Am I the only here who isn't a "racist"? Hear me out, for a second though:

Nah, doubt it.
Yeah, the scales are fucked, I don't disagree. It's all sideways now, but things change.

People on here (some of them) are extreme right as can be, and they're retarded. Irrational hatred, etc. Both sides have retards.

The kikes have backed us into a corner. We have no other option than to be racist.

You're absolutely correct. However we need to absolutely hate them to the point of considering genocide. If we don't, when we get to the voting polls to actually start shipping them off to where they should be, and we have the intent of peaceful deportation and the left has the intent of keeping them, then they'll negotiate that, "u-uh how about we just deport the bad ones :))))" and then the right actually accepts this... Then they negotiate and compromise until we get back to square one. When we get to the negotiations, we need to make sure we're extreme enough so that even if we get mellowed out, we still fulfill what we want.

You obviously haven’t been to any nigger and chink hate thread, they are barely human.

I've seen all of that. You think you can't post white people doing the same? Wake up

Good thread and I support what OP said, we could live in peace if everyone stays at their place.

OK NOW GIVE US BACK FALKLAND ISLANDS THEN, BRITBONG.

Nice cuck flag you got there.

So you are probably student age and live in a predominantly white area, most likely a safe little white town, otherwise you'd know better.

You're the sort of braindead zombie helping kill the country.
I suspect you will be voting Labour.

they were never yours to begin with.

Can't tell if this is a meme or not

>India
>So they don't need to be "welfare niggers"
Implying Indians aren't smart and rich as hell.

Racist doesn't have a proper definition anymore, OP. It now refers to anyone who doesn't think that whites are the devil and should kill themselves to benefit darkies.

Just acknowledging that the races are different, and some inferior to others, makes you racist.

I grew up in one of the worst estates in the country. Shut the fuck with the conjecture you retard. I escaped that, I know smarter blacks who did too.

Send them back home. I don't hate them, but they don't belong here.

Whats a meme about it?

Depends where you live, I guess. There are a lot of Indians here who are like blacks in the US.

Only for crazy people which is an increasingly large number of people

Operating on the belief that race exists makes you a racist, if I'm up to date on lefty rhetoric. Keep in mind that they concede the existence of phenotype, but believe it shouldn't be grouped by race, i.e. "tribes across Africa have more genetic variation than" etc etc.

>Only for crazy people which is an increasingly large number of people
Have you not noticed the inmates are running the asylum now? Dude, you're in fucking UK, you know how bad things are. You're not even allowed to carry a pocket-knife anymore because all the retarded darkies you imported are running around stabbing everybody.

I'm the same way. It's irrational to hate everyone based on their race. Distrust, based on prior experiences or certain knowledge, I can understand.

>Am I the only here who isn't a "racist"?
>Now Jews, on the other hand.... different story.
Jews are a race, so which is it?

Racism isn't even real it's a kike trick to justify their pathological hatred of europeans

(((Jews))) are not semites, they're converts.

Racism doesn't exist in 2018
America is no better than here, get off your imaginary high horse you fucking imbecile. Get off the internet and leave your house
Alright
Yeah for Jews I make an exception. Not all of them, again, but you know... the ones who hold any power whatsoever. Show me a good Jew in power, maybe I'll change my mind...
I agree, but for discussion sake I used the term racism. I don't believe it exist in 2018 either.

I literally don't hate other ethnicities or races. I just believe everyone has a right to preserve themselves and to self-determination with a homeland without meddling from (((them))) (who claim this as their sole right).

Mate, conveniently redefining words to suit your narrative is leftism 101. Hatred is not the only type of racism. You are asking for segregation. Segregation requires making a distinction between races; to note or observe a difference. Another word for this is discrimination. Discrimination is racist.

I'm not making a value judgment about racism as I believe it's inherent in all people and not necessarily harmful, but you absolutely are racist.

>America is no better than here, get off your imaginary high horse you fucking imbecile. Get off the internet and leave your house
Hell yeah it's better here, dumbass. I can and do regularly draw Mohamad and post it around town in broad daylight, I own multiple firearms, knives, and swords, and my president is trying to turn the tide against the globalist scum. Enjoy your bins, muzzies, and failed brexit.

>Segregation requires making a distinction between races; to note or observe a difference
Are you smoking meth? Legitimate question. How could I observe differences if there were none? Use that empty head of yours and give it a good ol' shake.

Send them back, maybe they prosper... They won't in the West. Isn't that what their entire argument is based on? Lol

Also, Racism doesn't exist in 2018. I quite literally live beyond racism, the only reason I even used "racism" in the OP was so to make it easier to have any discussion at all.

Regardless of this, to assert that acknowledging distinction is "racist" is laughable. Don't you know that my generation were taught everyone is unique? Because we were. We had presentations about it all throughout school. Based on distinction. Rooted in elitism. Elitism = nature. Don't like? Too bad.

Alright, you keep on believing that, I guess that counts for something!

If you're condoning treating people a certain way based on their race, in your case segregation, then you are racist. It's pretty simple.

Racism doesn't exist, so uh, no it kind of isn't. But let's say for arguments sake it is: Send them back, they prosper, it's better for them, it's better for me. Who loses here? Except that one group who, you know, rely on increasingly depraved news media and rising racial tension to operate their businesses... Any idea who I might be talking about? Except that same group who are still perpetuation WWII dead and repackaging over and over and over to sell.

Really makes one think!

perpetuating*

Again, I'm not making a value judgment about segregation or racism. I'm saying that discriminating, that is, treating them a certain way based on an racial grouping rather than individual quality, is racist. That is the literal definition of racism. Simply saying "it doesn't exist" with no substantiation is not a salient point.

Are traditions unique to specific racial groups racism?

If a tradition involves treating someone a certain specifically based on race, then yes. I don't know what traditions you're referring to though.

Racist jerk

The only people that love non-whites and afvocate for race mixing and mass immigration are the rich whites/jews that live in safe gated communities.

No no, I'm saying are traditions that are specific to a racial group "racist"? And why not? You know, you can choose any tradition at random that is specific to any racial group, doesn't matter which, is it racist? It's specific to a racial group.

Good job no one is advocating for that ITT then isn't it?

>I just want them to move back to their own homeland and get the fuck out of mine.
yep that's racist nowadays

Depends who you speak to. I've discussed this with blacks in real life and they agreed to most and actually considered their own homelands their "motherland", anyway... which I found pretty enraging but at the same time I can see where they are coming from. The UK isn't their homeland, or motherland, or whatever, so why should I expect them to treat it as such?

Whoever brought them here... they fucked up.

Why are you asking me to explain a nonsequitur argument that you made up? You tell me how they're racist.

Whenever the Jow Forums racism actually gets distilled down to definite policy proposals, it tends to start sounding like what you're talking about, OP.

I've been on Jow Forums since 2007 and on Jow Forums since before it was Jow Forums, and I've seen the basic idea you're describing running as a common thread through every phase/era this board has gone through. There are exactly three basic tenets that exist as something like universal constants on here, with everything else varying:

>1, a point exists at which too much of the commingling of different races becomes a bad thing
>2, a race should govern its own destiny, mindful of the fact described in 1
>3, for 2 to be possible, something needs to be done about the Jews

The details may vary wildly, but these basic ideas are *always* at work around here.

I'm not. I just want you to do the waste your time coming up with something so I can say it's racist in a finger-wagging like manner (like you) and yeah, just basically repeat "you're a racist actually", over and over.

Have you ever considered I don't give a fuck about your definition of racism? Definitions change all of the time, the definition of racism has changed a lot recently.

Send them back. Who loses? Except for that one extremely privileged ethnic group. You know the ones all too well, I'd bet!

>if you don't want black and brown people in your country, you shouldn't have gone to theirs. karma is a bitch.
stupidest logic i have ever seen

Pretty much, yeah.

It's not my definition of racism, it's the accepted definition of racism in common discourse. You're the one trying to redefine it to suit you, perhaps to make your view seem more moderate.
I'm not arguing against segregation, I'm saying you're trying to weasel out of accountability for your position. Nobody is going to demonize you for racism here, but conversely no one is going to fall for your bullshit doublethink, and that goes doubly for the people (read: normies) that this argument is designed to convince.

First of all: I don't know what "normies" are, because I'm not an incel neckbeard cartoon watcher.
Secondly, even If I was redefining something which has redefined numerous times recently, so what? The end result would be better for all parties involved. What's the big deal then? What is not "moderate" about my view anyway as it stands?

>Doublethink
No, I think that is what you're doing with the "you're a racist for noticing differences in racial groups because there are none"... how do you figure I noticed them then?

The "multiculti" experiment has failed. It's blatantly obvious otherwise this board wouldn't exist. These questions, or this discussion wouldn't be necessary. There wouldn't be anything for the Jewish press to run on. So then, send them back, they prosper in their own homeland. Everyone wins... except Jews in the West wouldn't be able to function the same way, conveniently. Which is a big no no for them, obviously.

Grouping by race implies that there is some significant greater similarity between people in that group than with people outside of their group. However there is evidence that two black people from different parts of Africa have more genetic difference between each other than with a member of another race. What you noticed are superficial similarities, and use them to group people who are different in more significant ways than those superficial features. That's racism.
Yes I'm aware that many cultures are incompatible, but culture =/= race.

>Le race doesn't exist its made up except Jews, they're a tribe and we must allow them to band together as one
Oh, fuck off, you could have said so 30 minutes ago and saved everyone the bother. Wanker. Why do I get the strongest fucking feeling that you're a big Jordan Peterson fan? Call it a hunch!

>strawman
Read the sticky please.

I never said there are no differences between races, in the ways that races are commonly defined. I said it's possible that these features that are used to group races together may not indicate similarity in more important features, like intelligence and behavior. That's neither here nor there.
The point is that racism is pushing the idea that race should matter. Calling for segregation based on race is absolutely pushing that idea. Doesn't mean that it's wrong or even immoral, but it is absolutely racist. You are a complete idiot if you think you can promote this idea without being rightfully defined as racist.

I disagree since the term "racist" carries so much negative connotation and drag that it isn't fitting here. The context you are using it doesn't fit with the definition most people use and know. Even *if* the definition currently states X or Y, it's been changed over time to mean different things.

you really are shilling very hard aren't you. This is what a high quality slide thread looks like, people.

But anyway, I'm not here to argue semantics and trivial bullshit.

>“A man lives by believing something; not by debating and arguing about many things.”

You get nothing done when you spend 3 hours discussing the definition of words that mean nothing anyway.

Who is shilling here? Explain what you are talking about

>leaf

Attached: F95E28A4-7633-40E4-B85C-ADEF12F80C1D.jpg (1200x900, 99K)

What does connotation have to do with definition here? That's the accepted definition of racism, whether you like it or not.
>The context you are using it doesn't fit with the definition most people use and know
What the hell are you talking about? Most people will absolutely call racial segregation racist, and they'd be correct by widely accepted definition. *If* you're trying to change the definition of racism, you won't get very far by simply saying "well hurr definitions change you know." You need some substance behind the change.

You are the one arguing that definition of the word that changes almost weekly now.. if so, then so is connotation, etc. Why wouldn't it be? The context in which you use a word is important, especially when you use a heavily charged word like "racist", no?
When someone thinks of "racism" generally speaking, they think of "you're a nigger!", or maybe discrimination which has no purpose, i.e. it's not for the greater good of the person being discriminated against, or maybe a cop shooting X or Y and so on. It's just hateful, irrational bullshit, etc. They generally don't think "I think you would prosper if you were in your homeland, and I'm in mine. And everyone would be much better off" is racist from my anecdotal experience nor do I see how it could be considered "racist", except with your recently updated definition of the word racism, which changes every other week to fit a wider and wider bunch of bullshit, basically.

Regardless of that, I'm tired of discussing this one quite trivial thing, and it's trivial because I couldn't give a fuck if it IS considered racist anyway, so moving past that... Sending people back to their homeland, bad idea, or good? And don't just say it's "racist", but if you do... alright, sure, but that doesn't mean it's bad.

literally no one above 85 iq identifies themselves as 'racist' unironically. people who use that fake, gay word will call you 'racist' for the beliefs you've outlined.
you are literally doing the "i'm not racist, but..." thing that basic bitch lefties make fun of. cut it out.

Attached: 37966035_256425141852976_5005788510951571456_n.jpg (640x530, 24K)

Not really, I don't care If I'm considered a racist really, where as they definitely do, but I don't believe I am. Not that it matters much because I know I'll be called one.

then what is the point of this thread?

Attached: 1526266447841.png (612x491, 98K)

To put forth the idea that you don't have to hate non-whites to want them to get the fuck out of your country. Pretty much.

You can judge the character of a man by how he treats his inferiors.

I'm willing to give anyone a fair go.

Attached: 1522817677138.png (900x1042, 90K)

according to liberals, all white people are racists

guess I'm a racist

A lot of us feel the same, only because the love of our own is stronger than the hated for others. Those who crank up the hate they feel for whatever ethnicity or group to the point where it consumes them become a problem in themselves. We just love our people enough to want to keep them alive and if possible in the best environment for them, which to be blunt is the western, European centric world.

Niggers in Africa and Asians in Asia are the primary cause of pollution and environmental damage. Wiping them all out is a win for whites AND the planet.

This particular aspect of its definition literally hasn't changed since the 16th century. Connotation has changed plenty, but racism has always meant a belief that humans can or should be divided into racial categories and treated according to them. That's precisely what you're advocating. I'm calling a spade a spade.
I've said repeatedly that I'm not making a value judgment, and I see the benefit in segregation. I'm saying that claiming you're not racist is intellectually dishonest and self-defeating, since anyone who doesn't support segregation will immediately dismiss you based on your hypocrisy.

>racism has always meant a belief that humans can or should be divided into racial categories and treated according to them
But they literally can. You are dividing someone into a racial category when you call me a "racist", aren't you, really? How can you not be? The word "racism" wouldn't exist, the definition itself wouldn't exist had there not been any way to divide into racial category. There has to be "race" and differences within it to exist for the word racism to have came about in the first place and be used in the context and with the definition you are claiming... and I know you're going to say, "yeah but those are just superficial differences" how do you know? Perhaps the science hasn't reached far enough for us to know yet, ever considered that?

And yeah, I get that to your definition and maybe even the 'accepted' definition (which really doesn't mean much) may render me a 'racist', however I would disagree with that.

Either way, being a "racist" in 2018 doesn't mean anything anymore. It carries so much baggage that it's basically a redundant word at this point.

"Racism" is a dishonest concept. It was coined by a communist professor in in the early 1900s as a way to shame those who reject foreign immigration.

"Racism" is just a defense mechanism that people use when they feel like they are being invaded by a threat. It's all a psychological warfare tactic to shame whites into lowering their guard.

>But they literally can
If you believe this you are by definition a racist.

Ok great, don't care then

Ok.

It doesn't matter, it's a meaningless word.

Ok.

>You are dividing someone into a racial category when you call me a "racist", aren't you, really?
That's not how it works. I can call someone a satanist without believing that satan actually exists, even though I know exactly what it means. I can recognize the phenotypic features that people attribute to race without thinking that race is a useful or accurate way to classify people. This is just rhetoric mind you, I don't know that it isn't. I just know that believing it is is the definition of racist. There doesn't "have" to be a race, those features can exist without being attributed to a "race" classification.
It's nice that you disagree with that, but you're disagreeing with virtually everyone. The onus is on you to convince people that the accepted definition is wrong, by doing more than simply stating it's wrong.
I'm well aware that the term is thrown around emptily these days, but your position is unambiguously racist by even the most conservative sense of the word.

O

>I feel they could do well on their own one day
kek what are you basing this feel on?

No, the word satanist wouldn't exist without "satan" being 'invented' (or actually existing, w.e.), and therefore some form of 'elitism' in the sense of you separating satan from normal people who aren't satan. When you use the word "satan", you are being racist (if he is of a separate race, which he must be), or... satanisitist! one might argue, like I am doing right now.

What do you think of them apples? hehe

discrimination*

>I just want them to move back to their own homeland

No slave descendant in America has a "homeland" to go back to. Not only will their bloodlines trace back to a thousand different villages, they have nothing in common with modern Africans other than general appearance.

Those people have no home but America.

the real black pill is the sjw leftist extremists are just are racist as the white supremacists. sad state of affairs.

Wrong. Their homeland is Africa, blatantly. They do not belong in the West or in Europe, that's for sure.

You can have ours as well then, you soppy cunt

i dont hate black or brown people because of the color of their skin
I hate them for how they act,
and the majority of them act like shit.

no. their homeland is the south. africans no longer identify with (((african americans)))

I think you're an absolute fucktard who thinks words mean what you want them to mean. A typical leftist-style tactic that might fly with a double digit IQ.
An "ism" is a philosophy, theory or ideology. Understanding or acknowledging an "ism" doesn't mean that you subscribe to it. No shit an idea wouldn't exist if someone hadn't come up with that idea. Doesn't mean that idea is correct. It's like talking to a fucking kindergartner.

But it really isn't though. You're just missing the point.

By your own definition discriminating against another race is "racism", is Satan not another race? Why not? He even meets your definition of the differences "not being superficial", doesn't he? Are you a racist? I think you might be.

Cognitive dissonance, my man. You're suffering

if you accept "satan" as a real thing maybe.

swear to christ I'm tired of the dwindling education here.

Don't bother. He's just another partisan hack.

This board is a fucking crater. Used to be we didn't subscribe to party ideologies here but now Jow Forums is just another pawn in stupid two-party games.

>hear me out
Dropped

This.

You can always count on Australia for true meaningful insight.

Even if it's hypothetical, they'd be still separating by 'race' and therefore discriminating. As per their own definition they've not stopped going on about for most of this thread.