The absolute state of American news

Ive been getting news alerts from jewgle since the election and it's unbelievable how biased these are. Il watch a deposition and notice the part that they will surely use it of context or ginned up. 9/10 I'm right

Soccer is gay lmao

>left can’t meme
Even the first fact listed is utter rubbish

Are you retarded? He literally did that on camera.

youtu.be/3kxG8uJUsWU

That image is terrible.
No. 1, 2 and 3 facts would only be supporting evidence to that Russia hacked the elections, but since there is no root evidence to support those facts upon, they mean nothing.

4 and 5
I'd at least expect some names or anything, not just "Russians" it's been 2 years and still, not a single name? Hell, it's so vague that it can even mean Russian diplomats and ambassadors were in the country discussing normal thing that they do, it's their job for gods sake.

I don't see the hacking being a big deal even if it were true, I agree with you on that. But it's the American public that makes such a big deal about it, as if some bots or posters every here and there can change the minds of literal millions of people to go vote for trump.

It's clear that the CIA wanted Hillary to win, that's why they invested $400 million in helping the Clinton campaign. But now that she's lost, they want to discredit Trump.

>jewgle news
>cnn
>literally a phone screenshot op
the fuck is wrong with you

Trash tier god damn phone poster. KYS OP.

fuck, posted twice

>Podesta falls for fishing scam
>hacking

Pick one.

Being on my phone trying to get sleep, when suddenly jewgle sends me some news. Won't turn the PC on just to send the screenshot into my PC, crop it and post it on Jow Forums.org.

Do you have any actual evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians during the 2016 election? Something concrete?
Audio? Video?

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

no

holy shit! you are a FUTURE MAN! im stuck in Wednesday still

So who do you think hacked the DNC and released the emails? The CIA?

You keep returning to this same tired "no evidence" talking point even though there's already evidence available. There are names, timelines, and methodology laid out. But to admit that would mean you'd have to admit that Trump's win might not be legitimate. You can't have that at all, so you'll always say there's not enough evidence. And even if Vladimir Putin admits that he did it, you'll say it does matter (even though a foreign power interfering in our election clearly is a problem). You're not arguing in good faith so what's the point in having this discussion?

google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2018/07/16/us/politics/trump-russian-hacking-conspiracy.amp.html

Attached: 1491261094764.jpg (1024x1004, 170K)

Phishing is literally a type of hacking. You proved my point.

See

Those balls literally all have chips in them, it written on the fucking ball in giant letters. CNN is pathetic

>"conspiracy theories = evidence"
So no audio or visual evidence then?

What audio or visual evidence could there possibility be? Are you expecting hackers to be live streaming their attempts to influence the election?

cnn.com/2016/12/26/us/2016-presidential-campaign-hacking-fast-facts/index.html

literally doesn't prove collusion. Do you know what collusion means?

You miss the point. No body is saying that the russians didn't try to hack in to the DNC server. The question is whether or not Trump worked with the Russians to win the election. Can you prove that he DIRECTLY COLLUDED with the Russians?

Great bait. How did you remove the Occupy Democrats logo?

>linking to CNN
Years before the internet and smart phones existed, President Nixon was done in by an audio tape. So yes, I'm asking for audio or video proof of your insane conspiracy theory.

I never heard him say hack. Find her emails, which is actually the US government property. So yes that would be a good thing though.

What a fucking reach lmao. This is the video that you provide when you know you have no proof, so you panic post.

As I stated before, even if Russia were to interfere with the elections Trumps victory would still be legitimate. A few posters here and there can't change the political landscape in a massive way.

As for the emails. I stated that the CIA funded $400 million for Clinton to win, so you stating that I thinkvthe CIA did is absolutely moronic. Who actually hacked them is a mystery, it could be anybody. An independent group of hackers, it could be Russia or even China or Turkey. There is as much evidence for Russia hacking it as there is for China getting those emails, which is none. There is nothing concrete.

I'm not pro trump or pro American whatsoever, I'm just stating the fucking obvious. I like Trump as much as Clinton or Sanders, which is not at all.

This Jew
Just said there was no election hacking. There is no definitely proof that Trump himself colluded with Russia. That's what the current investigation is for.

The DNC was hacked by Seth Rich. He transferred the emails to Julien Assange. The rest of this insane drama would be related to out of control ABC agencies. Laptops, Wasserman, Clinton, media, money, tech. Endless corruption and just for giggles follow Soros with links, donations and deceptive erosion of our government. Man, it's the worst parts of the bible come true.

You do realize audio tapes aren't the only form of evidence, right?

Also what is this "evidence" tell me everything you know that I haven't debunked already in one post and change my mind.

Attached: 20D3E0E2-528D-4F34-B651-FBDFD2883DA2.png (500x396, 115K)

Well he's a faggot. I want to see proof of actual collusion. The hacking is obvious. Although, I would say that the DNC takes some blame for this for being dumb enough to click on phishing emails and installing keyloggers.

So the investigation has been going on for 2 years now, what progress have they made since 2016? What evidence did they uncover?

>A few poster here
The scope of Russia involvement wasn't just in Jow Forums. It is impossible to know precisely how many voters nationally stayed home or voted for a third-party candidate because of the Russians’ social media campaign.

While Trump and his mindless supporters maintains there is no proof that the Russian assistance affected the election, the contours of that final month of campaigning and the closeness of the tally suggest that the opposite is true: that it is highly unlikely the Russian efforts did not affect the outcome.

Over the entire final month of the race, Trump essentially centered his campaign on talking about the emails stolen by Russian intelligence and then released through its allied group WikiLeaks. The messages, which were sent to and from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, cast Clinton in a bad light. “We love WikiLeaks!” Trump would tell his rally crowds and live TV audiences, urging them to go to the website and read the emails for themselves. “Boy, do we love WikiLeaks.”

Democrats and even some Republican consultants said the Trump campaign would not have based its closing strategy on that theme if it were not working.

You have to admit that the hacking of the DNC casted a massive shadow over the election. You cannot possibility claim it had little effect.

>It is impossible to know precisely how many voters nationally stayed home or voted for a third-party candidate because of the Russians’ social media campaign

you are a stupid person

Attached: hillary_polls.png (1920x954, 2.43M)

So you're just going to ignore the indictments and the entire investigation outline i posted here:
The only reason this is taking so long at this point is because of Trump's lawyers. Just have Trump testify under oath on live television. If you did nothing wrong, there shouldn't be a problem. I guarantee you the investigation will wrap up immediately after.

>polls

Nice bait

>of Russia involvement wasn't just in Jow Forums.

speculative russian involvement
at best

dung heap

Attached: manure-pile-for-sale.jpg (600x400, 175K)

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps

And you've provided nothing other than circumstantial evidence to support your claim. Do you also believe in the Seth Rich conspiracy? Pizzagate? Because there's arguably even more circumstantial evidence "proving" those conspiracies then there are yours

This is the problem with Anglos, they are not willing to listen out the other side and just call them stupid. Instead of saying "you are stupid and here's actually why" you know, something that would lead to productivity of debate.

A 14 year old larping on Jow Forums shouldn't be telling you this.

6:35AM going to sleep so no more replies from me.

take this with

you

Attached: mutebutton.jpg (1168x1152, 102K)

Well that's what the investigation is for, to find digital fingerprints and whatnot. If we go by the logic that 'the hackers don't stream therefore it's impossible to uncover anything' then what's the point of the investigation on the first place?

Thanks mom

Don't be jewed. The real world sucks, is full of boogeyman. Just wait and see, snakes are real. You either are a loser, a snake, or being attacked by a snake.

This is fucking US. Of course in Sweden you don't need to focus on serious problems. But here we are fighting off snakes. Is it the Russians? Idk. Honestly it's hard to blame people for thinking it is, so I'll leave that to hatets, but if you think Sweden that no one gives a shit about is like anything like the US thigh again.

This stupid fag reaching for shit.

Old news, true, but not the Russian spy part.
NFC chips are a standard component of modern competition soccer balls, but if you wanted to be certain that it couldn't interact with anything exposure to microwaves for a short period would destroy the circuitry.

>the absolute state of roasties

Attached: 1531197878335.jpg (960x1280, 145K)

>Just have Trump testify under oath on live television
for what? what initially started this investigation?

>It is unclear whether the ball Putin gave Trump contained the the advertised device -- and even if it does, that doesn't mean it necessarily poses a security risk.

How do people seriously fucking take CNN seriously.

The media is run by Jews, what did you expect?

Attached: 1531802273663.jpg (6530x2941, 3.91M)

IM EATING

>Pizza Gate
>Email Gate
>Benghazi Gate
>Whitewater
>Fusion GPS and Uranium One
>Dossier being a fictional story created by Anons
Seth Rich murdered by DNC
>DNC rigging the primaries against uncle Bernie
>Obama is not American
>Michelle is Tranny
>Jews control the media
>Flase flags mass shootings to enact gun laws
>satanic worship
>Pedo Elite Secret Clubs / Societies
>Awan Bros
>Tarmac meeting to cover up Hillary’s crimes
>Muh 33,000 deleted emails
>DNC Leaked and not hacked
>911 was an inside Job
>Towers brought down BG controlled Demolitions.
>Hillary secretly sick and hiding it during Election
>Polls rugged and Hillary did not have a 98% chance of winning
>Reply to this post or Hillary will win in 2020
The list can go on all night if you would like.

Q predicted this

>Panic post

I was just replying to a previous user.

You're an idiot. How is the Russia government going to obtain something that belongs to the US government? The only way to "find" it is by hacking.

>hurr durr it says fact so it must be true
Kys faggot

Attached: XHBa71T.jpg (702x1024, 70K)

You know what, you're 100% correct. Let's just assume that this vague, unquantifiable and currently unproven Russian effect really shifted everyone's votes to trump instead of mrs. "It was her turn", "why am i not 50 points ahead." Let's also assume that even if russia did interfere with the election, they did so by releasing emails which show the crimes the dnc was up to so instead of looking at that and why hillary Clinton's email server was more open than the legs of a 10 cent prostitute, let's focus on trump banging supermodels. And let's also totally ignore uranium one and how obama said he would have more flexibility after the election was over to putin. Let's also completely ignore the saudi funding behind clinton, the israeli funding behind clinton, the chinese funding of the Clinton campaign, all the clinton foundation's sketchiness in haiti, Hillary's shaky handling of benghazi, Bill's meeting with loretta lynch on the runway which made it look like he was strongarming her. No, instead let's just look into this one very specific thing which has yielded no evidence whatsoever instead of those much more fruitful avenues of investigation which will actually lead to things.