No one else thinks this is all just a russian counter propaganda? All of these conspiracy theories, really, pizza gate, and the like.
The cold war never ended and the internet/YouTube conspiracy theories/memes have been a godsend for russia to directly implement their propaganda in foreign territory. They openly admit to using it to overthrow georgia in 2008, and russian officials have put an emphasis on winning the "media" war.
It's common knowledge that fake news exists but Jow Forums thinks they're immune to it?(or maybe denies the existence of any fake news geared towards their party?) Are the russian shills that deeply embedded in this platform?
Or maybe I'm wrong and Jow Forums debunks just as many conservative conspiracy theories as they do "liberal" ones. I haven't been on here in over a year so I'm out the loop on current narratives around here.
wikileaks said it was a pied piper operation to divide and conquer patriots into researching things that are already public knowledge in order to shut them up about the mUeller fiasco.
I believe Wikileaks
Nathaniel Jenkins
ALPHA PROTOCOL [RT] DELTA FORCE OUT ERIK PRINCE IN TRUTH IS LIGHT STAY SAFE
>implying ANY of this russian shit is remotely true
>implying that pedogate wasn't just a bunch of Jow Forums autists noticing things grassroots style BUT was subverted by (((them))) with their little "crazed gunman bursts into Comet Pizzaria" shenagains
>implying Q is anything but a fat 40 year old who lives in Alabama somewhere
dont summon the cia niggers, q user is the president himself, and pizza gate is real. Libtards are retarded nothing fancy, if your too stupid to realize this its fine.
Noah Clark
Who's behind wikileaks? Why should I trust that person whoever they are? What do they have to gain from leaking that information and more importantly what world powers benefit from that information getting out there?
In the age of the internet, these are the questions you have to ask yourself after reading any "insider" piece. As if our "big brother" government are just letting information slip through the cracks.. kek
Connor Myers
>Just found about QAnon today Where have you been, on Pluto in a cave with your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears?
Jaxson Long
>t. underweight liberal who thinks hilliary should have won the election and trump should be impeached
Eli Jones
jullian assange, have you been in a coma for 12 years man. Assange has been leaking shit for years, his team of hackers and him are american anarchists who are tired of the shitty democrat rule.
Not even Russian. The level of sophistication is so low that it's most likely a journalist writing a story.
How I Fooled the Retards at Jow Forums for Months
Nolan Stewart
Kid, I knowed Q user 47 years ago when we were in college
Evan Bennett
Probably not even that. Just some lonely user who had to take a break from jerkin to trap porn because he got too many blisters.
Connor Brooks
> >>implying he and his "team of hackers" are acting independently and receiving no aid from anti western powers >kek
also I voted for Trump, it's been interesting watching it all unfold.
Nathan Gonzalez
>denies the existence of any fake news geared towards their party they really do its their fatal flaw
Adam Long
This is thread #4. Do you retards know how to use the catalog? I thought you were skilled bread crumb researchers? You can't even be assed to spend two minutes to see if your stupid thread is needed ir serves any purpose? Why are you all so fucking annoying? You're worse than jews
Anthony Wood
Honestly, haven't even read into any of the theories, just heard some user got a big enough following that people are showing up to rallies with Q signs and thought it was too ridiculous to be true.
Isaac Butler
4 threads means it is being shilled.
Brody Turner
Q is just here for summer
Josiah Reed
It's fascinating how biased people can be.
Daniel Johnson
calm down we're having fun
Andrew Gutierrez
>You can't even be assed to spend two minutes
that's a lot of time
Tyler Nguyen
> his team of hackers and him are he has 0 hackers. > american anarchists they're not anarchists. real anarchists have balls, these soi sipping, fedora wearing, feminist supporting faggots are just useless cowards hiding in tor chat rooms while participating in the most furious of circlejerks.
>The cold war never ended no, it didn't. it just got quieter. I never thought i would see the day where americans are supporting communism. what a bunch of traitors. anyone that supports russia or communism deserves instant death.
John Adams
Q = Simpsons confirmed
Levi Ortiz
>no, it didn't. it just got quieter.
I wonder how a cold war ends. Is there a peace treaty involved to not start anymore proxy wars? Or does it go on indefinitely with each side exchanging the advantage?
US won the 20th century, but it's not looking promising for the first of this one.
Brody Miller
Google inverted totalitarianism. It’s an actual description of what’s wrong without some gamergate fag screaming DA JOOS at you.
America’s current system is utterly satanic and is a guided democracy controlled by an war waging elite and a heavily consolidated media. Trump is a legitimate outsider who’s here to delay the elites plans.
The claim of Russian propaganda is a distraction from the giant dead elephant in the room in the shape of Wall Street, the military-industrial complex and a media complex consolidated to under 6 mega corps.
Carson Reyes
It ended but was revived when the Bush admin pulled out of the ABM treaty and started another arms race in 2003 and expanded NATOs borders.
>a guided democracy >Trump is a legitimate outsider
Quite the contradiction
Thanks for the info, I'll read up on that. Any other major events between 1991 and 2003?
Gabriel Roberts
>talking about conspiracy theories considering ive been banned 4 times for posting in "off topic bullshit" AKA conspiracy threads idk how we can debunk anything when the mods wont even allow us to
Levi Ross
A guided democracy is a false democracy, where elections don’t change policy. Trump on the other hand has brought major changes to policy, one major one being an immediate end to the TPP soon after he got elected, along with no non-fly zone over Syria as Hillary wanted, ending of support for rebels in Syria, and complete anti-trade moves completely reviled by status-quo elites, let alone the media system that is the gate-keeper of this fraud election system. You don’t have to rig elections, typically no matter what whoever wins policy won’t change, so it has a weak spot where well funded candidates can rise up and surpass status-quo candidates, as trump did. He’s literally the only guy since the end of the Cold War to do so.
And between 1991 to 2003 I would read up on the Yugoslav wars which almost escalated to a world war at times, along with Russia’s economic collapse in the late 90s over liberalization and its shaky experience through it with western institutions like the IMF. Overall though the Bush admins decisions were disastrous in the long run and coincidentally the media never talks about how we have been poking Russia with a stick this entire time with neocon policy, which Hillary was gonna continue onward to its inevitable conclusion in the shape of a nuclear war.
There's no contradiction there at all. If you want to talk about conspiracy theories, go back and have a read of the Podesta files (if you haven't read these, why the fuck do you think you have anything of worth to say on modern American politics?) and look for a guy called Michael Froman, a citigroup executive (at the time) who personally handpicked Obama's entire cabinet months before the election. It didn't matter whether you voted democrat or republican - one of the bankers who looted the country and got bailed out on the taxpayer's dime had total and complete control over the incoming president's cabinet.
This DIDN'T happen with Trump. Trump has been dealing with a combative administration since day 1, and the system has been doing everything it can to try and take him down. If you're actually intellectually curious, look up Robert Mueller - what kind of cases did he bring in the past? How did he conduct himself in previous cases? Once you've done that, look into the team that he assembled for the special counsel - and their respective histories (what exactly has Peter Strzok been responsible for before the current Russia investigation?).
I know the answers to every single one of the questions I just posed to you, and so do most of the non-shitposters here. The reason you get mocked for posting half-baked opinions is that you simply have not done the research. All this information is out there, waiting for you to read it. Hell, people have even indexed and annotated those releases for easy comprehension.
As for pizzagate, there's an incredible amount of smoke - those emails make it clear that pizza was code for SOMETHING, but that could just as easily be drugs or some other illicit activity. Overheated midwits rant and rave about the satanic powers running small pizza chains, and those idiots are selectively reported on to prevent people from looking into the more solid evidence that started all the noise.
