society based on low skill negroid labour.

They didn't want tariffs because tariffs helped industry, factories, manufacturing, and white workers. The south could produce nothing but agricultural exports and wanted to rely entirely on imports from foreign countries (Britain). The South's retarded, backwards policies are why it lost the war.

Marxism entails a "dictarorship of the proletariat" in an industrial society. They wanted niggers and whites to be equal to subvert the natural order of things and to industrailize the nation so that everyone is interdependent on one another economically.

Marx only talked about the means of production. Show me where he said he wants all property to be commonly owned as in traditional communism. Tariffs don't benefit anyone especially those aimed at benefitting certain people.

Marx talked explicitly about banning all private property as well as banning all racial, national, and ethnic identity along with all social classes, money, and government. The fact you don't know this shows how ignorant you are of basic politics.

>Tariffs don't benefit anyone

Tariffs benefit workers in your nation by not outsourcing their jobs overseas or across national borders. This leads to workers and local companies getting more business and workers getting higher wages. Thanks to tariffs America had the highest wages on earth from the mid 1800s to the 1970s.

>In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property

Chapter 2 of the Communist Manifesto 1848

>Andrew Jackson
>Calvin Coolidge
>Grover Cleveland
>Millard Filmore
I named four.

How the United States Created Al-Qaeda

In 1979 while speaking to the radical Islamist Mujahideen group in Pakistan,
President Carter’s
National Security Advisor told the group that “Your cause is right, and God is on your side.”
medium.com/@jackiethornhill/how-the-united-states-created-al-qaeda-2bbe129faf57