>the jews and their shills have been ramping up the development of drones for >drones, however, need EMF-communication to function >EMP-generators thus take out drones
How to not get killed by the kikes and shills their drones? Build an electromagnetic pulse generator.
Only concrete, objective, factual information matters.
Even then, the electronics required for balance, wind resistance, would be defeated by EMP. Or a laser.
Eli Stewart
It's not just the radios. Processors, motor controllers, anything MOS-based can also be destroyed with enough voltage across the wrong nodes. Also, GPS spoofing.
Jayden Phillips
>How to eliminate drones Spark gap generator Cut the power
Kevin Martin
Where is the DIY instruction you faggot? Gay ass shitpost! Not even the link to the Gist with the code or anything.
Pretty decent plan if you don't care your bird getting fucked by the props
Justin Wood
EMP is a fucking meme since the only device that effectively does it is a nuke
Austin Cruz
Will they? The wire lengths (antennas for an EMP) in a drone are tiny, and EMP probably follows a cube power law, so distance matters a lot. A nuke puts out a fuckton of power, I doubt that this gun does that. I think it's a directional multispectral jammer not an EMP generator.
Also fun fact, for EMP susceptibility testing, you have to get FAA clearance. Do the Feds really want someone running around with an EMP gun?
Nah, I think this is a jammer.
Hudson Martin
Falcons specialize in knocking prey out of the sky, they would get under it and flip it.
Cameron Rivera
AMAZING, either drones use the old anti---jam tech widespread in military hardware (yeah is not that hard) or lawmakers make it illegal, or law enforcement deploy high tech jammer (so we can hack it and use it on planes, trains, cars, small death ray...)
Matthew Rogers
The drone wouldn't let it just knock it out of the sky, it would fight it very aggressively thanks to the PID loop
Tyler Johnson
This. Falcons BTFO drones. Government is impotent against Nature.
Jordan Mitchell
no this nigga right, also its just stabilization once you consider falcon attack to be the new normal you can spray it with toxins powerful enough to knock the bird after touching it maybe tropane derivate with some thick gel that witstand air
Dylan Morris
You can make one at home with wire and a battery dumbass
Kayden Sullivan
This. Link to a fucking instructables or something OP.
Hudson Anderson
Based and redpilled.
Zachary White
Don't fucking call me "nigga" you fucking nigger.
John Powell
A fucking yagi antenna. Enjoy your cancer from the back lobe. t. Electrical Engineer
Austin Bell
Every way of attacking a drone creates defense.
A falcon would get fucked up if my drone had razor blades taped to it.
A radio wave pulse weapon would be hard to use. It would interfere with police radios for example and likely disable pace makers. Not to mention a drone could be hardened against it more than a pace maker.
Brayden Nelson
>Even then, the electronics required for balance, wind resistance, would be defeated by EMP. This isn't an EMP gun, it's a signal jammer. A pre-programmed flight plan would defeat this.
>Or a laser. You would need to hold the laser on the drone for at least a few seconds with what lasers we have available, this is probably impossible for a drone.
>A radio wave pulse weapon would be hard to use. It would interfere with police radios for example and likely disable pace makers. wtf am I reading
Jordan Cox
Train the falcon to drop a small net over the drone.
Lucas Davis
Do you guys think the Secret Service have some method of protecting Mango-Mussolini from drone bombs? They should have thought about this, but I don't see any hardware they carry that can counter a bomb drone.
Camden Miller
Furthermore it is not fcc cleared to be used, so it is generally illegal to use unless you are testing it for the government or a corporation.
Assuming it is fcc cleared, which is doubtful given the interference issues, then the frequency it uses will be well known and easy to counter.
Camden Martin
You call it a signal jammer and they call it an emp. Both are inaccurate. This creates a radio pulse using batteries and capacitors. It does interfere, but it isn't constantly on like a signal jammer.
Aaron Richardson
RF jammers. They'd lose control of the srone as soon as it losts signal, a programmable drone with onboard memory might be able to get past it tho. I like the falcon idea after YouTubing it. Eagles man, maybe even the greater owls to take out NV or IR drones.
Hudson Sanders
>the electronics required for balance, wind resistance, would be defeated by EMP. Or a laser. Defeat the EMP and laser via shielding
Luke Wood
>fcc cleraed Neither were Stingrays. And yet, here we are.
So much for range. There are semiconductor processes that are immune to latch-ups due to voltage spikes, but they're expensive and unusual outside of aerospace electronics.
I don't always revolutionize next gen warfare But when I do I drink Dos Equis
Jack Green
this...IF a portable EMP gun could actually be made, then why hasn't the police used them to stop cars that refuse to pull over?
Asher Reed
You have to keep in mind what the main use for these things are. It is in the military. You can't just willy-nilly use a signal jammer in war. It is like painting a big bullseye saying kill the soldiers over here! Especially now where you can detect signal jamming with $30 in cheap radio equipment.
Even a pulsed aimed device is problematic like the op pic, because a human would have trouble seeing a small high speed drone even only a little high. I quickly lost site of a small drone I was flying when it stopped responding to my commands.
Juan Miller
This is retarde. >enemy is using RF devices to shut down drones. >lets put some anti-radiation missiles. Now if you send RF waves to the drone, the drone will shoot a missile to the source aka you.
Samuel Torres
batteries, capacitors, charging and regulation circuits, antenna, trigger. construct the antenna to account for half the wavelength of the frequency range
Austin Gutierrez
And go to the drone shield website. What does it say? Can you buy it? No. They are shilling their products to the government.
Jack Gutierrez
>implying they can't >implying they haven't Liability, mainly. It's much easier for the department to not get sued when the driver is dead.
Ian Mitchell
I think people just get crazy over stuff like drones because they are now a full on meme.
Only people that are going to need a small drone killer is the military. And I say small because anything big enough they are just going to shoot or hit with a missile. An autocanon with cheap ammo that targets unknown drones 24/7 is more useful to the military and needs no signal jamming.
In the civilian world until someone attacks a stadium or something with small drones with explosives it is just not going to be taken seriously.
Noah Diaz
Take your microwave. Take away the magnetron and circuit board. There you go, you have a powerfull emp generator. Enjoy cancer
Gavin Moore
That was an old Russian missile defense method.
Justin Ross
it's meant for use against civilian RC, not military shit, which would be shot at
Well no dumb fucking beaner, snakes dont habe props.. and thats an eaglw, not a falcon.
John Wilson
watch kerosan on youtube
Aaron Ross
Spark gap generator
Sebastian Jenkins
you can make it with a CME
Jacob Davis
If that's real, I can think of a whole lot more uses for such a device than just taking out drones. You could wreak some serious fucking havoc with something like that....
Christopher Rodriguez
Every radiation can kill you if the amplitude is high enough. UHF will make the water incide your cells go wild. That can not be good for the cell.
>This device is not, and may not be, offered for sale or lease, or sold or leased, in the United States, other than to the United States government, its agencies, and its properly delegated representatives
Jaxson Morales
Yfw this thing actually works you can murder people that have pacemakers and never be caught
Christopher Robinson
Kek. Duke Nuken 3D!!!!
Ayden Clark
>shooter get cancer Nice run guys.
Cooper Phillips
Yeah, but it doesnt fucking cause cancer you fucking moron.
You need ionizing radiation to cause cancer.
You fucking think the guys that were radiation detectors for thier jobs, like xray techs are worried about fucking microwaves? Fuck ill stick that badge in the microwave and not a fucking thing. Because mictowaves dont fucking cause cancer you idiot.
Ionizing radiation causes cancer.
Samuel Cooper
More than that... you could fry cell phones, disable police radios, stop a running car, etc.
EMP is nasty shit in the modern age.
Isaac Jackson
lets just forge a doctor's note. >This nigga be a properly delegated representative. Give gun.
There’s one already the marines use it idk if it’s classified but it exists mounts to the side of a hummer or tank
Owen Ortiz
Yes it can user. Every country has regulations for RF, HF, VHF, UHF devices in regards to public safety. To calculate the dose, you take the wave lenght and the "current" (the amount of photons). The shorter the wave lenght the least photons you need to create a heath problem but a long wave can have the same dose with more current
Leo Roberts
>implying you shouldnt look at your own faggot post.
Asher Nguyen
Are you for real right now? The limits on RF are to avoid interference with other electronic devices. Some tissue heating concerns are an afterthought.
Jayden Williams
No it cant you moron.
Go fucking talk to the radiation oncologist when you do your oncology rotation in residency. Oh wait sorry, youre to fucking stupid and wont even finish undergrad.
Jeremiah Phillips
Illegal in the state of Michigan for a few years now, under the sinister moniker "e-bomb"
>what is FCC OET Bulletin 65 Know how I know you've never worked in the industry?
Jordan Gonzalez
>Only concrete, objective, factual information matters. How many of these threads have you made today?
Easton Thomas
>limits on RF are to avoid interference with other electronic devices. Some tissue heating concerns are an afterthought. All this is true. But remember there is a short reach wave and a long reach wave (the long one is used for comm). The short reach wave has a LOT of energy. Thats why when an antenna is in an urban area it must be reguraly checked. Usually is checked with a thermometer at 1 or 2 meters from the antenna
Jack Butler
You got me, I'm a shitposter. Cancer still isn't a concern, though.
Jeremiah Bennett
Have you ever seen a bird die in mid fly because it when too close to a long range radio link?
I'm sure it's illegal in a bunch of jurisdictions but IMO it would be virtually impossible to enforce. I mean, are we going to ban batteries and capacitors?
Grayson Ramirez
cheaper to build an EMP gun
you are not responsible enough to take care of a falcon either
If they could get away with controlling sales the same way they control diethyl ether or sudafed, I think they would. The ruling class gets really pissy when the consumers don't know their station.
Matthew Collins
Granted I do not know shit about medicine. I just know about electronics, I could be wrong about the medical risks. However we have laws and regulations and they are there to protect the publics heath... I do not know man. I am just an EE.
Nathaniel Edwards
Precision rifle fire, jammers, DF gear, the Dillon Minigun that sits in the black SUV. C'mon now son, you have to be smarter than this.
An EMP device could take out a manned aircraft. That's a little bit different than violating the Constitution.
Luke Gray
What's the effective range on that? Can it outrange a hellfire missile?
Nolan Phillips
>How to Eliminate Drones There are too many assassinations planned to bother trying to eliminate them now.
>you are not responsible enough to take care of a falcon either I was just scrolling by, still am in fact, but I feel like you're really speaking to Me user.
I do know medicine. Im not saying that microwave cannot kill you, you could boil your brain with it. But you cannot gwt cancer from it.
Jeremiah Thompson
>drones, however, need EMF-communication to function lol, this wont remain a limitation for long >the jews and their shills have access to at least the bleeding edge of technologies you know about, and likely more.
the drones will have increasingly complex fully autonomous modes.
and likely em shielding as well but i dont know how well that works, but the military has ways and so does the space industry for hardening against radiation.
so this technology seems useful for taking out the current generation of consumer level drones. which could be useful in stopping terrorism. or maybe someone keeps flying a drone over your property, looking in your windows, and you dont like it or know who it is, just pop it down.
but i dont see it being much use against a drone that can fly itself anyways. against top level globalist establishment drones, forget it. they wont need human operators.
Austin Foster
true, but still, we could arm the falcons with a gun on the back or belly or something. maybe the gun tracks what the falcon looks at and whenever the falcon screams it locks on and fires on that target.
lightweight carbon armor and diamond tipped talons.
look if its an arms race between drones and nature lets arm nature. does a bear not have the right to bear arms?