>everything is meaningless
>I play video games all day long
>any kind of work is futile
>you can't find any fulfillment in a pointless existence
>nothing is serious
>I need a 10/10 girlfriend, but since only 10/10 men get them and I'm a 1/10 beta male, I'll rant about how females are whores
>society needs to adapt to my demands because I'm infallible and need not improve myself
>Science explains everything
>I have never seen evolution or the big bang occur but they're proven facts
Atheism
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
colorado.edu
youtube.com
nypost.com
livescience.com
twitter.com
Christian life is meaningless. You live to serve an invisible being who knows everything you do and will send you to another dimension for eternity. So why not just work on converting as many people as possible? What's the point of preserving race if you live with millions of Christian blacks for eternity when you die?
sage
>clicking "post a reply"
>typing out a coherent sentence
>using a keyboard
>having an opinion
>could god have created free will without evil
>free will
>prevent you from doing something
pick one
We already had this thread earlier today
>there are those whinning jerks on the internet no one gives a shit about
>i'll spend extra time and efford to try to ridicule them on internet, so people start thinking our jewish news sources are credible again
>this is what jew worshipers actually believe
Can someone explain why this board is so triggered over atheism? Meanwhile, in the US:
>almost all Evangelicals are pro-Israel
>churches openly flying Israeli flags
>praying for the State of Israel to bring about the end times
>Catholics supporting mass immigration
So god is not all powerful.
>he admits to being a whiny manchild
You don't get to solve a mystery by appealing to a greater mystery. Your hypothesis has zero explanatory or predictive power, as well as no supporting evidence and can therefore be dismissed.
Sub 100 iq mutts can't imagine a world without magic sky daddy
Because they're stastically everything wrong with Western civilization.
fedoras are peak pathetic
>if i stay a virgin and pray to the imaginary jew, it will all be ok.
lmao damn, sure told them, christcuck!
sometimes i see those people at the subway or the train station. it seems to me they never advanced of their teeny angsty edgy phase. they are ridiculed in the internet for many years now. what are they thinking? are they aware of it? i mean, even on reddit there is neckbeard hate going on. these people are doomed. they are cought in the dissonance between their ideal of being superior while refusing change within themselves which would be mandatory for obtaining these high ideals.
>Can God Prevent Evil?
He can't force you to be a cunt. [1]
>Does God know about all the Evil?
Yes. [2]
>Does God want to prevent Evil?
Yes. [3]
>Then why is there Evil?
Fall of Lucifer. [4]
>An all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good God could and would destroy Satan
Could yes, would no. Refer to the Fall of Lucifer and why God allowed it. [5]
>Could God have created a universe without these?
He did. The world was pure until man sinned. [6]
>Could God have created a universe with free-will but without evil?
Yes. Before man that's what the universe was. [7]
Sources:
[1] The Bible
[2] The Bible
[3] The Bible
[4] The Bible
[5] The Bible
[6] The Bible
[7] The Bible
based recycle bin poster
The atheist caricature in your pic needs to be fat
>claim superiority
>claim you're highly intelligent
>claim society is defunct and useless
>sit indoors, do nothing, spout your meager opinions and engage in reductionistic thinking where everything boils down to meaninglessness
Evil exists?
No
Then wh- wait... Shit
>good
>bad
>existing values
Everything is meaningless and morals are subjective.
t. tipped his hat
>I've never seen evolution or the big bang happen so it's not real
I've never seen a dinosaur so they never existed.
I've never been to Mars so it's not real.
I thought Jow Forums was full of retards but this is really fucking >Low IQ
Supernatural creation is "it came from nothing" but with extra steps, brainlet.
God =nothing
If Christian life is meaningless to you then what is?
Also you're making the non-believer misconception of assuming that people become Christian because of some percieved reward after they die. They do it because of the experience of God in the world.
t. edgy atheist
This picture is good at destroying its own argument, you just have to make one small step at the very end.
Why didn't God create a universe with free will but without evil? Because that makes no logical sense. If you have free will that necessitates being able to choose to do evil. If you can't choose that then you don't have free will.
Real goodness is created through the experience of suffering and a real free choice. No light without darkness and so on.
This also ignores the pretense that good and evil are real objective things which they cannot be without God.
Can God create a square circle? No? DAMN GOD IS NOT ALL POWERFUL
He can't create it because it's total nonsense.
>jew worshipers
Get educated
Evil is subjective. Humans have freewill, something god did not expect, God will not remove our choices and instead allows you to make mistakes but the path to salvation always lies with him.
Removing evil removes freewill and destroys our essence.
>People ITT believe that a bearded man created the universe
fokken this
>Atheists unironically believe religious people believe a bearded man created the universe]
That picture you're replying to is basically a disgusting oversimplification of the reasoning for god as the origin of the universe.
>something god did not expect
omniscience ?
He's wrong on that, as well as evil being subjective. In a world where God exists everything is objective just as matter is in the physical world.
Can God create a rock so heavy that he himself is unable to lift?
Again a nonsensical question. If God created the universe then he must have existed outside the universe, therefore he must exist outside of space and time and have no material form so your question makes no sense.
God in full form creates a 200 lb rock , he then turns in to a man limiting him self to lift the rock
These threads are always full of insults and hate. Man is fundamentally spiritual in essence and being. Arguing with hollows about this should not happen. Why would you argue with purely materialistic animals (they are exactly this, according to their reductive materialism shalom goodgoy science)? They have no soul, no substance
>don't worship atheism
>follow my false religion instead
>you won't deny reality if we hit you with a bat
It's illusory pain
>It's illusory pain
How ? by definition this is already no real pain
Idk, I don't really believe it is all an illusion.
I appreciate that Christian ethics are the bedrock of Western Civilization and I believe they should be preserved. But if you want me to believe that things like virgin birth, and the resurrection were anything other than allegory then I'm gonna have to decline.
I think the point of the christian mythology especially the ressurection is you are supposed to recognise the absurdity of it and still believe because the implication is so great.
t. Demiurge worshipper
You fucking maggot. No one ever dies. No one suffers but God.
A question to the Atheists; Do you believe in such a thing as objective morality?
If not; How would you argue against necrophilia?
Not trying to get a gotcha, just genuinely interested.
>I have never seen evolution or the big bang occur but they're proven facts
This is the one that gets me. I've never heard a proper atheist retort to this statement. In the same breath they'll say God doesn't exist because you can't see him.
>fedoras
>morality
colorado.edu
>An intriguing study involving walking stick insects led by the University of Sheffield in England and the University of Colorado Boulder shows how natural selection, the engine of evolution, can also impede the formation of new species.
this just demonstrates that god isn't all good
but this should be obvious to anyone who lives in the world - nature reflects god and it's not all sunshine and roses even though those are also an aspect of creation
Evolution isn't real. They have zero evidence for it.
>If Christian life is meaningless to you then what is?
i think you meant to ask "what ISN'T", I'll assume thats what you meant
and the answer: the life of all those who don't believe that we're doomed to failure, that the material world isn't a waste of time, that there can be victory in the end and our efforts actually determine the outcome
Microevolution is proven in the lab. But I'm not convinced we have species like rodents turning into completely different species like dogs.
>but they're proven facts
They're not though? They're scientific theories. Theories are based on facts, if new facts appear, theories can change.
because we don't, there's no evidence that DNA randomly spawns new information
you start off with a pool of information, over time parts of that information become more prominent or less prominent (natural selection) but this is just switches toggling on or off, there's no elephant trunk DNA in a seed
>there's no evidence that DNA randomly spawns new information
You mean, like some sort of mutation? Yeah, no evidence for that at all : ^)
Mutation is the alteration of already existing information. It can't add new information. A bear can grow thicker hair, or a butterfly can change different colors. A cow can't go from eating grass to eating krill as a whale.
replication errors don't explain how new information enters the genome
if you repeat a codebase of 1 million lines every 10 years for a million years, and every 80 years there's one letter that is randomly changed, you don't end up with entirely new, functional blocks - you end up with code that doesn't compile. This is why 99% of all mutations are either harmful or lethal, they're ERRORS. It's not a sufficiently explanatory mechanism for the diversity, especially for parts with irreducible complexity far beyond even 100 mutations
“Atheist...everything is meaningless...”. There just may be a clue in there Sherlock.
>microevolution
Yeah, no. In order to prove microevolution as factual you would have to make, for example, cancer cells evolve into something completely different (like necrotizing fasciitis or even pneumonia).
The whole basis of evolution is that you get a new, completely separate life form from another one.
I'm atheist and I think people have a sort of craving for spiritualism and mysticism even without having a belief in a god.
It might be some kind of human condition flaw.
It's evolutionary beneficial you mong. Jesus, do you ever actually think about why people think you're fucking retards? You haven't put as much thought in these things as you think you have.
I legit wonder how stupid people like this exist.
Evolution is an extremely long drawn out process, it doesn't happen instantly you fucking mongoloids.
>Evolutionary benefit
>Zealots are 9/10 unreasonable useless dolts who fuck everything over.
Forced meme
James Randi is an atheist, and that man is one of the most intelligent man alive.
>I legit wonder how stupid people like this exist.
You don't understand timescales and series convergence, you think all 'really huge' quantities are the same, and you have the gall to call others stupid? Go kill yourself.
The Universe is very young, comparatively speaking. There's an infinite number of random processes that take more time than the age of the Universe.
Christian Zionists just love Israel
nypost.com
Liberal Jews hate Israel
>there are demiurge feeders in this thread
In other words, a JCB operator takes a chunk out of a building, climbs out of his tractor and shows people that he can't lift the giant piece of concrete. It doesn't prove anything. The question was whether the true form of God can create a rock so heavy he can't lift it.
If God is all powerful, nothing should stop him from interacting with what he creates.
Evolution was discovered by British white man, your fairytale book was written by a kike.
End of discussion.
Are you trying to be dimwitted on purpose?
Evolution is not random sporadic change, it's the successful passing down of traits that eventually leads to differing genetic groups.
If you legit think evolution needs an infinite amount of time like shaking the random parts of a clock together in a bag, you are either purposefully obtuse or a literal inbred.
>you can observe bacterial procreaction in a rapid succession of generations just by putting some cells in a petri dish and call it proof of evolution
>you, however, can never see one type of disease or cell evolve into another one because it would take 6 000 000 years to prove
>Wow why can some of the most simple of organisms with an organ designed to rewrite genetic material have more sudden change that larger complex organisms.
So you ARE a retard.
>muh fedora meme :DDDD
DEUS VULT!!!
>claims all organisms stem from bacteria
>cannot prove that one type of cell could develop from another one
Fuck off with that forced meme
>All organisms stem from Bacteria
But that's wrong retard.
The thing he creates stops him from interacting , he is to powerful for the material world .
Are you complaining that the constant different strains and species of bacteria we find are not evolving simply because they are not evolving "Upwards" and no longer being Bacteria?
The free will argument is a meme. God could have made doing evil physically impossible, just like many other things are. Is our free will limited by our inability to locally move faster than light?
livescience.com
>The earliest evidence for life on Earth comes from fossilized mats of cyanobacteria
t. doesn't know anything about the subject
>It can't add new information
Transposons can. Genes can change through recombination, just look at the globines. A cow can theoretically go from eating grass to eating krill, over millions of years through millions of tiny changes, but then it would not be a cow anymore.
Also, mutation can lead to completely new DNA, if the damage to a set of base pairs is so great that no template remains, random base pairs will get added.
>This is why 99% of all mutations are either harmful or lethal
but the other 1% could be an improvement. This is literally how biocatalysis is done. You randomly mutate a gene and you screen for one that has increased catalytic activity.
Y'all should read a genetics textbook lmao.
>Stromatolites — like these, found in the World Heritage Area of Shark Bay, Western Australia — may contain cyanobacteria, which were most likely earth's first photosynthetic organisms
Your article doesn't even mention Cyanobacteria as being the first life on earth, hell, it says the exact opposite.
>In order to prove microevolution as factual you would have to make, for example, cancer cells evolve into something completely different
Where's the logic? In order to prove microevolution, you have to prove macroevolution?
There is no such thing as micro- and macroevolution. Tiny changes over millions of years will eventually result in big changes.
If 2+2=4 then you can also conclude that 200+200=400
This is Jow Forums if you swap the word meaningless with Jews
>cyanobacteria
>first photosynthetic organisms
That's the so called evidence. There is no proof of other organisms predating that. Now...prove that cyanobacteria can become cancer in a petri dish or that it could become pneumonia.
That article literally has proof of things existing before Cyanobacteria.
>Prove Cyanbacteria can become Cancer or Pneumonia
Nigga Cancer and Penumonia are CONDITIONS not even bacteria.