We should all be individualist

We should all be individualist.

Change my mind.

Attached: individualism.jpg (940x466, 84K)

When everyone is an """""individual"""" no one is
The cult of personality was a mistake... Oh you have a unicycle and drive it around hipster neigborhoods? You must be just a deep free thinker

>we should all
>individualist

pick one

>We
Steady there, collectivist

>This guy blocks your path and tells you to stop being a collectivist

Wat do?

Attached: 1506261886420.jpg (959x958, 258K)

If you disregard white identity white nations will be flooded with darkies and your children's future will be destroyed.

someone post that pick of peterson in the spartan line

>we
>should

Oh boy

Beat his ass with my three brownshirt friends then laugh at his delusional thinking.

You’ll have less of a social, emotional, and financial support network that way. Extreme individualism & collectivism are both terrible. I strive to find a happy medium in between.

Now imagine that picture was half darkies half whites. And the darkies wanted to kill whites. In your world he would have to fight 1v20 while in our world it would be 20vs20 then after fight make a civilization were individualism is ok. What people don't realize is that everyone is already a individualist but to apply it to everything is actually autistic to the highest order

>become individualistic by dressing and acting like the media tells you!

Attached: 1512606529710.jpg (1181x1181, 300K)

We should be collectivist.
Change our mind.

We should...

So you can make moral declaratives on the basis of a shared identity?

Sounds collectivist to me

>all
Pretty totalitarian

The collective protects the individual and thus in turn the individual has a responsibility to the collective. Don't like it? Go live in the fucking woods.

>Sitting here and asking Jow Forums what it thinks
>individualist

Pick one

>be an individualist
>realize groups exist
Here.

Attached: 1531593287481.jpg (2126x1300, 854K)

An individual cannot protect himself, his family, or his property from a collective, except by participating in a collective himself.

Attached: 1520552886038.jpg (1032x827, 122K)

You are reliant on all of the humans that came before you, reliant on those producing now, reliant on nature and this planet, reliant on family. You are inherently partially collectivistic if you rely on even one of these things. You are apart of an ecoystem of humans that is apart of an Earth ecosystem. You cannot be entirely individualistic in that system, no matter how hard you try. The pinnacle of civilization is to harmonize the collective with the individual and not raise either one above the other.

Yes because: The only thing that's fundamental is love.

>Change my mind.
No. I do what I want.

What you're trying to express is (COOPERATIVE)... Also an aspect of love.

Semantics.

Being stubborn is a poor choice, also one you adopted?

the type of people who would define themselves as individualists are easily manipulated by superior groups without ever being aware of it
the need for social connections and group appartenance is a strong attack vector. if you trade christianity for feminism, you're still following a religion; and if you shun family gatherings but chase EDM concerts, you've been conned into paying for something you had for free

True... Agreed.

What made Jesus Christ the divine individual?
He did it for everybody.
Here's a redpill: every tribe, every community, every nation is a collective consisting of individuals who contribute their best not just for their own sake, but for the betterment of their children and everyone else.
Individuals who only serve themselves are very lonely people, but collectives that require nothing are empty shells, husks of what they could be.
Now imagine we take a collective such as the nation, and concentrate all efforts towards turning the unfortunate and the weaker into truly productive members of society.
Imagine the collective helps the whole nation become divine individuals.
That would be social. Nationally social.

Not if one has an open sceptical mind.

If it not your experience it's not your reality.

>his family

A family is a collective though. Can't have that.

Imposing anything on anyone, is a fatal philosophy, it's proved many times over ,that it doesn't work.

So you don't belive in laws then?

As I've stated in a previous post, being part of a cooperative requires rules/laws, this doesn't mean I'd need to surrender my free will to a philosophy.

Fair enough.

How is a cooperative functionally different from a collective?

>1 post by this ID

Sage for being a fucking nigger

why would nigs want to come when there arent any welfare benefits

A previous reply to my post suggest samantics, I agreed.

Suggested *

this, i am so fucking tired i just want the human race to end now

Attached: hpg.jpg (1024x1024, 170K)

We live in a world obsessed with image, its not about what you know, but do you look credible.

Becoming an individual is about taking responsibility.

Try not to become a man of success, rather try and become a man of values.

Ironically enough, the more individualistic a society on the macro level, the more likely those 'individuals' are likely to seek out a collective to which to belong and conform

Sub-cultures like hipsters, goths, punks, skaters, weed smokers etc are the perfect example of that. Individualism is a sick Jewish ideology intended to destroy any sense of cohesion within (white) societies.

Attached: 20160130_BRP005_1.jpg (595x335, 55K)

It suggests that quality of consciousness is a constantly evolving state.

If you don't use it you lose it.

A modern family is generally a very small collective, minuscule compared to others.

>When everyone is an """""individual"""" no one is
this is the dumbest shit I've read today
and I've read a lot of dumb shit today

Poor choices in reading material, try harder user.