>Men Report More Opposite-Sex Sexual Partners Than Women
Men reported a mean of 14.14 lifetime partners; women reported 7.12.
So once again it's men who are more promiscuous than women. For men everything is so easy.
>Men Report More Opposite-Sex Sexual Partners Than Women
Men reported a mean of 14.14 lifetime partners; women reported 7.12.
So once again it's men who are more promiscuous than women. For men everything is so easy.
Other urls found in this thread:
tandfonline.com
gesek.net
twitter.com
Women lie, wow.
>Women are honest creatures
Sage and hide slide threads.
>reported
saged and hidden
Incel thread
Men inflate their numbers while women play them down. Simple as can be.
Imagine that. Women want to seem as if they have less sex than they do, deflate the number. Men want to look like studs, inflate the number. Golly gee.
This.
Men lie too. They raise numbers while women lower them. With women you add at least 5 and with guys you cut it in half.
divide men by 2 for real number - 7.7
multiply women by 5 for real number - 35
both sexes lie
men add to the count while women prune the count
It should be equal by arithmetic rules.
What counts as sex here?
> lying on an anonymous survey
you have a really bad image of men
/thread
This so much.
right? who would make up lies when you're anonymous? personally i believe everything i've ever read on Jow Forums
Women lie like psychopathic con artist about sex constantly.
you don't get (you)s from an anonymous survey, you dip
I wasn't being serious you dumb turbo autist.
The annoying thing is that the article only talks about how men could be inflating the number, but doesn't mention how women could be playing it down.
The homos that have thousands of sexual partners, sometimes hundreds in a single month, really tip the scales.
Guess you've never been on the misc. Everyone is 20+ partners before 25. You can even say 80 if you want to if you've built up reps for 6 months and use some gay roiders body as avi.
Also I know people irl who bloat their numbers as well as add 4cm to their penis length and they aren't even trolling. This is their persona.
This is mostly due to the fact that women lie and answer with a lower number and men lie while answering with a higher number. I'm actually quite sure its pretty much the same for both sexes.
Why do women want to be men so badly?
And I laugh at 14.14.
>7. 12.
Nice to see you surveyed 2 women out of 3 billion, schlomo.
where is the fucking source? why is everyone even replying to this shit?
Lol if you watch any of those real life shows on MTV etc the men always come home with woman not the opposite.. This incel shit in this board is pathetic
Men
14 / 2 = 7
Women
7 + 5 = 12
I guess you've never heard of Tinder or women "travelling".
>"the mean number of opposite-sex partners"
No gay sex included.
Its good for a man to say a high number and to suggest he is sexually successful. It's bad for a woman to do the same.
The rule is to X what the women says by 7.
Don't let women find out this rule please.
who the fuck is this slag? i would tell her to get in my car
Gracious.
This is her.
I usually dont post in these threads but seeing how there's so many retards replying I want to clear something up. Disregarding the gay sex, the mean average partners should be the same for both sexes. So it basically means this thread is shit.
Is it?
This, guys exaggerate it as it makes them look like they’re desired and women lie as they don’t want to seem slutty.
At best the number is pretty even on both sides.
>real life shows on MTV
>Men Report More Opposite-Sex Sexual Partners Than Women
Chads raising the average while women congregate to chads lowering their average.
> Asking a woman for her body count
> Believing the answer
> current year
I get a strong feeling of "retard" here.
Those are some fat milkers
Went by the search engine's recommendations.
That wasn't her but this one is.
gesek.net
>Women always tell the truth
Can certainly share more as this is ultimately part of a political discussion.
top lad
Woman don't count "the guy from the club that night" and so on,
>reality tv is real
were you that feminist ((male)) that got bitched out in the other thread
She looks Jewish.
Fewer
Woman have fewer sexual partners than men
Majestic.
Those fat tits are definitely political. I'm gettin an alt-right in my boxers, if you know what I mean fellas.
You do understand that if one sex has fucked a certain number of the opposite sex, then the opposite sex has fucked the same about of the first sex, right? You can't honestly be this stupid. The self reported numbers just show that women like 2 times more than men since their number is half.
50-85% of women cheat (with sex)
100% cheat with "male friends" (emotional/relational)
and
Women generally have 3x as many partners as they admit to. They just count the ones they saw themselves having a potential future with.
Would you take her out to dinner?
I'm having a massive political discussion in my pants, if you know what I mean.
double the womens numbers and halve the mens numbers
A debate is taking place, I see.
Since the numbers are different and women:men is nearly 1:1, it means gay men are out fucking gay women. Big deal, let gays do what they want, they're not hurting anyone.
Whalebro?
Woman: I only had 3 real partners (internally: the other 100 were just black boys )
Man: I've fucked over 100 females, fucking get on my level
There's a difference between how males and women talk about their sex lives.
no it shouldn't
>They just count the ones they saw themselves having a potential future with.
I was not ready for this blackpill
>men reported
>women reported
Don't trust an ego-centric creature that lives on social validation to tell the truth about itself.
pic related
This.
Besides it will always be a thing, as long as male promiscuity and female chastity are pushed as an ideal at the same time. You can't have a society where the men are looking for sex only while the women want a LTR or marriage first. Even if those are their start positions, once they get in contact with each other, something has to be sacrificed. The end result: men lie that they had more, women lie that they had less.
Unironically this. You can close the thread mods
>Maths joke
*Laughs in Asian*
When someone asks me how many people I've fucked do I include or exclude prostitutes?
dont count blowjobs or anal either
almost every girl I know has slept with 30+ guys. the "good" ones are still around 10
That still says nothing about the actual AVERAGE man. Because if the top 20% of men get to fuck 80%+ of women you get a huge imbalance not addressed in that article.
That would mean that only the top 20% with a lay count of dozens, in some cases hundreds of women, are the ones pulling the "average number" up for everyone.
What if you cut out those outliers? You might be able to see the real picture. 80% of men having sex with 3 or 4 women. And Jow Forumsack autists being permavirgins.
Both are lying
Include. It was sex
It's me, straight outta Jow Forums
Correct. It amazes me how many people suck at math so much that they don't instantly notice this. There could be a very small variance in opposite sex partner numbers due to the small difference in the number of each sex but most of that is due to women living longer, which also coincides with being past when one typically is sexually active so even that shouldn't matter much.
Men jus finna fuck
men lie and claim they have fucked more bitches than they actually have, bitches lie about how few men they have fucked because no man wants a whore who has had 30 miles of random cocks cratering that worn out pussy.
>no sources
fuck off kike.
thats not the formula.
X number of men, x 1/2 her age, divided by the number of amy grant CDs in her room. if the product is less than 1, marry that girl. if if the sum is greater than 10, dump that slut and get tested for VD.
Average doesn't show imbalance you imbecile. That was my original point, asking for average partners is useless because we are looking at what your middle individual who isn;t deformed or super attractive gets in terms of sex and that can only be captured with medians not avg.
For example 1+1+1+1+16/5 and 4+4+4+4+4/5 both come out to 4 average partners even though one is skewed to the right (females) and the other has a flat distribution. Don't use averages when calculating hypergamic tendencies of the female sex.
Citation needed. I see 80/20 rule repeated as gospel but I never see studies that back it up. The closest I came to seeing a study to back it up was how women valued physical attractiveness of men from photos much harsher than men valued physical attractiveness of women from photos. But if you think a woman would reject a guy she finds average or even ugly-ish who turns out to have charisma / self esteem, or in gold diggers' cases, money, you're nuts.
Besides, if 80/20 rule is correct, take a random group of 100 guys in their early 20s - 80 of them are virgins or maybehad sex once. That's super delusional thinking.
Retards. Read:
>It's bad for a woman to do the same
no it isn't. I wish women were actually shamed as much as people say they are.
aware
more is not always better
name?