Fallacies can actually be useful and correct ways to attack an argument. For instance, if someone is not educated about a topic (a plumber, for example) than that person should not and cannot be useful as arguer against that topic (saying that a rocket can't go to space). Why does Jow Forums not believe in science and supports idiots with no existent credentials to their name.
Fallacy fallacy
Kayden Bennett
Connor Rivera
some BODY once told me the cult was going to sell me
I'm not the brightest kid in the shed
I was looking kinda dumb with bill and epstein's cum in the shape of the star of david on my forehead
WELL
the tears start coming and they don't stop coming
sold to david brock and his shills start bumming
did it make sense to get raped by jews
democrat pedos get rich and the kids get screwed
some kids to rape some cash to pay
just a day's work for the CIA
you can't go to jail if you're a fed
kids can't rat you out if they're all dead
HEY NOW
YOU'RE A CLINTON
RAPE 14 KIDS
GET PAID
HEY NOW
YOU'RE A DEMOCRAT
FIGHT THE CIVIL WAR
TO KEEP SLAVES
all those niggers are gold~
only chosen people
g-d gave souls~
Blake Cox
>supports idiots with no existent credentials to their name.
Supporting or believing an argument because someone has credentials next to their name is a fallacy called argument from authority.
Kayden Ward
>Why does Jow Forums not believe in science and supports idiots with no existent credentials to their name.
The problem is your entire argument can't be a strawman fallacy champ.
Julian Gray
K
Lucas Morris
>references
>psychologist and historical re visionary
go figure
Brody Green
I regret to inform you, good sir, that you have rendered your argument invalid by committing the following fallacies:
- Argument from ignorance
- Argument from incredulity
- Argument from repetition
- Argumentum ad hominem
- Shifting the burden of proof
- Confirmation bias
- Circular reasoning
- Continuum fallacy
- Suppressed correlative
- Equivocation
- Ecological fallacy
- Etymological fallacy
- Fallacy of composition
- Fallacy of division
- False authority
- False equivalence
- Fallacy of the single cause
- Furtive fallacy
- Hedging
- Homunculus fallacy
- Incomplete comparison
- Intentionality fallacy
- Ignoratio elenchi
- Ludic fallacy
- Mind projection fallacy
- Moral high ground fallacy
- Moralistic fallacy
- Moving the goalposts
- Naturalistic fallacy
- Nirvana fallacy
- Onus probandi
- Post hoc ergo propter hoc
- Proof by assertion
- Psychologist's fallacy
- Red herring
- Referential fallacy
- Regression fallacy
- Reification (hypostatization)
- Retrospective determinism
- Shotgun argumentation
- Special pleading
Mason Walker
I was making a statement, not an argument.
Dominic Harris
Your post contains two explicit claims.
1. Inaccurately portraying the position of Jow Forums renders the posters claim invalid.
2. The poster is a champion.
Your post contains one implied claim.
1. The poster is Inaccurately portraying the position of Jow Forums.
You must now defend these claims with rigorous logic without committing any logical fallacies because that's how normal people communicate.
Leo Foster
Claims aren't inherently arguments dickhead.
Levi Fisher
Agreed OP.
Arguments made by faggots should be immediately discarded.
OP is a faggot.
Chase Brown
Agreed.
Benjamin Jackson
What do you base this belief on? Do you have any data suggesting that my head is a penis?
Ryan Robinson
much fallacy is when you can't come up with a counter-argument
most "fallacies" aren't fallacies
Ryder Morgan
the key is forcing them to prove it's a fallacy
they can't prove it's a fallacy without committing a "fallacy" of their own (eg. appeal to authority, appeal to popularity, etc.)
Colton Ross
Bump.
Ryder Perez
>Why does Jow Forums not believe in science and supports idiots with no existent credentials to their name.
The irony of this from leftists. Please tell us more about the 32 genders some leftist social theories made up out of their ass. SAGE
Chase Cruz
fpbp
Cameron Jenkins
The fallacy fallacy
>This is a VERY careful card to play
It boils down to
>Is the fallacy the BASIS of the argument or just a part
Example: Ad-hominem
>Argument in which fallacy fallacy won't help: The guy believes some crazy shit means he's wrong
>Argument in which it will help: This guy is a wrong crazy-believing person who [Insert some facts and actual good debating]
Fallacies are NOT good, they're neutral at best.
Ethan Foster
Because adhering to (((accredited scientist))) isn’t appeal to authority, right? Fuck off faggot.
Benjamin Jones
I half-expected to see the fallacy fallacy fallacy and the fallacy fallacy fallacy fallacy arguments debunked by the original fallacy but that was a fallacy fallacy in and of itself.
3/10 good attempt but lose the narcissistic obsession with yourself
Camden Lopez
Your fallacy is not recognising how great I am. I should be way more obsessed with myself.
Dominic Reyes
>Claims aren't inherently arguments
Jackson Nelson
How do argue without fallacy please teach me Jow Forums