IT IS GOING TO TAKE DEMOCRATS THAT LONG TO RECOVER.
three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit has just ruled that the right to openly carry a firearm for the purpose of self-defense is a protected activity under the Second Amendment. The case is Young vs. Hawaii and the lawsuit challenges a Hawaii law, which says A concealed carry or open carry permit is only issued once you’ve convinced the local police chief that you are engaged in an activity “[w]here the urgency or the need has been sufficiently indicated” and the applicant “is engaged in the protection of life and property.”
GOD BLESS THE U.S.A.
GOD BLESS DONALD TRUMP.
GOD BLESS SCOTUS!
THREAD THEME;
youtu.be
SECOND U.S. CIVIL WAR POSTPONED 100 YEARS
David Jackson
Other urls found in this thread:
reuters.com
youtu.be
documentcloud.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
macleans.ca
foxnews.com
twitter.com
Jacob Sullivan
Onions Hoggs is on suicide watch
Christopher Jones
>9th circuit
I thought the 9th was the one with all of the anti-Trump judges on it.
Michael James
So does this mean I can open carry in CA now?
Carson Mitchell
They take pains to point out that, by the logic of their Peruta vs. San Diego, if concealed carry is not a right, then open carry must be:
In short, the text of the Amendment, as interpreted by Heller and McDonald, points toward the conclusion that “bear” implies a right to carry firearms publicly for self-defense.
They cite to Dred Scott’s use of bearing firearms as a marker of citizenship to show that this is a historical right.
Easton King
YES.
Jason Campbell
ITT: bullshit that never happened and never will and cites no source
cool slide
Ayden Williams
You go na get me shot, user?
Thomas Powell
Holy shit is it Christmas already? Best present ever
Blake Butler
So I can open carry in NYC tonight?
Now I just need a gun