Ethics

Imagine for environmental reasons you have to sterilize the rich or the poor
Who do you sterilize and why

Attached: me-after-realizing-adulting-is-hard-0-the-life-of-27262561.png (500x654, 74K)

how rich and how poor are we talking

The less intelligent, I'd say. I've seen poor geniuses and retarded lucky guys, and who will spread their genes? That's why Italy has the highest IQs, they freed the intelligent slaves while the dumb ones didn't get to have kids.

>adulting
I hate gen z

Attached: b2c.png (680x585, 245K)

Nikola Tesla vs. Paris Hilton.

Lower income correlates with slightly lower IQ so it'd be safer to save the rich. There are fewer of the rich too so you'd avoid overpopulation at the same time.

the poor, obviously. But only if it is voluntary. I think you'd get a lot of takers if you included free sterilization with a lump payment.

I don't have the statistics, but I swear to fucking god 50% of the rich people I met were subhumans that didn't even know how to think. For the poor part... I only know myself. And I'm not even kidding. I'm poor and I can easily score over 120+ in any IQ test, I did 131 in test.mensa.no and I swear to god my family is lower-middle class.
All of my friends agree that a spic friend is beyond -80IQ and is the least intelligent one, and he has a shit ton of money. So, you could be dealing with a ±5% error and the country's IQ wouldn't dramatically rise at all as you would expect.
I'd pick killing poor people, anyways. I'll make my way through to get into the higher tiers of society, so I don't really care. People had their opportunities except for children. I'd say, kill the fathers and make richs adopt the intelligent children.

Tesla was poor by choice though, he didn't give a shit about wealth and just wanted to work on cool inventions. He could have easily become rich if he had any motivation to do so. He wasn't too keen on courting women either, because while he loved everything about women during his youth, he thought they'd become not worth marrying during his later years.

Attached: tesla-marriage.jpg (1159x1600, 652K)

Or yeah, the cucked way, sterilize not kill the poor. But first have them take an intelligence test, you could be losing kangz genes.

the brown ones

some of that could be lack of exposure to critical thinking and having all their choices made for them. The only struggles the rich have had is playing sports or doing exactly as their tutors tell them.

I don't agree with your supposition that rich children are broadly less intellegent. Especially when some of the smartest and best looking people I've known were rich, I'm not talking about rat-nosed jews and I've unfortunately met many of those.

Sterilize both. Those who are one the extreme ends of the income spectrum are worthless and lazy:—financial parasites within (((neoliberal))) establishments. Seize whatever assets they might have, and send them both to agriculture labor camps for the rest of their lives; use the seized funds from globalist kikes for heavy investment into education and infrastructure, and watch true prosperity and national fortitude manifest before your very eyes.

Then you should be smart enough to know a) your anecdotes don't trump actual studies and b) MENSA is a bullshit institution that lies to people about their intelligence so they can scam them in to paying to be in their "special smart person club".

Wipe the rich. Too many people have made their fortune abusing the residential real estate market. We don't need people like that

I didn't say rich people are less intelligent. I've just said I've met stupid rich people and intelligent poor people. And it would go like 5% of poor people are more intelligent than average for rich people, and 5% of rich people are actually subhuman scum. Most intelligent people I met were rich, anyways. Genes take a big part in intelligence, that explains Jow Forums's beliefs by the way.

I didn't expect Tesla's reasoning to go that direction. But the master of lighting has a brilliant mind.

I refuse to believe that he didnt call at least a booty every now and then

For environmental reasons? The poor, of course
Africa? Wiped out
Middle East? Except for oil towns, gone
South America? GG no re, except for the resorts
Killing the world's poor is the absolute best possible outcome for the environment, it gets rid of ancient vehicles, much of the coal power infrastructure, and makes room for progress

The rich, gets rid of the high level jews.

Attached: 0BAD0041-2527-4762-B8D1-6532F78DE27B.jpg (750x739, 388K)

It doesn't surprise me to be honest. A century ago all the feminist bullshit was just starting, and even then he saw that the breakdown of the family unit would ultimately destroy society. Now look where America is at, there's god damn 10 year old trannies, radical feminists calling for increasingly retarded legislation and single motherhood is considered normal, all the while half the nation is depressed and popping pills like never before. No one is actually happy with what's happened, but they sure love to pretend the right choices were made.

Had we listened to Tesla's warning, we might still have a healthy dynamic between the genders in the West.

It's believed he was either asexual or had e. dysfunction

The former is more likely, but even that isn't really supported by what he himself says. According to him, as confessed in he was just obsessed with his laboratory and didn't really see himself as worthy of marriage until early feminists had made most women undesirable for him to marry anyway. I think he was just highly eccentric, not that there was anything "wrong" with him.

Attached: tesla.png (627x457, 350K)

>he was just obsessed with his laboratory and didn't really see himself as worthy of marriage until early feminists had made most women undesirable for him to marry anyway
Consider that he had one of the best minds ever in history, if he was asexual or had problems he probably knew he had to "favour" women publicly in order to not be regarded as homosexual or weirdo

The poor. Statistically speaking, you’d dramatically increase the global IQ in one generation.

Don’t forget the cast majority of Asians.

>steralize the few people who keep society running or the billions of people who do nothing but waste resources
hmmm

>overpopulation
more people = more labor = more economic power = more prosperity

I doubt that given he had such a detailed opinion about how marriage went to the shitter as an institution. He obviously at least had some interest in reversing the pattern so future generations wouldn't have to suffer from it.