there is litteraly NOTHING wrong With female homosexuality, we should encourage this practise because has many advantages
>women are naturally bisexual
>it's pleasant to watch
>women can procreate normally
>women go for the better genes and not for the most attractive one
>for a child is better to have two moms
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
twitter.com
ಠ_ಠ
Uhhh.....you're stupid.
Although gay men are 10x more degenerate than lesbians homosexuality is wrong both ways
>yes you filthy shiska, find a woman instead of a man
>who cares if your biological clock will expire
all women should be revolutionary daddi healers
Women do as they're told, whether by men or by society. Actual legitimate lesbians are about as rare as a genius from Mozambique. Women are essentially children who happen to be adults, and will ALWAYS need a guiding hand to walk down the path of righteousness.
I agree with this. Tacitus recounts how traditionally, only 'cowards, shirkers, and sodomites' are supposed to be pressed into the bog via a wicker fence.
Rubbing pussies together is cute. Fucking another man's hairy, shit-filled ass is not.
Being a sissy faggot is not OK either. However, butch lesbians are droll.
lesbianism is a spook.
>procreate normally
>go for better genes
>go
>for
>better
>genes
>better for child to have two moms
You sure about that? nytimes.com
>we should encourage this practise because has many advantages
agreed. Feminists tell us today's modern women are unhappy because of men. The solution is for them to be encouraged to date and marry each other.
There are many advantages.
>women understand each others emotional needs
>female - female sex has no risk of pregnancy so anxiety free orgasms
>low risk of Stds
>lesbians can still have kids with donated sperm
>woman have careers money and can buy homes together.
I agree.
we should also allow lesbian pedophilia between a girl and a woman.
You're unironically "right". Among the 4 groups, only Ls are kinda ok, not because I'm a /u/ fag, but because there's pretty much no negative repercussion from their relationship.
Don't be a beta fag. Women are attracted to men that can commit aggression. It's programming that goes back over hundreds of thousands of years. If a man can prove he can kill a man he is more attractive to women.
>beta fag
Giving women full control of mate selection will basically ruin civilization and drag humanity down from the depths from which men have dug it out of. I imagine a future in which they are killed off like the loose ends they are once the appropriate technology has come along to replace them. So too will the men be killed who would preserve them for whatever braindead reason they might pull out of their ass to preserve the fundamentally broken gynocentric order of humanity. Sometimes improving something does not require the addition of a thing, but the subtraction of that which is detrimental to the whole.
Redpilled and based. Girl on girl love is pure and cute
>it's pleasant to watch
t. Basement dweller who has never seen a gay women, only porn.
It's only okay if they are both married to the same man. Polygyny all the WAYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyy...
It's not real, like seriously it isn't a thing. It's basically uggos who gave up on men or for political or daddy issue reasons.
>>for a child is better to have two moms
Lesbian homes have 900% more physical abuse than straight homes!
Why would you want to remove more white women from the gene pool by turning them into lesbians? Oh, sage
degenerate