Post Ur political compass

Attached: 1514757538867.png (364x408, 238K)

i want all the minorities deported and then american can become the ultimate libertarian paradise

Attached: compass 6-27-18.png (480x400, 17K)

That's covered under libertarian/authoritarian. You can't, for example, be libertarian left according to your definition of left/right. A libertarian that wants more economic regulations is an oxymoron.

Attached: My 8values.png (800x650, 109K)

Clear Nobody gets that far left/right without purposely answering what will make them the most left/right

The chart devides social and economic veiws.

...

So what would be "socially" right and why?

Attached: 1192720181921814781.png (475x473, 241K)

Its again, more or less social restrictions. Neither is right wing because you can have either liberal or conservative social restrictions.

Your the first commie who actually said "More Economic Regulations and Nationalization" is leftwinged.

Kudos for being honest. You are the only commie I have any once of respect for.

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

So what would be a liberal social restriction for example? I'm trying to form an opinion

From a immediate point of veiw of course. In capitalism we don't have to prevent people from going back to fuedalism, its unthinkable. But back before capitalism was fully setteled the state had to intervene to break up old property relationships like peasant communes or large land lords to get the free trade of capitalism going. We'll have to do something similar.

I suppose anti-discrimination laws? Pronouns and such? At least thats what the right seems to think.

These compasses have a left bias and are designed to (((reevaluate))) your political views

Example?

Attached: 3312CF93-BED5-46A6-96B0-0AB7280DC557.png (640x600, 36K)

I don't really see how you can go back to fedualism. Landlords can evict you off of your land if you don't own it. But at the same time a CEO/Landlord/ or Manager isn't going to hold you at gunpoint and demand you to do something like a king or dicator would. The worst they usually can do is evict you or sue you.

Attached: 9k=.jpg (480x720, 51K)

Any Jeffersonians or georgists here???

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-06-02 at 2.17.06 PM.png (1012x1090, 118K)

Die commie

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-24 at 11.19.52 AM.png (2880x1474, 1.57M)

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-24 at 2.06.01 PM.png (1076x1434, 544K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-06-30 at 6.24.04 PM.png (706x992, 384K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-06-15 at 11.58.11 PM.png (1468x1398, 333K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-06-03 at 5.43.13 PM.png (1606x1310, 643K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-06-03 at 1.02.11 PM.png (1470x1188, 90K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-01 at 8.53.02 AM.png (1574x1052, 303K)

Attached: chart 1.png (480x400, 17K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-06-26 at 10.04.57 AM.png (2314x318, 74K)

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-11 at 9.02.51 AM.png (1044x1518, 302K)

Attached: Jeffersonian Principles.jpg (8185x5787, 3.61M)

nationalism does not mean left at all

>Deeply located in the red panel
>Posts a far-right, NationalSyndicalist flag

Are you 9 y.o.?

Attached: Agragrian republic.jpg (2541x1962, 1.42M)

Attached: Jefferson and George.jpg (2408x1488, 522K)

bump

Attached: english plz.jpg (806x823, 46K)

Imperial Prussian?

test has a left bias

Attached: rise above democracy.jpg (400x400, 19K)

rehabilitation and ecology, how gay

Attached: canvas.png (800x1200, 219K)

This. The guy who made this is a Noam Chompsky fanboy.

Its impossible now, but many people in early capitalism lived in peasant communes or had a sort of local fuedalism with a town landlord (like Kulaks in Russia) these property relations had to be destroyed. Peasant communes were privatized and split up and Kulaks were undermined with industrialization.

I'm literally Hitler

Attached: IMG_sxujfe.jpg (959x799, 110K)

>Industrialist who rely on wage slavery calling an agrarian who makes his own dam food gay.
kek

Nah, your kinda like Pinochet. lmao

i guess he ran to south america after all

Economically left, yes.

I'm not a jewish neoliberal shill...

>autocracy
What a poof test desu, autocracy is no ideology, well, it's not like these tests are any good anyway

Attached: hmmm.png (800x650, 61K)

Take another one, then

What's that test?

>tfw 100% nationalism

Attached: filterico.png (1356x1364, 210K)

heck

Why does that shock you? National Socialists are exactly that; authoritarians with leftist tendencies. So to be in the upper left quadrant is about right.

a free market isn't wage slavery, we can't just have everyone produce their own food. mass producing is very effective. and from what i remember, the question on that test that would get you more ecology points all come tied with regulations like no GMOs and less production but higher "diversity". i would gladly eat pills if we had the technology

politicaltest.net/en

this, these threads are little psyops

nah, not at all. would you say that the soviet union was more nationalistic than nazi germany? the left simply want to distribute wealth more, the right is focused on the individual and his ability to compete in the market

>„That means that you’ve become a party supporting the class struggle! You called yourself the Workers’ Party! That was the first step. You called yourself Socialist. That was the second. Now you’re talking about a middle-class one-class State. That’s the third and last step.
>„Is there even anything left now to set you apart from Marxism?“
>„Really, there’s nothing more hypocritical than a well-fed citizen protesting against the working class idea of class struggle.
>„You made it through the winter all snug and comfortable. Your very person is provocative of class struggle. What gives you the right to puff yourself up, all swelled with the pride of national responsibility, against the struggle of the working class? For almost 60 years, has the middle-class State really been anything other than an organized one-class State which, out of compelling historical necessity, itself gave rise to the working class concept of class struggle Didn’t you pay the price of this one-class State on November 9, 1918? And aren’t you at this very moment busily exploiting the people’s despair of the insanity of Marxism in order to re establish the same old reactionary middle-class nonsense as before?
Source: nseurope.org/English/Goebbels_Nazi-Sozi.pdf

But shouldn't people be more self employ? I'm not against the free market, I just think people should be independent rather than relying on employers. As for the test, I just answer to have great ecology, but at the same time a free market.

A joo?

holy shit i actually am closer to a nazi than expected

Attached: ecks dee.jpg (504x399, 32K)

Quite basic this one too, the hassle seems to be its economic point of view when it comes to the left-right axis, disregarding anything else really

Attached: Hmmm2.png (480x400, 17K)

No, but tariffs which people would call nationalistic are a policy that restricts economics.

Attached: download.png (800x1200, 221K)

You are more closer to neocon than I expected
Reminder that (((Britain))) would be classified in the blue squad at before/during/after WW2

Attached: UncleSchlomo.png (800x1062, 407K)

A Communist against government management of the economy you say

Attached: quietus.png (175x202, 30K)

why

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

Almost there where Thomas Jefferson is at.

Attached: politicalchart.png (3200x2560, 3.26M)

it is way more efficient to mass produce, and to mass produce something means that a company has to do it, and a company needs workers. if everyone was self employed, mass production would be impossible

Who is chaotic evil and why is the chaotic good siding with neutral evil?

Attached: 1524977235481.png (1258x620, 120K)

how'd i do goys?

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

We wont know until it all folds out

Attached: hmmm3.jpg (782x511, 67K)

Well not everyone has to be self employ, just a majority can.

Neo-con?

>It folds out when you are in war with Iran
That's a good strategy through

i don't exactly understand what you mean... so would these self-employed people refuse to sell their own stuff for money to buy mass produced stuff? at that point they're not even part of the economy... and if they did decide to sell their stuff, no way would the majority of the population be able to sustain themselves that way while competing with industrialisation, at least someone will try to top the competition, and at one point the only room for growth is going to be starting a proper company and employing more people

sounds about right

Attached: commie.png (724x1081, 209K)

>Considers himself a national socialist
>"How am I actually a socialist, guise"

>economics explain the entire left/right spectrum
Commiescum, typical.

Attached: 1507650055420 (1).jpg (500x488, 215K)

daily reminder that anything on the bottom side should be gassed

Attached: compaSS.png (480x400, 17K)

gay

y tho

says the fucking commie

Attached: E0A032C6-DA15-421D-B823-50D060018905.jpg (750x469, 99K)