Everyone gets mad at AMERICA for taking land from the North American natives, but why does nobody ever get mad at France for taking land from Brittany and Normandy?
Everyone gets mad at AMERICA for taking land from the North American natives...
Logan Green
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Jacob Jackson
It was a logical union
Jack Miller
Brittany seems comfy.
Liam Murphy
Normandy was never an independant kingdom.
You might think so because the Brits called their conquest by France the "Norman invasions", to not have to face the fact they were invaded by the French, of all people.
Nolan Lopez
You "logical unioned" your way through Savoy, Brittany, Normandy, Burgundy, Provence, The Papal State, and Lorraine.
Wyatt Wright
All perfectly fine, if we didn't do it these regions would have been absorbed by someone else
Kayden Brooks
You are wrong.
"In 1202, Philip II of France declared Normandy forfeit to him and seized it by force of arms in 1204."
en.wikipedia.org
Angel Murphy
As is the case with the USA and Indian lands.
Henry Mitchell
>american education
Juan Taylor
Yeah I guess. I think it's only pro immigration leftards who ever use the "b-b-but AMERICA immigrated and stole the land" bullshit though
Blake King
We saved them from genetical teeth decay
Nathan Martinez
"The territory ceded to Rollo comprised the pagi of the Caux, Évrecin, Roumois and Talou. This was territory formerly known as the county of Rouen, and which would become Upper Normandy. A royal diploma of 918 confirms the donation of 911, using the verb adnuo ("I grant"). There is no evidence that Rollo owed any service or oath to the king for his lands, nor that there were any legal means for the king to take them back: they were granted outright."
Aiden Gutierrez
Communists try to destroy civilization.
Matthew Allen
Is normandy any nice anyway
Ayden Richardson
>part of France invade England
>that part of France becomes part of England
>France takes it back
not an independant kingdom, is that hard to understand
Parker Myers
>French education
Reread your post
Jacob Moore
>american comprehension
even taiwan know better
Justin Torres
It was basically a viking colony, baguette. Not really "part of France"
Ryder Allen
>a viking colony
Luke Ortiz
Not an argument. You going to surrender again?
Ian Collins
you obviously have no idea of what you're talking about
Jose Lee
Is English your second language or something? I have no idea what that post means. Are you using a translator?
Gavin Peterson
Everywhere on earth was conquered usually multiple times
Colton Thompson
>Amerishit lecturing french ppl about french history
Julian Baker
Normandy was French clay given to vikings to stop their chimping out. They were still supposed to be subordinate to the french king.
Camden Morris
Normandy was never really foreign to France, they had some Vikings taking it for sometimes and that's it.
It's a different story for Brittany. Britons left Britain to settle in Armorica, we don't know exactly how many they were but they were enough numerous to export their language (Breton is closely related to Welsh and Cornish) and genetic studies shows important proximity with others Celts from Britain and Ireland. Plus they created an independent kingdom and duchy. The national feeling still exists.
Aiden Perez
they have taken land from belgium, rijsel is unironically flemish. it is our land.