Society allow women to be topless in summer?

Cunts shouldn't be allowed to wear clothes at all. Letting them wear clothes will get them thinking that they're people. And if they wear clothes they'll have pockets and then they'll want money to put in those pockets.

Fuck yeah

I'd make the men wear bras too if that was socially doable

Women need no clothes.

They already are (allowed)
Sage

We hide breasts because they are sexual but more importantly sacred. Mens chests are worthless so they dont bother.

Also women like having support or they wouldnt have it.

Only women I see going topless when it’s allowed are either dog-faces who wouldn’t be looked at otherwise or part of a promo.

read the rules

tie one off and hang with stan you waste of space

Not in the states.

>it's the same nonsense puritans had against women revealing ankles etc.
Yes. It's a dumb silly non-issue that only exists because some people can't separate reality from their own imagination.

>t. Ferengi

Attached: Quark_2385.jpg (554x645, 127K)

My boner exists in reality

What does Varg think?

Attached: 1253314895_eddie-murphy-raw2.png (720x368, 296K)

Tits or gtfo

Most people look ugly naked so no, women shouldn't go topless just on that alone. Hell most men shouldn't go topless either.

He's not wrong you leaf.

There is literally no reason why women should not be allowed to be topless.

It's not about what you want to see, it's about what women have the right to do.

2521 Purity requires modesty, an integral part of temperance. Modesty protects the intimate center of the person. It means refusing to unveil what should remain hidden. It is ordered to chastity to whose sensitivity it bears witness. It guides how one looks at others and behaves toward them in conformity with the dignity of persons and their solidarity.

Basically it all comes down to just woman having no rights over something. We should allow them to be naked just like men are.

Not far behind in Canada

They are parasexual organs. Keep your subhuman degenerate genes out of the gene pool, please.

>I don't really see why woman shouldn't be able to go topless.
Says the literal faggot.
> I know the argument is that boobs are sexual and children shouldn't see
The argument is that open public nudity further contributes to the degradation of society.
> It is just absurd to me that it's ok for children to see boobs for the first few years then suddenly OMG NO!
It's "okay", because it's necessary for the child's growth and development. The child is too young to process it, and the woman opens her shirt to nurse, then closes it. She's not supposed to just let her tits hang out all a time cuz BOOBZ lol.
>Men are allowed to go topless and to me there as alluring as topless woman are to heterosexual men.
Sounds like a personal problem. Also sounds like a typical argument from a fag who thinks society should be run according to what is convenient/prudent to him, rather than for the benefit of society as a whole.
>So should woman be allowed to go topless in public?
No.
>Do we need to unravel the prudeness
It's worked well so far, right?

Attached: 1528442663382.jpg (750x747, 115K)

>The argument is that open public nudity further contributes to the degradation of society.
How does it degrade society? Do you think african society didn't advance because of boobs were showing?

All you do is restrict women of having certain rights that man have and degrading them.

Guess Whats next? Pussies hanging out.
Progressivism is a fucking cancer.

WE NEED FUCKING CLASS IN SOCIETY NOT MORE DEGENERACY

Stfu faggot

weak non argument, proves my point.

It degrades society by normalizing and devaluing sexuality.

Some mods are fat ugly dykes and cucks/basedboys/other snowflake words that get triggered by attractive women.

The VAST (>99%) majority of people look disgusting naked. Seeing the one in a few hundred actually hot wouldn't be worth seeing all of the disgusting people and the convenience of not having to wear cloths and I say this as a man who frequently walks around his house naked because of how much I dislike clothing.

Imagine unironically wanting to see your mom’s and sister’s tits when you go to the pool. Fucking gross I would never go

No one should be allowed to show their nipples in public, regardless of their gender.

> Do you think african society didn't advance
African society didn't advance. period. Compared to the rest of the world much of Africa that was left to develop on it's own did so at a rate that is markedly behind nearly every other society in history. The fact that in most African cultures the women walk around without clothing isn't the cause of this, but it is most definitely the symptom. The fact is that the less developed a society is, the less clothing they tend to wear, barring convenience (yes, we don't wear thirty layers like in victorian england, but by and large we all still wear tops, bottoms and shoes.) Men CAN technically go topless, but in many areas it's considered uncouth. It is NOT, however, inherently sexual--as it is with women, because Men's breasts are not secondary sexual organs, regardless of your personal preferences.
>How does it degrade society?
see (pic related). Seriously. That's you. That is what you are arguing for. Really think about that.
>All you do is restrict women of having certain rights that man have
Tell you what: ban male genital mutilation, allow single fathers the right to cede parenthood, make women's right to vote contingent on the draft and legalize abortion rights for men. That's four rights women have that men do not. Wouldn't you agree that constitutes as inequality?
>degrading them
Making people wearing clothes degrades them. Again, see (pic related)

Attached: Voltaire.jpg (1242x1754, 608K)

In France they can

If women get topless, do you really think its the 16 year old girls who do this?

No, it will be 50+ years olds

>There are people out there that will gladly destroy the moral fabric of society just to see a pair of tittys
The funny thing is you fucks are incredibly stupid. The majority of women with nice tits will still go about as normal because they know their nice body gives them value for $$$ and letting guys watch it for free is bad business sense. Only obese ham planets and fugly women will be topless.

yeah its legal, but not acceptable.

Topless ..be careful. What you wish. For ONE nice set of boobies ..you I'll have those that sag and hang flat on the waist

so man can show his fat onions boobs but not woman?

there is a reason, i dont want to get hard everywhere i go.

they should be allowed to, just as us men are allowed to be topless.

im already on it

Attached: gentlemen.jpg (960x640, 181K)

>What are designated FKK beaches

women dont want to be topless, they want to wear slutty, degenerate clothing that shows off their good sides and hides their flaws. women dont know what is best for themselves though, this is why some semblance of a dress code must be maintained on them. they are already out of control with wearing yoga pants everywhere and dressing like whores when they go to a party.

Oh stfu leaf. You know I am right.
The West is a cess pool of debauchery.

Going to address my points? Or are you done?

i quite frequently see little kids id guess around 5 years old without any clothes on

yes, these bitches are out of control as is.

Attached: backtothekitchen.gif (320x281, 984K)

yeah, a man can show his nipples because they aren't genitals, remember how theres a difference between the two genders?

the problem is when a man looks at a topless woman walking through his field of view he is literally a rapist and shamed publicly and loses his job

Breasts are secondary sexual characteristics, not organs.

>It didn't, but it has nothing to do with clothing, and vice versa. In fact it's more about climate, hence why men don't wear t shirts when they are out in the hot and why women shouldn't either unless they want to protect their skins

>see (pic related). Seriously. That's you. That is what you are arguing for. Really think about that.
That's not me and that is far from what I'm arguing for, I'm arguing for equality.
>Tell you what: ban male genital mutilation, allow single fathers the right to cede parenthood, make women's right to vote contingent on the draft and legalize abortion rights for men. That's four rights women have that men do not. Wouldn't you agree that constitutes as inequality?

I never said I'm against these, sure go ahead

>>degrading them
It's more about equalism than what you wear. Having rights because a woman is human too.

At this point they can only wear byttplugs for all I care. Womens whoredom was restrained for a reason, now its all lost

Attached: beach4.png (402x594, 328K)

Men can do whatever they want because they earned that perk for putting up with the shit women and faggots give them.

KILL YOURSELF.

Attached: abstinence and western civilization.png (751x370, 101K)

>Can't even dick proper hole
>Giving advice

Sexual arousal is opposed to intellectual discussion you retard kike.

Attached: 1524141698552.png (841x750, 188K)

In Europe they are topless on the beach when they feel like it, mutt.

Yeah that's why, fucking retard. Sure is intelligent here in Jow Forums.

Fuck no, you degenerate nerd. Most women look terrible topless. Imagine a fat whale flapping her tits or some heavily infested cellulite cunt. Fuck that, it seems to me you've been watching too many porn movies.

> it has nothing to do with clothing, and vice versa
Again, their wearing little or no clothing is not what prevented them from developing. The point was that their lack of development (i.e. lack of industry/ability to produce textiles) is the reason for their lack of dress. So, yes. Vice versa. There are plenty of cultures in hot climates where the people wear clothes.
>That's not me and that is far from what I'm arguing for
What you're arguing for is the "right" to walk around bare-breasted. That picture is the end result of a society that embraces what you're arguing FOR. Unbridled sexuality, uninhibited and proudly displayed for all to see.
>I'm arguing for equality.
Do you know why it became common practice for men to go shirtless while women still remain covered? It came about in blue-collar construction industries with men literally HAVING to take off their clothes to avoid dying. Simply letting women take off their clothes for no other reason then "well the men do it" is like, well...giving women the right to vote WITHOUT requiring them to have to sign up for the draft. Hence the next point you just skipped over.
>Tell you what: ban male genital mutilation, allow single fathers the right to cede parenthood, make women's right to vote contingent on the draft and legalize abortion rights for men. That's four rights women have that men do not. Wouldn't you agree that constitutes as inequality?
>I never said I'm against these, sure go ahead
No one said you were against them. You missed the point again. You come here all pumped up and trumpeting "equality" like you're really on a noble crusade or some shit, but when presented with an ACTUAL gender dispairity, you shrug it off with "wtv do what you want lol."
The point was to (hopefully show you your hypocrisy, or at the very least your pettiness.)
Imagine trying to talk to someone about FGM, and the response you got was "yeah, okay, but what about guys having to wear a tie at the office?"

I perosnally don't like the idea of girls going topless, as in I wouldn't do it if I was a gurl (if only), and I wouldn't like if my gf does it. But I hate when the state over regulates shit in the name of some dubious morality.

So let the sluts show their titties.

>sex is about love & fun because i say so
>boobs are natural because and serve the purpose of breast feeding because men say they are about lust

t. chris chan

Given the opportunity to maybe meet the other side halfway--to achieve some actual equality as you claim to want, you hand wave it away because it's not the issue you are personally invested in. You aren't interested in equality. You're interested in furthering your own agenda. You don't actually want to know WHY people might be against "free the nipple," or whatever flavor of the week issue you happen to be peddling. No, you're just looking for a 'gotcha'. Some technicality over which your opponent might cede some ground. You want to know why we're against women going topless? Because we know it will never stop there with you. You'll keep needling and needling and never be satisfied because you're not content until everyone accepts every little whim that pops into your head and can be vaguely formed into a new, noble cause to parade around in front of as many people will pay attention. We're not buying what you're selling. We're done. You want "equality?" Be prepared to give up some ground.

The second after you let women to go topples, the Courts will be flooded with sues about "street harassment" or straight Rape accusations.

You goys are all newbies in this forum now, I'm officially not a newfag now because this topic was already settled back in 2015 when I first came here.
Enlighten yourselves.
therationalmale.com/2017/11/09/the-creep-part-1/
therationalmale.com/2017/11/13/the-creep-part-2/
therationalmale.com/2017/11/25/the-creep-part-3/

Human female breasts are literally designed to invoke lust in males. Show me another species that has engorged breasts when not lactating.

So?

It already is allowed you dimwit.

>Human female breasts are literally designed
to feed a baby, invoking lust is a pleasing secondary effect that either by coincidence or by design can also be used for pleasure when you are sucking on those nipples

Nice snipping out the other half of my post. I’ll repeat it since you seem to have trouble with reading comprehension.
> show me another species with engorged breasts when not lactating
This begs the question, why would a human female NEED large breasts EXCEPT to showcase fertility and attract a mate.

show me another species that has boobs
>why would a human female NEED large breasts EXCEPT to showcase fertility and attract a mate.
they don´t for fuck sake, many get boyfriends and pregnancies without having big boobs, wich do grow larger when they get pregnant because they are lactating not because they want a erect dick

Well? Nothing to say?

t. Ferengi

> show me another species that has boobs
They’re aren’t any, that’s the point!
> they don´t for fuck sake, many get boyfriends and pregnancies without having big boobs, wich do grow larger when they get pregnant because they are lactating not because they want a erect dick
You’ve got to be shitting me. Compare a sexually mature male and female (that hasn’t had puppies) dogs’ nipples. They are identical. Now do the same thing with humans and tell me there is no difference. Human Female breasts are designed to arouse males.

Everyone should wear more clothes fuck this hippie body freedom shit. More clothes in hotter weather or you are murdered on the spot.

I don't mind when chicks go topless, but to be honest it doesn't really excite me either. I'd rather leave a little to the imagination honestly, I like modest girls.

Making it legal to go topless doesn't mean that all women suddenly will go topless to the supermarket.

based

Do not reply to JIDF threads encouraging degeneracy.

>Sage.

>They’re aren’t any, that’s the point!
So you admit using a false equivalence?
No, im not shitting you, their eyes and lips to their feet are made to arouse a man, their primary function still is to walk, to see and the boobs to feed a baby

I saw more tits as a little kid on french beach (toulon / Cannes) than i would be able to on porn sites, they were just everywhere
and I loved every second of it

americans think I'm "molested" now probably, even though they certainly more often have problems with their sexuality

> So you admit using a false equivalence?
I don’t think you understand the words you are saying.
> No, im not shitting you, their eyes and lips to their feet are made to arouse a man, their primary function still is to walk, to see and the boobs to feed a baby
Jesus I guess I have to spoon feed this to you. I am stating the following:
1) human female breasts remain enlarged even when not actively lactating
2) point 1) is in contrast to all other mammals, there must be a reason for this deviation
3) human males are aroused by human female breasts
4) given 1, 2, and 3, and given the absence of other physical factors leading to the evolution favoritism of large breasts, we must conclude that enlarged breasts are sexually selected for in women and are designed by evolution to attract mates

No, fuck off, that's degenerate.

based burger

>1) human female breasts remain enlarged even when not actively lactating
And they can get saggy or hard depending on the women and her clothing, genetics, fat and mood, I´m not denying
>2) point 1) is in contrast to all other mammals, there must be a reason for this deviation
Because we are bipeds,
>3) human males are aroused by human female breasts
As they are aroused with everything
>4) given 1, 2, and 3, and given the absence of other physical factors leading to the evolution favoritism of large breasts, we must conclude that enlarged breasts are sexually selected for in women and are designed by evolution to attract mates
But then there would be no small boobs because men would have only breed big women, whereas in reality not only did they also breed medium and small breasted women man have also for centuries arranged marriages based on propriety rather than genetics, unleass you were a piss poor peasant or a nigger..

> Because we are bipeds,
Explain this
> As they are aroused with everything
They are aroused by breasts more than elbows.
> But then there would be no small boobs because men would have only breed big women, whereas in reality not only did they also breed medium and small breasted women man have also for centuries arranged marriages based on propriety rather than genetics, unleass you were a piss poor peasant or a nigger..
no, you’re conflating terms. 90% (probably more) of healthy women have more breast volume then a comparable mammal of any species. A small breasted woman still has more breast tissue than a non-lactating female mammal of any species and more breast tissue than a healthy male. I never said that sexual selection was purely a race to the largest possible breast, only that human females were sexually selected for larger breasts THAN OTHER MAMMALS.

>Explain this
biped is a two-footed animal, even most mammals walk in four legs
>They are aroused by breasts more than elbows.
that is the norm, but then again you have expetions and the general norm of getting more aroused at pussy than boobs
>no, you’re conflating terms. 90% (probably more) of healthy women have more breast volume then a comparable mammal of any species. A small breasted woman still has more breast tissue than a non-lactating female mammal of any species and more breast tissue than a healthy male. I never said that sexual selection was purely a race to the largest possible breast, only that human females were sexually selected for larger breasts THAN OTHER MAMMALS.
i see it, you are right, still the human body developed to versatile, a dick serves the purpose of procreation but you can also piss from it, boobs serve the purpose of beast feeding but you can also be aroused by it. Or are you going to tell me these natural pair of tits turns you on?

Attached: saggy nigger.jpg (240x360, 25K)

It should be mandatory for hot women and forbidden for all others.