Why don't Murrica just break Facebook and Google monopolies? They used to be a based country, what happened?

Why don't Murrica just break Facebook and Google monopolies? They used to be a based country, what happened?

Attached: theodore-roosevelt-laughing.jpg (605x412, 43K)

jews

The USA government is corporate headquarters

Bill Clinton's government allowed for the monopolies to form and the competition was bought up or shutdown due to lack of profits

Politicians are either heavily lobbied by corporations or believe the neoliberal propaganda that cartels and powerful corporate monopolies are "good"

also this

because muh free market economics

Because neither is a monopoly. It's amusing how people are so quick to call big companies monopolies. Seems like no one has any idea what a monopoly is other than a board game, and most play that wrong.

>Google
Vittual monopoly of internet researching.
>Facebook
Virtual monopoly of social network.

why won't the rest of the world come up with alternatives
chinks and russians use their own shit, why doesn't the EU?

They're still cartels/trusts and they need to be broken up and/or regulated as a public utility

But yes this is the classic libertarian/ancap/neoliberal excuse for not breaking up monopolies is that "hurr cartels/trusts don't count as monopolies" despite the act allowing such break ups being called the "Sherman anti-trust act" not the anti-monopoly act.

Attached: consumer-internet_042016.png (2500x5562, 472K)

they're either monopolies or trusts/cartels there's very little difference between the too. Trust busting should have never gone out of style.

Attached: Sherman-Act-cartoon-1200x480.jpg (1200x480, 955K)

People have forgotten they can shoot the oligarchs trying to kill their republic.

Give it time and it will sort itself out.

Also about Facebook:
Aside facebook.com, they own Instagram and WhatsApp. It should be broken in at least 3 different business.

fpbp

>Duckduckgo, Bing, etc
>LinkedIn, Twitter, Jow Forums

The only legitimate monopoly is Youtube

>The only legitimate monopoly is Youtube
Which belongs to... Google.

>Twitter
>Bing
WTF is a virtual monopoly?

Just because you don't like them doesn't make it so. You can't legally break them up and it would cost a fuckton of money to even bring it to a hearing.

Nope.

Google is CIA. Google Maps was developed by a CIA research company and transferred to them.
Facebook is Military Intelligence. Look up the military's Lifelogger project, which was shut down the day Facebook went live.
Amazon is CIA. It hosts the CIA cloud on its Amazon AWS platform.

So what you search, what you watch (Youtube), who you talk to, your emails, (Gmail) your location (Android), your DNA (23&me) and what you buy are all tracked, recorded and placed in a threat matrix.

(You)

Attached: foil.0.jpg (1200x675, 114K)

>Bing
Only translate tool is good. Also, it belongs to Microsoft.
And please, don't say
>MySpace

Bing exists, people can use it. Someone else mentioned DuckDuckGo. There are alternatives. You lack the understanding of what makes a monopoly. A good place to start learning would be looking up the breaking of the Bell System in 1982.