Why are communist symbols ok but natsoc symbols aren't?

communism kill people for what they do nazis kill people for who they are

a banker can stop banking but a jew cant stop being a jew. therefore nazim contains killing within its very being

Attached: big.jpg (960x956, 116K)

>communism kill people for what they do nazis kill people for who they are
What if they are filthy capitalist pigs owning the means of production?

they can still stop doing that, surrender the means of production and then there will not be any reason to kill them, they were already defeated

Thar's not what commies did every fucking time. Murdering people was the first thing they do to get communism going.

Communists are able to slide by on the not real communism defense

Attached: CC0A8295-EA50-43E3-B0BA-AB99D2C84E4C.jpg (326x301, 62K)

^^This^^ is a great picture of Che, OP picture isn't *FAKE NEWS* while I agree with the sentiment and che did much more gruesome deeds than that. That is not che . ElSalvadoran civil war FMLN killing "counter revolutionary" government sympathizers in the 80s.

Attached: deadche.jpg (461x365, 43K)

>give us your shit or die

Communism ideology killed millions indirectly through retarded agricultural programs while Naziism killed millions very deliberately

Che Guevara sholting his followers like my gay neighbor.

Attached: che.jpg (563x500, 36K)

yeah, but its not the capitalists shit, its our, we made it. workers work, capitalists accumulate capital.

Attached: dddc.jpg (951x956, 64K)

Because jews are behind communism. Its a-ok to kill millions of goyim, goyim.

Who the fuck are "we"?
The machines did it and you I can tell you exactly who paid for these machines, not you.

who made the machines? see, you cant answer that becouse the answer would be: the workers.

People who get paid for the parts. By selling shit you no longer own them you see.

Are you seriously implying communism didn't directly kill millions of people?
The American education system ladies and gentlemen

Communist symbols might or might not be okay to show in public. Depends on the country.

And who will facilitate the transfer of this wealth and power?

In Poland they murdered everyone with higher education who wasn't a commie to lower our national IQ. We still suffer because of that. We will never forgive communists.

Political purges are not the same as ethnic cleansing

Inb4 not real communism

forget selling and buying, selling and buying are the capitalists activity.

whoever made a thing should have direct, free access to it. Trump Towers should belong to the working people. the commons

Yeppppp the workers spontaneously got up and got together imported the parts and everything.... God Idk if you're all childish or just that fucking stupid.

Or maybe evil...

Do you think a laborer has an equal claim to this building as the architect who designed it?

>Didn't communism kill more people?
Yes but it didn't discriminate.

>sell shit to X
>take it back because X doesn't own it
I believe X should shoot the guy in the spine for that as at this point this is stealing. I lived in communism. Nobody cared to take care for 'public shit' and sooner or later it always got stolen because it belonged to noone.

It did as communists murdered people who opposed communism first.

>trace lineage of production back to the first factory where all machines are made
>these are the workers that deserve everything

I'm sure the families of those who were murdered by communists will be comforted to know it was an ideological murder and not a racial one.

You guys are fucking ridiculous. Imagine a world in which the nazis just kicked all the Jews out of Germany without killing them. Would you still say they were worse than the communists?

>imported the parts and everything

who put the parts on the ship? who sailed the ship? who unpacked the parts and transported them? its was all done by the workers

you always have recourse to abstract activity, im talking about concrete activity.

the concrete material world was made by the working people. Trump never build the Trump towers. the workers did, and yet they have no free access to it.

OP's pic was taken in 15 years after Che Guevara died, in El Salvador, where he never fought.

Because they traded their labor willingly for money?

Nigga, if it wasn't for capitalism nobody would do anything. There would be 0 reason to do any of that shit. Tge "workers" would remain laying on their rocks waiting for an animal to hunt for food.

Because Fascism works.

Attached: A7B5D6AC-1E34-4F16-B996-A40DF53D0E84.jpg (750x1662, 359K)

yes, engineers, architects, brick layers, all deserve a free access to this building that they had all built collectively.

and while they were building that tower farmers provided them with food, and when they returned home after a day of construction they slept on a bed made by carpenters.

our world was made collectively, we are all interdependent. a free world means that we all have free accesses to everything made by everyone

Attached: 36915084_1965288536848875_661679298662367232_n.jpg (960x432, 36K)

see this is why oone likes you cause you're retarded

Communism represents a small jewish elite ruling over all with impunity.

NatSoc represents a nation completely free from jewish control.

Thus, one of these things is celebrated as "the solution" and the other is erased from history.

Attached: waat.png (99x106, 30K)

That face when 10 bums broke into my house, ate my food, got malware on my pc, raped my dog and clogged my toilet. I'm sure this will work.

Yeah but communism was Jews killing Goys and NS was Goys killing Jews for once.

But to be an Architect requires a large amount of education and time commitment. What is the incentive for doing this if the quality of life will be the same if I just smoked weed and picked potatos out of the ground?

How about a Surgeon? Or a Firefighter? What about a military?

They were paid to build the towers. They traded their labor for monetary incentives and and favourable end-state was achieved for both parties. Don't believe every lie you're told at college about the glories of communism and you'll be a stronger, more resilient man for it.

Theoretically yes but the reality is that people in power don't mind commie symbolism while anything remotely fascist or nazi is persecuted.
Our Supreme Court even decided that "communist party of Poland" is not propagating communism just to shelter this literal communist fucking party from the law. This is how deeply corrupt the system is.

Attached: 1521940648557.jpg (640x351, 41K)

Because of Marxist professors in American universities.

It's easy, you do what the party says or get murdered.

Attached: hqdefault(6).jpg (480x360, 35K)

I'M TALKING ABOUT REALITY
THE REAL FUCKING WORLD
If a war kicks off, you'll fucking learn, there's always a MASTERS always BOSSES Soldiers don't just run off into battle. Collectively voting under gun fire and explosions.

GROW UP.

Now fat pride is part of the lgbtp movement along with pedos. open borders for the queers is the latest gay thing.

>Didn't communism kill more people?
Yes, but not more (((People)))

i think its because of such reasons: 1. natsoc was more about Germany and german people (yes, I know most other nations were tolerated, but it was mostly about Germany) so it was Germany against everyone therefore not being so popular 2. It involved some sort of open racial hatred which makes it hard for it to be popular, especially nowadays 3. History is written by the victors and therefore it impacts modern society of them tellin us how to view things 4. joos

>natsoc was more about Germany and german people

What about Italy and other natsoc countries?

Attached: tenor(2).gif (220x169, 847K)

Because the USA fought a war for survival agaist the Nazis, but not agaisnt the Soviets.
Now ask my why is the Confederacy flag is forbidden.

>We
Ayyy lmao

Depends what you mean by "ok." In America, you're legally allowed to carry any symbols around. If you mean society thinks it's okay, then it depends on where you are and who you're showing it to.

As far as who killed more people, isn't the fact that millions of innocent people being slaughtered already a bad sign for your brand of authoritarian dictatorship?

mirkujesz?

>killing more people indiscriminately is not as bad as killing fewer people because of their race

Attached: when-its-okay-to-murder-hundreds-of-millions-of-people-14077472.png (500x530, 53K)

that becouse those "bums" are poor, they have no access to land to grow food, they have no access to the materials to build a house.

poverty leads to crime. capitalism is poverty. capitalism produces a surplus humanity and is those people want to live at all they have to become criminals

They should add shit eaters too.

It wasn't until king nigger went into office here. This, and we did fight quite a few proxy wars with the USSR.

Because apparently killing someone for their race is worse than killing someone for a different belief

Viszon zdech i musiałem wykurwiać na wykop :(

Italy wasn't natsoc, it was fascist.

that was fascism. natsoc stems from fascism (correct me if im wrong!). fascism for example didnt have any racial policy, mussolini actually left jews alone until they got real close with germany

I believe that was in 1943 when the Germans had to puppet Italy to preserve Mussolini's rule because their army was shit

Might as well be synonymous in the current year

yep

They chose to be bums you idiot. When I tell a fucking bum tgat I can find him a job he says no because stealing and begging makes him more money for less work.

Meh people don't get the differences sadly. It makes me cringe because Italian Fascism came first.

>Be a kid
>get killed for being a reactionary fascist scum
>this is social justice
>mfw

Attached: anastasia.jpg (300x225, 7K)

Context matters!

Attached: maxresdefault(10).jpg (1280x720, 131K)

capitalism is also the reason why you can get out of poverty instead of the state taking everything you earn away from you just to make you as poor as everyone else. also free trade is important for the healthy economy

He was wearing a Bongistanian uniform anyways lol

This is nothing more that tautology dressed up in catchy language, and can easily be reversed.
>communism kills people for what they do, not who they are
People need to eat. They cannot change this. Communism kills people for producing food to feed themselves -> communsim kills people for their immutable biological need to eat, i.e. who they are.
>Nazis kill people for who they are not what they do
Yes, a jew can't stop being a jew, but they can stop being a jew in Germany's rotting carcass. I don't remember Hitler killing the jews in Spain or the USA or the Levant. Granted you could make the claim that the Nazis wanted world domination, and thus there would have been no option to be a jew anywhere but Germany, but in that case the issue is with globalism, which will lead to the same end irrespective of whether it starts as global capitalism, global communism, global facism, or global anything else.

Attached: food.png (1054x687, 278K)

well then, faggot, you better send that smart phone back to China cos it aint yours homie. Also ima need dem shoes, mine have holes in them and you're being unequal cos yours are nicer.

Attached: FB_IMG_1525550822294.jpg (666x960, 51K)

if people wont want to become architects then no complex structures will be built, if they are fine with it then no problem. its the same with you during breakfast. whats you incentive to make a complex fancy breakfast on just a peanut butter sandwich? its your life. and if the commons wont choose to erect complex buildings that that's the lifestyle that people chose

obviously Firefighters will exist, becouse people wont just watch by as buildings burn. so does doctors, people wont just watch by as love ones get sick and die of otherwise treatable conditions.

an architect is dependent on everybody else just like everybody.

>muh Stalin killed 60 million Russians
>Russians still think he was great leader anyway
>therefore Russians are stupid
this is so tiring

Do you understand how a contract works?

Nigga if you make an agreement, it's understood that you actually agree to it (it's in the word)

Because neva forget the 6 gorjillion

Attached: 1532787464223.png (1220x822, 433K)

Are there people who like diving in shit and not for money? How about oil rig workers? They all work in shit dangerous conditions because they need money, not because they like doing risky, filthy shit. Everyone can't become a doctor. Someone has to be a garbageman.

that's not che

capitalism was implemented with fire, blood, murder, exclusion.

Poor people are found in pre-agrarian and agrarian societies on every continent; if they are not poor enough to be willing to sell their labor when the capitalists arrive, they are impoverished by the activities of the capitalists themselves. The lands of hunters gradually become the "private property" of "owners" who use state violence to restrict the hunters to "reservations" which do not contain enough food to keep them alive. The tools of peasants gradually become available only from the same merchant who generously lends them the money with which to buy the tools, until the peasants' "debts" are so large that they are forced to sell land which neither they nor any of their ancestors had ever bought. The buyers of craftsmen's products gradually become reduced to the merchants who market the products, until the day comes when a merchant decides to house "his craftsmen" under the same roof, and provides them with the instruments which will enable all of them to concentrate their activity on the production of the most profitable items. Independent as well as dependent hunters, peasants and craftsmen, free men as well as slaves, are transformed into hired laborers. Those who previously disposed of their own lives in the face of harsh material conditions cease to dispose of their own lives precisely when they take up the task of modifying their material conditions. Those who were previously conscious creators of their own meager existence become unconscious victims of their own activity even while abolishing the meagerness of their existence. Men who were much but had little now have much but are little.

That's not the point.

>if people won't want to become Architects no complex structures will be built
>if people won't want to be engineers, no new inventions will be made
>if people don't want to fight in the military, we won't have a military
Also
>the other nations which do incentivize these advancements will fucking crush you

>capitalism was implemented with fire, blood, murder, exclusion.

communism was implemented with fire, blood, murder, exclusion.

Che was great though, he was racist as all hell and just wanted to defend the self determination of people, there is a reason his death was a joint operation between the USSR and the US of A.
He was third way.

Great pic(axe)

look, you wash your dishes right? you wipe your ass right? you wash your floor right?

if people wont agree to work on oil rigs then at that moment the agree that electricity is not worth it. thats it. its their lives, they are free to work there or not.

you just said that people are FORCED to do those jobs and yet pro capitalist people here always say they capitalism is freedom. funny huh...

tak mnie coś tknęło xD pozdro cumplu

advancements? are those really advancements?

are all those stupid electronic screens really are an advancement? we live in a sick society, countless people are depressed. read the Unabomber

Literally only because "Jews"

Nigga, different people need to do different things to make the entire system work.
Your fairytale works in a small commune of fags farming and killing cows for meat. Without capitalism nobody would give a fuck and sacrifice their lives just to give something to "everyone" for free. Human nature doesn't work that way. If you work for free for people you don't know and like you are a chump.