I mean, writing in all CAPs and having outbursts over Twitter is not what leaders do. It's hard to take someone in a position of power seriously when they sound like children. Some degree of being professional is needed.
Jesus.
Can Trump at least not act like a manbaby on Twitter?
Nathan Sullivan
Other urls found in this thread:
google.com
theamericanconservative.com
twitter.com
Brandon Nguyen
Your concern has been saged.
Cameron Wood
I agree, look how obungas mum professionally takes a beer bottle
Brandon Torres
If you're incapable of accepting a single criticism of your pathetic president, then you have serious issues. It's not dignified to have outbursts over Twitter like a big manbaby.
Jacob Smith
By definition, whatever a leader does, is what leaders do.
Be upset about it someplace more kosher you kike shit.
Cooper Collins
Why do you have to make everything into some kind of partisan battle?
Trump literally had an outburst over Twitter over sensitive international political matters.
Nathan Peterson
>kike shit
Why would kikes be upset about Trump's outburst? That's exactly what they'd want. He is an Israeli firster with a fragile ego.
Landon Lewis
>writing in all CAPs and having outbursts over Twitter is not what leaders do.
The evidence does not support your position.
Ayden Price
Heard the same rhetoric with his handling of Kim. Maybe you shouldn't be such a little uppity bitch.
Wyatt Nguyen
It's not what dignified leaders do. It's not professional at all. None of our founding fathers would approve of it.
Charles Gomez
hahaha triggered libshits are the best
Isaac Butler
He didn't have such extreme outbursts over Twitter like this for Kim though. This is simply not dignified behavior. None of our Founding Fathers would approve of it.
Robert Flores
I'm not liberal. I'm just saying that Trump's behavior is obscenely childish. It is not dignified whatsoever, and none of our Founding Fathers or even recent presidents, would condone such behavior.
John Hughes
Our founding fathers told Britain to piss off and killed them when they invaded. Doesn't matter if they used Old English to express it.
Like I said, you're just a giant pussy.
Jack Gutierrez
take your stupid millenial emotions back to where you came from. this is a 72 year old man who will write any fucking way he pleases, whether it offends your weak sensibilities or not, because people like you aren't his target audience, and you're projecting the way you read this shit growing up onto the entire US populace.
tl;dr most people don't give a shit LITTLE BOY
>monsterenergy.jpg
Jayden Walker
>dignified and professional is what i think it is and i know what the founders would approve of
Mason Collins
appropriately saged
Austin Davis
>what the world players say in public vs what they say in private.
>taking international intrigue at face value
you should know better. assuming you're over 18
Hunter Flores
They were being directly threatened by Britain, however. There is no direct threat from Iran. It is not diplomatic behavior, and it is very embarrassing to see our president stoop to such Mafia-like tactics of intimidation. It is undignified and makes America look like a big bully.
There has to be a level of professionalism in discourse, otherwise USA's reputation will lower on the international stage. It is not professional behavior, period. I would be pointing this out too if a liberal president did this.
Typing in all CAPs and having a big outburst over Twitter over serious political matters is obscenely childish.
Eli Hill
nice try libshit. go back to sucking a dick, faggot.
nobody gives a fuck about your womp womp tier feelings.
Jace Collins
HEY OP YOU IMMENSE FAGGET, HOW ABSOLUTELY DARE YOU BE CAPS-O-PHOBIC!!!
MAYBE SOME OF US HAVE TO USE CAPS.
ALSO FUCK THE IRANIAN REGIME, I'M WITH THE IRANIAN PEOPLE.
SCREENCAP THIS: MAKE IRAN PERSIA AGAIN.
Elijah Miller
>Founding Fathers
the genocidal, raping, slave-owning ones? those are the ones your using as the epitome of graciousness?
Jayden Lee
There was literally no reason, whatsoever, for Trump to have an outburst over Twitter. Iran is not directly threatening USA outside of its hegemonic interests in the Middle East. Having an outburst, like a child, over complex geopolitical matters make you come off as undignified. Stop making this about liberal vs. republican. Imagine if Bush went on Twitter and started threatening Saddam in all caps while lying he is a direct threat to the US people.
Nolan Barnes
>Federalist Congressman Roger Griswold of Connecticut attacked Vermont Representative Matthew Lyon with a hickory walking stick in the chambers of the United States House of Representatives. Griswold struck Lyon repeatedly about the head, shoulders and arms, while Lyon attempted to shield himself from the blows. Lyon then turned and ran to the fireplace, took up a pair of metal tongs, and having armed himself thus returned to the engagement. Griswold then tripped Lyon and struck him in the face while he lay on the ground, at which point the two were separated. After a break of several minutes, however, Lyon unexpectedly pursued Griswold again with the tongs, and the brawl was re-ignited.
>The two men had a prior history of conflict. On January 30 of that year, Griswold had publicly insulted Lyon by calling him a coward, and Lyon had retaliated by spitting in Griswold's face. As a result of Lyon's actions in that case, he became the first Congressman to have charges filed against him with that body's ethics committee, although he escaped censure through a vote in the House.
Sebastian Morris
Joseph Hill
Bill Clinton bombed a medicine factory in Sudan to distract the news from the story of his coercive sexual acts with a teenage Jewish intern.
Hudson Lewis
I'm not a liberal. Stop making every single damn political discussion partisan. It makes you lose nuance when discussing complex matters.
The country has been called Iran since Sassanian empire. It was due to Hitler's advise Reza Shah Pahlavi asked other nations to refer to Persia by its native name "Iran", a cognate of Aryan. Regardless, this is not what the topic is about.
Leaders should not have outbursts. Leaders should value being Stoic and professional. It is an important part of Western ethos. Trump's belligerent outbursts is going to make more Iranians distrustful of USA.
Austin Wright
lol who made you the leader?
sage
Julian Kelly
>Iran is not directly threatening USA outside of its hegemonic interests in the Middle East.
Jaxson Cruz
FUCK YOUR PROFESSIONALS
Ryan Powell
>I'm not a liberal. Stop making every single damn political discussion partisan. It makes you lose nuance when discussing complex matters.
Alright brainlet, i'll explain it to you: Your idea of dignified behavior is bunk. It looks nice and feels nice, but it's totally ineffective for achieving results in the real world. Trump is employing the strategy that works on people. You don't like having to face the idea that people are monkeys and need to be controlled with monkey tactics, but that's the reality.
Rationality and polite words can only get you so far.
Luis Campbell
That is absolutely a false equivalence. I can understand Trump writing in all-caps to a country that threatened to invade or harm US citizens, but Iran has never expressed such sentiments. Also, 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi, and they indeed funded the hijackers. Thus, they attacked US soil and get absolutely no slap on the wrist.
Trump is just a puppet for Jews and Saudis, and he is not ashamed of it whatsoever. He even has outbursts to nations that serve as no direct threat to his.
Brandon Morris
LITERALLREEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
Jackson Hernandez
It won't work on Iran because the country has never threatened to directly attack US on its soils. The only reason Trump is angry at Iran is because they are fighting US hegemonic interests in Syria and elsewhere. However, they pose absolutely no threat to Americans, so then why does Trump have an outburst acting like Rouhani wants to do that?
It's just going to make more Iranians even more distrustful of Trump's administration.
Nicholas Wilson
Nignogs forget that presidents used to shoot motherfuckers on the lawn with pistols and call women fat to their face.
"Presidential" behavior is what a good puppet does.
Parker Ross
>It won't work on Iran because...
Bullshit. You are sitting here telling the world's top chess player how to play chess.
Sit the fuck down. You don't know what you're talking about.
Zachary Watson
Being disturbed by a leader childishly threatening a non-hostile nation is not equivalent to libtards who are incapable of discussing race in impartial terms.
Andrew Anderson
>acting like Rouhani wants
what did this guy say or do anyway? all these threads and I missed that memo. I still say it's an act. to what ends I do not know.
>death to America. reee
Cameron Wright
YEAH, SUCK MY BALLS FAGGET. I WENT TO SCHOOL WITH KIDS (ONE OF WHOM WAS MY 'BEST FRIEND') AT THE TIME OF THE AYATOLLAH REVOLUTION.
THEY NEVER CALLED THEMSELVES IRANIAN, THE CALLED THEMSELVES PERSIAN.
IE. THE COUNTRY WAS CALLED IRAN, THE PEOPLE CALLED THEMSELVES PERSIAN.
NO ONE LIKED THE PAHLAVI REGIME, BUT THEY ALL THINK THE ISLAMIC STATE LITERALLY SUCKS THE SHIT OUT OF A RABID GOATS ASS.
CUNT.
Angel Roberts
>the world's top chess player
He is not the world's top chess player. He is the biggest dick sucker for Jews and Saudis that has ever existed. Why don't you go back to r_Donald instead of ruining Jow Forums with your unwarranted jingoism and kike'd neocon bullshit.
>You don't know what you're talking about.
Go back to r_Donald, you Boomer fag. You can't even accept one criticism of your Jew'd and childish leader.
Zachary Martin
>MUH BOOOMERS
>Falling for the millennial Psy-Op
Christopher Watson
>He is not the world's top chess player.
He is. You are the poster boy for dunning Kruger. When you accomplish anything in the field of public persuasion, let me know. Maybe i'll hear you out at that point.
Trump is literally the president because of his shitposting on twitter. You are nowhere near his league. Your low iq worldview is a joke.
Ethan Jones
And how do you feel that Trump is supporting MEK/NCRI, who are literal COMMIE Islamists? They initially backed the Revolution, and they have a history of cultish behavior, molestation, Marxism, and were recently delisted as terrorist. Trump has an advocate of them in cabinet, and Bolton shills for them hard.
They are no better than the regime. Trump does not have the best interest of the Iranian people at heart. His extremely infantile and hypocritical behavior is further proof.
>Pahlavi regime
I like them, but the Shah later ceased being an OPEC puppet after 1974. He also hiked oil prices, and Carter's administration backed Khomeini to get rid of the Shah. That's why Carter kept claiming about Iran's human rights violations under the Shah, as pretext to push for Khomeini. I could provide more sources for this.
You are delusional if you think Iran will be better with MEK/NCRI commie terrorists also.
Christian Anderson
>Enemy nation directly threatens the US.
Trump responded correctly.
Nicholas Cook
Go back to r_Donald. He's literally supporting Jews and Israel, commie Marxist terrorists (MEK/NCRI), Saudi Arabia's spread of Wahhabism, and more.
He is the biggest kike'd and Arab'd president to have ever existed, and he has absolutely no shame about it.
Robert Richardson
>womp womp
As I said before: kys, libshit.
Colton Garcia
Iran never threatened to harm USA on its own soil. This is a blatant lie. I am tired of all this deceit. Iran simply does not like US hegemonic interests in the Middle East.
Austin Mitchell
>Trump is supporting MEK/NCRI
PROVIDE ONE SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE IN REALITY WHERE GEOTUS HAS EVEN MENTIONED THESE PEOPLE.
PIC RELEVANT
> Trump does not have the best interest of the Iranian people at heart
YOUR ASS IS NOT A CREDIBLE SOURCE
> You are delusional if you think Iran will be better with MEK/NCRI commie terrorists also
COMMUNISLAM CAN SUCK MY EXTRA VINEGARY BALLS
Cameron Long
I'm not a libshit. In fact, those who support Trump are libshits. Why? Because Trump is literally supporting commie Islamist terrorists called MEK/NCRI.
Like I've said, you need more nuance in your worldview. Shit is a lot more complex than libshit vs conservative.
Hunter Hill
he's a New Yorker. wtf did u expect?
Aaron Rivera
>Those who support Trump are libshits.
You're a fucking retard, m8.
Luke Davis
>PROVIDE ONE SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE IN REALITY WHERE GEOTUS HAS EVEN MENTIONED THESE PEOPLE.
There are so many sources about it. Bolton for example shills for them hard. Also, there is a literal advocate for them in his cabinet. Just Google around:
The Rajavis, the main heads of MEK/NCRI (parent groups), also descend from Turkic Qajaris. They are not ethnically Iranian or Persian.
Parker Gray
You are a libshit. There is a kind of indeterminacy with all you faggots who refuse to see nuance. You make every single political topic in some kind of partisan battle refusing to understand nuance and form your own educated views.
Easton King
>Hurrr everything isn't partisan
>libshit
You are a stupid piece of shit
Brayden Taylor
You are a neocon shithead. My views are closest to paleoconservatives like Pat Buchanan, you retarded faggot. Even Pat Buchanan says there is literally no reason to invade Iran and fuck over the people by installing commie terrorists MEK/NCR into power.
Jonathan Wood
A non hostile nation? They threatened the u.s with "the mother of all wars". How is that not a threat?
Dominic Jenkins
He said "war with Iran is the mother of all wars". He never threatened USA with the mother of all wars. He said IF the USA were to attack Iran, and Trump acted like he was directly threatening to harm US civilians.
Angel Diaz
>mother of all wars
>not a threat
Enjoy your souy.
Asher Butler
Nice head canon
Tyler Diaz
Awww its a corgo
Oliver Ross
He said if USA unjustly invades Iran, then the people will retaliate. That is not a threat. It is an assertion that they were defend themselves.
He said "war with Iran is the mother of all wars". He never threatened USA with the mother of all wars. He said IF the USA were to attack Iran, and Trump acted like he was directly threatening to harm US civilians.
Ryan Carter
ONE
SOURCE
WHERE
TRUMP
EVEN
MENTIONS
THEM.
Nicholas Rogers
>You support Drumph because you're a Republican. You lack the nuance that things are more complex than that
Sounds like he's going to tell you about the intersectionality of things he views problematic
Carson Smith
He will listen when you take a small loan of 1m and make it 1b. And then you beat the establishment candidate for presidency.
Adam Clark
U.S. isn't going to invade Iran. Not a word on that. Their comment was unnecessary. It was just an excuse to threaten us.
Colton Watson
Literally all his actions are supporting this Islamo-communist cult:
theamericanconservative.com
There are other Iranian resistance groups they could support, but they went with MEK/NCRI because they are pro-Saudi.
Brayden Long
>take a small loan of 1m and make it 1b
> 10BILLION$
Lincoln Powell
OMFG, it's another Trump doesn't conform to my narrow view of behavior that I have no qualifications to criticize, but will try to bandwagon criticism based on CAPS, or whatever new outrage this week or this hour I can hope to garner consensus, Pathetic.
Zachary Wright
Yeah, they are. I'm like 99% sure of it now. USA is going to invade Iran and put Islamo-communists MEK/NCRI into power and then watch the country fragment. Their main goal is to take hold of Khuzestan province which is close to Strait of Hormuz, where most of the world's oil goes through.
The USA has greatly invest in UAE, Dubai and Saudi Arabia, so I think they have squarely put themselves in the Sunni/Wahhabist camp, hence why they turn a blind eye to them.
Josiah Morris
GOT IT, YOU CANNOT BACK UP YOUR STATEMENT
> And how do you feel that Trump is supporting MEK/NCRI
SO, ... APPARENTLY ....
THE DOOR TO YOUR FATHERS HAIRY ASS IS ALWAYS OPEN.
Owen Scott
You are a delusional faggot. Iran is finished, Reza. Trump's administration has vehemently been pushing for these Islamo-communist MEK/NCRI faggots to get power because they want Iran to Balkanize and split into multiple countries.
You are unbelievably naive, and I doubt you are even a pure Iranian. Why? Because you didn't even know Persian was the Latinized word for one province of Iran called Pars/Fars. The people have been calling themselves Iranian since Sassanian empire.
Million will die and the country will split up. Deal with it, Reza. You are too much of a naive dick-sucker to see this inevitable tragic fate.
Also, I'm not pro-IRI either, retard. IRI was also backed by Carter's administration. The country has been on US shitlist since 1974 when the Shah disagreed to William E. Simon's petrodollar deal.
Benjamin Kelly
Nice theory you have their.
Where's your evidence to support it this will be the move?
If we enable others to fight for something they already believe in, are we really the ones invading?
Wouldn't it be a war on their own territory, rather than Iran attacking the U.S.?
Jonathan Moore
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
> I GOT FUCK ALL EVIDENCE
TL;DR
PIC RELEVANT FOR YOU.
Blake Bennett
BY THE WAY, THAT'S YOUR DAD'S ASS, I GOT IT OFF YOUR FACEBOOK.
Samuel Gonzalez
>Where's your evidence to support it this will be the move?
Why else would the USA support Islamo-communist cultists called MEK/NCRI when they are vastly unpopular in Iran? With the intent to Balkanize and fragment the country.
Most of the world's oil goes through Strait of Hormuz and it is geostrategically import to USA's leaders, so their goal is to manufacture pretexts to destabilize the country further.
The USA also backed Khomeini before he went rogue.