Study finds that global warming exacerbates refugee crises

Lol Yes goyim. Buy our electric cars if you want to stop mass immigration. Putrid

Global warming isn't real.
If anybody thinks it is they're literally morons.

global warming is most likely individually manufactured climatic phenomenons using some climate altering tool (cloud seeding for example) in order to create a narrative. also some of these (((phenomenas))) are done to cause catastrophes in specific areas that will cause migration
been doubting this hoax for some time now

Attached: Baolbui.jpg (615x447, 71K)

water is also wet

what is happening in europe is but a trickle of what is to come. Hilarious how all the denier cucks refuse to recognize this.

Migrants will continue to flow north in north America as well, it will get worse in the future, but Europe is literally right next to north africa / middle east. Wait till resource wars break out over water / crop failures and hundreds of millions try to flood into europe for refuge.

I'll get right on it

Or how about we just send them back and let their boats sink/die in the desert. It's really that simple, and ruthlessly prosecute and deport any migrants

all the major scientific organizations agree.

Attached: changepointdetectionintrendsoftemperature-cahill2018.jpg (1085x733, 425K)

>(((study)))
lol climate faggots are so desperate now they will make up anything
youtube.com/watch?v=48lGGfiV1H4

Attached: 2262607_1.jpg (630x630, 30K)

When did the climate begin to change and what is the ideal temperature?

heat records are being broken at an increasing rate

Attached: high-low-temps-download6-2016.png (928x730, 50K)

multiple independent studies come to the same conclusion. It's getting hotter.

Attached: 2015DecadeRecords.jpg (1920x1080, 632K)

or we could let them drown
which reduce their overpopulation and prevent them using our technogly (less CO2 )

>Daily Caller
Not to mention the fact that whoever wrote that trash doesn't understand the cook paper, nor do they understand what concensus studies do.

The Cook study is just one of many dozens of consensus studies that have been done on global warming.

Let me explain it to you brainlet, in the field of climate science, climate scientists aren't out to explicitly state that global warming is anthropogenic or a fact in their papers, the vast majority of papers make no statement because it's not necessary and the scientists don't need to clarify their stance on the matter, because they accept it.

It's like claiming that any astrophysics paper must make a statement confirming they support the theory of relativity, it's pure and utter nonsense.
>only 41 out of the 11,944 published climate studies examined by cook explicitly stated that mankind caused most of the warming since 1950
No shit, because most papers wouldn't ever make this statement since it's completely and utterly unnecessary to make such a statement in a climate paper that might never even touch that subject. Climate science is a huge fucking field involving atmospheric physisists, hydrologists, paleoclimatologists, geologists, and pretty much all earth science in general.

Anyways, back to how these consensus studies work; they pick tens of thousands of scientific papers and they look at those that DO make a statement about whether global warming is anthropogenic, and 97% of the papers that make that statement agree that it's a problem. The article also falsly cites a very small number, 0.3% claiming that only 0.3% of scientific papers in climate science support the idea of global warming being anthropogenic which I outlined above, is a load of horse shit.

Of course that shitty article also mentions roy spencer, king of climate change denial and a general retard who has been wrong on all of his own climate projections for decades now.

Its a bullshit post-fact justificatin. According to "studies" from decades ago we should alredy have 50 million plus "climate reffugees". Fuck you faggot OP

will Europe be able to cope with endless photos of dying children if this happens?

Europe needs its womp womp moment

And simply enforcing the border solves that problem. 100 foot walls. Militarize it if you have to.

>1950-2009
That wasn't my question.

>BREAKING NEWS
>STUDY FINDS THAT ONE THING WE'RE TRYING TO CONVINCE YOU OF MAKES ANOTHER THING WE'RE TRYING AND FAILING TO CONVINCE YOU OF WORSE
>STUDY FINDS
>NEW STUDY REVEALS
>SCIENCE SHOWS
>AND THAT'S A GOOD THING

Attached: 1530664470790.jpg (464x460, 229K)

Considering shipping contributes more pollution than all the cars combined, banning all NGOs from picking up drift wood would help prevent global warming.

this goes back to 1880

Attached: Instrumental_Temperature_Record.png (800x591, 39K)

> climate scientists aren't out to explicitly state that global warming is anthropogenic or a fact in their papers
Well no shit, because they can't even prove that c02 is a "climate" motivator, much less why there was more of it in the atmosphere during the last ice age.

there's a very strong correlation between the increase of co2 in the atmosphere and global warming user.

Attached: cs_global_temp_and_co2_1880-2012_v3_1.png (2261x1714, 116K)

The nigger population is rising. Maybe that's the cause? I mean, since we're just pulling shit out of our asses. I guess that means more niggers need to die and then all will be right.

>Weather channel founder John Coleman
aka the retard that dropped out of the AMS because he has no idea what he's talking about and literally embarrassed himself over and over again with his incorrect statements such as the Arctic was increasing in ice volume (despite the volume of arctic sea ice literally decreasing at an increasing rate since the late 1970s).
It's also worth noting that Mr. Coleman has no educational training in climate science, or any background in atmospheric physics (meteorologists are NOT earth scientists, nor climate scientists).
It's the equivalent of a mathematician saying climate change is a hoax, despite them having no actual training or understanding of the phenomenon.
It's also funny you bring this guy up, because he's a well known shill for the Heartland Institute, the same organization that takes in millions of dollars from companies like Exxon mobil, and foundations like Donor's Trust.

>Well no shit, because they can't even prove that c02 is a "climate" motivator, much less why there was more of it in the atmosphere during the last ice age.
What a complete and utter brainlet you are. I honestly feel pity for your dunning-kruger ignorance. It is a literal fucking fact that CO2 is the cause of the current temperature trend, isotopic ratios of C13 / C12 in the atmosphere prove this. Not only that, the physical records of CO2 concentrations going back almost a century, not to mention paleoclimate records from ice cores that go back over 400k years show us what CO2 levels were like in pre-industrial times compared to now. We also understand very well how well mixed greenhouse gasses like CO2 operate in the atmosphere.

Also, brainlet, we are still in an ice age. Learn what the definition of an ice age is before you spout off your sheer ignorance so publicly. We are in an Interglacial, an ice age is any period in geological history in which the climate is cold enough to maintain ice sheets at the Earth's poles.

On the television news here in the UK, whenever they talk about 'migrants', they say, 'the migrant crisis, caused by global warming'. Insane levels of propaganda, if they were being honest, they'd say, 'the migrant crisis, caused by us letting them in time & time again so more keep on coming'.

I love how they always first scream Syria, as if Syrian refugees would be majority of shitskins flooding Europe...

Climate change isn't the main driving factor in mass migration from Africa, middle east and central asia. That would be uncontrolled population growth, shitskins are breeding faster than economies and infrastructure of their countries of origin can support. By allowing population pressure to be released, it only feeds to further population growth. Niggers are simply too stupid to understand consequences of their breeding, or any other actions.

To a certain degree it is though, in Syria for example higher than average temperatures have had a negative effect on agriculture, combined with the pressures of the ongoing civil war many people fled.

Agricultural issues with crop failures and droughts in regions of the Earth already very susceptible to droughts will only increase any future migrations / refugee crises in Europe. The middle east / Africa have some of the most rapid population growth on Earth currently, all those babies that are being pumped out will be grown men / women in a few decades and will pump out even more babies, using up more resources, and as the global average temps continue to increase throughout this century there will be massive consequences on human civilization in the region.

You're missing the point and avoiding my question. Can you point to a time in history when the climate was never changing?

global population increase makes it worse for certain. Population increase in the USA makes it far worse because we produce far more greenhouse gases per capita.

But even Trump can't get the wall built...

The "crises" are that they are being allowed to migrate to white countries. If not for global warming they'd still want to migrate because they live in shitholes.

Sounds to me like you advocate for a race war. I like the way you think user.

the point is that is has been increasing rapidly in accordance with CO2 emissions. That's the point.

Oh, I see you're on stage 2. The classic "climate has always changed" argument. It's a fallacious argument though.

Maybe read this:
skepticalscience.com/climate-change-little-ice-age-medieval-warm-period-intermediate.htm

Attached: Stages of denial.png (500x500, 362K)

>a literal fucking fact
no u

it will probably bring on a race war sooner or later, whether I want that to happen or not.

Given that governments aren't doing shit to solve either the climate change and/or immigration problems, it's probably inevitable.

Whites better arm up.

So, by genociding niggers and arabs we can solve both!

nobody cares. let those faggots fry. if they think they are gods children then let him save them. surely if their religion isnt a afront to god they wouldnt be punished by the sun

>yfw all these shitskins are piling into the West for gibs/poon and we just intellectualize it with retarded wankery as we set ourselves up for our eventual suicide

If we're doomed to a world of harsh climate change where resources and living space are finite why the fuck are we giving away ours whilst taking in all of Africa, Asia and the Middle East?

We can fix these problems. We just need a generation brave enough to say "no".

Attached: 1531738185760.gif (155x173, 949K)

>It is a literal fucking fact that CO2 is the cause of the current temperature trend,
Shouldn't be hard for you to prove it then, Oh wait you can't. Pic related is what I think of your "climate science".
Then it should be no problem for you to explain why larger amounts of c02 were in the atmosphere during the last ice age.

Attached: Cartoon - Climate Science.png (400x305, 76K)

Okay, let's use nuclear pow-
>Fuck no you can't do that bigot! That's endangering humanity and is a form of racism against third-world peoples who rely on resource extraction to drive their economies! Colonizer!
>But it would hurt Russia too, their economy relies on oil exports.
>Oh. Proceed.

>In accordance with CO2 emissions
CO2 makes up only a tiny fraction of atmospheric gases, and only a tiny fraction of that CO2 is from his man activity.
Nice little graphic you have there. I'm not denying anything but it helps if you can try to box me in with that. It's not a non sequitur, it's a very real consideration. Man very well may have something to do with it, but like I said before, CO2 is only a tiny fraction of what makes up the atmosphere, the biggest contribute to the green house effect is water vapor.

>if you have air conditioning, then you must let in niggers
Well that settles it, LET THEM ALL IN

There wouldn't be refugees if they would stop reproducing like vermin.

what are you talking about, the amount of co2 in the atmosphere has gone up 7 fold due to humans.

Attached: 565cb19b1700008100e1abc0.jpg (555x402, 43K)

But, there is also the excuse of low birth rates in Europe, Canada US etc...if it is not global warming that causes migration, then it will still be low birth rates, AFTER being told the world is overpopulated.

Progressives lost credibility a loooong time ago.

>Global warming linked to shrinking penises
>99% of all scientists agree

This is all getting a wee bit pathetic

It's not my fault that you choose to be a Dunning Kruger ignoramous, but I understand why you feel this way. It's much easier to be an uninformed brainlet that doesn't understand what he's talking about, yet speaks with absolute certainty that you know better, it's much harder to be a skeptic and challenge your beliefs and do research into scary ideas that challenge your own.

As for your fallacious argument about "larger CO2 levels in previous ice ages," what data are you referring to, because you apparently still don't understand what an ice age is. There has been ice in the arctic pole for 2.58 million years now, and there was ice at the antarctic for longer than that in the Quaternary ice age.

You also fail to understand that there's many things that cause climate shifts, from changes in Milankovitch cycles, to volcanism, to eccentricity of the Earth's orbit, to changes in global thermohaline circulation, and numerous other factors.

Earth's current CO2 levels are the HIGHEST in the past 400k years. No where in any of the ice core data we have is CO2ppm higher than it is now at approx. ~410ppm. Pre-industrial average was around 268ppm.

There have been periods in Earth history in which CO2ppm was much higher than now, and periods where it was much lower, that's just part of Earth history, but never in the paleoclimate record has there ever been such a rapid increase in CO2ppm, ever. A doubling of atmospheric CO2ppm can lead to potentially a rise of 4C in global average temperatures. We are on pace for 1.5C by the end of the century, and the warming will continue regardless of whether we stop outputting all anthropogenic CO2 right now. The oceans are heating up and becoming more acidic, that's where most of the heat and CO2 is going, trapped in our oceans.

It's only about 3% of total atmospheric composition and of that less than 1% is due to human activity.

Water vapor is a greenhouse gas too, but water vapor in the atmosphere is pretty stable. You also make the fallacious argument that because CO2 is a small fraction of the atmosphere, that it must be insignificant. The truth is the atmosphere is a very large, complex system, very small changes such as an increase in CO2ppm from 280 to 400+ is a very large deal in such a complex system with wide ranging ramifications in trapping heat in the Earth's atmosphere and ocean.

citation or stfu.

Only fucktards deny global warming.
WE NEED THIS WORLD TO BE COLDER
IF THE ENTIRE WORLD IS COLD THEN NIGS WILL LITERALLY DIE OFF
WHITE SKIN IS FOR HIDING IN THE SNOW
ITS FOR BEING ABLE TO GAIN SUNLIGHT EASILY DURING COLD, CLOUDY TIMES
BLACK SKIN IS TO PROTECT YOUR BODY FROM SUN RAYS, LIKE A TINTED WINDSHIELD
IF THE WHOLE WORLD GETS HOTTER
WE WILL ALL TURN BLACK
WHETHER OR NOT WE RACE MIX
DUE TO EVOLUTION

Open bobs

That guy's on Gore's payroll.

underrated

CO2 is much smaller than 3%. It's currently around ~408-410ppm, meaning 0.041% of the atmosphere is CO2.

Also, of course the majority of CO2 in the atmosphere is not even from humans, what you need to understand is this is a cumulative thing, looking at emissions over decades, emissions that are increasing every year. Most CO2 is part of the natural carbon cycle, eg plants dying and decaying, outgassing from the oceans, burial of plants into soils and through tectonics sequestering the carbon, weathering of rocks and minerals. We've been doing this for centuries now, adding carbon to the atmosphere that was never part of the current carbon cycle, pumping out gasses and liquids that have been sequestered for millions upon millions of years, combusting them and creating new CO2 from industry in the atmosphere.

What we have done is completely alter the natural balance of the carbon cycle, of sediments weathering and sequestering carbon, and plants dying / decaying adding carbon to the atmosphere in relative balance.

Turns out greenhouse gasses like CO2 have a huge impact on climate throughout Earth history. It's not a factor of whether the planet will survive what humans are doing to it, it's been through far worse, what's really at stake is whether our civilization and out of control population grown / out of control resource consumption can withstand the pressures of climate change, including rising sea levels, mass migrations, ecological collapse, crop failure, etc.

I'm making the valid claim that the largest contributor to the green house effect is water vapor. Also, the relative effect that CO2 has on the atmosphere is insignificant. The difference between the two is that water vapor doesn't remain in the atmosphere as long as CO2. The fear is that CO2 will build up over time, not being able to be absorbed fast enough.
>Trapping heat
Yes, water vapor does this very well. Very small changes in CO2 are not a very large deal. Over time, large changes, yes.
Take two seconds, go to Google, and type in "percentage of CO2 emissions caused by man". Find which I source you want.

lol, gotta love how denier cucks bring up al gore relentlessly like he's some sort of climate messiah or some shit. Is that seriously the best """argument""" you have?

>There have been periods in Earth history in which CO2ppm was much higher than now
Yes I know, you just proved my point.
>MUH RAPID RISE IN TRACE GAS
You can keep droning on and on about your pseudo science nigger, the fact remains that refraction from c02 has never been proven. It's such a minute trace element in the atmosphere you faggots have literally made up the science to fit the symptoms.
Ad homs aren't an argument you zero gag reflex metrosexual faggot
>dat 300k peak tho

Attached: CCC_Fig4_3_2.jpg (516x281, 63K)

See, you should have just opened with we'll all turn black.

>Also, the relative effect that CO2 has on the atmosphere is insignificant.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about here pal, you're out of my league in this discussion. Making a blanket statement when you have such little understanding of the topic proves what an absolute brainlet you are. Go out there and get educated, there's no excuses.

>Take two seconds, go to Google, and type in "percentage of CO2 emissions caused by man". Find which I source you want.

OK. I just did that user, and this is what I found.
"Climate myths: Human CO2 emissions are too tiny to matter".
newscientist.com/article/dn11638-climate-myths-human-co2-emissions-are-too-tiny-to-matter/

No again, by far the largest contributor to the green house effect is water vapor, and being that CO2 has a relatively minute effect, small increases aren't going to cause the problems you claim. Over time, yes, if we lost all life that relied on CO2.

One fucking degree? Oh shit wheres my life raft?

>1 whole degree
QUICK OPEN THE BORDERS BLACK ALL THE WHITE WOMEN

Global warming makes it a white man's world too. Frozen land that isn't worth shit will become warmer and valuable, the oceans will fill with squid for the white man to catch, and the shitholes will get so hot that the only people who can access them for resources will be whites with modern equipment.

Global warming is IRL region locking

WRONG! There is no "refugee crisis", it's just a made up crisis to promote hate and fascism.

That's great, there are more. You're free to read all of them.
I actually do know what I'm talking about. But I don't think you shouldn't believe me, do the research yourself.

That may not sound like a lot, but it’s close to the global temperature scientists say can trigger dramatic sea-level rise, more destructive storms, and heat waves.

So, when you think about global warming, think of the tortoise, and remember that slow changes add up over time.

yaleclimateconnections.org/2017/04/why-a-1-degree-temperature-rise-matters/

>>There have been periods in Earth history in which CO2ppm was much higher than now
>Yes I know, you just proved my point.
You don't even understand what I was saying apparently, nor do you have any understanding of the complexities of measuring paleoclimate levels of atmospheric CO2 or paleoclimatology in itself. Spoilers, the people that study these things are all in agreement on climate science, including the very people who make the images you post as "proof" of your own ignorance on the subject. You are a person who has little to no understanding of the data, yet uses these data as "proof" that climate change is a fraud, again, despite you having no actual understanding of the things you post.

I guess you've never once heard of a Milankovitch cycle then. Not surprised, considering you say this data is from the "last ice age," despite the fact it's from the very same ice age the Earth is currently in, the Quaternary ice age. Fucking brainlet.

You are so resoudingly ignorant of the facts too, you claimed that CO2 was higher in "the last ice age," look at the very chart you posted. The highest the data goes in Vostok is not even 300ppm, CO2ppm right now as measured in our atmosphere from multiple datasets is ~408-410ppm as I already stated above, so the statement you made before is blatantly false.

Second, you claim CO2 is a "trace gas," once again a fallacious argument attempting to say that because CO2 is a small fraction of the atmosphere its effects must also be small. Oh my you are so incredibly ignorant of what you speak it honestly makes me feel pity for your ignorance.

Funny how you mention ad homs while also ad homming, man this image is so fucking true it hurts.

Honestly, you should just be fucking embarrassed and leave this thread, but I'm quite enjoying you laying out your ignorance so bare.

Attached: 1439914551713.png (706x674, 44K)

>That's great, there are more. You're free to read all of them.
It contradicts what you are saying user.

I see you failed to understand a single thing I wrote, not surprised.

You do realize that atmospheric ppm is at its highest levels in nearly 20 million years, no? You do realize that in the Earths atmosphere, a change of ~100ppm normally takes 5000 to as much as 20,000 years, right? We have risen over 100ppm in a little over a CENTURY.

We know that the reason for this CO2 rise is due to human industry because we can study the C13/C12 ration. The ratio of C13 to C12 is falling rapidly and follows the trend in emissions from human activity very closely.

Holy fuck, I haven't seen that image in years. Brings me back to the good old day.

Global Anthropogenic warming ( fuck people who say its not from humans ) will cause great harm to white countries.
Not only will it affect nigger areas it will affect white areas as well.

White people want to rebuilt and make the fucking coast areas safe.

Niggers just want to escape for gibsmedat

>WERE IN AN ICE AGE
>AN ICE AGE THAT KEEPS GETTING HOTTER
KEK
>what is deglatiation and why are c02 levels always higher during deglatiation.

Attached: 50225507.jpg (400x400, 102K)

The more you research, the more you'll notice how many people ignore data they find inconvenient to their side of the argument. It's become more of a political debate than scientific. So yes, that source may contradict me but others don't. And I'm not sold on either side, I just try to understand the issue as best I can.
I'm not denying your data, I'm saying the largest driver of the GH effect is water vapor.

>study finds that women are growing fully functional penises at an average length of 10 inches and 7 inches of girth
Will this ever be reality Jow Forums?

Ice age is any time in which there is ice at the Earth's poles for the last fucking time you goddamn brainlet. This is one of the first things you learn in any intro geology course in University. The Earth IS in an ice age, just because you think that an "ice age" refers to a glacial phase doesn't mean you are correct.

We are in an interglacial, aka a period in an ice age in which calmer conditions and a warmer climate prevails, and ice sheets recede towards the poles, which is the exact situation we're in right now. There are massive ice sheets in Greenland, Antarctica and the north and south pole have permanent ice sheets.

Water vapor is the most significant greenhouse gas in terms of how it interacts with radiation in the atmosphere, yes, but water vapor does not have a long residence time in the atmosphere like CO2 or Methane does, and its levels are relatively stable over time as the water cycle of evaporation / precipitation is relatively stable. It's not what's responsible for the current warming trend, CO2 is the culprit.

>So yes, that source may contradict me but others don't. And I'm not sold on either side, I just try to understand the issue as best I can.
respect scientific publications contradict you user.

lol isnt this from the data that NOAA admitting to doctoring?

>but water vapor does not have a long residence time in the atmosphere like CO2
I believe I already said this in an earlier post. If CO2 becomes a problem, it will be because we've killed the oceans. Plankton uses most of it and if we don't stop using plastic, we'll kill it.

Sauce me up OP you fucken useless cunt.

>"correlation equals causation goys"
Yeah I'm sure it has nothing to do with the EU and NGO's creating massive incentives for the third-world to invade Europe. Must be global warming. Now accept climate refugees or you're an evil DRUMPF nazi.

>lol isnt this from the data that NOAA admitting to doctoring?
People wrongly claimed that a major government institution faked environmental data — businessinsider.com/noaa-climate-data-not-faked-2017-2and it caused an uproar

science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records

lmao no fucking way. i no longer have faith in this theory now. climate change btfo.

Attached: 518.gif (342x342, 376K)

businessinsider.com/noaa-climate-data-not-faked-2017-2

No Data Manipulation at NOAA
factcheck.org/2017/02/no-data-manipulation-at-noaa/

So the solution is to immigrate to mostly consumer countries? I never understood this logic. Western countries are starting to maintain an equilibrium with their environment regarding birth rates, and this is somehow a problem.

Use your faggot lying media to convince everyone that they're just fine in their own countries, just like our lying faggot media is telling us we need to import more rape and terrorism.