Self described fascists define fascism

Evola's occultic barbarism is extremely semetic to me. There is no way that young man having ritualistic rape of women builds a healthy, family oriented, conservative society.

a faggot with an axe.

fascism has a strong connection to Heimat, history and tradition
it seeks out to protect these, even if it costs the present and future
(and its not even wrong)

Together we are stronger. Individuals can be broken easier than a cohesive society who is willing to defend itself.

Attached: 1486527935431.jpg (480x720, 169K)

That's why chad Hitler took the reigns and made neo-classical design the ideal adornment for the reich.

Mussolini was just another faggot Italian designer who happened to have a really defined chin.

its totaltarianism but with a proper dictator. its no different than a monarchy except there is much more emphasis on preservation of culture. the monarch has to give a fuck about the country and its people, otherwise its just an autocracy

a bundle of sticks
faggots
faglord
male hierarchy
patricians
jehovah
jehovahm

The antithesis to society is anarchy.

Attached: society.jpg (2405x917, 865K)

Fascism is a class collaborative false revolution that is used as a last defense reaction against socialism, stealing it's slogans, marches, aesthetic as catharsis in order to maintain private property of capital.

Attached: PP0331_org_l.jpg (768x768, 75K)

>literally no consciences

>private property of capital is a bad thing
>capital can be freely purchased through labor
>therefore, private property of the product of ones own labor is a bad thing
Where I come from, that's called slavery.

imagine actually thinking this is an okay way to build and maintain a society.

>Stealing.
Socialism is a Marxist social construct whereas hierarchy is biological and predates society itself.

Attached: equality.png (794x564, 301K)

A king, dictator, or ruler doing what they want instead of obeying “the people”.

Attached: 3BD1230C-3D3B-4728-B28B-FEA10E0B6B71.jpg (601x438, 145K)

Roger Griffin had a good definition, but he clearly isn't one.

Fascism isn’t the same thing as totalitarianism.

im trying to form a working deffintion, so ty user

>alone we are a twig
>but together we form a mighty faggot

Attached: 1529080411805.jpg (793x400, 29K)

The most important thing you can do for the white race, and for yourself, is keep your own life in order. Start with yourself. You must be competent, reliable, hardworking, and to the greatest possible extent, happy. Do people in your life trust and respect you? What does your family think of you? Are you capable of raising children? Racial politics doesn't have to be the only factor of your life. And if you can't achieve such things for yourself, then the chances are very high that you are not ready to be a political activist, either online or in real life. Because how can you make a difference for the race, for the lives of many, if you can't even make anything of your own, individual life? How can you make a real difference in society, when the greatest extent of your capacity is to be out-organized by jews on social media?

Always remember: we live in first world countries and have opportunities that most people born on this planet do not. Things aren't as good for us as they were for our parents. But billions of people in the third world would still kill to have the opportunities that you do right now. So take care of yourself! Work your ass off, everyday, to build a good life for you, and for your family. You have the power to create yourself. Clear your mind of self destructive thoughts, and keep yourself focused on realistic goals. Work hard, but also do fun and wholesome things with real people in real life. That is very important. Nothing on the internet should ever take away from your real life

The most egregious parts of it are the amount of control the government has over individuals, groups and companies. We have that now.

He has a book which has fascist primary sources, I believe it's an Oxford reader.

Nothing is in nazis though, Oxford has a separate book on Nazism.

The term he used was "Palagenic ultranationalism".

are you implying this borderline rococo shit is "traditional"

fascism= collective action for the good of the nation/people/race

All government is based on violence, there's nothing unique about fascism in regards to government force/violence

government= the monopoly on violence within a specific region.

Collectivist (as opposed to individualist) organization of society where the main societal goal is maintaining and/or growth of an ethnic/racial nation, and the continuance of said nation is the main factor in all policy decision-making (as opposed to say, the acquisition of wealth being the driving force of policy).

This means fascism isn't necessarily anti-capitalist, but it isn't necessarily capitalist. Economics and economic policy are de-emphasized in society, except what is necessary to help the nation survive of course.

The reason you are mad about people using collective action is because it actually works as opposed to the autistic individualist who could never stand up to collective action.

fascism is the direction of government and economy to provide ultimately for the good of the people; the government finances loans (without usury) for companies who put forth a plan to have a positive impact on the country and its people. freedom to express ideas counter to the fascist state is limited and people who do not conform to the ideals of the state are punished. because economic and social incentives are aligned there can be a significant safety net for women, children, the infirm, and elderly.

it's kind of like communism but with property ownership.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belle_Époque
The Belle Époque was a Golden age of Western history.

The 18th century enlightenment era was actually more traditional than the fascist movements of the 20th century because the Enlightenment still recognized monarchism and aristocracy as "rational". In fact Fascism, nationalism, and even socialism are more "centrist" ideologies while the monarchism of the past is on the far right and modern anarchism/communism is on the far left.

imagine not knowing that's how it's been done since the beginning of human history, and any tribe that was too pussified to keep their pimp hand strong ends up dying out.

It's cool bro, we're nice guys
youtube.com/watch?v=ottANpOE2Nc

That looks incredible...

A stick will bend and break on it's own, a group, or bundle will hold and stick together, strong. Place the group over the individual.

Reaction to Communism, or a system wherein society operates organically, first by family, then extended family, religious, social, and labor organizations, nation (ethnic group), all composing and culminating in the state.

If one thing [stick] is different, or is a threat to the group, it must be expelled.

feudalism was not dysgenic, it was an important part of the process of elevating Europeans above all other races.
bitchute.com/video/P78Zd8265_k/

Based and redpilled. Amazing how many idiots there are whining at you. You’re dead on.
This shouldn’t be that hard. But Jow Forums is just that stupid.

>traditionalism/feudalism was highly dysgenic
So what do you call it when violent criminals and insane faggots aren't removed from the gene pool and random mating is encouraged among the stupid while birth control and anti-natal propaganda are given to the middle class?

spot on. The scales can tip in either direction. without dissent we work wonders. How we get there can vary.

Attached: 1532542874183.png (497x726, 1.06M)

lol violence is just an adjective bud

Restoring Natural Order. Any other definition is nigger shit.

Attached: 4y6dqqf-1-289x300.png (289x300, 73K)

Great Uniforms and Great music.
Also death to Commies.

Fascism is the government structure.
The economic structure could be socialist, capitalist, or one of the many others. British Fascism was capitalist in design, Mosley wanted companies to thrive and create. They had to put the country and the people before itself. No one can explain "fascism" to you in the character limit provided in Jow Forums. Read some books nigger.

Define the U.S.A. in the last 100 years of it's existence. Certainly it is one form of it?

Attached: Obama_Butter120808a.jpg (504x789, 64K)

No
worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm
>After socialism, Fascism trains its guns on the whole block of democratic ideologies, and rejects both their premises and their practical applications and implements. Fascism denies that numbers, as such, can be the determining factor in human society; it denies the right of numbers to govern by means of periodical consultations; it asserts the irremediable and fertile and beneficent inequality of men who cannot be leveled by any such mechanical and extrinsic device as universal suffrage. Democratic regimes may be described as those under which the people are, from time to time, deluded into the belief that they exercise sovereignty, while all the time real sovereignty resides in and is exercised by other and sometimes irresponsible and secret forces. Democracy is a kingless regime infested by many kings who are sometimes more exclusive, tyrannical, and destructive than one, even if he be a tyrant. This explains why Fascism - although, for contingent reasons, it was republican in tendency prior to 1922 - abandoned that stand before the March on Rome, convinced that the form of government is no longer a matter of preeminent importance, and because the study of past and present monarchies and past and present republics shows that neither monarchy nor republic can be judged sub specie aeternitatis, but that each stands for a form of government expressing the political evolution, the history, the traditions, and the psychology of a given country.

A man becomes a fascist after recognizing and internalizing the idea that all political ideologies are implicitly subservient to the natural right of self-preservation by any means necessary when faced with a problem that cannot be solved through the political framework itself.

Fascism is the recognition that whenever political theorists talk about their ideas, they are taking for granted that their ideas can only be implemented atop a society with certain qualities. A man can be a fascist and believe in libertarianism, and a man can be a fascist and believe in socialism. What makes both of these men fascists is the fact that they believe some societal curation is required before their ideology can be successfully implemented.