> The president can take control of the Fed. It may be recalled when the law was written creating the Federal Reserve the secretary of the Treasury was designated as the head of the Federal Reserve. We are going to return to that era. Like it or not the Fed is about to be politicized.
cnbc.com
Fed Thread #2
Carter Bell
Other urls found in this thread:
thenewamerican.com
boblivingstonletter.com
bis.org
nationalvanguard.org
wallstreetdaily.com
archive.fo
twitter.com
Zachary Adams
as a millennial i approve of this.
Josiah Bell
>inb4 JFK
Sebastian Miller
assassination incoming?
Christian Smith
>and it's a good thing
The Fed needs to represent the interests of the USA, not globalist and other foreign interests.
Benjamin Williams
If they don't try to kill him I'll have to concede he's the goodest goy and is adhering to (((their))) plan
Carson Rogers
>inafter
Hudson Morales
Samuel Watson
>President Trump could find himself experiencing the effect of the Fed’s manipulative power in the 2018 congressional elections. Or, he could find out that the Fed can sink his chances for reelection in 2020. It would behoove him to draw attention to the illegitimate Fed power sooner rather than later. In any case, the drive for an impartial audit of the Fed would help, not just him but all who crave freedom.
>If our nation remains a captive of the Fed, it will become a captive a United Nations version of the Fed. And both independence for the nation and continued liberty for the people will disappear.
thenewamerican.com
Ryder Lewis
Required reading dump. Pages might be out of order.
1/18
Luis Kelly
2/18
Logan Hall
3/18
Luis Hall
4/18
Ryder Sanders
5/18
Joseph White
6/18
Benjamin Scott
i love this part
Dylan White
7/18
Juan Adams
the right to amend, alter or REPEAL
Brandon Anderson
>The Fed itself is merely an empty shell. It is an institution on paper, representing a set of illusions that are treated as concrete. If we are looking for the top of the globalist pyramid, we would certainly not start with the Fed. The Fed is a tool for manipulating the U.S. political framework and economic engine, and like all other central banks in the world its policies are dictated by much more important entities like the Bank For International Settlements (BIS).
This has caused considerable confusion for many alternative analysts. They have spent so long operating under the notion that the Fed will protect U.S. markets, protect the dollar and thus protect itself. What they refused to accept was the possibility that the Fed is actually a suicide bomber whose goal is to eventually destroy itself and everything around it, thus bringing down America from within.
>But why would the globalists do this? For those that assume the U.S. economy represents the “goose that lays the golden eggs,” what I describe above is inconceivable. In order to understand what is happening and why, we must cast off the lie that America is a golden goose that perpetually supports the globalist agenda. Rather, America is more like a host to the globalist parasites, and once the host is drained of all vitality, the parasites will leave and move on to bigger and better targets.
>In other words, just as numerous empires before it, the U.S. system served a purpose for a particular window of time. It was exploited as a means to an end, and now the banking elites are moving on to a “new world order” in which America plays a far diminished role. This is why the Fed continues to act in a manner that appears bewildering to so many people. This is why the Fed is taking actions that they have openly admitted will cause a crash. They want a crash.
boblivingstonletter.com
Levi Stewart
>The globalists do not care about maintaining the U.S. system as it is. They are even willing to sabotage it in order to create the chaos needed to generate social and political capital; the kind of capital that will buy them a worldwide economic reset and their so-called “new world order.” Within this construct, the masses would be made to accept open centralization of financial and political control into the hands of the banking elites. That is to say, the globalists no longer want to be covert; they prefer to be overt, and venerated as saviors of humanity rather than despised as parasites.
Christian Williams
If this is happening, this will set trumps legacy as the Greatest Ever!!!!
Benjamin Peterson
>A battle between Trump and the Fed serves a couple of purposes; firstly, it provides cover for the dismantling of the U.S. stocks and the U.S. dollar, just as the trade war (also blamed on Trump) provides cover for the same. A conflict between the president of the United States and the Fed would lead to substantial doubt in markets over the safety of investment in U.S. equities, debt and currency.
>Secondly, if Trump is seen as getting “getting tough” on the Fed, liberty activists that are skeptical of the Trump administration and his globalist appointed cabinet might be lured into the fold and support policies which are ultimately the unmaking of liberty. Dismantling the Fed several years ago would have done irreversible damage to the banking elites and their plans for a perfectly timed economic reset. Today, it’s too little too late. In fact, the globalists may prefer that the Fed be taken down by conservatives now so that we become the bumbling villains that triggered a historic fiscal panic.
>This is not to say that I support the continued existence of the Fed, but I do want to point out that Trump is not talking about combating the IMF or the BIS, nor is anyone else in the mainstream discussing it. Removing one sacrificial appendage of the vampire squid is useless; we must go to core organizations and shut them all down to make any difference in the outcome. The fact that they are going to sacrifice the Fed and the dollar anyway does not help matters.
another opinion, may be worth looking at
Henry Scott
>I do not know if the globalist script calls for Trump to go as far as shutting down the Fed completely, but rest assured if he does there will be thousands of alternative analysts decreeing that it is irrefutable proof that Trump is not controlled opposition and he “must have a plan.” The actual plan will be the end of the dollar as the world reserve currency to make way for the global economic reset and a NWO currency framework, all in the name of stopping a catastrophe initiated by “evil conservative populists.”
Dylan Rivera
8/18
Adam Sanchez
9/11
Cameron Harris
10/18
Tyler Evans
11/18
Isaac Richardson
12/18
Austin Morris
13/18
Thomas Perez
14/88
Wyatt Phillips
15/18
Liam Ross
> the current federal tax system is voluntary
Henry Brooks
16/18
Liam Richardson
the fed helps out foreign interests to HELP us. Like giving easy swap lines for Brazil and SK so they wouldn't dump their fannie may mortgages and push us into a deeper recession.
>Fed is about to be politicized.
what does this even mean? wsj and bloomberg had amazing drama articles about Bernake/Yellen being pissed at Obama for most of his presidency.
>In any case, the drive for an impartial audit of the Fed
???? it's not like their balance sheet/portfolio is a secret.
Christopher Thompson
17/76
Ethan Harris
18/18
Ayden Morgan
>9/11
Nolan Moore
the title is great, how ironic it was 20 years ago
Joshua Robinson
>The Bank for International Settlements has published its June statement of account, which gives some information on its use of gold swaps and other gold-related derivatives in the month:
bis.org
>The information provided in the BIS monthly statements is not sufficient to calculate a precise amount of gold-related derivatives, including swaps, but it appears that the bank's total exposure as of June 30, 2018, was approximately 413 tonnes of gold, which is essentially unchanged from May.
>When it comes to its activities in the gold market, the BIS provides little information on what it is doing, why, and for whom.
puc related:
bis.org
Eli Hill
DICK BOVE
MORE LIKE DICK LOVE
Joseph Stewart
>politicized
How? I thought Democrats liked the idea of the government controlling everything. Or does that not apply to private banking institutions?
Xavier Myers
>the jewish plan is to give up their power and hope for the best
Maybe jews aren't omnipotent
Zachary Adams
The significance of the Fed’s setting of bank-to-bank interest rates; broken down step-by-step:
Every dollar injected into the monetary system has to be loaned, at interest, by the Federal Reserve and its members banks (your local bank).
Because all money is injected via loans of one type or another (Fed’s purchase of U.S. Bonds, corporate debt, consumer debt etc.) – there will always be more debt, (much more!) than there is money in circulation.
As old loans are repaid, money leaves the system (deflation). This decreases the money supply; which would fall to zero if new loans were not injected. A shrinking money supply means more bankruptcies and higher unemployment.
Camden White
The money that one borrower needs to repay an old loan MUST BE created somewhere else in the economy by another debtor who just took out a new loan! And so on, and so on, and so on…
One of the mechanisms which the Fed (Central Bank) uses to increase the amount of new debt money flowing into a debt-ridden system is to keep the rate of usury (a practice which should actually be banned!) as low as possible. Low rates = more borrowing = more debt-money “created out of thin air” (for the most part). Too much debt-money supply = inflation.
Therefore, the “business cycle” is not a natural occurrence, at all! “Easy money” = “Boom”; which leads to inflation because more currency is chasing goods and services (counterfeiting effect). “Tight money” = “Bust” because folks can’t get their hands on enough money to repay old loans. The “recession” / “depression” must ultimately be remedied by another round of “easy money”. And on and on and on the cycle of counterfeit money insanity plays out decade after decade after decade — which is why a loaf of bread has gone from 5 cents to $2 over the past 100 years.
source: nationalvanguard.org
(a little white supremacist for me, but they get it when it comes to the Fed)
Ryder Reyes
>liberals will literally argue that an elite, unaccountable bank is a good thing just to stick it to drumpf
Evan Richardson
In certain scenarios, when debt really gets out of hand, the new money is not enough to “stimulate” a sick economy (like today!) — in which case, there is high unemployment AND high inflation (pay no attention whatsoever to the Labor Department’s LIES about 5% unemployment and 1% CPI / inflation!)
In short, think of the debt-money supply as a bucket containing water, but full of holes. The water pouring into the bucket from your garden hose represents the new loans. The water escaping the bucket through all the holes represents the old loans being paid back into the part real / part make-believe bank-money system. The “challenge” for the Jewish “geniuses” at the Federal Reserve is to keep enough water in the bucket to prevent it from emptying out (Great Depression, Asset Crashes) — while not pouring so much in that the bucket overflows (high inflation, hyperinflation, asset bubbles, “overheating” economy etc.). Indeed, since the Fed’s inception (and even before)every, and we do mean every, “boom” and asset bubble was preceded by an artificial bank-induced, debt-based monetary expansion (too much water going into the bucket). Conversely, every, and we do mean every “Panic”, stock market crash, real estate crash and recession was preceded by the inevitable monetary “correction” / contraction (bucket emptying out as water flow is reduced and people scramble to get their hands on “liquidity”).
Nicholas Mitchell
>Fed gets audited
>Ron Paul as advisor
Kevin Robinson
the privately owned Fed cartel’s only hope of avoiding delaying a very painful “correction” is to keep the water flowing in (through bond purchases, bailouts, purchases of bad debts, low interest rates, etc), which actually causes the pressurized water in the bucket to flow out of the debt-holes faster and faster with each new loan.
The hardest-hit victims of this zero discount rate policy (the rate which the Fed charges to member banks who must crawl to it, and which in turn serves as the basis for what banks pay to depositors) are the elderly savers. Example: If Grandpa has $300,000 sitting in CD’s at 1%, with REAL inflation at 5%; then he is losing about 4% annually($12,000 per year) in purchasing power. This is NO DIFFERENT that a mugger robbing Grandpa of $1000 each month, at gun point, and pumping it to the general economy and/or stock market by dropping the cash out of a helicopter.
But Grandpa will never figure this game out because the talking egg-heads of TV land and Academia have caused his mind to shut down with their academic jargon about “quantitative easing” and “stimulus” and “economic cycles” and “Open Market Operations”, blah blah blah — blah blah blah.
You are being robbed, Grandpa! And it’s far less complicated than you think. Just think: ‘waterbucket’, Grandpa — with holes in it.
Jacob Reyes
this person is an idiot
the fed is a tool indeed, therefore as it is itself just a tool, it is incapable of doing these things you are accusing. people run the fed, throughout the decades, the fed is operated by people, some whom make good policy through the fed, others who make bad policy
obviously people are incompetent or lack personal resposibility , others are idealogical , thus we have tradgedies such as the crash in the 30's but overall, the fed is a system thaat has managed to usher in the greatest economic prosperity in history, if youi look at all things considered. is it perfect? of course not. but what is perfect? mankind is imperfect, all we can hope for is the least worst solution.
Josiah Stewart
Luis Rodriguez
wrong
inflation is caused by washingtons lust for spending
the fed is a tool of congress, you idiots have it backwards as usual
congress needs only to project their spending, and the fed prints accordingly. desu I cant tell if the people who have all this grief with the fed reserve are serving a more insidious purpose or just plain incompetent but I find I suprising that nobody is willing to shift the blame to congress, which makes me think that its the government paid ctr shills shifting the convo away from out of control spending by washington
Jaxson Clark
the point at hand is that we should be paying interest to our own treasury, not a private vanking corporation, especially not to issue our own currency. That is the only issue in this thread, not that we shouldn't pay interest, but in regard to issuance of currency that we shouldn't pay it to anyone but our own treasury.
Christopher Martin
lol inflation is primarily due to fractional reserve banking (which makes one dollar turn into ten). you can just stop there.
Christopher Taylor
and yes, we could afford to spend less, in addition to abolishing the Fed
Ayden Campbell
explain
William Hughes
you're kidding right? the privately-held Fed and its member banks, digitally create and issue our currency. they are allowed to create up to ten times the currency they actually hold.
Joshua Cooper
Angel Johnson
Nathaniel Powell
Christian Perez
get I get a quick rundown on the US Fed Reserve?
Nolan Taylor
this one is good...seeing how the FED and the IRS were both created in 1913
Levi Miller
old thread from earlier:
>
that should be a good start
Mason Cook
The FED has been politicized for a long long time now. They need to get rid of it anyways and we can print our own money, then lend it to wall street. The interest can go back into our treasury. No bailouts if wall street goes broke gambling either.
Isaiah Rodriguez
Carter Perry
amen
Logan Foster
Logan Ortiz
Wyatt Sullivan
Lucas Stewart
Mason Foster
this cartoon erroneously depicts the Fed as a government agency..it is not-- it is a private corporation controlled by the BIS and has shareholders
Thomas Cox
Evan Baker
Nicholas Allen
Brayden Garcia
Colton Ortiz
Ben Garrison is so good.
Connor Gray
Yet he absolutely refuses to acknowledge the JQ.
Cameron Ross
Jack Thomas
the fed is not all jewish..i know, i know....
there are many conspirators in the Fed, the jews could never have done this alone
Joseph Carter
Bank gets a deposit of 10 dollarydoos. They can loan out 1000 dollarydoos.
Fractional reserve. You only need a reserve of a fraction of loans. Most banks don't even keep the reserve though, which is why audits are extremely important and under utilized.
Anthony Evans
or without the ignorance and apathy of the american people
Brayden Fisher
lol like seven captcha screens
Jonathan Anderson
this cartoon erroneously implies that the Fed and its member banks aren't all one in the same
Jace Mitchell
David Morales
Robert Young
Samuel Stewart
Oliver Peterson
Jaxon Edwards
Leo Flores
Ayden Phillips
y'all missed this check
Anthony Johnson
take it from an old fag...DICK "bloviating" bove is FOS.
Adrian Hall
...
Jacob James
I hope that means he will be shutting it down.