Why do Republican bigots want to deny two consenting adults in love the right to be legally united?

Most of us don't. We don't want it to be normalized or have kids subjected to it for no reason. If your advocates wasn't so degenerate, no one would even care about you.

I have no problem with them doing it in secret
it should never be normalized and publicly promoted though
yes

Attached: trump_flag.jpg (3200x1800, 531K)

Kek look at the flag is upside down. I don't think an actual faggot would write on the flag upside down like that

no one gives a fuck what you do in private.
the problem with it stems from the use of "marriage".

on a national/legal level you should be able to have a contract with another of the same sex in case of death and have all familiar rights...
that's great.. america.. freedom..

the problem is..
stop calling it "marriage"
you all got no problem inventing genders..
invent a new word and ritual for your "marriage"

Low IQ
subhumans and egalitarians

call it garriage or carriage

It's not love. It's a perverted desire to conduct sexual fetishes that are deemed not normal to a productive society of breeding.
Love = NO SEX

you overestimate average burger intelligence

You're gonna be in my society of breeding fuckboy. Humans contribute to society by doing other things.

I would like to get the government out of our relationships altogether. Then you faggots would be on the same level as the rest of us. No special treatment. Would be good for "divorce" rates, too. If a woman couldn't take a man's shit, plus alimony, plus child support, she'd be less likely to be a roastie slut and leave her children's father for another man that she will eventually do the same thing to.

Why do Republican bigots want to deny 1.6 consenting adults in love the right to be legally united?

Attached: alg_interracial_couple.jpg (485x364, 49K)

so you hate gay pride?

beingvisibly gay and vocally gay is every gay humans right and even duty to the closeted gays to get them to come outside and be prideful

cishet society needs to accept gay culture

I'm Republican and I don't want to prevent you from marriage or having children. As long as nobody is fucking kids or dogs, they're alright by me as far as orientation goes..

Absolutely Not Fake but Extremely Gay.
No one actually gives 2 shits what you faggots do. In fact im 100% in favor of faggots, less competition for prime females, gays pay more taxes , less unwanted pregnancies. My biggest issue with faggots is , SHUT THE FUCK UP.
No one wants to listen to your complaining, stop pushing your lifestyle down everyones throat.

Gay marriage doesn't make sense.
If two gay people want to have sex they can do it like anybody else does: at home and leaving everybody else out of it. They don't need to be married for it.

Now, religious marriage is, obviously, for religious reasons but it was design for social reasons. Which is to get the male to bond with the child which is much harder to do than for the mom. Basically gives tries to give the male some benefits to build a home rather than spreading his seed and therefore protecting the mom in such vulnerable state (pregnancy) and the child (raising it until coming of age).

Civic marriage is meant to benefit the country and the society that it's supposed to ward. Marriages create families, those families create children and those children become, supposedly, functioning members of society.

So basically it all revolves around having children and building families. Since gays can't bring more children there's absolutely zero reason for them to want to get married other than their love for pompousness and parades. Therefore gay people shouldn't be pandered in this regard. Also, arguing that gay people can adopt children is a terrible idea. First of all children for adoption shouldn't exist, all children should be loved by their biological fathers. Since the argument to defend something shouldn't be based on the wish that something terrible has to happen gay people should wish for children to never be brought to adoption, not wishing they can marry so they can pick someone else's leftovers.

>being visibly gay and vocally gay is every gay humans right and even duty to the closeted gays to get them to come outside and be prideful
Why is this a thing, it just reinforces in people that gays are obsessed with sex and push it on them.

bigots!

Be united, no one gives a fuck, just don't call it marriage and don't demand that priests and Christians perform a ceremony for you in a church that's against their sincerely held religious beliefs, you hypocritical aids patients.

Also stop trying to usurp existing tax code by getting married to your dicksucking bro that was designed for hetero couples who actually produce offspring and benefit society by creating more taxpayers, fucking fudgepacking retards.

I am all in favor of uniting these things. By putting their ashes into the same urn.

check'd and kek'd

checked. underrated

Because of how marriage has become a legal as well as a religious union, gay marriage pisses on the traditional purpose of marriage, the binding of two of the opposite sex for the purpose of reproductive security.
If they wanted a civil union analog, then fine.
As is, it gives them far too many rights which are supposed to be reserved for those who are capable of producing offspring.

Because their bible which is filled with fairy tales, tells them that being gay is wrong.

ironically enough Joe Rogan is dumber than a bag of rocks

>Hillary is running in 2020
roll out the 90's wedge issues!

Attached: biafraUZi.jpg (1216x2408, 401K)

And your fellow Muhammad friends say it too

so does the Qu'Ran, Ahmed

Too bad that islam is also made up fantasy!

Attached: c5367de513639b4b3d88cd02c56fc39d--problem-of-evil-paradox.jpg (736x736, 83K)

Was SHE the reason we lost the star rating system?

Attached: shocked mussolini.png (492x593, 332K)

Why would they need to? They're not going to have kids to leave their inheritance to, are they?

discord gg/vvRV6f

add a .

Attached: Pic.jpg (957x1024, 210K)

Attached: gay-lions-2.jpg (1536x2048, 493K)

Marriage is a business contract. It means fucking nothing now. Soon straight guys will start doing it just for tax benefit.

Gay married men with kids make on average more than a quarter million dollars a year:

taxpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/publication/153351/same-sex_married_tax_filers_after_windsor_and_obergefell.pdf

This pattern in which families with dependent children are higher income is also true of FF and MM couples, but is particularly striking for MM couples, for which the average income of couples with children is about $264,000. Almost half of MM couples with children earn more than $150,000. Differences between same-sex female couples with and without children are much smaller.

A seminal U.S. study of 156 long-term same-sex couples found that the majority were unable to sustain a monogamous relationship for more than a year. In fact, not a single same-sex couple was capable of maintaining fidelity for more than five years. Rather, ‘all couples with a relationship lasting more than five years … incorporated some provision for sexual activity outside of their relationships.

>rich gay men can afford a live-in diddle toy
wow much surprise.

>Why do Republican bigots want to deny two consenting adults in love the right to be legally united?

Anal infatuation is not love.

Or mentally disturbed, I don't know a single gay that isn't either an abuse victim or mentally ill.

Are gays more likely to be pedophiles?

archive.is/gK3Si

Genetic Evidence of Homosexuality:

archive.is/grwgp

The benefits of gay marriage:

archive.is/0I0EO

Statistics on gays and marriage:

archive.is/Uajwi

Science on gays as parents:

archive.is/9sqNr

Does conversion therapy work:

archive.is/uPIbi

HIV information:

archive.is/oJS6y

Is being gay a mental illness?

psc.dss.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites//rainbow/html/facts_mental_health.html

The study, titled “Choices: Perspectives of Younger Gay Men on Monogamy, Non-monogamy and Marriage,” was conduced by researchersBlake Spears and Lanz Lowen. They surveyed over 800 single, monogamously-coupled, and non-monogamously coupled gay menages 18-40 years about their relationships. A handful of “monogamish” men were also interviewed.

“The most striking finding of this study is younger gay men’s greater inclination toward monogamy,” the researchers report. “We see this in the overwhelming number of relationships that are monogamous (86percent). In addition, 90percentof the single younger gay men were seeking monogamy. This is a sea change compared to older generations of gay men.”

thecouplesstudy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CHOICES-Younger-Gay-Men-final-160812.pdf

>banned from marrying who you love for thousands of years

>told to only have sex in secret or face beatings, jail, or even death

>hurr why do they not have monogamous relationships

:^)

psc.dss.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites//rainbow/html/facts_mental_health.html

Attached: GayChildMolestation.png (2290x1080, 345K)

u
Relationships that exclude one of the sexes can never be the same as relationships that include both.
FACT! and sage

discord gg/vvRV6f

add a .

Attached: Pic.jpg (957x1024, 210K)

So you hate white pride?

Being visibly white and vocally white is every white human's right and even duty to the closeted whites to get them to come outside and be prideful.

Non-white society needs to accept white culture.

>Why do Republican bigots want to deny two consenting adults in love the right to be legally united?

Because some things are wrong and it OK to say 'No!'

Adult is a social construct

>it’s love
It’s a fucking disorder that makes people masturbate inside others intestines. They deserve aids

Why do Demcrat bigots want to deny two consenting adults in love to be legally united?

Attached: 567876546578.jpg (1280x720, 111K)

Gays are 1000X as likely to rape their own children.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8970651/

>The most striking finding of this study is younger gay men’s greater inclination toward monogamy

I agree. According to my experience most of single gays just want a caring partner to live with

RACE RELISM THREAD

Anyone interested is welcome.

Was this an attempt to refute what I said or confirm it? From the stats you showed in your pic it seems like you are confirming what I said, gays and bisexuals have a significantly higher rate of mental illness, among other disturbing trends. I personally don't care what gays do, I don't hate them or think they should have less rights. My problem comes frok the small vocal community that shoves their gayness in your face every chance they can get. It only serves to annoy the general public and antagonize deeply religious people.

why do you always have to word it like you're trying to ooze your way around something?

If molestation somehow causes homosexuality, how do you explain the 2/3 of gay men who report none?

How exactly, on a biological level, does molestation turn a human gay?

You have no good answer to either of these questions and will simply avoid answering, change the subject, or flame me with unrelated content.

Your theory falls apart when questioned for specifics.

I went to an all male orgy yesterday.
Got sucked by 5 guys, fucked by 4, and sucked on 3 more. Felt great.

Same as with rape, cannibalism, child murder...
Your point ?

bump

Attached: we are on to you.jpg (789x847, 155K)

>If molestation somehow causes homosexuality, how do you explain the 2/3 of gay men who report none?
There are also gays who are born because they are like the third or fourth son and their mother's immune system attacked their hormones in the womb, making it a birth defect and causing them to not be fully cooked.
>How exactly, on a biological level, does molestation turn a human gay?
That's like asking how it can turn people into drug addicts. If there are clear associations, then it could be as simple as changes to glucocorticoid sensitivity leading to maladaptive coping strategies.

>changes to glucocorticoid sensitivity leading to maladaptive coping strategies

source:

dude, just trust me

meanwhile you know better than all these studies indicating that being gay is likely biological in origin and fixed:

Genetic Evidence of Homosexuality:

archive.is/grwgp

??

Attached: citationneeded.jpg (600x387, 89K)

I farted

There are more reliable studies (25 years) which suggest the opposite.

psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-sexual-continuum/201006/25-year-long-study-finds-children-lesbian-parents-may-be-better-adj

Parental Sexual Orientation and Children's Psychological Well-Being: 2013–2015 National Health Interview Survey:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/cdev.12989/full

Nontraditional Families and Childhood Progress Through School:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000058/

whatweknow.law.columbia.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/02/12/what_we_know_about_lesbian_and_gay_parenting_making_sense_of_the_studies.html

archive.is/j0S7Q

www.asanet.org/documents/ASA/pdfs/12-144_307_Amicus_%20(C_%20Gottlieb)_ASA_Same-Sex_Marriage.pdf

Farr, R. H. (2017). Does parental sexual orientation matter? A longitudinal follow-up of adoptive families with school-age children. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 252-264.
dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000228

williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Patterson-Farr-Forssell-AppliedDevScience-Jul-2010.pdf

bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635

How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=userIsAuthenticated=false

pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/131/4/e1374

ibtimes.com/study-having-gay-parents-does-not-affect-childs-gender-identity-2579343

pastebin.com/PaAFXqQj

Australia gay parenting survey:

bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635?site=bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com

Closeness to fathers best predicts quality of health for sons raised by gay dads:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29144882

lifelongadoptions.com/lgbt-adoption/lgbt-adoption-statistics

Gay married men with kids make on average more than a quarter million dollars a year:

taxpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/publication/153351/same-sex_married_tax_filers_after_windsor_and_obergefell.pdf

This pattern in which families with dependent children are higher income is also true of FF and MM couples, but is particularly striking for MM couples, for which the average income of couples with children is about $264,000. Almost half of MM couples with children earn more than $150,000. Differences between same-sex female couples with and without children are much smaller.

Children of gay fathers and lesbian mothers were reported as showing fewer psychological problems than children of heterosexual parents:

journals.lww.com/jrnldbp/Abstract/publishahead/Same_Sex_and_Different_Sex_Parent_Families_in.99302.aspx?PRID=JDBP_PR_062818

I don’t, the governemt doesn’t have a right to stop you from being a (legal) degenerate. I think your parades are fucking disgusting and need to stop though

Homosexual behavior has been documented in multiple species and the Greeks set a precedence for it in western history.

Homosexuals legit freak me the fuck out.
Always have. I don't know what it is about them.
It's just uncanny. Like you're talking to an alien pretending to be human or something.

Straight people freak me out.

Attached: gaysian.jpg (1024x682, 140K)

>>banned from marrying who you love for thousands of years
Why is that important in a time when being gay is best than ever and even high status? Do you also believe holocaust trauma is inheritable?

Its both. I do not believe in the molestation theory at all. However this is a natural mechanism for population control.

Homosexuality increases the higher the amount of people around within a limited amount of space, there has been several studies with animal behavioural changes due to overpopulation, amongst others.

It has the mothers body attacking the fetus as one, but there seems to be some other epigenetic changes, unsure exactly what/why.
There is nothing wrong with nature's population control mechanisms, leave gays to do gay shit, who cares.

I understand and support fighting against Islam, against African invasion of europe, Mexican invasion of the US, but how exactly are gays a threat, unless you make them one by being a bigot towards that? Division tactics again. Same shit with women, stop antagonising those groups and perhaps they will stop supporting the threats out of spite for you. Most women are racists, women in general do not like group outliers and they are strong ingroup mentality, they are the perfect "ally" against those real threats, but you mongoloids keep antagonising them and gays, so they will change groups and defend them.

Can you elaborate?

If you work in academia you know there are plenty of subjects which will not get you published, despite being well understood to be worthy of research.

You'd also know there is nothing that is simple as just being genetic or not genetic. Environment matters. Their is also not always a single etiology for something that is as generalized as being a homo. Some people can be born that way (birth defect), others it could be a paraphilia caused by a personality disorder, etc.

>Are gays more likely to be pedophiles?
Progressives: It isnt pedophilia if its consensual.

just about 100% of homosexuals have had abnormal sexual experiences at a young age. Most cope by saying they were sucked off at 8 because they were born gay.

Attached: 1517461697890.webm (672x504, 827K)

On point

SODOMY = PSYCHOPATHY

Attached: 1532494454568.png (506x519, 69K)

>Why do Republican bigots want to deny two consenting adults in love the right to be legally united?
>fags can marry they just can't marry their preference and that VIOLATES DA RIGHTS

That's like saying if you deny someone a paper ballot and instead you must vote with a machine you're denying that person the right to vote. It doesn't work that way and it's only twisted liberal jew logic that makes you think otherwise.
No republican forbids marriage of consenting adults. If you want to marry, marry someone of the opposite sex. We don't need to acquiesce your fetishes and destroy the institution our country was founded on just like we don't need to acquiesce to some whiny faggot who wants a paper ballot. We'd say do it the same way as everybody else or don't do it at all, simple as that.

You don't have a right to preferences. Read that twice and then one more time.

>shows bisexual actions in animals
Lions aren't gay though, it's never been observed.
No animal species except for two (humans and rams that may have have domesticated ancestors) have permanently lost opposite sex attraction in exchange for being sexually attracted to the opposite sex. Hence "gay animals" should objectively be relegated to the status of unnatural and so should LGBT relations.

*except of course for sex-morphing animals which can change from male to female and reproduce. But that's not analogous to human faggots.

Because Democrat bigots denied me with divorce laws, abortion and feminism

All this is missing the point that everyone despises gays. The moment a genetic biomarker is found that can detect homosexuality in the womb, gays will become like people with down syndrome, nearing 100% abortion rate.

You have ZERO specifics or evidence as to HOW someone could turn gay from their environment.

You have ZERO examples that you can prove where someone who otherwise would have been heterosexual was "turned gay" by trauma or other environmental causes.

This is all just anti-gay bullshit and people aren't buying it anymore.

why do redd!t faggots always hide their flags?
do you learn that fagghotry in shareblue camp where they tell you to post on our page with your crap to earn george soros shekels?
fuck off and never come back
SAGE

Attached: SAGE.png (1156x2031, 290K)

bump

>Why do ignorant bigots hold ignorant and bigoted views
It's in their nature

You sound mad user

>1 post by this ID
>Homosexuals are good goy!
I wonder how could be behind this post.

Attached: MaSecondDraw.png (717x690, 82K)

Just because someone was born a certain way it doesn't mean they are "right". Defects happen all the time, even in nature. Just because someone is predisposed to being a certain way it doesn't mean they should be
Also, a large male with an aggressive stance and a certain kind of facial structure looks imposing and people naturally are intimidated. Difference is a strong male doesn't destroy a society.

what gay propaganda site do you copy and paste this from? I usually can find them but sometimes they're from multiple sources. The reason I ask is I'm sure someone has already made a whole website debunking your links or explaining how your links you havn't read are taken out of context.

Like just skimming through your links for instance the $250k gay fathers nonsense is just because most gay "dads" are in the bay area or west coast and it's trendy to for fags to groom adopted pet children there. It's also normal to have $125k incomes so two males would just default to that by accident. Highly unscientific to pretend it matters. You should compare their incomes to white normal heterosexual families in the same area.

I'm sure the rest of your links follow suit with unscientific nonsense so that's why I'm curious where you copied them from. Someone probably already did the work for me.

I organized these links myself from a wide variety of sources.

>most gay "dads" are in the bay area or west coast

simply not true

Gay men and lesbian women earn 10% more than their heterosexual peers:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/soej.12233/full

discord gg/vvRV6f

add a .

Attached: Pic.jpg (957x1024, 210K)