Just a daily reminder that removing Saddam was the most cuck move the US ever made

>how is it cucked to take out enemies who invade your allies and refuse to comply with weapons inspections you want to make?
>being this naive

Uhm, exactly which part is tripping you up?

Attached: ABS_FAIL.jpg (480x640, 22K)

This. Removing Gadaffi from power was the worst thing for the West ever done in the MENA region

What up fuckwit? Did you vote for Tony Blair as well?

Attached: BP.jpg (2187x1340, 169K)

>facts i dont like aren't true because noam chumsky!!

see flag
>sandmonkeys

Attached: 1511035689723.gif (768x256, 415K)

Saddam insinuates he's going to drop the petrodollar and sell his oil in Euros
>"OI VEY SADDAM WAS BEHIND 9/11 INVADE IRAQ NOW"
Gadaffi insinuates he's going to drop the petrodollar and sell his oil in African Gold Dinars
>"OI VEY KADAFFI WAS BEHIND 9/11 BOMB LIBYA NOW"

all middle east wars are wars for oil waged under false pretenses. If Norway said it was going to sell its minor amount of oil in Euros, then Norway would be bombed and invaded because Norway was behind 9/11.

>>facts
hahahaha
>noam chumsky
literally who?

no i dont like tony blair, nice attempted ad hom. also iraq's oil mostly fell into the hands of russia, not america or the uk telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/10731708/Russias-Lukoil-opens-giant-Iraq-oil-field-adding-to-crude-glut.html

so saddam didn't invade us allies or refuse to comply with requested weapons inspections?

if the us wished to increase the value of its currency it could do so in much easier ways than waging trillion dollar wars.

I honestly dont have much against you. After all its the US that cucked itself and listened to you as well as others in the GCC. But fuck you just for the principle.

No problem BP. I 100% believe you. I wont use Shell now.

>gold bug conspiracies
Stop this shit.

t. Iraqi diaspora

>Being exactly this embarrassing on behalf of bongs because ** I believe in weapon inspectors. You sexy thing! **

Attached: labour.jpg (700x612, 83K)

>stating objective and widely known facts is 'embarassing'
>anyone who believes in facts is a labour voter

t. Tony Blair supporter

True

Truth

Attached: 95E9D965-BC5E-4535-8E91-65137B02CE7C.jpg (480x480, 73K)

>objective and widely known

>Let me strum you the song of my people

Attached: Acoustic_cr.png (445x425, 311K)

>so saddam didn't invade us allies or refuse to comply with requested weapons inspections?
that has nothing to do with why he was ousted, dingus

>stating objective and widely known facts is 'embarassing'

And next you'll say the BBC and CNN coverage was 100% accurate. Im serious man I'll stop using BP if you keep going down this road.

just because you're ignorant of something doesn't mean it can't be widely known. you're most likely young and highly ignorant.

Let's invade Iran too, it'll be easy breezy.

Attached: JSA.jpg (750x1000, 61K)

Yeah looking back that was pretty dumb. Papa Trump would have had good relations with him.

>He kept a lid on the sandmonkeys and you fucked opened the fuck out of it.
Uh yeah that's what we do here

Attached: 1101950911_400.jpg (400x527, 53K)

>that has nothing to do with why he was ousted
according to you
>And next you'll say the BBC and CNN coverage was 100% accurate
you just made that up. you have made zero actual contributions to discussion so far.

Removing Gaddafi was a mistake aswell

Bush, Obama, Cameron and Blair are war criminals

>just because you're ignorant of something doesn't mean it can't be widely known. you're most likely young and highly ignorant.

Ironically shot yourself in the bollocks there, (((old boy))).

Fucking bastards

Attached: muammar.png (1368x1610, 1.98M)

All of youre 'facts' have been disputed a long time ago. Show me ONE credible report confirming WMDs. Go on.

I dont have to make contributions to an argument that clear as fuck and has been confirmed as a fraud. Theres almost 15 years of questioning and research from a multitude of sources to back that up. What the fuck do you have? CNN and BCC articles? Government and UN issued reports? All meaningless as the shit you wiped off in the shitter.

worth considering the alternative pov

Attached: gadaffi.png (656x592, 257K)

A Republican won the primary openly berating the Iraq War, and won the presidency. Americans have gotten wise quickly. Such a thing would have been unthinkable ten years ago.

Both parties voted for it overwhelmingly, and we were preyed on by our anti-Muslim bloodrage following 9/11. It won't happen again. That's why it was up to Cameron and Sarkozy to spearhead the Libya debacle because Americans were so war-weary. Public sentiment also kept Obama out of Syria despite a full-blown media effort, "muh red line." Obama knew it would have completely sunk his presidency.

[CITATION NEEDED]

>Breaking: Strong-arm dictator was a bit of a cunt!

IMAGINE MY SURPRISE!

>Just a daily reminder that removing Saddam was the most cuck move the US ever made.
>He kept a lid on the sandmonkeys and you fucked opened the fuck out of it.
occupying iraq and nation buildings was the worst thing we did.
overthrowing iraq and letting it descend into civil war would have been just fine by me. I mean it did that anyway, but at the cost of thousands of american lives... which was not necessary. getting rid of saddam and getting out should have been our goal. Then we could have armed both sides with airdrops of weapons and cameras (so they can film it for our entertainment back home).

>Show me ONE credible report confirming WMDs. Go on
that wasn't the claim that was made you fucking idiot. my claims were he
a) invaded neighbouring countries.
b) didn't comply with weapons inspections.
you're too dumb to bother with if this how you're going to behave.

Thats fucking bullshit. For example: back in 2009 I worked for a big vocational/technical college here in Seoul. I was sent out to an education conference in Misrata which was about introducing technical colleges as a thing rather than just university. It was a normal fucking country. There were lively restaurants, cinemas and even a fucking casino.

Our college was about to do big things. Then the fucking war happened.

I sort of like the Shiite majority having power in Iraq desu. I know the war and what ensured was bad news, but the Shiites are /our Muslims/

I dont have to behave in anyway you fucking mong. And invading neighboring countries in the middle east had FUCK ALL to do with your decision and everything to do with war loot Blair and his masters would get.

>I like record migration to every western country and that actual nationalist arabs had their identity and country wiped the fuck out.
Then theres fuckwits like this one.

>you're too dumb to bother with if this how you're going to behave.

Oh, look! Someone is gearing-up to declare himself the winner of the entire cake.

Attached: WinnerIsYou.jpg (480x360, 14K)

even if this is true it's not justification for a giant banker war which fucked both their and our countries

And he did none of those things

Attached: GaddafiWasRight.png (1368x1610, 2.51M)

you're doing a bit of 'every swan i have ever seen is white, therefore all swans are white'. obviously you wouldn't be able to read about everything he did in the free press as there was none

>that wasn't the claim that was made you fucking idiot. my claims were he
Except that was the claim you fucking dolt, the whole reason they invaded in 2003 is to "disarm Iraq from WMD's", (((free))) the Iraqi people and muh terrorism haven (which it wasn't).
>a) invaded neighbouring countries.
What is the Gulf War?
>b) didn't comply with weapons inspections.
Except he did in 1991 and they found nothing

Attached: mfw.jpg (236x364, 19K)

I know VERY well what he did. The main thing is you twat, that he ensured that fuckery stayed in Iraq and by extension, in the middle east. He had to handle a country divided up by drunk royal viceroys who groups all of the most extreme cases together. And he was doing a VERY good job.

>he did in the free press as there was none
>keeps quoting """facts""" from said un-free press

I wont even respond to you. Best go get your anus tounged by your local Iraqi imam or some shit.

> invading neighboring countries in the middle east had FUCK ALL to do with your decision and everything to do with war loot Blair and his masters would get.
what loot did who get? how are you aware of this?

you: gadaffi didn't help the ira
the ira: actually yes he did
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-12539372

(you): oh god i can't stop sucking muhamads cock

i never made any claim about the motivation of the invasion. sorry you can't read.

>What is the Gulf War?
a response to one invasion saddam made

>Except he did in 1991 and they found nothing
you clearly are aware he stopped complying, so why even make a dumb attempt to distract attention from it...

>keeps quoting """facts""" from said un-free press
im not quoting the libyan press you absolute fucktard

isn't that the job of people who complain about the alleged million dead iraqis

he said as millions more migrated to our country

Removing him is 100% why the refugee crisis existed in the first place. This is Hillary Clinton's doing.

Reminder that the kikes that reside in the UK, US, and other parts of the world are just as much sandmonkeys as Saddam.

>i never made any claim about the motivation of the invasion. sorry you can't read.

Yes actually, you did—

>how is it cucked to take out enemies who invade your allies and refuse to comply with weapons inspections you want to make?

Attached: BrainletP.jpg (336x235, 4K)

Attached: boomer.png (327x300, 59K)

>Jow Forums is now sympathizing with a massive Stalinist arab piece of shit
based and redpilled

which doesn't claim that to be the motivation.

>What is realpolitik?

Attached: ButterleafFly.png (418x402, 327K)

>implying an Iraqi refugee living in Australia represents the typical pol user

>I'm still dying for Israel but at least no refugees right?

any evidence israel supported the iraq war?
saddam was anti-iran.

shut the fuck up neoliberal

Attached: GAY.gif (500x360, 548K)

Are you seriously *that* autistic?

Attached: Autism_rage.jpg (300x137, 9K)

shut up commie

Attached: 1487961503187.jpg (1065x800, 85K)

>i never made any claim about the motivation of the invasion. sorry you can't read.
I never made any claim about your claim about the motivation to invade. Sorry you can't read.
>a response to one invasion saddam made
Which is why the west supported Saddam in his previous invasion against Iran?
>you clearly are aware he stopped complying, so why even make a dumb attempt to distract attention from it...
They still searched and found he had no WMD's, not only once in 1991 but also in 1998, in 2002 the Iraqi government even invited the UN secretary to discuss the disarmament issues but of course Bush chimped out at this and the rest of the UN followed his lead.

Attached: (you).jpg (800x450, 41K)

>supporting your enemies means you win
based

And yet most people still haven't learned from the chaos that came from removing Saddam, Gadaffi, and Mubarak. Anyone who still wants to remove Assad should be shot

youtube.com/watch?v=zbM2dYs2NEw

Attached: 1531341266385.jpg (884x902, 295K)

>Jow Forums is now sympathizing with a massive Stalinist arab piece of shit
And ensured the shitskins remained in one fucking place. But yeah I guess a leaf would have a problem with that.

>implying an Iraqi refugee living in Australia represents the typical pol user
Nor do pussyfucks who want more Iraqis.

youtube.com/watch?v=DdAusn4sMXk
Also Ehud Barak said that everyone but Israel should lead the charge against "da turrists" right after 9/11
youtube.com/watch?v=GAueLjdKh1s

>meme flag
>le ebin pinoshit US puppet leader!
you have to go back

>And ensured the shitskins remained in one fucking place
see

>Leaf can't into politics

Attached: CrabEnemy.jpg (640x361, 43K)

>Which is why the west supported Saddam in his previous invasion against Iran?
iran is not only not an ally, but actually an enemy of the west. there is no double standard.

>They still searched and found he had no WMD's,
which has nothing to do with not complying ten years later...

Kek!
Good luck arguing your point. Your doing great so far....

Glad to see the board can mostly agree that your right. Its a start Those fucking yellow ribbon gas station magnets really pissed me off back in 03.
No asshole I don't "support the troops" fighting a war on false premises

Supporting some random third-world strongmen because of "muh realpolitiks" is the same logic that caused the US to support the Taliban in the 1980s and Obama to support arming Islamists during the arab spring.

Fuck off.

>implying the US didn't make the globalists' job much easier by giving them propaganda of war zones for the migrants to "flee" from
The mass invasion of Europe is almost entirely America's fault

oh man how hindsight is 20/20 amirite?

One day, hopefully, we will never have to deal with your kind again.

Attached: ETERNAL.png (500x351, 44K)

>iran is not only not an ally, but actually an enemy of the west
gee I wonder why, it's not like we've committed regime change against them multiple times or anything and have neoliberal politicians and ambassadors like Nikki Haley who constantly rattle their sabers for war with Iran or anything. They're just crazy and have no reason to hate us whatsoever.

>which has nothing to do with not complying ten years later...
why the fuck does that matter, there was still no WMDs found. Even if there was, oh noooooo a middle eastern state actually has the deterrent means of keeping away US regime change, what will we dooooooo

>the mass invasion of Europe is America's fault
No, it's Europe's fault for letting them in

I wonder who got the get

>youtube.com/watch?v=DdAusn4sMXk
being concerned about iraq trying to acquire missiles doesn't mean they supported the invasion or that it was a war 'done in israel's interests'. i could easily see them supporting the maintenance of the saddam regime to stop iraq becoming a pro-iran shia state even more dangerous to israel

All of these countries have liberal politicians that aren't controlled by the people, of course they would let in refugees, everyone knows they will. Thus, it is America's fault for starting wars which would cause these floods in migration

(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((()))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Attached: Fellow White Person.jpg (1067x572, 72K)

Yea guys.. don't you watch the BBC too??

stop stealing our phrases commie

Attached: skreee.png (2130x1410, 1001K)

>gee I wonder why
you're free to wonder why. not the subject under discussion

>why the fuck does that matter,
because my initial question was how taking out someone who doesn't comply with your requests is 'cucked'

Iraq didn't have missiles you imbecile, what about that did you not fucking understand?

Supporting an established government for the sake of stability and peace is not the same as supporting terrorist insurgents who actively destabilize their nations.
Europe's governments never would have had the excuse to let in the hordes without the chaos and destruction in the Middle East and Africa that the US caused. Do you think it's coincidental that the migrations only started occurring in earnest after almost every stable government in the region was destroyed or thrown into turmoil? Do you think Gadaffi would've tolerated hundreds of thousands of foreigners crossing his country to get to Europe?