Trumpfags got conned

>the left: 'tax cuts don't do anything for the working class'
>the right: 'buhhh.... something something mexicans'

Braindead.

>graph goes from 7.5 to 9.5

These fucks aren't even pretending to be honest anymore

you already lost the argument. just take the L and walk away

>that y-axis scale

Attached: 1530119391296.png (386x420, 74K)

>Yelling 'fake news' doesn't make the data go away. Facts don't care about your feelings.

Source: Payscale.com

Only the leftist elites have an understanding of economics. Leftist zombies like you don't understand a thing.

>Taking info from some crowd sourcing site as legitimate.

>he thinks anecdotes > data
Stop arguing with your feeders you little faggot.

>Trump is pumping the economy full of shitty, low wage jobs
Thanks?

The graph is NEGATIVE, fucktard

That y-axis tho.

The actual scale and numbers don't matter. What matters is that it looks like it's going down and that the amount it goes down looks really big compared to before.

Because the graph isn't about informing people, it's about manipulating them.

Then why does the economy always perform better when dems are in charge?

I have gotten a $12k raise since the tax cuts. Like I am going to listen to some kike propaganda.

I've received over 16 thousand dollars in raises, and 5 thousand in bonuses, in just the last 12 months. It's been working pretty well for me.

This is due to inflation, not actual wages going down. Bloomberg is fucking retarded.

>millions of formerly unemployed workers start work higher than the national average
The Left can’t into logic or do reasoning

My wages went up and I live in California of all places.

OP, why does that chart say since 2006, but only shows 2016?

>(((Bloomberg)))
Nothing to see here, people. Move along.

"trickle down"
youtube.com/watch?v=VlWCnA7TbNU
saged

>what's the difference between mean median and mode

Actually a correct: even though my first raised was announced last July it didn't kick in until October 1st, so that's 16 thousand in raises and 5 thousand in bonuses in the less than 10 months.

huh, im making more money than under Obama, who did they poll? Mcdonalds workers?

Only the left calls it trickle down economics and our economy is doing better than ever you dumbfuck.

And you think that's because of... tax cuts? I hate to break it to you, but people got bonuses before the tax cuts. Pretty normal actually.

You guys are fucking retards
Go back to 3rd grade math. You clearly never learned how to read a simple graph.

imagine it this way.

70 people are working full time jobs doing the work of 80 people and getting paid ok wages of an average of $18/hour. a tax cut comes through and businesses are freed from the shackles of obama-care. They hire on 10 more people to bring their employment up to snuff; however they've been making due with 70 doing the full job, so since income hasn't increased they can't pay the new people full wages, and instead pay them min wage of $10/hour.

well you've just added 12.5% more people to the labor pool at almost 60% the salary of the origional group. the net result is a decrease in real wages. (now 80 people are making an average of $17/hour) a decrease of $1 per hour.

Now ask me, would you rather 70 people working at 18/hour and 30 people not working or paying any taxes, or 80 people at an average of 17/hour and 20 people not working. your stats are a fucking lie repeated only by lefty tumblerinas who know jack shit about math, economics or politics.

Attached: 1484205471373.jpg (750x750, 74K)

What it means is large numbers of low wage employees who were unemployed no longer are, thus skewing the average downward.
The real news is that these people have employment opportunities that are strong enough to get them off the gaming chair where they were riding the the system and have them actually doing something..

You are too dumb to be from my country

can any smart user tell me what the y axis means of the graph?

I got a raise as did everyone at my job.

Attached: E830B10B-29DB-4B0A-AF52-DDEAF93264CF.gif (275x206, 3.75M)

>More jobs for people who would be on governmental assistance is somehow negative.
Thanks retard

You ok leaf? That was a sensible and appropriate answer. Are you feeling Well?

>anecdotes
Stop arguing with your feefees

>what are real wages?
Drooling moron.

If this were true, then unemployment numbers would have changed more. Stop being willfully ignorant.

Its comparing real wages to 2006 numbers. Jesus Christ Jow Forums is retarded

>more anecdotes
Data trumps your shitty anecdote

I know it is. The owner of the company literally told me he was giving it to me due to the tax cuts.

Explain

>data
Let me guess, it's not wages but "real wages" and by "real wages" they mean they account for inflation (the 1.2% down) but not total salary tax savings (the 3.1% up).

Use real data.

I don't understand how wages can drop significantly in just 3 months as a result of vague changes to the tax code. Someone explain how this works in real life.

>changes in """real""" wages
Let's look at the data without modifiers, shall we?

>got conned by not voting for the establishment

K

FUCKING.
RETARDED.
Unemployment rates have remained relatively stable so far this year. If what you say is true, then the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate should have changed.

Facts don't care about your feelings.

Attached: Mika-Hakkinen-joins-McLaren-Honda.jpg (698x400, 45K)

SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE

THIS IS A SLIDE THREAD

That girl looks like Murdoch-Chan.

> educated >100IQ white men actually believe this

>Trump creates a fuck load of jobs
>A lot of these jobs are low entry. Meaning low pay.
>These jobs probably don’t get raises right off the bat.
Drumpf is ruining the economy! Look how the minimum wage is going down! We aren’t overvaluing labor enough!

The unemployment data doesn't really support this theory. Also, this isn't what was promised when Trump pitched the tax cuts. Growth and wages were two of the selling points of the cuts, and neither have panned out.

Here. Let’s look at it mathematically. Let’s say you’re making ten dollars an hour and loose 2%, just like your graph shows.
10*.02=.02
So you’re freaking out about two cents. That’s not a big deal. Any problems with the math?

People were getting raises before the tax cuts too. Congratulations though.

They're negative numbers

>more
>anecdotes
Jesus Christ you faggots can't argue for shit.

>more jobs
Not even true. Labor force participation and unemployment rates would have changed, and they haven't.

I make more money now, tax cuts work. Try getting a real job.

And my dad works for Nintendo.

>source : pay scale
Kek

I got a new job since Trump was elected where I’m making more money than I ever have in my life and have full benefits.

>imagine emptying your entire full weighted sack directly into her womb

>Trickledown economics

You know you fags made up that term, right?

How can you be so stupid to think your employer having less money instead of more is good for you? Honestly dude.

Modifiers?
Real wage simply accounts for inflation and variances in cost of living.

Lmao the graph is intentionally misleading, in fact it's a classically misleading graph that would be thrown out of any journal

Trump promised a $4,000 - $9,000 increase in annual wages for the average American workers. Don't you idiots remember anything this idiot President says?

Is our inflation really that high?

Maybe we should stop importing foreign workers.

This is really fucking bad. It's almost as though Trump has been lying to us the whole fucking time and deceiving people by telling them what they want to hear, regardless of reality.

Attached: Trump lies again.jpg (1280x720, 65K)

>(((BLOOMBERG)))

Attached: (((hands))).png (171x158, 3K)

Exactly

Really makes me distrust Bloomberg

>he thinks labor is overvalued
Then why the fuck is our GINI coefficient Africa-tier?

OH NO NO NO NO NO

>if more people join the workforce because of open jobs, wages go up immediately

yes I can see that they're negative numbers. What do the numbers represent? Negative compared to what?

this graph says that seems to suggest that wages have been kind of stagnant since 2016. They dont seem to be rising or falling that far off.

Attached: file.png (1200x1029, 151K)

How can you be so stupid to think your employer having more money instead of more is good for you? Honestly dude.

Mfw I immediately took home $200 more monthly when tax cuts hit, and I've gotten 2 raises since. Trump economy doing okay for this fag.

Attached: received_10215404040710107~2-01.jpg (421x423, 101K)

>he thinks a 2% dip in wages over a 6 month period is nothing to worry about
Retard.

So where are actual numbers for how much they're being paid?
You think people now losing money when they work?

>*breaths in* HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>Trickle down economics

Attached: 10408932_1122861634391480_7603892852682156816_n.png (849x314, 383K)

>Unemployment rates have remained relatively stable so far this year. If what you say is true, then the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate should have changed.
this is a falacy. The unemployment rate only counts people actively looking for work WHILE collecting unemployment. There are millions of able bodied people capable of working not counted in the unemployment numbers due to the obama ecconomy who have no on the books income. In the prior example, if those 10 employees hired at min-wage were from the pool of unemployed thanks to the obamapacalypse the actual unemployment numbers wouldn't change at all.

Attached: 1484205471371.jpg (643x960, 81K)

i just got a 7.5% raise and a 5k bonus. im ok with this

Everyone can see that you're a liar

Where do you think your paycheck comes from dumbass? Do you think you're going to get a raise if your boss can't afford it?

From the White House website:

“Reducing the statutory federal corporate tax rate from 35 to 20 percent would, the analysis below suggests, increase average household income in the United States by, very conservatively, $4,000 annually.”

The document goes on to say:

“When we use the more optimistic estimates from the literature, wage boosts are over $9,000 for the average U.S. household.”

1 in 3 Americans is unemployed. Does that sounds like a fucking good thing to you?

Attached: 1514927259830s.jpg (125x125, 3K)

so wages are probably only going down in california then

My boss can afford to end global poverty several times over.

Funny my wage was 9.50 before Trump, now I make 12.10.

nice bait heres your you

I just got a new job for $10 an hour more, so suck my nuts

Ah yes, the old "believe me and not your own lying eyes" strategy of the left. Tell me, do you people ever get tired of trying the same things and expecting different results?

>bloomberg
user I...

Soros wouldn't do something like that.

FINALLY - Real wages are measured against inflation, and as anyone can attest, cost of living has been spiking as well. Real wage is not a measurement of either wages or employment. It's a measure of "average income" against inflation. Go back to tumbler you socialist idiots. less people there know to recognize your fucking propaganda

Attached: 1484205471365.jpg (960x720, 114K)

Sorry, I'll only post info from Breitbart and the Daily Caller from now on.

I bet a memeflagger couldn't even imagine how Mexico would pay for it