"A republic and a democracy are the same thing!"

Both forms of government tend to use representativs i.e., citizens vote to elect politicians torepresenttheir interests and form the government. In a republic, a constitution of rights protects certain inalienable rights that cannot be taken away by the government, even if it has been elected by a majority of voters. In a democracy, the majority is not restrained in this way and can impose its will on the minority. All leftist are socialist and want to impose their belief and values on the people and punish, ostracize and humiliate those who step out of their set laws.

Attached: 1531509132632m.jpg (1024x724, 128K)

You mean constitutional democracy, right?

And were not a fucking democracy. The US has always been a republic; always anti-majority.

The founding fathers condemed the idea of creating a democracy. They believed it to be another form of tyranny. In this case a tyranny to the minority.

Democracy, no. A republic allows the few to have as much power and reach as the majority.

>muh minorities
JewSA confirmed founded by civcucks

The monarchy and Parliament fought for control of England during the seventeenth century. Though Oliver Cromwell appeared to offer England a better mode of government, he assumed broad powers for himself and disregarded cherished English liberties established under Magna Carta in 1215. As a result, the English people welcomed Charles II (b) back to the throne in 1660, soon after the new king gained the throne. So really early colonist were trying to rid themselves of the jewish threat that sneaked into the britbong kingdom.

I'll clarify. Oliver Cromwell was one of the most prominent supporters of the irish slave trade. "The Forgotten White Slaves is about the 100,000 Irish people and probably far more, sent as slave labour to the new British colonies in the 1650s to 1660s. It began in 1625 when James 11 issued a proclamation that 30,000 Irish political prisoners be sent to the Caribbean. It escalated 25 years later under Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector of England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland. By his death in 1658 from pneumonia safe in his England home, the Irish population of 1.5 million was down to an estimated 600,000." We all know that the slave trade was a lucrative business. That attracted the greedest of (((people))). It really set the early beginnings of the jewish slave trade of the irish and then the africans.

When will the Americans finally admit that democratic institutions were a mistake?

Attached: Neo-reactionary 01.jpg (1275x1650, 634K)

When the Fins can fend Russia off

Attached: finland_zps5f4e97e4.jpg (480x384, 45K)

Yet, Jefferson did not like the Constitution. He wasn't even in the country at the time of the Philadelphia Assembly.

>Pro neutrality

i.e. the Soviet Union becomes the dominant superpower in the world as America lets Communism spread around the world unchallenged.

>No army during peacetime

Good luck defending yourself from China.

>"Independence can be trusted nowhere but with the people in mass. They are inherently independent of all but moral law."
Its true, he mentioned how some of the wording sent the wrong message. Most notably "all men are created equal." He later wanted "-with equal rights", but if he started changing ot, who knows what else might have also been changed.

Every communist nation has fallen or is falling within the last 100 years.

The point is, the US is a republic and la creatura is the byproduct of jew york.

Attached: 1512937476735.jpg (452x798, 109K)

First of all, don't use this pic if you don't understand the difference between democracy and republicanism.
Second, the difference is that in a democracy, the people can vote out anything they want, even liberties. Republicanism on the other hand isn't a democracy, or a oligarchy, or a monarchy. It's a combo of all 3, and it contains a constitution where it says what the government can or can do and same with the people.

Pic related

Attached: Republicanism.png (500x207, 132K)

>Doesn't read the part of having a strong militia and the 2nd amendment
Are you retarded?

This

I agree pic is not at all what jefferson believed. However, its more to do with what liberals are against, which is republicanism.

I pretty sure everyone today have abandon ideas of republicanism and state rights, not just liberals. For example, everyone hat the electoral college even though that's what a republic needs and libertarians want direct democracy.

I say its because thats all we have known in the last 150 years. I bet if the core values of that era were implemented today, every major city would fall to choas with out government deciding and caring for them instead of themselves.

How so? Jeffersonian Democracy isn't anarchy.

John Adams
An Essay on Man's Lust for Power — 1763
>[D]emocracy will soon degenerate into an anarchy, such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes and no man's life or property or reputation or liberty will be secure, and every one of these will soon mould itself into a system of subordination of all the moral virtues and intellectual abilities, all the powers of wealth, beauty, wit and science, to the wanton pleasures, the capricious will, and the execrable cruelty of one or a very few.
John Adams
letter to John Taylor — 1814
>Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.
Fisher Ames
speech in the Massachusetts Ratifying Convention — 1788
>The known propensity of a democracy is to licentiousness which the ambitious call, and ignorant believe to be liberty.
James Madison
Federalist No. 10 — 1787
>[D]emocracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.
Benjamin Franklin
>Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!
Thomas Jefferson
>Democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where 51% of the people may take away the rights of the other 49%.
and the list keeps going

It's not. I'm saying were so accustomed to the current way of government, that most of us would just die. Because jefferson believed in little to no governement involvement on the populace. That includes the no hand outs government provides. I think he said he was agaist the role of government being a form of reliance or charity.

Oh ok, my bad. Well he did got involve in trade in order to maintain that agrarian republic he believed in.